Scott C. Douglas

Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status

This study examines whether the experience of identity threat predicts antisocial behavior directed towards other employees. A social interactionist model is used as a theoretical framework for predicting that employees who are frequent recipients of actions that challenge or diminish their sense of competence, dignity, or self-worth will engage in higher levels of antisocial behavior. However, it is predicted that the strength of this relation will be moderated by individual (gender, age, and attitudes toward revenge) and situational (aggressive modeling, hierarchical status) factors. Data from 308 employees from three organizations supported moderating effects of age, revenge attitudes, and hierarchical status. A three-way interaction was also found showing that identity threat was more strongly related to antisocial behavior for low as compared to high status employees, but only when they were exposed to low levels of aggressive modeling.

Dues Paying: A Theoretical Explication and Conceptual Model

This article uses a practical and theoretical explication of “dues paying” as a vehicle for synthesizing and integrating attribution, justice, and impression management theories. A model is proposed that depicts the dues paying process as a specific type of impression management process that is stimulated by information that cues attributions of justice and equity. The paper ends with a discussion of the potential for integrating research and theory in the areas of impression management, attributions, and justice and suggestions are offered for managing dues paying impressions.