Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Scott J. Wells is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Scott J. Wells.


Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 1999

Herd-level economic losses associated with Johne's disease on US dairy operations.

Stephen L. Ott; Scott J. Wells; Bruce A. Wagner

Johnes disease (paratuberculosis) is a chronic, infectious, wasting disease that affects dairy cattle. Estimation of its impact on herd productivity and corresponding economic loss on US dairy operations was part of the USDA National Animal Health Monitoring Systems (NAHMS) 1996 national dairy study. Johnes-positive herds experience an economic loss of almost US


Veterinary Microbiology | 2000

ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method

Robert H. Whitlock; Scott J. Wells; Raymond W. Sweeney; J. van Tiem

100 per cow when compared to Johnes-negative herds due to reduced milk production and increased cow-replacement costs. For Johnes-positive herds that reported at least 10% of their cull cows as having clinical signs consistent with Johnes disease, economic losses were over US


Clinical and Vaccine Immunology | 2005

Evaluation of Five Antibody Detection Tests for Diagnosis of Bovine Paratuberculosis

Michael T. Collins; Scott J. Wells; Kristine R. Petrini; James E. Collins; Ronald D. Schultz; Robert H. Whitlock

200 per cow. These high-prevalence herds experienced reduced milk production of over 700 kg per cow, culled more cows but had lower cull-cow revenues, and had greater cow mortality than Johnes-negative herds. Averaged across all herds, Johnes disease costs the US dairy industry, in reduced productivity, US


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2000

Fecal shedding of Campylobacter and Arcobacter spp. in dairy cattle.

Irene V. Wesley; Scott J. Wells; K. M. Harmon; A. Green; L. Schroeder-Tucker; M. Glover; I. Siddique

22 to US


Journal of Food Protection | 2001

Fecal Shedding of Salmonella spp. by Dairy Cows on Farm and at Cull Cow Markets

Scott J. Wells; Paula J. Fedorka-Cray; David A. Dargatz; K. Ferris; Alice L. Green

27 per cow or US


Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 1999

Papillomatous digital dermatitis and associated risk factors in US dairy herds

Scott J. Wells; L.P Garber; Bruce A. Wagner

200 to US


Journal of Food Protection | 1999

Factors associated with fecal shedding of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 on dairy farms.

L.P Garber; Scott J. Wells; L. Schroeder-Tucker; K. Ferris

250 million annually.


Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2000

Risk factors for fecal shedding of Salmonella in 91 US dairy herds in 1996

E.K. Kabagambe; Scott J. Wells; Lindsey P. Garber; M. D. Salman; Bruce A. Wagner; Paula J. Fedorka-Cray

The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA and fecal culture tests for paratuberculosis in dairy cattle are examined. ELISA and fecal culture data from seven dairy herds where both fecal cultures and ELISA testing was done concurrently are included. A cohort of 954 cattle including 697 parturient adults, cultured every 6 months from 10 herds followed over 4 years served as the basis to determine fecal culture sensitivity. The fecal culture technique utilized a 2g sample with centrifugation and double incubation. Of the 954 cattle cohort of all ages (calf to adult) that were fecal sampled on the first herd visit, 79 were culture positive. An additional 131 animals were detected as culture positive over the next seven tests at 6-month intervals. The sensitivity of fecal culture to detect infected cattle on the first sampling was 38%. Of the 697 parturient cattle cohort, 67 were positive on the first fecal culture, while an additional 91 adult cattle were culture positive over the next seven tests, resulting in a sensitivity of 42% on the first culture of the total animals identified as culture positive. Animals culled from the herds prior to being detected as infected and animals always fecal culture negative with culture positive tissues at slaughter are not included in the calculations. Both groups of infected cattle will lower the apparent sensitivity of fecal culture. Infected dairy herds tested concurrently with both fecal culture and ELISA usually resulted in more than twofold positive animals by culture compared to ELISA. The classification of infected cattle by the extent of shedding of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in the feces helps define the relative proportion of cattle in each group and therefore the likelihood of detection by the ELISA test. ELISA has a higher sensitivity in animals with a heavier bacterial load, i.e. high shedders (75%) compared to low shedders (15%). Repeated testing of infected herds identifies a higher proportion of low shedders which are more likely to be ELISA negative. Thus, the sensitivity of the ELISA test decreases with repeated herd testing over time, since heavy shedders will be culled first from the herds.


Clinical and Vaccine Immunology | 2006

Evaluation of a rapid fecal PCR test for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy cattle.

Scott J. Wells; Michael T. Collins; Kay S. Faaberg; Carrie Wees; Saraya Tavornpanich; Kristine R. Petrini; James E. Collins; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Robert H. Whitlock

ABSTRACT Five diagnostic tests based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technology for bovine paratuberculosis were evaluated by using individual serum or milk samples from 359 dairy cattle in seven paratuberculosis-free herds and 2,094 dairy cattle in seven Mycobacterium paratuberculosis-infected dairy herds. Three independent laboratories using three different culture procedures completed fecal cultures for M. paratuberculosis on these cattle and found 417 cows to be shedding M. paratuberculosis in their feces. An animal that was fecal culture positive for M. paratuberculosis by any of the three laboratories was considered a confirmed case of infection. The specificity of three ELISAs (two on serum and one on milk) was ≥99.8%. The specificity of the remaining two ELISAs, both done on serum, was 94.9 and 84.7%. Four of the five ELISAs evaluated produced similar sensitivity in detecting fecal culture-positive cattle (27.8 to 28.9%). Serum ELISA “D” had the lowest specificity (84.7%) and the highest sensitivity (44.5%), but if the cutoff value defining a positive test was changed from 125 to 250% (of the positive control) the sensitivity and specificity, 31.8 and 97.5%, respectively, were comparable to those of the other four assays. If the case definition for M. paratuberculosis infection was based on the culture results of a single laboratory instead of the combined results of three laboratories, ELISA sensitivity estimates were 45.7 to 50.0%. With the exception of ELISA D, assay agreement was high (kappa 0.66 to 0.85) for categorical assay interpretations (positive or negative), but linear regression of quantitative results showed low correlation coefficients (r2 = 0.40 to 0.68) due to the fact that ELISA results for some cows were high in one assay but low in another assay. Likelihood ratio analysis showed a direct relationship between the magnitude of ELISA result and the odds of a cow shedding M. paratuberculosis in its feces. If used judiciously and interpreted quantitatively, these ELISAs are useful tools in support of paratuberculosis control programs in dairy herds.


Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2003

Evaluation of herd sampling for Salmonella isolation on midwest and northeast US dairy farms

Lorin D. Warnick; John B. Kaneene; P.L. Ruegg; Scott J. Wells; Charles P. Fossler; Amy M. Campbell

ABSTRACT Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Arcobacter spp. were detected in feces of healthy dairy cows by highly specific multiplex-PCR assays. For C. jejuni, at this one-time sampling, cows from 80.6% of farm operations (n = 31) and 37.7% of individual dairy cattle fecal samples (n = 2,085) were positive. Farm management factors were correlated with prevalence in herds in which >25% of cows were positive for C. jejuni. Statistical significance was set at a P of 0.20. Using these criteria, application of manure with broadcast spreaders (P = 0.17), feeding of whole cottonseed or hulls (P = 0.17) or alfalfa (P = 0.15), and accessibility of feed to birds (P = 0.17) were identified as possible risk factors for C. jejuni infection. C. coli was detected in at least one animal in 19.4% of operations and 1.8% of individual cows (n = 2,085). At the herd level, use of broadcaster spreaders was not a risk factor for C. coliinfection. For Arcobacter, cows from 71% of dairy operations (n = 31) and 14.3% of individual dairy cattle fecal samples (n = 1,682) were positive. At the herd level, for Arcobacter spp., feeding of alfalfa (P = 0.11) and use of individual waterers (P = 0.19) were protective. This is the first description of Arcobacter spp. in clinically healthy dairy cattle and the first attempt to correlate their presence with C. jejuni.

Collaboration


Dive into the Scott J. Wells's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.M. Godden

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John B. Kaneene

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P.L. Ruegg

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce A. Wagner

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Fetrow

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy M. Campbell

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge