Seckin O. Ulualp

Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

We report a meta-analysis of a series of studies in which 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring was performed in 1) normal subjects, 2) the normal control subjects in studies of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and 3) the patients with LPR in these controlled studies. The statistical analysis utilized the fixed-effects model by Mantel-Haenszel and the random-effects mixed model. There were 16 studies from the past 12 years that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They involved 793 subjects (264 normal and 529 with LPR). The numbers of positive pharyngeal reflux events for normal subjects and for patients with LPR differed with a p value of <.0001. There was also a significant difference in the mean percentage of acid exposure times between normal subjects and patients with LPR (p = .003). We conclude that the upper probe gives accurate and consistent information in normal subjects and patients with LPR. The numbers of reflux events and acid exposure times are most important in distinguishing normal subjects from patients with LPR. The technology and methodology of probe testing is quite reliable and is consistent on a worldwide basis.

Possible relationship of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux with pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis.

Gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux (GEPR) has been suggested as a cause of pediatric sinusitis. However, its contribution to the pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis in adults has not been systematically investigated. We evaluated the prevalence of GEPR in 11 CT confirmed chronic sinusitis patients (51 ± 4 years) who had not responded to conventional therapy, and 11 normal healthy controls (44 ± 7 years). A 3-site ambulatory esophagopharyngeal pH monitoring technique (probe location: 2 cm proximal, 3–4 cm distal to UES and 5 cm proximal to LES high pressure zones) was used. A pharyngeal pH drop was accepted as a true reflux event only if it was coincident with or preceded by esophageal pH declines of a similar or larger magnitude. Studies were performed while subjects were on a uniform 2500 calorie diet (provided). Results: Ambulatory pH monitoring documented GEPR in seven of 11 patients (1–12 episodes) and two of 11 normal volunteers (1,2 episodes) (p < 0.05). A total of 34 nonbelch related pharyngeal acid reflux events were identified in patients, but none was associated with coughing. In both groups, all pharyngeal acid events occurred in the upright position. Compared to normal controls prevalence of pharyngeal reflux of gastric acid is significantly higher in patients with chronic sinusitis unresponsive to conventional therapy and suggests a different esophagopharyngeal distribution pattern of gastric refluxate in this patient group; these findings suggest that GEPR may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis in some adult patients.

Pharyngeal acid reflux events in patients with vocal cord nodules

Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis of vocal cord nodules. However, a cause‐and‐effect relationship has not been established. Because documentation of pharyngeal acid reflux events makes this correlation more plausible, the aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of pharyngeal acid reflux events in patients with vocal cord nodules. Methods: Eleven patients with vocal cord nodules (mean age, 42 ± 6 years) and eleven healthy volunteers (mean age, 45 ± 6 years) were studied. Patients underwent barium esophagram and ambulatory 24‐hour simultaneous three‐site pharyngo‐esophageal pH monitoring. Controls only had ambulatory 24‐hour simultaneous three‐site pH monitoring. In the ambulatory pH monitoring studies, pH was recorded from the manometrically determined sites of pharynx (2 cm above upper esophageal sphincter), proximal esophagus (10 cm distal to pharyngeal site), and distal esophagus (5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter). Pharyngeal acid reflux event was deemed acceptable if all three sites recorded a decrease in pH below 4 which was not related to meal or drinking. Results: Pharyngeal acid reflux events occurred in seven of 11 patients with vocal cord nodules (1–4 episodes) and two of 11 controls (1–2 episodes) (P < .05). In both groups all pharyngeal acid reflux events occurred in upright position and were not associated with belching or coughing. Barium studies documented hiatal hernia in two patients and gastroesophageal reflux in five of 11 patients. However, none of the esophageal reflux events reached the pharynx on barium esophagram. Conclusions: Prevalence of pharyngeal acid reflux events is significantly higher in patients with vocal cord nodules compared with normal controls and suggests a contributory role for gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux in the pathogenesis of some vocal cord nodules.

PHARYNGEAL PH MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH POSTERIOR LARYNGITIS

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 3-site 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis (PL) and the prevalence of esophageal abnormalities in this patient group. METHODS: Twenty patients with PL and 17 healthy volunteers were studied as controls. Control subjects had transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD) and ambulatory pH monitoring. Patients underwent T-EGD, ambulatory pH monitoring, and barium esophagram. RESULTS: T-EGD documented no abnormality in controls. Esophagitis was present in 2 PL patients, and hiatal hernia in 3. Ambulatory pH monitoring showed that 15 PL patients and 2 controls exhibited pharyngeal acid reflux. Barium esophagram documented gastroesophageal reflux in 5 PL patients. However, none of these barium reflux events reached the pharynx. All PL patients with barium esophagram evidence of gastroesophageal reflux also showed pharyngeal acid reflux by pH monitoring. CONCLUSION: Pharyngeal acid reflux is more prevalent in patients with PL than in healthy controls. Patients with PL infrequently have esophageal sequelae of reflux disease. Ambulatory 24-hour simultaneous 3-site pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring detects gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux events in most patients with PL.

Pharyngeal acid reflux in patients with single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) events in single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with otolaryngologic symptoms and objective findings and 34 healthy control subjects were studied with an ambulatory 24-hour, 3-site pharyngoesophageal pH monitoring technique. Otolaryngologic diagnosis included isolated Posterior laryngitis (PL) in 28 patients, isolated chronic rhinosinusitis (SIN) in 12, combined PL and SIN (PL+SIN) in 6, PL plus laryngotracheal stenosis (PL+LTS) in 12, and PL plus vocal cord nodules (PL+VCN) in 9. RESULTS: PAR events were documented in 68% of patients with PL, 34% of patients with SIN, 67% of patients with PL+SIN, 67% of patients with PL+LTS, 78% of patients with PL+VCN, and 21% of controls. The prevalence of PAR events in patients with isolated PL as well as those with PL combined with other disorders was significantly higher than that in patients without PL and that in controls. As a group, patients with PL had a greater number of PAR events and acid exposure time than other patients and controls. Distal and proximal esophageal reflux parameters were not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PAR is significantly higher in patients with isolated PL compared to patients with other isolated otolaryngologic disorders and in controls. The prevalence of PAR in isolated otolaryngologic disorders other than PL is similar to that in healthy controls. The prevalence of PAR is significantly higher in patients with both PL and other otolaryngologic disorders than in controls and in patients with isolated otolaryngologic disorders.

LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX: State of the Art Diagnosis and Treatment

Gastroesophageal reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of otolaryngologic disorders. Patients with otolaryngologic disorders associated with gastroesophageal reflux infrequently have the classic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, such as heartburn. Clinical presentation of laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly characterized by chronic intermittent symptoms. A meticulous synthesis of the information obtained from a complete otolaryngologic examination, diagnostic tests, and response to treatment is essential for the efficient management of patients with otolaryngologic disorders associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Outcomes of acid suppressive therapy in patients with posterior laryngitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of acid suppressive therapy (AST) in posterior laryngitis (PL) patients with and without documented pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR). METHODS: The charts of all patients with PL who received AST and who had undergone pharyngeal pH monitoring were reviewed. Results of AST in patients with PL with and without documented PAR were evaluated by laryngeal examination, symptom scores, and self-reported overall benefit. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with PL had received AST and undergone pharyngeal pH monitoring. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 27 months. Laryngeal findings were improved in patients with and without PAR. Pretreatment total symptom scores were significantly greater than that of posttreatment in patients with and without documented PAR. Overall benefit from AST was reported by the majority of PL patients with and without documented PAR. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of AST to reduce or eliminate signs and symptoms in PL regardless of documentation of PAR. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:16-22.)

Osteoplastic flap versus modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure in patients with frontal sinus disease.

The aim of the present study was to review the clinical results of osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration and modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure. Charts of patients with frontal sinus disease who underwent osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration or modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients with frontal sinus disease underwent osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration. Frontal sinus disease was chronic sinusitis in 21, mucocele in 18, and papilloma in four. None of the patients had recurrence within 3 to 12 years follow-up period. Six patients had decreased forehead sensation, one had a CSF leak, and one had toss of the fat graft. Fifteen patients with chronic frontal sinusitis underwent modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure. The follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 years. Two patients had recurrence of disease 2 and 6 months after surgery and required osteoplastic flap. In patients with chronic frontal sinusitis, both procedures achieved good relief of symptoms; however, follow-up time of modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure was smaller than that of osteoplastic flap procedure. In conclusion, osteoplastic flap procedure with abdominal fat obliteration provides successful treatment in patients with frontal chronic sinusitis, mucocele, or papilloma. Modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure achieves the relief of symptoms in patients with chronic frontal sinusitis. With the future availability of long term follow-up results, modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure may reduce the number of osteoplastic flap procedures in patients with chronic frontal sinusitis.

Pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in patients with posterior laryngitis

Background: Earlier studies have shown that stimulation of the human pharynx by injection of minute amounts of water stimulates the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex. It has been suggested that this reflex may be activated during pharyngeal reflux of gastric and/or esophageal content, thus increasing the UES pressure and possibly preventing further entry of the refluxate into the pharynx. However, the integrity of this reflex in patients with posterior laryngitis has not been studied. Aim: Evaluate the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex in a group of patients with objective findings of posterior laryngitis. Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients with posterior laryngitis (mean age, 48 ± 6 y) and 13 healthy volunteers (mean age, 53 ± 6 y) were studied by concurrent pharyngeal water stimulation and UES manometry. Results: The threshold volume required to evoke the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex in the laryngitis group (0.4 ± 0.05 mL) was significantly higher than that of the control (0.2 ± 0.04 mL) (P < .05). Following stimulation of the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex, the maximum postinjection pressure in patients (75 ± 6 mm Hg) was similar to that of the controls (78 ± 6 mm Hg). The percent increase in UES pressure following stimulation of the reflex in the laryngitis group (99% ± 15%) was significantly higher than that of controls (55% ± 11%) (P < .05). Conclusions: Compared with normal controls, a significantly larger volume of liquid is required to trigger this reflex in patients with posterior laryngitis. When triggered, the maximum UES pressure induced by the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex is similar between the two groups. These findings suggest an altered afferent sensory limb of this reflex in patients with posterior laryngitis. Key Words: Upper esophageal sphincter, reflux laryngitis, airway protection.

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy for upper airway evaluation in children with obstructive sleep apnea†‡

To evaluate sites and characteristics of upper airway obstruction, as detected with drug‐induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).