Sebastien Denvil
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sebastien Denvil.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2005
Jean-Louis Dufresne; Johannes Quaas; Olivier Boucher; Sebastien Denvil; L. Fairhead
[1] In this study, we examine the time evolution of the relative contribution of sulfate aerosols and greenhouse gases to anthropogenic climate change. We use the new IPSL-CM4 coupled climate model for which the first indirect effect of sulfate aerosols has been calibrated using POLDER satellite data. For the recent historical period the sulfate aerosols play a key role on the temperature increase with a cooling effect of 0.5 K, to be compared to the 1.4 K warming due to greenhouse gas increase. In contrast, the projected temperature change for the 21st century is remarkably independent of the effects of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols for the SRES-A2 scenario. Those results are interpreted comparing the different radiative forcings, and can be extended to other scenarios. We also highlight that the first indirect effect of aerosol strongly depends on the land surface model by changing the cloud cover. Citation: Dufresne, J.-L., J. Quaas, O. Boucher, S. Denvil, and L. Fairhead (2005), Contrasts in the effects on climate of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols between the 20th and the 21st century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21703, doi:10.1029/ 2005GL023619.
Climate Dynamics | 2013
T. P. Sabin; R. Krishnan; Josefine Ghattas; Sebastien Denvil; Jean-Louis Dufresne; Frédéric Hourdin; Terray Pascal
This study examines the feasibility of using a variable resolution global general circulation model (GCM), with telescopic zooming and enhanced resolution (~35 km) over South Asia, to better understand regional aspects of the South Asian monsoon rainfall distribution and the interactions between monsoon circulation and precipitation. For this purpose, two sets of ten member realizations are produced with and without zooming using the LMDZ (Laboratoire Meteorologie Dynamique and Z stands for zoom) GCM. The simulations without zoom correspond to a uniform 1° × 1° grid with the same total number of grid points as in the zoom version. So the grid of the zoomed simulations is finer inside the region of interest but coarser outside. The use of these finer and coarser resolution ensemble members allows us to examine the impact of resolution on the overall quality of the simulated regional monsoon fields. It is found that the monsoon simulation with high-resolution zooming greatly improves the representation of the southwesterly monsoon flow and the heavy precipitation along the narrow orography of the Western Ghats, the northeastern mountain slopes and northern Bay of Bengal (BOB). A realistic Monsoon Trough (MT) is also noticed in the zoomed simulation, together with remarkable improvements in representing the associated precipitation and circulation features, as well as the large-scale organization of meso-scale convective systems over the MT region. Additionally, a more reasonable simulation of the monsoon synoptic disturbances (lows and disturbances) along the MT is noted in the high-resolution zoomed simulation. On the other hand, the no-zoom version has limitations in capturing the depressions and their movement, so that the MT zone is relatively dry in this case. Overall, the results from this work demonstrate the usefulness of the high-resolution variable resolution LMDZ model in realistically capturing the interactions among the monsoon large-scale dynamics, the synoptic systems and the meso-scale convective systems, which are essential elements of the South Asian monsoon system.
Journal of Climate | 2009
Alexandre Laîné; Masa Kageyama; David Salas-Mélia; Gilles Ramstein; Serge Planton; Sebastien Denvil; S. Tyteca
Abstract Different possible behaviors of winter Northern Hemisphere storm tracks under 4 × CO2 forcing are considered by analyzing the response of two of the ocean–atmosphere coupled models that were run for the fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR4), namely the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace’s global coupled model (IPSL-CM4) and the Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques’s coupled ocean–atmosphere model (CNRM-CM3). It is interesting to compare these models due to their very different responses, especially concerning the North Atlantic storm track. A local energetics study of the synoptic variability in both models is performed, derived from the eddy energy equations, including diabatic terms. The ability of both models to simulate the present-day eddy energetics is considered, indicating no major discrepancies. Both models indicate that the primary cause for synoptic activity changes at the western end of the storm tracks is related to the baroclinic co...
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
François Lott; Sebastien Denvil; Neal Butchart; C. Cagnazzo; Marco A. Giorgetta; Steven C. Hardiman; Elisa Manzini; Thomas Krismer; Jean-Philippe Duvel; P. Maury; J. F. Scinocca; Shingo Watanabe; Seiji Yukimoto
We analyze the stratospheric Kelvin and Rossby-gravity wave packets with periods of a few days in nine high-top (i.e., with stratosphere) models of the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). These models simulate realistic aspects of these waves and represent them better than the tropospheric convectively coupled waves analyzed in previous studies. There is nevertheless a large spread among the models, and those with a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) produce larger amplitude waves than the models without a QBO. For the Rossby-gravity waves this is explained by the fact that models without a QBO never have positive zonal mean zonal winds in the lower stratosphere, a situation that is favorable to the propagation of Rossby-gravity waves. For the Kelvin waves, larger amplitudes in the presence of a QBO is counter intuitive because Kelvin waves are expected to have larger amplitude when the zonal mean zonal wind is negative, and this is always satisfied in models without a QBO. We attribute the larger amplitude to the fact that models tuned to have a QBO require finer vertical resolution in the stratosphere. We also find that models with large precipitation variability tend to produce larger amplitude waves. However, the effect is not as pronounced as was found in previous studies. In fact, even models with weak precipitation variability still have quite realistic stratospheric waves, indicating either that (i) other sources can be significant or that (ii) the dynamical filtering mitigates the differences in the sources between models.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2013
Eric Guilyardi; V. Balaji; Bryan N. Lawrence; Sarah Callaghan; Cecelia DeLuca; Sebastien Denvil; Michael Lautenschlager; Mark Morgan; Sylvia Murphy; Karl E. Taylor
The results of climate models are of increasing and widespread importance. No longer is climate model output of sole interest to climate scientists and researchers in the climate change impacts and adaptation fields. Now nonspecialists such as government officials, policy makers, and the general public all have an increasing need to access climate model output and understand its implications. For this host of users, accurate and complete metadata (i.e., information about how and why the data were produced) is required to document the climate modeling results. Here we describe a pilot community initiative to collect and make available documentation of climate models and their simulations. In an initial application, a metadata repository is being established to provide information of this kind for a major internationally coordinated modeling activity known as CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5). It is expected that for a wide range of stakeholders, this and similar community-managed metad...
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2016
Dean N. Williams; V. Balaji; Luca Cinquini; Sebastien Denvil; Daniel Q. Duffy; Ben Evans; Robert D. Ferraro; Rose Hansen; Michael Lautenschlager; Claire Trenham
AbstractWorking across U.S. federal agencies, international agencies, and multiple worldwide data centers, and spanning seven international network organizations, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) allows users to access, analyze, and visualize data using a globally federated collection of networks, computers, and software. Its architecture employs a system of geographically distributed peer nodes that are independently administered yet united by common federation protocols and application programming interfaces (APIs). The full ESGF infrastructure has now been adopted by multiple Earth science projects and allows access to petabytes of geophysical data, including the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)—output used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment reports. Data served by ESGF not only include model output (i.e., CMIP simulation runs) but also include observational data from satellites and instruments, reanalyses, and generated images. Metadata summarize basic infor...
international conference on e-science | 2012
Luca Cinquini; Daniel J. Crichton; Chris A. Mattmann; John Harney; Galen M. Shipman; Feiyi Wang; Rachana Ananthakrishnan; Neill Miller; Sebastien Denvil; Mark Morgan; Zed Pobre; Gavin M. Bell; Bob Drach; Dean N. Williams; Philip Kershaw; Stephen Pascoe; Estanislao Gonzalez; Sandro Fiore; Roland Schweitzer
The Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) is a multi-agency, international collaboration that aims at developing the software infrastructure needed to facilitate and empower the study of climate change on a global scale. The ESGFs architecture employs a system of geographically distributed peer nodes, which are independently administered yet united by the adoption of common federation protocols and application programming interfaces (APIs). The cornerstones of its interoperability are the peer-to-peer messaging that is continuously exchanged among all nodes in the federation; a shared architecture and API for search and discovery; and a security infrastructure based on industry standards (OpenID, SSL, GSI and SAML). The ESGF software is developed collaboratively across institutional boundaries and made available to the community as open source. It has now been adopted by multiple Earth science projects and allows access to petabytes of geophysical data, including the entire model output used for the next international assessment report on climate change (IPCC-AR5) and a suite of satellite observations (obs4MIPs) and reanalysis data sets (ANA4MIPs).
international conference on big data | 2015
Dean N. Williams; Michael Lautenschlager; V. Balaji; Luca Cinquini; Cecelia DeLuca; Sebastien Denvil; Daniel Q. Duffy; Benjamin J. K. Evans; Robert D. Ferraro; Martin Juckes; Claire Trenham
This article describes the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) mission and an international integration strategy for data, database and computational architecture, and stable infrastructure highlighted by the authors (the ESGF Executive Committee). These highlights are key developments needed over the next five to seven years in response to large-scale national and international climate community projects that depend on ESGF for success. Quality assurance and baseline performance from laptop to high performance computing characterizes available and potential data streams and strategies. These are required for interactive data collections to remedy gaps in handling enormous international federated climate data archives. Appropriate cyber security ensures protection of data according to projects but still allows access and portability to different ESGF and individual groups and users. A timeline and plan for forecasting interoperable tools takes ESGF from a federated database archive to a robust virtual laboratory and concludes the article.
Climatic Change | 2013
H. Huebener; Michael G. Sanderson; I. Höschel; J. Körper; T. C. Johns; J.-F. Royer; Erich Roeckner; Elisa Manzini; J.-L. Dufresne; Odd Helge Otterå; Jerry Tjiputra; D. Salas y Melia; Marco A. Giorgetta; Sebastien Denvil; Pier Giuseppe Fogli
Unfortunately, in the aforementioned contribution, Fig. 5 (Monthly multi-model (mean and range) precipitation change (mm/day) for 2080–2099 minus 1980–1999 averaged over the 26 regions, E1 (black) and A1B (grey) scenarios) contains an error. For two of the contributing models (ECHAM5-C and INGVCE) the evapotranspiration data had the wrong sign, leading to an opposing annual cycle in these models compared to the other models. The corrected Fig. 5 is presented here. It can be seen that the annual cycles of the climate change signals in evapotranspiration in the two scenarios agree much better between the different models than previously estimated. The general picture clearly underscores the findings from the preceding Figs. 3 and 4 that the climate change signals are much reduced under the E1 scenario compared to the A1B scenario. This is true for the ensemble properties (means, percentiles, ...
Climate Dynamics | 2010
Olivier Marti; Pascale Braconnot; Jean-Louis Dufresne; Jacques Bellier; Rachid Benshila; Sandrine Bony; Patrick Brockmann; P. Cadule; Arnaud Caubel; Francis Codron; Nathalie de Noblet; Sebastien Denvil; L. Fairhead; Thierry Fichefet; Marie-Alice Foujols; Pierre Friedlingstein; Hugues Goosse; Jean-Yves Grandpeix; Eric Guilyardi; Frédéric Hourdin; A. Idelkadi; Masa Kageyama; Gerhard Krinner; Claire Levy; Gurvan Madec; Juliette Mignot; Ionela Musat; Didier Swingedouw; Claude Talandier