Scott D. Grosse
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Scott D. Grosse.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research | 2008
Scott D. Grosse
Cost–effectiveness analyses, particularly in the USA, commonly use a figure of
Genetics in Medicine | 2010
Mercy Mvundura; Scott D. Grosse; Heather Hampel; Glenn E. Palomaki
50,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained as a threshold for assessing the cost-effectiveness of an intervention. The history of this practice is ill defined, although it has been linked to the end-stage renal disease kidney dialysis cost-effectiveness literature from the 1980s. The use of
Genetics in Medicine | 2006
Scott D. Grosse; Muin J. Khoury
50,000 as a benchmark for assessing the cost-effectiveness of an intervention first emerged in 1992 and became widely used after 1996. The appeal of the
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2011
Scott D. Grosse; Isaac Odame; Hani K. Atrash; Djesika D. Amendah; Frédéric B. Piel; Thomas N. Williams
50,000 figure appears to lie in the convenience of a round number rather than in the value of renal dialysis. Rather than arbitrary thresholds, estimates of willingness to pay and the opportunity cost of healthcare resources are needed.
Pediatrics | 2009
William T. Mahle; Jane W. Newburger; G. Paul Matherne; Frank C. Smith; Tracey R. Hoke; Robert Koppel; Samuel S. Gidding; Robert H. Beekman; Scott D. Grosse
Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies to identify Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer and to offer targeted testing to relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome.Methods: We calculated incremental costs per life-year saved for universal testing relative to no testing and age-targeted testing for strategies that use preliminary genetic tests (immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability) of tumors followed by sequencing of mismatch repair genes. We also calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for pairs of testing strategies.Results: Strategies to test for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed colorectal tumors using preliminary tests before gene sequencing have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ≤
Circulation | 2009
William T. Mahle; Jane W. Newburger; G. Paul Matherne; Frank C. Smith; Tracey R. Hoke; Robert Koppel; Samuel S. Gidding; Robert H. Beekman; Scott D. Grosse
45,000 per life-year saved compared with no testing and ≤
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2008
Lijing Ouyang; Xiangming Fang; James A. Mercy; Ruth Perou; Scott D. Grosse
75,000 per life-year saved compared with testing restricted to patients younger than 50 years. The lowest cost testing strategies, using immunohistochemistry as a preliminary test, cost ≤
Pediatrics | 2009
Scott D. Grosse; Michael S. Schechter; Roshni Kulkarni; Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear; Bonnie Strickland; Edwin Trevathan
25,000 per life-year saved relative to no testing and ≤
Pediatrics | 2006
Scott D. Grosse; Coleen A. Boyle; Aileen Kenneson; Muin J. Khoury; Benjamin S. Wilfond
40,000 per life-year saved relative to testing only patients younger than 50 years. Other testing strategies have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ≥
American Journal of Public Health | 2005
Scott D. Grosse; Norman J. Waitzman; Patrick S. Romano; Joseph Mulinare
700,000 per life-year saved relative to the lowest cost strategies. Increasing the number of relatives tested would improve cost-effectiveness.Conclusion: Laboratory-based strategies using preliminary tests seem cost-effective from the US health care system perspective. Universal testing detects nearly twice as many cases of Lynch syndrome as targeting younger patients and has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparable with other preventive services. This finding provides support for a recent US recommendation to offer testing for Lynch syndrome to all newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer.