Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Scott B. Luthcke is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Scott B. Luthcke.


Science | 2012

A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance

Andrew Shepherd; Erik R. Ivins; Geruo A; Valentina Roberta Barletta; Michael J. Bentley; Srinivas Bettadpur; Kate Briggs; David H. Bromwich; René Forsberg; Natalia Galin; Martin Horwath; Stan Jacobs; Ian Joughin; Matt A. King; Jan T. M. Lenaerts; Jilu Li; Stefan R. M. Ligtenberg; Adrian Luckman; Scott B. Luthcke; Malcolm McMillan; Rakia Meister; Glenn A. Milne; J. Mouginot; Alan Muir; Julien P. Nicolas; John Paden; Antony J. Payne; Hamish D. Pritchard; Eric Rignot; Helmut Rott

Warming and Melting Mass loss from the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica account for a large fraction of global sea-level rise. Part of this loss is because of the effects of warmer air temperatures, and another because of the rising ocean temperatures to which they are being exposed. Joughin et al. (p. 1172) review how ocean-ice interactions are impacting ice sheets and discuss the possible ways that exposure of floating ice shelves and grounded ice margins are subject to the influences of warming ocean currents. Estimates of the mass balance of the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica have differed greatly—in some cases, not even agreeing about whether there is a net loss or a net gain—making it more difficult to project accurately future sea-level change. Shepherd et al. (p. 1183) combined data sets produced by satellite altimetry, interferometry, and gravimetry to construct a more robust ice-sheet mass balance for the period between 1992 and 2011. All major regions of the two ice sheets appear to be losing mass, except for East Antarctica. All told, mass loss from the polar ice sheets is contributing about 0.6 millimeters per year (roughly 20% of the total) to the current rate of global sea-level rise. The mass balance of the polar ice sheets is estimated by combining the results of existing independent techniques. We combined an ensemble of satellite altimetry, interferometry, and gravimetry data sets using common geographical regions, time intervals, and models of surface mass balance and glacial isostatic adjustment to estimate the mass balance of Earth’s polar ice sheets. We find that there is good agreement between different satellite methods—especially in Greenland and West Antarctica—and that combining satellite data sets leads to greater certainty. Between 1992 and 2011, the ice sheets of Greenland, East Antarctica, West Antarctica, and the Antarctic Peninsula changed in mass by –142 ± 49, +14 ± 43, –65 ± 26, and –20 ± 14 gigatonnes year−1, respectively. Since 1992, the polar ice sheets have contributed, on average, 0.59 ± 0.20 millimeter year−1 to the rate of global sea-level rise.


Science | 2006

Recent Greenland ice mass loss by drainage system from satellite gravity observations.

Scott B. Luthcke; H. J. Zwally; Waleed Abdalati; David D. Rowlands; Richard D. Ray; R. S. Nerem; Frank G. Lemoine; J. J. McCarthy; D. S. Chinn

Mass changes of the Greenland Ice Sheet resolved by drainage system regions were derived from a local mass concentration analysis of NASA–Deutsches Zentrum für Luftund Raumfahrt Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE mission) observations. From 2003 to 2005, the ice sheet lost 101 ± 16 gigaton/year, with a gain of 54 gigaton/year above 2000 meters and a loss of 155 gigaton/year at lower elevations. The lower elevations show a large seasonal cycle, with mass losses during summer melting followed by gains from fall through spring. The overall rate of loss reflects a considerable change in trend (–113 ± 17 gigaton/year) from a near balance during the 1990s but is smaller than some other recent estimates.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1994

Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON

Byron D. Tapley; J. C. Ries; G. W. Davis; R. J. Eanes; B. E. Schutz; C. K. Shum; M. M. Watkins; J. A. Marshall; R. S. Nerem; B. H. Putney; S. M. Klosko; Scott B. Luthcke; D. Pavlis; R. G. Williamson; Nikita P. Zelensky

The TOPEX/POSEIDON mission objective requires that the radial position of the spacecraft be determined with an accuracy better than 13 cm RMS (root mean square). This stringent requirement is an order of magnitude below the accuracy achieved for any altimeter mission prior to the definition of the TOPEX/POSEIDON mission. To satisfy this objective, the TOPEX Precision Orbit Determination (POD) Team was established as a joint effort between the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the University of Texas at Austin, with collaboration from the University of Colorado and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. During the prelaunch development and the postlaunch verification phases, the POD team improved, calibrated, and validated the precision orbit determination computer software systems. The accomplishments include (1) increased accuracy of the gravity and surface force models and (2) improved performance of both the laser ranging and Doppler tracking systems. The result of these efforts led to orbit accuracies for TOPEX/POSEIDON which are significantly better than the original mission requirement. Tests based on data fits, covariance analysis, and orbit comparisons indicate that the radial component of the TOPEX/POSEIDON spacecraft is determined, relative to the Earths mass center, with an RMS error in the range of 3 to 4 cm RMS. This orbit accuracy, together with the near continuous dual-frequency altimetry from this mission, provides the means to determine the oceans dynamic topography with an unprecedented accuracy.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1994

Gravity model development for TOPEX/POSEIDON: Joint gravity models 1 and 2

R. S. Nerem; F. J. Lerch; J. A. Marshall; Erricos C. Pavlis; B. H. Putney; Byron D. Tapley; R. J. Eanes; John C. Ries; B. E. Schutz; C. K. Shum; M. M. Watkins; Steven M. Klosko; J. C. Chan; Scott B. Luthcke; G. B. Patel; Nikolaos K. Pavlis; R. G. Williamson; Richard H. Rapp; R. Biancale; F. Nouel

The TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) prelaunch Joint Gravity Model-1 (JGM-I) and the postlaunch JGM-2 Earth gravitational models have been developed to support precision orbit determination for T/P. Each of these models is complete to degree 70 in spherical harmonics and was computed from a combination of satellite tracking data, satellite altimetry, and surface gravimetry. While improved orbit determination accuracies for T/P have driven the improvements in the models, the models are general in application and also provide an improved geoid for oceanographic computations. The postlaunch model, JGM-2, which includes T/P satellite laser ranging (SLR) and Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite (DORIS) tracking data, introduces radial orbit errors for T/P that are only 2 cm RMS with the commission errors of the marine geoid for terms to degree 70 being ±25 cm. Errors in modeling the nonconservative forces acting on T/P increase the total radial errors to only 3–4 cm RMS, a result much better than premission goals. While the orbit accuracy goal for T/P has been far surpassed, geoid errors still prevent the absolute determination of the ocean dynamic topography for wavelengths shorter than about 2500 km. Only a dedicated gravitational field satellite mission will likely provide the necessary improvement in the geoid.


Journal of Glaciology | 2008

Recent glacier mass changes in the Gulf of Alaska region from GRACE mascon solutions

Scott B. Luthcke; Anthony A. Arendt; David D. Rowlands; John J. McCarthy; Christopher F. Larsen

The mass changes of the Gulf of Alaska (GoA) glaciers are computed from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) inter-satellite range-rate data for the period April 2003–September 2007. Through the application of unique processing techniques and a surface mass concentration (mascon) parameterization, the mass variations in the GoA glacier regions have been estimated at high temporal (10 day) and spatial (2 × 2 arc-degrees) resolution. The mascon solutions are directly estimated from a reduction of the GRACE K-band inter-satellite range-rate data and, unlike previous GRACE solutions for the GoA glaciers, do not exhibit contamination by leakage from mass change occurring outside the region of interest. The mascon solutions reveal considerable temporal and spatial variation within the GoA glacier region, with the largest negative mass balances observed in the St Elias Mountains including the Yakutat and Glacier Bay regions. The most rapid losses occurred during the 2004 melt season due to record temperatures in Alaska during that year. The total mass balance of the GoA glacier region was −84 ± 5 Gt a −1 contributing 0.23 ± 0.01 mm a −1 to global sea-level rise from April 2003 through March 2007. Highlighting the large seasonal and interannual variability of the GoA glaciers, the rate determined over the period April 2003–March 2006 is −102 ± 5 Gt a −1 , which includes the anomalously high temperatures of 2004 and does not include the large 2007 winter balance-year snowfall. The mascon solutions agree well with regional patterns of glacier mass loss determined from aircraft altimetry and in situ measurements.


Reviews of Geophysics | 2014

Accuracy assessment of global barotropic ocean tide models

Detlef Stammer; Richard D. Ray; Ole Baltazar Andersen; Brian K. Arbic; W. Bosch; L. Carrère; Yongcun Cheng; Douglas Chinn; B. D. Dushaw; Gary D. Egbert; Svetlana Y. Erofeeva; Hok Sum Fok; J. A M Green; Stephen D. Griffiths; Matt A. King; V. Lapin; Frank G. Lemoine; Scott B. Luthcke; F. Lyard; James H. Morison; Malte Müller; Laurie Padman; James G. Richman; Jay F. Shriver; C. K. Shum; E. Taguchi; Yuchan Yi

The accuracy of state-of-the-art global barotropic tide models is assessed using bottom pressure data, coastal tide gauges, satellite altimetry, various geodetic data on Antarctic ice shelves, and independent tracked satellite orbit perturbations. Tide models under review include empirical, purely hydrodynamic (“forward”), and assimilative dynamical, i.e., constrained by observations. Ten dominant tidal constituents in the diurnal, semidiurnal, and quarter-diurnal bands are considered. Since the last major model comparison project in 1997, models have improved markedly, especially in shallow-water regions and also in the deep ocean. The root-sum-square differences between tide observations and the best models for eight major constituents are approximately 0.9, 5.0, and 6.5 cm for pelagic, shelf, and coastal conditions, respectively. Large intermodel discrepancies occur in high latitudes, but testing in those regions is impeded by the paucity of high-quality in situ tide records. Long-wavelength components of models tested by analyzing satellite laser ranging measurements suggest that several models are comparably accurate for use in precise orbit determination, but analyses of GRACE intersatellite ranging data show that all models are still imperfect on basin and subbasin scales, especially near Antarctica. For the M2 constituent, errors in purely hydrodynamic models are now almost comparable to the 1980-era Schwiderski empirical solution, indicating marked advancement in dynamical modeling. Assessing model accuracy using tidal currents remains problematic owing to uncertainties in in situ current meter estimates and the inability to isolate the barotropic mode. Velocity tests against both acoustic tomography and current meters do confirm that assimilative models perform better than purely hydrodynamic models.


Marine Geodesy | 2003

The 1-Centimeter Orbit: Jason-1 Precision Orbit Determination Using GPS, SLR, DORIS, and Altimeter Data Special Issue: Jason-1 Calibration/Validation

Scott B. Luthcke; N. P. Zelensky; David D. Rowlands; Frank G. Lemoine; T. A. Williams

The Jason-1 radar altimeter satellite, launched on December 7, 2001 is the follow on to the highly successful TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) mission and will continue the time series of centimeter level ocean topography measurements. Orbit error is a major component in the overall error budget of all altimeter satellite missions. Jason-1 is no exception and has set a 1-cm radial orbit accuracy goal, which represents a factor of two improvement over what is currently being achieved for T/P. The challenge to precision orbit determination (POD) is both achieving the 1-cm radial orbit accuracy and evaluating the performance of the 1-cm orbit. There is reason to hope such an improvement is possible. The early years of T/P showed that GPS tracking data collected by an on-board receiver holds great promise for precise orbit determination. In the years following the T/P launch there have been several enhancements to GPS, improving its POD capability. In addition, Jason-1 carries aboard an enhanced GPS receiver and significantly improved SLR and DORIS tracking systems along with the altimeter itself. In this article we demonstrate the 1-cm radial orbit accuracy goal has been achieved using GPS data alone in a reduced dynamic solution. It is also shown that adding SLR data to the GPS-based solutions improves the orbits even further. In order to assess the performance of these orbits it is necessary to process all of the available tracking data (GPS, SLR, DORIS, and altimeter crossover differences) as either dependent or independent of the orbit solutions. It was also necessary to compute orbit solutions using various combinations of the four available tracking data in order to independently assess the orbit performance. Towards this end, we have greatly improved orbits determined solely from SLR+DORIS data by applying the reduced dynamic solution strategy. In addition, we have computed reduced dynamic orbits based on SLR, DORIS, and crossover data that are a significant improvement over the SLR- and DORIS-based dynamic solutions. These solutions provide the best performing orbits for independent validation of the GPS-based reduced dynamic orbits. The application of the 1-cm orbit will significantly improve the resolution of the altimeter measurement, making possible further strides in radar altimeter remote sensing.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1995

The temporal and spatial characteristics of TOPEX/POSEIDON radial orbit error

J. A. Marshall; N. R. Zelensky; Steven M. Klosko; Douglas Chinn; Scott B. Luthcke; K. E. Rachlin; R. G. Williamson

Satellite orbit error has long been the bane of oceanographers who analyze altimetry data. However, radial orbit error on TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) has been reduced to the 3 to 4-cm root-mean-square (rms) level over a 10-day repeat cycle, which represents an order of magnitude improvement over earlier altimetry missions such as Geosat. Consequently, oceanographers are now able to directly evaluate the absolute ocean topography to unprecedented accuracy levels. While significantly reduced, the T/P orbit error still requires quantification. This study examines the spatial and temporal characteristics of the T/P radial orbit error, as assessed through the analysis of laser tracking residuals and orbit comparisons with independently generated trajectories. Spectral analyses of the orbit differences between the orbits determined from satellite laser ranging and Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite data and the independently determined reduced dynamic Global Positioning System (GPS) ephemerides indicate that the predominant power is at the once-per-orbital revolution frequency with 2- to 3-cm peaks. When the orbit differences are colinearly aligned to a fixed geographic grid and spectral analysis is performed at each geographic grid point, a nearly 60-day period is found with maximum amplitudes in the 2- to 4-cm range. The contribution of both conservative and nonconservative force and measurement mismodeling to this error signal are assessed. We demonstrate that the ∼60-day error period seen at fixed geographic locations arises from weaknesses in the dynamic ocean tidal models used in the orbit calculations. New tidal models have been developed which significantly reduce this error. Second-generation orbits incorporating many model improvements have been computed and demonstrate a significant reduction in the radial orbit error signals. Some orbit error still exists, and methods for further model improvements and the possibility of achieving 1-cm radial rms orbit accuracy in T/P are discussed.


Journal of Glaciology | 2008

Greenland ice sheet surface temperature, melt and mass loss : 2000-06

Dorothy K. Hall; Richard S. Williams; Scott B. Luthcke; Nicolo E. DiGirolamo

Author Posting.


Journal of Glaciology | 2008

Validation of high-resolution GRACE mascon estimates of glacier mass changes in the St Elias Mountains, Alaska, USA, using aircraft laser altimetry

Anthony A. Arendt; Scott B. Luthcke; Christopher F. Larsen; Waleed Abdalati; William B. Krabill; Matthew J. Beedle

We acquired center-line surface elevations from glaciers in the St Elias Mountains of Alaska/northwestern Canada using aircraft laser altimetry during 2000-05, and compared these with repeat measurements acquired in 2007. The resulting elevation changes were used to estimate the mass balance of 32 900 km 2 of glaciers in the St Elias Mountains during September 2003 to August 2007, yielding a value of -21.2±3.8Gta -1 , equivalent to an area-averaged mass balance of -0.64±0.12 m a -1 water equivalent (w.e.). High-resolution (2 arc-degrees spatial and 10 day temporal) Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mass-balance estimates during this time period were scaled to glaciers of the St Elias Mountains, yielding a value of -20.6 ± 3.0 Gt a -1 , or an area-averaged mass balance of -0.63 ± 0.09 m a -1 w.e. The difference in balance estimates (altimetry minus GRACE) was -0.6 ± 4.8 Gta -1 , well within the estimated errors. Differences likely resulted from uncertainties in subgrid sampling of the GRACE mass concentration (mascon) solutions, and from errors in assigning an appropriate near-surface density in the altimetry estimates. The good correspondence between GRACE and aircraft altimetry data suggests that high-resolution GRACE mascon solutions can be used to accurately assess mass-balance trends of mountain glacier regions that are undergoing large changes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Scott B. Luthcke's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David D. Rowlands

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank G. Lemoine

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas Chinn

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nikita P. Zelensky

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian D. Beckley

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Terence J. Sabaka

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeanne Sauber

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge