Sebastian Mueller

Investigating the biocompatibility of two new heavy intraocular dyes for vitreoretinal surgery with an isolated perfused vertebrate retina organ culture model and a retinal ganglion cell line.

BackgroundDuring vitreoretinal surgery, vital dyes are used to visualize anatomical structures. Substances with a density higher than water are added to facilitate sedimentation and staining. BBG with 4% PEG (ILM Blue) and BBG with TB and 4% PEG (MBB Dual) are two new dyes. This study evaluates biocompatibility of the new dye solutions, using cell cultures and electrophysiological evaluation.MethodsTo determine cytotoxicity of ILM Blue and MBB Dual for 30, 60, 120 and 320 seconds, monolayer cultures of retinal ganglion cells (RGC5) were used. For functionality testing, bovine retinas were isolated and superfused with an oxygen-saturated nutrient solution, and the electroretinogram (ERG) was recorded. The two dye solutions were applied epiretinally for 30, 60 and 120 seconds. ERG recovery was monitored.ResultsAfter staining with ILM Blue, no statistical significant reduction of a- or b-wave amplitudes at the end of the wash-out was recorded. For MBB Dual, only a significant reduction of the a-wave amplitudes after 30 seconds of application at the end of the wash-out was noticed, while no statistically different changes for a- and b-wave amplitudes up to 120 seconds were noted. During the MTT assay, we noted no significant difference in cell viability after 30, 60, 120 and 320 seconds of staining with ILM blue, MBB Dual or 4% PEG in comparison to the control group (DMEM, Triton X-100 0.9% as positive control) after formazan extraction.ConclusionsILM Blue and MBB Dual seem to be safe for clinical use for a staining period of up to 120 seconds, probably even up to 320 seconds.

Comparing the Effects of Two Different Irrigation Solutions on an Isolated Perfused Vertebrate Retina

Purpose: To compare the effect of a taurine-containing intraocular irrigation solution (PuriProtect™) to a standard irrigation solution (BSS™) we evaluated the retinal function using an electroretinogram (ERG) and analyzed the survival of retinal ganglion cells on isolated whole mount retinas. Materials and Methods: During ERG recordings, each irrigation solution was superfused for 45 min with the relevant irrigation solution. To investigate the effects on photoreceptor function, 1 mM asparate was added to obtain a-waves. The recovery of the a- and b-wave was monitored after superfusing the retinas with standard medium again. To evaluate the percentage of dead ganglion cells, retinas were stored for 24 h at 4°C in darkness and after staining the retinas with ethidium homodimer-1 the retinas were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. Results: The application of standard medium supplemented with 2 mM taurine resulted in a significant increase of the b-wave amplitude compared to standard medium alone. The a-wave amplitudes showed no significant changes under taurine supplementation. Compared to standard medium BSS showed no significant decrease in b-wave amplitudes, but a significant decrease in a-wave amplitudes. In contrast to BSS there were no significant changes in the a- or b-wave amplitudes detectable after the application of PuriProtect. At the end of the washout period no significant changes in a- or b-wave amplitudes were recorded for any tested irrigation solution. Retinas stored for 24 h in PuriProtect or in standard medium with taurine had a statistically significant smaller amount of dead cells than retinas stored in standard medium without taurine supplementation. Conclusions: BSS does not seem to be an ideal irrigation solution, because it compromises the a-wave in the ERG. In contrast to BSS, PuriProtect showed no significant impact on the ERG and showed a better long-term effect on ganglion cell survival. Taurine supplementation, therefore, seems to be neuroprotective and its supplementation to an intraocular irrigation solution favorable for the retina.