Seelam Bharani

The second version of the L. V. Prasad-functional vision questionnaire.

Purpose. The L. V. Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire (LVP-FVQ) was developed using Rasch analysis to assess self-reported difficulties in performing daily tasks in school children with visual impairment (VI) in India. However, the LVP-FVQ has psychometric problems of inadequate measurement precision and lack of detailed assessment of dimensionality. Furthermore, items pertaining to use of technology are lacking. The aim of this study was to present the development and validation of the second version of LVP-FVQ (LVP-FVQ II). Methods. Development of LVP-FVQ II involved extracting items from other similar questionnaires (albeit developed for Western populations) and focus group discussions of children with VI and their parents that resulted in a 32-item pilot questionnaire. Overall, six items from the LVP-FVQ were retained. The questionnaire underwent pilot testing in 25 such children, following which a 27-item LVP-FVQ II emerged, and this was administered to 150 children with VI. Response to each item was rated on a three-category scale. Rasch analysis was used to validate the LVP-FVQ II. Results. Rating scale was used by participants as was intended to. Four mobility-related items required deletion, as these did not contribute toward measurement of a single construct, indicating a secondary dimension. Deletion of the four items resulted in the 23-item unidimensional LVP-FVQ II, with good measurement precision, effective targeting of item difficulty to participant ability, and lack of notable differential item functioning. The LVP-FVQ II has high reliability, indicating that it is effectively able to discriminate between visual disability of school children in India, and is valid across age, gender, duration of VI, and location of residence. Conclusions. Given the superior measurement properties and the interval-level scores, the LVP-FVQ II appears to offer advantages over LVP-FVQ in assessment of difficulties in performing daily tasks in this population. It can be adapted for use in other developing countries.

Quality of life of caregivers of children with congenital glaucoma: development and validation of a novel questionnaire (CarCGQoL).

PURPOSE We developed and validated an instrument to measure the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers of children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG): the Caregivers Congenital Glaucoma Quality of Life (CarCGQoL) questionnaire. METHODS A total of 70 caregivers of children with PCG under follow-up at a tertiary eye care center in India participated in a series of focus groups, and pre- and pilot testing phases in the development of the 45-item CarCGQoL questionnaire. Subsequently, this instrument was administered to 111 caregivers of children with PCG awaiting glaucoma surgery. Response to each item was rated on a four-category scale. Rasch analysis was used to validate the instruments psychometric properties, such as unidimensionality (by principal components analysis [PCA] of residuals), item fit to model, measurement precision (by person separation [PS]), response category performance, differential item functioning (DIF), and targeting of items to participants QoL. RESULTS Categories required reorganization resulting in a shortened rating scale of 3 categories. The instrument showed misfit to the Rasch model and lacked unidimensionality. Deleting 15 items (obtained through PCA of residuals) restored unidimensionality, but additional items misfit, necessitating item reduction. In addition, 2 items showed DIF and were deleted. Finally, a 20-item CarCGQoL instrument showed good fit and unidimensionality. Targeting was good (0.69 logits) and PS was 2.51, indicating good measurement precision. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a psychometrically robust 20-item caregiver derived questionnaire, the CarCGQoL, that is a valid and reliable measure of QoL of caregivers of children with PCG. Given its brevity, it is quick and easy to administer in the clinic, and has potential for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials of treatment of PCG.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9: Validation among Patients with Glaucoma

Background Depression and anxiety are two common normal responses to a chronic disease such as glaucoma. This study analysed the measurement properties of the depression screening instrument - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) using Rasch analysis to determine if it can be used as a measure. Methods In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, the PHQ-9 was administered to primary glaucoma adults attending a glaucoma clinic of a tertiary eye care centre, South India. All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation. Patient demographics and sub-type of glaucoma were abstracted from the medical record. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the following properties of the PHQ-9: behaviour of the response categories, measurement precision (assessed using person separation reliability, PSR; minimum recommended value 0.80), unidimensionality (assessed using item fit [0.7–1.3] and principal components analysis of residuals), and targeting. Results 198 patients (mean age ± standard deviation  = 59.83±12.34 years; 67% male) were included. The native PHQ-9 did not fit the Rasch model. The response categories showed disordered thresholds which became ordered after category reorganization. Measurement precision was below acceptable limits (0.62) and targeting was sub-optimal (−1.27 logits). Four items misfit that were deleted iteratively following which a set of five items fit the Rasch model. However measurement precision failed to improve and targeting worsened further (−1.62 logits). Conclusions The PHQ-9, in its present form, provides suboptimal assessment of depression in patients with glaucoma in India. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new depression instrument for our glaucoma population. A superior strategy would be to use the item bank for depression but this will also need to be validated in glaucoma patients before deciding its utility.

Is utility-based quality of life in adults affected by glaucoma?

PURPOSE We evaluated the utility values (UVs), using the time trade off (TTO) technique, associated with primary glaucoma and varying degrees of visual field (VF) loss. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 198 adults (mean age, 59.8 years) with primary glaucoma were recruited from the glaucoma clinic of a tertiary center in Hyderabad, South India. Each patient underwent comprehensive glaucoma evaluation, and completed the utility (TTO) and Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 questionnaires (Rasch version, Glaucoma Activity Limitation [GAL]-10). Better mean deviation (MD, using Humphrey Field Analyzer program 24-2) between two eyes was used to classify participants into mild, moderate, and severe VF loss groups. Utilities (range, 0.0-1.0) derived by TTO technique (lifetime traded against perfect vision) and interval level Rasch scores of GAL-10 were used for analyses. RESULTS Mean UV was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.84); that is, a decrease in quality of life (QoL) of 19%. Of the subjects, 59% were willing to trade lifetime in return of perfect vision; those willing to trade were significantly younger with poorer acuity in the worse-seeing eye. In univariate and multivariate analysis, severe VF loss in the worse eye was associated with lower UV (β = -0.108; 95% CI, -0.201 to -0.014; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that primary glaucoma in adults causes substantial decrease in UVs (and QoL thereof), and is highly dependent on the severity of VF loss in the worse eye.

Assessment of the Impact of Keratoconus on Vision- Related Quality of Life

PURPOSE We determined if the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) is a valid questionnaire to measure the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in keratoconus patients, and investigated if the VRQoL varied with disease severity in this sample. METHODS WE RECRUITED 160 CONSECUTIVE BILATERAL KERATOCONUS PATIENTS (MEAN AGE 23.3 YEARS, 63% MALE) FROM AN INDIAN TERTIARY EYE CARE CENTER. PARTICIPANTS UNDERWENT A CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND COMPLETED THE IVI. PARTICIPANTS WERE DIVIDED INTO THREE GROUPS BASED ON THE AVERAGE OF THE STEEP KERATOMETRY (K) READINGS: mild (average Sim K < 45 diopters [D]), moderate (average Sim K 45-52 D), and severe (average Sim K > 52 D). Rasch analysis was used to validate the IVI and the VRQoL scores thus obtained were compared across the disease groups. RESULTS THE MAJORITY (63%) OF PATIENTS HAD SEVERE, WHILE THE REMAINDER (37%) HAD MODERATE KERATOCONUS. RASCH ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATED THE VALIDITY OF THE IVI TO ASSESS VRQOL THROUGH TWO SUBSCALES: vision-specific functioning (VF) and emotional well-being (EWB). There was no significant difference in VF (mean change -0.16, P = 0.55) and EWB scores (mean change -0.32, P = 0.23) between moderate and severe keratoconus groups. CONCLUSIONS The revised IVI subscales have interval-level measurement properties, which support their suitability to measure VRQoL in this keratoconus sample. Patients with moderate or severe keratoconus had similar, but higher VRQoL scores as assessed by the revised IVI subscales, indicating lack of impact of the disease on their VRQoL. However, this does not exclude the possibility of finding an impact in other populations.

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis

Purpose To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20)- a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in adults with strabismus, and if flawed, to revise the AS-20 and its subscales creating valid measurement scales. Methods 584 adults (meanage, 27.5 years) with strabismus were recruited from an outpatient clinic at a South Indian tertiary eye care centre and were administered the AS-20 questionnaire.The AS-20 was translated and back translated into two Indian languages. The AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales – ‘psychosocial’ and ‘function’were assessed separately for fit to the Rasch model, including an assessment of the rating scale, unidimensionality (by principal components analysis), measurement precision by person separation reliability, PSR, targeting, and differential item functioning (DIF; notable > 1.0 logits). Results Response categories were not used as intended, thereby, required re-organization and reducing their number from 5 to 3. The AS-20 had adequate measurement precision (PSR = 0.87) but lacked unidimensionality; however, deletion of the six multi-dimensionality causing items and an additional three misfitting items resulted in 11-item unidimensional questionnaire (AS-11). Two items failed to satisfy the model expectations in the ‘psychosocial’ subscale and were deleted – resulting in an 8-item unidimensional scale with adequate PSR (0.81) and targeting (0.23 logits). One item misfit in the ‘function’ subscale and was deleted—resulting in a 9 item Rasch-revised unidimensional subscale with acceptable PSR (0.80) and targeting (0.97 logits).None of the items displayed notable DIF by age, gender and level of education. Conclusions The AS-11 and its two Rasch-revised subscales – 8-item psychosocial and 9-item function subscale may be more appropriate than the original AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales for use as unidimensional measures of HRQoL in adults with strabismus in India. Further work is required to establish the validity of the revised rating scale.

Measuring Coping in Parents of Children with Disabilities: A Rasch Model Approach

Background Parents of a child with disability must cope with greater demands than those living with a healthy child. Coping refers to a person’s cognitive or behavioral efforts to manage the demands of a stressful situation. The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) is a well-recognized measure of coping among parents of chronically ill children and assesses different coping patterns using its three subscales. The purpose of this study was to provide further insights into the psychometric properties of the CHIP subscales in a sample of parents of children with disabilities. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 220 parents (mean age, 33.4 years; 85% mothers) caring for a child with disability enrolled in special schools as well as in mainstream schools completed the 45-item CHIP. Rasch analysis was applied to the CHIP data and the psychometric performance of each of the three subscales was tested. Subscale revision was performed in the context of Rasch analysis statistics. Results Response categories were not used as intended, necessitating combining categories, thereby reducing the number from 4 to 3. The subscale – ‘maintaining social support’ satisfied all the Rasch model expectations. Four item misfit the Rasch model in the subscale –maintaining family integration’, but their deletion resulted in a 15-item scale with items that fit the Rasch model well. The remaining subscale – ‘understanding the healthcare situation’ lacked adequate measurement precision (<2.0 logits). Conclusions The current Rasch analyses add to the evidence of measurement properties of the CHIP and show that the two of its subscales (one original and the other revised) have good psychometric properties and work well to measure coping patterns in parents of children with disabilities. However the third subscale is limited by its inadequate measurement precision and requires more items.

Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire: Evaluation in visually impaired

Purpose To explore the psychometric properties of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ) in children with visual impairment (VI) using Rasch analysis. Methods One hundred fifty Indian children with VI between 8 and 16 years (mean age, 11.6 years; 69% male; mean acuity in the better eye of 0.80 logMAR [Snellen, 20/126]) were administered the revised OBVQ. The 40-item revised OBVQ was developed to assess victimization (i.e., being bullied) and bullying (bullying others) in normally sighted schoolchildren. Only 16 items are used for Rasch analysis and are divided into two parts: I (victimization, eight items) and II (bullying others, eight items). Separate Rasch analysis was conducted for both parts, and the psychometric properties investigated included behavior of rating scale, extent to which the items measured a single construct (unidimensionality by fit statistics and principal component analysis [PCA] of residuals); ability to discriminate among participants’ victimization and bullying behaviors (measurement precision as assessed by person separation reliability [PSR] minimum recommended value, 0.80); and targeting of items to participants’ victimization and bullying. Results Response categories were misused for both parts I and II, which required repair before further analysis. Measurement precision was inadequate for both parts (PSR, 0.64 for part I and 0.19 for part II), indicating poor discriminatory ability. All items fit the Rasch model well in part I, indicating unidimensionality that was further confirmed using PCA of residuals. However, an item misfit in part II that required deletion following which the remaining items fit and PCA of residuals also supported unidimensionality. Targeting was −0.58 logits for part I, indicating that the items were matched well with the participants’ victimization. By comparison, targeting was suboptimal for part II (−1.97 logits). Conclusions In its current state, the revised OBVQ is not a valid psychometric instrument to assess victimization and bullying among children with VI.

Glaucoma symptom scale: is it a reliable measure of symptoms in glaucoma patients?

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide after cataract and accounts for 10% of the worlds blind.1 Although patients with acute angle closure glaucoma are symptomatic, those with other forms of glaucoma (at least in the early stages) usually do not experience many symptoms, thereby, resulting in the disease often going unnoticed with possible progression. In some cases, patients with fluctuating levels of intraocular pressure may experience blurred vision and see haloes around lights. The Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) was developed to assess ophthalmic symptoms experienced by patients with glaucoma.2 The GSS comprises 10 ocular symptoms, of which six are non-visual and four are visual. The non-visual symptoms include ‘burning/smarting/stinging’, ‘tearing’, ‘dryness’, ‘itching’, ‘soreness/tiredness’, and ‘feeling of something in the eye’. The visual symptoms include ‘blurry/dim vision’, ‘hard to see in daylight’, ‘hard to see in darkness’, and ‘halos around lights’. The GSS is unique in that it assesses symptoms as compared with visual functioning by other glaucoma-specific questionnaires. Like most questionnaires in ophthalmology, the GSS was also developed using traditional psychometric methods, that is, the classical test theory (CTT).3 The limitations of CTT have been well acknowledged. A major shortcoming of CTT pertains to its scoring assumptions: Likert or summary scoring in which the scores are calculated from …

Parent-Child Agreement on Health-Related Quality of Life in Congenital Glaucoma

Purpose We assess parent-child agreement regarding childs health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children operated for congenital glaucoma (CG). Methods A total of 121 children aged 8 to 18 years (mean age, 11.8 years) operated for CG (mean duration since surgery, 10.2 years) and their parents (mean age, 36.5 years) completed the child and parent versions of the Kidscreen-27 questionnaire, respectively. Psychometric properties of Kidscreen-27 were assessed using Rasch analysis, and child–parent agreement regarding childs HRQoL was investigated using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) method. Results Minor modifications in the rating scale and deletion of few misfitting items resulted in a psychometrically robust Kidscreen-23 questionnaire. Average parental HRQoL score was higher than the childs own ratings, with a significant difference between their scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD] difference = 0.53 ± 2.58 logits, P = 0.02; lower LoA [95% CI], −4.52 [−5.31 to −3.72] and upper LoA [95% CI], 5.58 [4.79–6.38]). The range of child–parent agreement was wide and bidirectional, with parents tending to underestimate and overestimate their childs HRQoL. Younger children and girls showed greater discordance in their HRQoL with parental reports than adolescents and boys, respectively. Conclusions Discordance between CG childs self-report of HRQoL and parents report indicate that both groups perceive the broader impact of living with CG very differently. Translational Relevance The HRQoL as reported by the child with CG and by his/her parent should be viewed as being complementary, rather than interchangeable. Both assessments should be taken into account in clinical practice and research studies.