Sebastian Jaeger

The Protective Effect of Pulsed Lavage Against Implant Subsidence and Micromotion for Cemented Tibial Unicompartmental Knee Components: An Experimental Cadaver Study

Cemented UKAs were performed in 12 pairs of human cadaver legs and the bone bed was cleansed using pulsed lavage (group A) and conventional syringe lavage (group B). Subsidence and micromotion of the loaded tibial trays were measured. There was a significant effect of BMD on subsidence (P = 0.043) but not on micromotion. Cement penetration of group A was significantly increased (P = 0.005). Group A showed a reduced implant subsidence (P = 0.025) and micromotion (P = 0.026) compared to group B. The group differences in micromotion and implant subsidence of UKA tibial components were statistically significant but rather small and might clinically be of minor importance. Nevertheless a worse bone quality adversely affected implant subsidence and pulsed lavage had a protective effect in these specimens.

The stability of the femoral component in the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of single and twin peg designs

Aseptic loosening of the femoral component is an important indication for revision surgery in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). A new design of femoral component with an additional peg was introduced for the cemented Oxford UKR to increase its stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability of the two designs of component. Medial Oxford UKR was performed in 12 pairs of human cadaver knees. In each pair, one knee received the single peg and one received the twin peg design. Three dimensional micromotion and subsidence of the component in relation to the bone was measured under cyclical loading at flexion of 40° and 70° using an optical measuring system. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was performed to detect differences between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the relative micromotion (p = 0.791 and 0.380, respectively) and subsidence (p = 0.301 and 0.176, respectively) of the component between the two groups at both angles of flexion. Both designs of component offered good strength of fixation in this cadaver study.

Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments

Objectives In order to address acetabular defects, porous metal revision acetabular components and augments have been developed, which require fixation to each other. The fixation technique that results in the smallest relative movement between the components, as well as its influence on the primary stability with the host bone, have not previously been determined. Methods A total of 18 composite hemipelvises with a Paprosky IIB defect were implanted using a porous titanium 56u2009mm multihole acetabular component and 1u2009cm augment. Each acetabular component and augment was affixed to the bone using two screws, while the method of fixation between the acetabular component and augment varied for the three groups of six hemipelvises: group S, screw fixation only; group SC, screw plus cement fixation; group C, cement fixation only. The implanted hemipelvises were cyclically loaded to three different loading maxima (0.5u2009kN, 0.9u2009kN, and 1.8u2009kN). Results Screw fixation alone resulted in up to three times more movement (pu2009=u20090.006), especially when load was increased to 100% (pu2009<u20090.001), than with the other two fixation methods (C and SC). No significant difference was noted when a screw was added to the cement fixation. Increased load resulted in increased relative movement between the interfaces in all fixation methods (pu2009<u20090.001). Conclusion Cement fixation between a porous titanium acetabular component and augment is associated with less relative movement than screw fixation alone for all implant interfaces, particularly with increasing loads. Adding a screw to the cement fixation did not offer any significant advantage. These results also show that the stability of the tested acetabular component/augment interface affects the stability of the construct that is affixed to the bone. Cite this article: N. A. Beckmann, R. G. Bitsch, M. Gondan, M. Schonhoff, S. Jaeger. Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:282–288. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.74.BJR-2017-0198.R1.

Influence of humeral head material on wear performance in anatomic shoulder joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUNDnThe number of total shoulder arthroplasties has increased in the past years, with encouraging results. However, the survival of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is lower compared with that of knee and hip replacements. Wear-associated problems like loosening are well-known causes of long-term failure of aTSA. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the wear behavior of ceramic-polyethylene bearings compared with the standard metal-polyethylene bearings. Because there is a lack of valid experimental wear testing methods, the secondary aim was to develop a validated wear simulation.nnnMETHODSnThe wear assessment was performed using a force-controlled joint simulator for 3u2009×u2009106 cycles, and polyethylene wear was assessed gravimetrically and by particle analysis. Kinetic and kinematic data were adopted from in vivo loading measurements and from several clinical studies on shoulder joint kinematics. The reaction of the rotator cuff was simulated on the basis of a virtual soft tissue model. As activity, an abduction-adduction motion of 0°-90° lifting a load of 2u2009kg superimposed by an anteversion-retroversion has been chosen.nnnRESULTSnThe studied aTSA resulted in a polyethylene wear rate of 62.75u2009±u20091.60u2009mg/106 cycles in combination with metallic heads. The ceramic heads significantly reduced the wear rate by 26.7% to 45.99u2009±u20091.31u2009mg/106. There were no relevant differences in terms of the particle characteristics.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis is the first study that experimentally studied the wear behavior of aTSA based on patient-related and biomechanical data under load-controlled conditions. Regarding polyethylene wear, the analyzed aTSA could benefit from ceramic humeral heads.

Comparison of the Primary Stability of a Porous Coated Acetabular Revision Cup With a Standard Cup

BACKGROUNDnThe number of revision hip arthroplasty procedures has been increasing substantially, with the acetabular component requiring component revision in over half of the cases. New porous implant designs attempt to improve outcomes due to improved osseointegration; however, sufficient primary stability is paramount for good osseointegration.nnnMETHODSnWe compared 2 revision cups of the same geometry, yet different surface properties in an inxa0vitro scenario: a porous titanium surface and a conventional sintered-bead titanium surface. These were tested in 10 cadaveric pelvises under a physiologic cyclic partial weight-bearing scenario. Each side was randomly implanted with one of the implants. Relative motion between the bone and cup was measured using an optical measuring device. Statistical evaluation was carried out descriptively using a covariance analysis with repeated measures and a test of fixed effects, with significance determined as P < .05.nnnRESULTSnThe conventional cup displayed an average relative motion of 28.02 μm; and the porous implant displayed an average relative motion of 33.42 μm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two with regard to the resultant relative motion (Pxa0= .2649). The bone mineral density does have a significant influence on resultant relative motion (Pxa0= .0406), with higher bone mineral density correlating with less relative motion in both implants.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe porous implant provides similar primary stability to the conventional implant in the tested scenario; the motion of both implants relative to the bone was within safe limits for osseointegration. Bone stock must be considered when choosing implant type and postoperative care.

Can intraoperative measurement of bone quality help in decision making for cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUNDnIn uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), low bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with aseptic loosening. BMD is usually assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography, which takes time and exposes patients to radiation. Due to its low risk profile, intraoperative measurement of the trabecular stability might be a useful alternative to DXA.nnnMETHODSnIn 24 human femora, BMD was analysed using DXA at the femoral necks and the knees. Performing the standard Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA) implantation procedure, a wingblade (DensiProbe) coupled to a torque probe was used to evaluate the trabecular peak torque. The standard procedure was modified: before the completion of the central peg drill hole, the DensiProbe was inserted into the pre-drilled hole and then turned until a loss of resistance was achieved. The obtained data was then correlated with BMD at the femoral neck as well as the knee.nnnRESULTSnIn all tested regions, a higher peak torque was observed in correlation with a higher BMD.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAs demonstrated, the DensiProbe can be a helpful tool to assess the bone quality intraoperatively in OUKA. It can be a valuable decision guidance when faced with choosing between a cemented and a cementless implant. Due to the fact that the central peg hole of the OUKA can be used for the procedure, no additional risk for the patient exists, while the additional work for the surgeon is minimal.

Treatment of high-grade acetabular defects: Do porous titanium cups provide better stability than traditional titanium cups when combined with an augment?

BACKGROUNDnRevision total hip arthroplasty frequently faces challenges associated with deficient bone stock. Porous metal implants were developed to meet the challenge, but require rapid osseointegration for ultimate success. This study aims to assess relative motion as an indicator for primary stability and osseointegration of two different titanium cups each combined with a titanium augment.nnnMETHODSnIn 14 cadaver hemipelvises, 2 types of titanium acetabular cups, a traditional sintered-bead cup (POROCOAT Acetabular Cup [PAC]) and a newer porous-coated cup (GRIPTION Acetabular Cup [GAC]) each associated with a porous augment, were subjected to 3-dimensional varying loads, replicating 30% of loads experienced during normal gait. Relative motion was measured at the cup/bone, augment/bone, and cup/augment interfaces.nnnRESULTSnOnly at the cup/bone interface was there a statistically significant difference in relative motion between the traditional PAC and the newer GAC, with PAC showing less relative motion (Pxa0= .0037). Bone mineral density (BMD) had a significant effect on relative motion (Pxa0= .0019) at the cup/bone interface of both cup types, with low BMD specimens showing more relative motion.nnnCONCLUSIONnBoth cup types combined with augments displayed minimal relative motion that was within the accepted range thought to allow osseointegration, although the traditional surface proved superior to the newer surface. This difference was more pronounced at low BMD, with the well-established PAC cup displaying less relative motion than the more porous GAC cup, consistent with better osseointegration than the more porous cup. This suggests that the more porous implant may be less advantageous than traditional PAC cups, particularly in cases with poorer bone stock.