Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sebastian H. Hoefer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sebastian H. Hoefer.


Innovative Surgical Sciences | 2017

Undergraduate medical students need more training in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a comparative study between medical and dental students

Lukas B. Seifert; Jasmina Sterz; Bernd Bender; Robert Sader; Miriam Ruesseler; Sebastian H. Hoefer

Abstract Purpose: To compare the performance in oral, craniomaxillofacial, and facial plastic surgery (CMF)-specific surgical skills between medical students (MS) and dental students (DS) and hence adjust the current CMF training to student-specific needs. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no performance differences between MS and DS. Methods: The investigators implemented a comparative retrospective item-based analysis of student performance in a CMF-specific objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) from 2008 to 2015. The sample was composed of 1010 MS and 225 DS who completed a standardized CMF training and OSCE. Three OSCE scenarios [management mandible fracture (MMF), management zygomatic fracture (MZF), and structured facial examination (SFE)] were included in the study because learning objectives were equal. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed and the p value was set at 0.05. Results: In all of the analyzed OSCE scenarios, DS significantly outperformed MS (MMF p<0.001; MZF p=0.013; SFE p<0.001). DS especially appeared to be better in the correct interpretation of radiological findings (five of seven items, MMF) and the correct allocation of anatomical structures (four of five items, MZF) as well as the symptom-oriented examination of the eye (three of three items, SFE). Discussion and conclusion: DS overall seem to be perform better in typical CMF skills. The reasons for this performance gap could be a more profound knowledge of the facial anatomy as well as a higher awareness for CMF as a related specialty to dentistry. CMF should be included in medical curricula in a larger scale, and possible career paths should be highlighted to MS and DS to raise attraction for the specialty. Further studies should focus on the implementation of modern teaching methods in CMF education.


annals of maxillofacial surgery | 2015

Perspectives of patients about bioabsorbable internal fixation for maxillofacial fractures.

Constantin A. Landes; Sebastian H. Hoefer; T. Richards; F. Walcher; Robert Sader

Purpose: Resorbable/bioabsorbable internal fixation provides effective treatment for maxillofacial fractures and avoids the need for metal hardware removal. We evaluated the initial knowledge, attitudes, subjective demand, and treatment satisfaction of patients concerning bioabsorbable osteofixation for maxillofacial trauma. Materials and Methods: From May 2007 to October 2009, there were 71 patients (63 males and 8 females; mean age: 35 ± 15 years) included in this prospective study. The patients completed preoperative and postoperative (4–6 weeks and 1 year) questionnaires. Results: After receiving information, 70 patients (99%) preferred resorbable/bioabsorbable bone fixation, usually because they preferred to avoid a second operation to remove metal hardware (67 patients [94%]). The higher cost of resorbable/bioabsorbable bone fixation was believed and justified by 41 patients (58%) and not justified by 30 patients (42%). No adverse events were reported by 27 of 34 patients (79%) at 4–6 weeks and by 14 of 21 patients (67%) at 1 year after surgery. Most patients were very satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Conclusion: Patients who have maxillofacial trauma have a high frequency of preference and high satisfaction with resorbable/bioabsorbable than metal osteofixation. Literature review showed increased activity in research and publication worldwide about resorbable bone fixation, suggesting that there may be increased patient demand for resorbable bone fixation in the future.


Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 2018

A nationwide survey of undergraduate training in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Lukas B. Seifert; Sebastian H. Hoefer; Swantje Flammiger; M. Rüsseler; Florian Thieringer; Michael Ehrenfeld; Robert Sader

PurposeTo investigate the current status of undergraduate training in oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgery in Germany using a nationwide survey and hence contribute to an educational improvement in the field.MethodsA 39-item questionnaire was sent to all university clinics with an OMF surgery chair in Germany (n = 34).ResultsNinety-two percent of OMF clinics are involved in the curricular training in medicine and 100% in dentistry. Eighty-one percent of OMF clinics perform curricular examinations and, respectively, 86% in dentistry. Examinations are mainly performed written with multiple-choice tests (62% medicine, 76% dentistry) and using non-structured oral examinations (57% medicine, 86% dentistry). Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are only used in 19% of all faculties.ConclusionOMF surgery with its involvement both in medical and dental education has a special position as a surgical discipline. Our results show that OMF as a specialty is underrepresented in dental and especially in medical education considering the numerical and health economic importance of OMF consultations. Enhancing curricular integration and developing more structured examination forms is necessary to guarantee a high quality of OMF education.


Innovative Surgical Sciences | 2018

Young surgeons’ challenges at the start of their clinical residency: a semi-qualitative study

Maria-Christina Stefanescu; Jasmina Sterz; Sebastian H. Hoefer; Miriam Ruesseler

Abstract Introduction According to German regulations on licensing to practice medicine, the aim of undergraduate medical training is to produce a scientifically and practically trained physician who is able to work independently. More precisely, medical training has to impart the required knowledge and skills in diagnostics, therapy, health promotion, prevention, and rehabilitation. From the young residents’ point of view, this aim is not achieved, and they do not feel prepared to be a doctor. However, the literature on this subject relies mostly on data based on surveys, and there is a lack of deep analysis of the specific details of the topic. The aim of this study was to analyze in depth how junior doctors in their first and second years felt about their preparation for clinical practice as a doctor from their undergraduate training, as well as which teaching formats and factors influence their preparedness. Methods This semi-qualitative study is based on recorded interviews conducted using a structured interview manual. This serves to limit the subject matter of the interview and to target the topics. The study participants were 35 residents of general and visceral surgery, trauma surgery, and urology in their first and second years of medical specialty training. The number of participants was defined by the concept of saturation of the content. Basic data regarding age and the location and length of study were collected using a questionnaire. The audio recordings were transcribed word by word and analyzed with structured qualitative content analysis techniques. Results Only 43% (n=15) of the 35 participating residents stated they were sufficiently prepared to be a doctor from undergraduate medical training, and 22.9% stated that they were not prepared for their work as a resident (8/35). However, 34.3% of the residents stated that undergraduate medical training did prepare them for some of the parts they were expected to master in daily clinical practice, but not other parts. Most of the participants described their first weeks as doctors as particularly stressful and exhausting. As major hurdles during their daily clinical work, participants described knowledge gaps regarding organizational and administrative pathways (71%), deficits in linking knowledge to clinical reasoning (71%), decision making (54%), and therapy planning (51%). Most participants stated that the practical placements during the semester, the clinical clerkships, and the last year internship were most effective as preparation for clinical residency. To be better prepared for clinical practice, participants suggested providing a clearer structure and that the course subjects bear better relations to each other. Nearly all participants proposed increasing patient encounters directly from the beginning of medical training as a longitudinal approach. Discussion Even though we were able to demonstrate an increase in residents’ preparedness, 57% of the study participants still felt unprepared for their job to some extent. One might argue that starting a new profession will always result in a feeling of being unprepared to some extent. However, this unpreparedness can increase the risk for patients’ well being due to medical errors, which actually represents the third leading cause of death in the US after malignant tumors and cardiovascular diseases. Structured on-the-job adjustment, structured qualification training, and guided professional training are becoming increasingly important for future doctors as selection criteria for career choice and choice of employer. Thus, the surgical disciplines that are struggling with new young residents have to improve their concepts.


Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery | 2014

Long-term prospective teaching effectivity of practical skills training and a first OSCE in Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery for dental students

Constantin A. Landes; Sebastian H. Hoefer; Florian Schuebel; Alexander Ballon; Anna Teiler; Andreas Tran; Roxane Weber; F. Walcher; Robert Sader


Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie | 2017

Medizinische Prüfung zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit – Analyse der Übereinstimmung zwischen dem 2. Abschnitt der ärztlichen Prüfung und dem Nationalen Kompetenzbasierten Lernzielkatalog Chirurgie

Jasmina Sterz; M. Rüsseler; Vanessa Britz; Christina Stefanescu; Sebastian H. Hoefer; Farzin Adili; Teresa Schreckenbach; Iris Schleicher; Roxane Weber; Hans-Stefan Hofmann; Friedericke Voß; S. König; Markus K. Heinemann; Martina Kadmon


Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie | 2017

Qualitätssicherung in der Lehre – Entwicklung und Analyse von Checklisten zur Beurteilung von Lehrvideos zum Erlernen praktischer Fertigkeiten

M. Rüsseler; Jasmina Sterz; Phaedra Kalozoumi-Paisi; Anna Schill; Bernd Bender; Sebastian H. Hoefer; Iris Schleicher; Alexander I. Damankis; Dennis Josephs; Falk Ochsendorf; Christina Stefanescu; Holger Hoffmann; Teresa Schreckenbach; F. Walcher


Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery | 2017

Structured evaluation and need-based restructuring of the cranio-maxillofacial surgery module within surgical clerkship

Sebastian H. Hoefer; Jasmina Sterz; Bernd Bender; Christina Stefanescu; Marius Theis; F. Walcher; Robert Sader; Miriam Ruesseler


BMC Medical Education | 2017

Conveying practical clinical skills with the help of teaching associates—a randomised trial with focus on the long term learning retention

Sebastian H. Hoefer; Jasmina Sterz; Bernd Bender; Maria-Christina Stefanescu; Marius Theis; F. Walcher; Robert Sader; Miriam Ruesseler


Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie | 2018

Durchführung einer strukturierten mund-, kiefer- und gesichtschirurgischen Untersuchung nach Trauma

Sebastian H. Hoefer; Yannick Haas; Arne Nelskamp; Christina Stefanescu; Robert Sader; Lukas B. Seifert

Collaboration


Dive into the Sebastian H. Hoefer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jasmina Sterz

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miriam Ruesseler

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernd Bender

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Sader

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Walcher

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lukas B. Seifert

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Rüsseler

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marius Theis

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge