Scott Chasan-Taber

Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients: A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease?

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine clinical and laboratory correlates of calcification of the coronary arteries (CAs), aorta and mitral and aortic valves in adult subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis. BACKGROUND Vascular calcification is known to be a risk factor for ischemic heart disease in non-uremic individuals. Patients with ESRD experience accelerated vascular calcification, due at least in part to dysregulation of mineral metabolism. Clinical correlates of the extent of calcification in ESRD have not been identified. Moreover, the clinical relevance of calcification as measured by electron-beam tomography (EBT) has not been determined in the ESRD population. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 205 maintenance hemodialysis patients who received baseline EBT for evaluation of vascular and valvular calcification. We compared subjects with and without clinical evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease and determined correlates of the extent of vascular and valvular calcification using multivariable linear regression and proportional odds logistic regression analyses. RESULTS The median coronary artery calcium score was 595 (interquartile range, 76 to 1,600), values consistent with a high risk of obstructive coronary artery disease in the general population. The CA calcium scores were directly related to the prevalence of myocardial infarction (p < 0.0001) and angina (p < 0.0001), and the aortic calcium scores were directly related to the prevalence of claudication (p = 0.001) and aortic aneurysm (p = 0.02). The extent of coronary calcification was more pronounced with older age, male gender, white race, diabetes, longer dialysis vintage and higher serum concentrations of calcium and phosphorus. Total cholesterol (and high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein subfractions), triglycerides, hemoglobin and albumin were not significantly related to the extent of CA calcification. Only dialysis vintage was significantly associated with the prevalence of valvular calcification. CONCLUSIONS Coronary artery calcification is common, severe and significantly associated with ischemic cardiovascular disease in adult ESRD patients. The dysregulation of mineral metabolism in ESRD may influence vascular calcification risk.

Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a rare genetic disorder in which both LDL-receptor alleles are defective, resulting in very high concentrations of LDL cholesterol in plasma and premature coronary artery disease. This study investigated whether an antisense inhibitor of apolipoprotein B synthesis, mipomersen, is effective and safe as an adjunctive agent to lower LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with this disease. METHODS This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was undertaken in nine lipid clinics in seven countries. Patients aged 12 years and older with clinical diagnosis or genetic confirmation of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, who were already receiving the maximum tolerated dose of a lipid-lowering drug, were randomly assigned to mipomersen 200 mg subcutaneously every week or placebo for 26 weeks. Randomisation was computer generated and stratified by weight (<50 kg vs >/=50 kg) in a centralised blocked randomisation, implemented with a computerised interactive voice response system. All clinical, medical, and pharmacy personnel, and patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL cholesterol concentration from baseline. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00607373. FINDINGS 34 patients were assigned to mipomersen and 17 to placebo; data for all patients were analysed. 45 patients completed the 26-week treatment period (28 mipomersen, 17 placebo). Mean concentrations of LDL cholesterol at baseline were 11.4 mmol/L (SD 3.6) in the mipomersen group and 10.4 mmol/L (3.7) in the placebo group. The mean percentage change in LDL cholesterol concentration was significantly greater with mipomersen (-24.7%, 95% CI -31.6 to -17.7) than with placebo (-3.3%, -12.1 to 5.5; p=0.0003). The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions (26 [76%] patients in mipomersen group vs four [24%] in placebo group). Four (12%) patients in the mipomersen group but none in the placebo group had increases in concentrations of alanine aminotransferase of three times or more the upper limit of normal. INTERPRETATION Inhibition of apolipoprotein B synthesis by mipomersen represents a novel, effective therapy to reduce LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who are already receiving lipid-lowering drugs, including high-dose statins. FUNDING ISIS Pharmaceuticals and Genzyme Corporation.

Tolevamer, a Novel Nonantibiotic Polymer, Compared with Vancomycin in the Treatment of Mild to Moderately Severe Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea

BACKGROUND Current antibiotic therapies for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea have limitations, including progression to severe disease, recurrent C. difficile-associated diarrhea, and selection for nosocomial pathogens. Tolevamer, a soluble, high-molecular weight, anionic polymer that binds C. difficile toxins A and B is a unique nonantibiotic treatment option. METHODS In this 3-arm, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-design phase II study, patients with mild to moderately severe C. difficile-associated diarrhea were randomized to receive 3 g of tolevamer per day (n = 97), 6 g of tolevamer per day (n = 95), or 500 mg of vancomycin per day (n = 97). The primary efficacy parameter was time to resolution of diarrhea, defined as the first day of 2 consecutive days when the patient had hard or formed stools (any number) or < or = 2 stools of loose or watery consistency. RESULTS In the per-protocol study population, resolution of diarrhea was achieved in 48 (67%) of 72 patients receiving 3 g of tolevamer per day (median time to resolution of diarrhea, 4.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-6.0 days), in 58 (83%) of 70 patients receiving 6 g of tolevamer per day (median time to resolution of diarrhea, 2.5 days; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-3.0 days), and in 73 (91%) of 80 patients receiving vancomycin (median time to resolution of diarrhea, 2.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0 days). Tolevamer administered at a dosage of 6 g per day was found to be noninferior to vancomycin administered at a dosage of 500 mg per day with regard to time to resolution of diarrhea (P = .02) and was associated with a trend toward a lower recurrence rate. Tolevamer was well tolerated but was associated with an increased risk of hypokalemia. CONCLUSIONS Tolevamer, a novel polystyrene binder of C. difficile toxins A and B, effectively treats mild to moderate C. difficile diarrhea and merits further clinical development.

Vancomycin, Metronidazole, or Tolevamer for Clostridium difficile Infection: Results from Two Multinational, Randomized, Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common complication of antibiotic therapy that is treated with antibiotics, contributing to ongoing disruption of the colonic microbiota and CDI recurrence. Two multinational trials were conducted to compare the efficacy of tolevamer, a nonantibiotic, toxin-binding polymer, with vancomycin and metronidazole. METHODS Patients with CDI were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio to oral tolevamer 9 g (loading dose) followed by 3 g every 8 hours for 14 days, vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours for 10 days, or metronidazole 375 mg every 6 hours for 10 days. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as resolution of diarrhea and absence of severe abdominal discomfort for more than 2 consecutive days including day 10. RESULTS In a pooled analysis, 563 patients received tolevamer, 289 received metronidazole, and 266 received vancomycin. Clinical success of tolevamer was inferior to both metronidazole and vancomycin (P < .001), and metronidazole was inferior to vancomycin (P = .02; 44.2% [n = 534], 72.7% [n = 278], and 81.1% [n = 259], respectively). Clinical success in patients with severe CDI who received metronidazole was 66.3% compared with vancomycin, which was 78.5%. (P = .059). A post-hoc multivariate analysis that excluded tolevamer found 3 factors that were strongly associated with clinical success: vancomycin treatment, treatment-naive status, and mild or moderate CDI severity. Adverse events were similar among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Tolevamer was inferior to antibiotic treatment of CDI, and metronidazole was inferior to vancomycin. Trial Registration. clinicaltrials.gov NCT00106509 and NCT00196794.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of mipomersen in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.

Objectives Mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B synthesis, significantly reduces LDL-C and other atherogenic lipoproteins in familial hypercholesterolemia when added to ongoing maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Safety and efficacy of mipomersen in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia was evaluated. Methods and Results Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients (n  = 58) were ≥18 years with LDL-C ≥7.8 mmol/L or LDL-C ≥5.1 mmol/L plus CHD disease, on maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy that excluded apheresis. Weekly subcutaneous injections of mipomersen 200 mg (n  = 39) or placebo (n  = 19) were added to lipid-lowering therapy for 26 weeks. Main outcome: percent reduction in LDL-C from baseline to 2 weeks after the last dose of treatment. Mipomersen (n = 27) reduced LDL-C by 36%, from a baseline of 7.2 mmol/L, for a mean absolute reduction of 2.6 mmol/L. Conversely, mean LDL-C increased 13% in placebo (n = 18) from a baseline of 6.5 mmol/L (mipomersen vs placebo p<0.001). Mipomersen produced statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a), with no change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Mild-to-moderate injection site reactions were the most frequently reported adverse events with mipomersen. Mild-to-moderate flu-like symptoms were reported more often with mipomersen. Alanine transaminase increase, aspartate transaminase increase, and hepatic steatosis occurred in 21%, 13% and 13% of mipomersen treated patients, respectively. Adverse events by category for the placebo and mipomersen groups respectively were: total adverse events, 16(84.2%), 39(100%); serious adverse events, 0(0%), 6(15.4%); discontinuations due to adverse events, 1(5.3%), 8(20.5%) and cardiac adverse events, 1(5.3%), 5(12.8%). Conclusion Mipomersen significantly reduced LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a). Mounting evidence suggests it may be a potential pharmacologic option for lowering LDL-C in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled using existing therapies. Future studies will explore alternative dosing schedules aimed at minimizing side effects. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00794664.

Decrease in Thoracic Vertebral Bone Attenuation With Calcium-Based Phosphate Binders in Hemodialysis

We performed a posthoc analysis of a 52‐week randomized trial conducted in adult hemodialysis patients that compared the effects of calcium‐based phosphate binders and sevelamer, a nonabsorbable polymer, on parameters of mineral metabolism and vascular calcification by electron beam tomography. In this analysis, we evaluated the relative effects of calcium and sevelamer on thoracic vertebral attenuation by CT and markers of bone turnover. Subjects randomized to calcium salts experienced a significant reduction in trabecular bone attenuation and a trend toward reduction in cortical bone attenuation, in association with higher concentrations of serum calcium, lower concentrations of PTH, and reduced total and bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Sevelamer Carbonate in Hyperphosphatemic Patients Who Have Chronic Kidney Disease and Are Not on Dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Sevelamer carbonate is an improved, buffered form of sevelamer hydrochloride developed for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study investigated the ability of sevelamer carbonate to control serum phosphorous in hyperphosphatemic patients who had chronic kidney disease and were not on dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This was an open-label, dosage-titration study. Patients with serum phosphorus > or =5.5 mg/dl were enrolled (n = 46). Sevelamer carbonate was administered for 8 wk. Patients were supplemented with native vitamin D (400 IU). The primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline in serum phosphorous. Secondary measures included the percentage of serum phosphorus responders; changes in serum lipids, calcium-phosphorus product, and bicarbonate; and safety and tolerability. RESULTS Sevelamer carbonate treatment resulted in a statistically significant decrease in mean serum phosphorous levels from baseline to end of treatment. A total of 75% of patients with stage 4 and 70% of patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease achieved the target serum phosphorous at the end of treatment. There were statistically significant decreases in serum calcium-phosphorus product and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at the end of treatment and a statistically significant increase in mean serum bicarbonate levels (from 16.6 to 18.2 mEq/L). Sevelamer carbonate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Sevelamer carbonate is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for the control of phosphorous levels in hyperphosphatemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis.

Efficacy and safety of sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium acetate in patients on peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND Inadequate phosphorus control is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD stage 5. Although phosphate binders are often used in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), no large randomized controlled studies evaluating their use solely in this population have previously been reported. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label study, adult patients on PD with serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dl were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of treatment with sevelamer hydrochloride or calcium acetate. Doses were titrated to achieve serum phosphorus of 3.0-5.5 mg/dl. Changes in serum phosphorus, calcium, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), lipids and plasma biomarkers were assessed. RESULTS A total of 253 patients were screened, 143 of whom were randomized (sevelamer hydrochloride, n = 97; calcium acetate, n = 46). Treatment groups were well balanced with regard to baseline demographics. Serum phosphorus levels were significantly reduced after 12 weeks with both sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium acetate (P < 0.001). Serum PTH was also reduced in both groups while serum calcium increased in the calcium acetate group (P = 0.001) but not in the sevelamer hydrochloride group. Sevelamer hydrochloride was also associated with decreases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and uric acid and an increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (all P < 0.001 versus baseline). Both treatments were well tolerated and safety profiles were consistent with previous reports in haemodialysis patients. Hypercalcaemia was experienced by more calcium acetate-treated patients (18 versus 2%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In summary, sevelamer hydrochloride provides a reduction in serum phosphorus compared to that obtained with calcium-based binders in PD patients. The effects of sevelamer hydrochloride appear similar in both PD and haemodialysis populations.

A Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label Study to Compare Once-Daily Sevelamer Carbonate Powder Dosing With Thrice-Daily Sevelamer Hydrochloride Tablet Dosing in CKD Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND Sevelamer carbonate powder for oral suspension is a new dosage form of sevelamer, which may be suited to once-daily dosing. STUDY DESIGN Randomized parallel open-label study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION After a 2-week phosphate-binder washout, patients were randomly assigned to once-daily sevelamer carbonate powder or thrice-daily sevelamer hydrochloride tablets. OUTCOMES Assessment of noninferiority with respect to change from baseline in serum phosphorus levels. MEASUREMENTS Serum phosphorus to 24 weeks. RESULTS After washout, mean serum phosphorus level decreased 2.0 +/- 1.8 mg/dL (from 7.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dL) for sevelamer carbonate and 2.9 +/- 1.3 mg/dL (from 7.6 +/- 1.3 mg/dL) for sevelamer hydrochloride (both P < 0.001). The upper CI bound was 1.50 mg/dL; therefore, noninferiority was not shown. 54% of sevelamer carbonate powder-treated patients and 64% of sevelamer hydrochloride tablet-treated patients had serum phosphorus levels within the National Kidney Foundations Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) target (> or =3.5 and < or =5.5 mg/dL). Overall, the percentage of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between groups. However, a greater percentage of treatment-related upper gastrointestinal events, including nausea (10% vs 3%) and vomiting (6% vs 1%), were noted with sevelamer carbonate powder once daily. In addition, 4 (3%) sevelamer carbonate-treated patients experienced stimulation of the gag reflex and 2 (1%) experienced dislike of the taste with sevelamer carbonate powder. A greater percentage of sevelamer carbonate powder-treated patients discontinued treatment because of these treatment-related events or consent withdrawal. LIMITATIONS Study was not blinded. Once-daily dose may not have been with the highest phosphate content meal; further exploration of alternative dosing schemes is warranted. CONCLUSIONS Once-daily administration of sevelamer carbonate powder was not as effective in decreasing serum phosphorus levels as thrice-daily administration of sevelamer hydrochloride tablets. Nevertheless, once-daily sevelamer carbonate powder decreased serum phosphorus levels significantly, reaching the KDOQI phosphorus target in most patients. Therefore, once-daily dosing of sevelamer carbonate may be a reasonable alternative.