Scott F. Huntington
Yale University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Scott F. Huntington.
British Journal of Haematology | 2015
Andrew G. Evans; Paul G. Rothberg; W. Richard Burack; Scott F. Huntington; David L. Porter; Jonathan W. Friedberg; Jane L. Liesveld
A patient with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with Richter transformation was treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified T cells targeted for CD19 but later relapsed with a clonally related plasmablastic lymphoma. The loss of most routine markers of pre‐plasma cell or B lymphoid differentiation (including CD19) highlights the ability of such mature lymphomas to evade lineage‐specific targeted immunotherapy by differentiating along pathways comparable to their normal cellular counterparts. Molecular genetic evaluation demonstrated multiple independent lines of CD19‐negative disease that eventually evolved in this single patient. Such plasticity represents potential challenges for antigen‐directed CAR‐T cell therapy, while serving as a testament to the selective pressure exerted by these engineered T cells over time.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Scott F. Huntington; Jakub Svoboda; Jalpa A. Doshi
PURPOSE Surveillance imaging of asymptomatic patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first remission remains controversial. A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies following first-line immunochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three strategies were compared in 55-year-old patient cohorts: routine clinical follow-up without serial imaging, routine follow-up with biannual computed tomography (CT) scans for 2 years, or routine follow-up with biannual [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) for 2 years. The baseline model favored imaging-based strategies by associating asymptomatic imaging-detected relapses with improved clinical outcomes. Lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each surveillance strategy. RESULTS Surveillance strategies utilizing 2 years of routine CT or PET/CT scans were associated with minimal survival benefit when compared with clinical follow-up without routine imaging (life-years gained: CT, 0.03 years; PET/CT, 0.04 years). The benefit of imaging-based follow-up remained small after quality-of-life adjustments (CT, 0.020 QALYs; PET/CT, 0.025 QALYs). Costs associated with imaging-based surveillance strategies are considerable; ICERs for imaging strategies compared with clinical follow-up were
British Journal of Haematology | 2016
Amer M. Zeidan; Amy J. Davidoff; Jessica B. Long; Xin Hu; Rong Wang; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P. Gross; Gregory A. Abel; Scott F. Huntington; Nikolai A. Podoltsev; Uno Hajime; Thomas Prebet; Steven D. Gore
164,960/QALY (95% CI,
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2015
Scott F. Huntington; Sunita D. Nasta; Stephen J. Schuster; Jalpa A. Doshi; Jakub Svoboda
116,510 to
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2017
Amer M. Zeidan; Rong Wang; Cary P. Gross; Steven D. Gore; Scott F. Huntington; Thomas Prebet; Gregory A. Abel; Amy J. Davidoff; Xiaomei Ma
766,930/QALY) and
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2012
Scott F. Huntington; Mahsa Talbott; John P. Greer; David Morgan; Nishitha Reddy
168,750/QALY (95% CI,
The Prostate | 2017
Rong Wang; Amer M. Zeidan; James B. Yu; Pamela R. Soulos; Amy J. Davidoff; Steven D. Gore; Scott F. Huntington; Cary P. Gross; Xiaomei Ma
117,440 to 853,550/QALY) for CT and PET/CT, respectively. Model conclusions were robust and remained stable on one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Our cost-effectiveness analysis suggests surveillance imaging of asymptomatic DLBCL patients in remission offers little clinical benefit at substantial economic costs.
British Journal of Haematology | 2018
Nirav N. Shah; Aniko Szabo; Scott F. Huntington; Narendranath Epperla; Nishitha Reddy; Siddhartha Ganguly; Julie M. Vose; Cynthia Obiozor; Fahad Faruqi; Alexandra E. Kovach; Luciano J. Costa; Ana C. Xaiver; Ryan Okal; Abraham S. Kanate; Nilanjan Ghosh; Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja; Lauren E. Strelec; Mehdi Hamadani; Timothy S. Fenske; Oscar Calzada; Jonathon B. Cohen; Julio C. Chavez; Jakub Svoboda
The hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine and decitabine are both approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the USA. In Europe, decitabine is not approved due to lack of survival advantage in randomized trials. The two drugs have not been compared in clinical trials. We identified patients diagnosed with MDS between 2004 and 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database in the USA who received ≥ 10 doses of either HMA. We estimated survival from HMA initiation with Kaplan–Meier methods and used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for covariates. Analyses controlled for histological subtype and we conducted a subset analysis limited to patients with refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB). In 2025 HMA‐treated patients, median survival was 15 months with no difference in survival based on the HMA received in adjusted analysis (decitabine versus azacitidine, hazard ratio = 1·06, 95% confidence interval: 0·94–1·19, P = 0·37). For RAEB patients (n = 523), median survival was 12 months, with no significant difference based on HMA received. No significant survival difference was found between azacitidine and decitabine in patients with MDS, including RAEB. Importantly, population‐based survival of azacitidine‐treated RAEB patients was substantially shorter than in the AZA‐001 clinical trial (11 versus 24·5 months).
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Rong Wang; Amer M. Zeidan; Stephanie Halene; Xiao Xu; Amy J. Davidoff; Scott F. Huntington; Nikolai A. Podoltsev; Cary P. Gross; Steven D. Gore; Xiaomei Ma
[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) is part of standard pretreatment staging and post-treatment assessment in patients undergoing first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While many providers obtain interim PET/CT (I-PET) for DLBCL, the clinical utility of these scans is unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with DLBCL undergoing I-PET during first-line therapy (n = 94). The majority (61%) of patients had at least one negative I-PET and all patients with negative I-PET remained in remission at the end of treatment. I-PET was strongly associated with progression-free survival and remained independent on multivariable modeling (non-complete remission [CR]:CR I-PET, hazard ratio 2.7, p = 0.01). All patients with negative I-PET were in remission at the end of frontline therapy, and end-of-treatment PET/CT offered little clinical utility in this subset. Therefore, I-PET may offer an approach of early clinical predication and obviate the need for end-of-treatment imaging in the majority of patients with DLBCL.
Cancer | 2017
Amer M. Zeidan; Xin Hu; Jessica B. Long; Rong Wang; Xiaomei Ma; Nikolai A. Podoltsev; Scott F. Huntington; Steven D. Gore; Amy J. Davidoff
Amer M. Zeidan, Rong Wang, Cary P. Gross, Steven D. Gore, Scott F. Huntington, Thomas Prebet , Gregory A. Abel, Amy J. Davidoff and Xiaomei Ma Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA