Semanti Mukherjee
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Semanti Mukherjee.
Nature Genetics | 2009
Outi Kilpivaara; Semanti Mukherjee; Alison M. Schram; Martha Wadleigh; Ann Mullally; Benjamin L. Ebert; Adam J. Bass; Sachie Marubayashi; Adriana Heguy; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop M. Kantarjian; Kenneth Offit; Richard Stone; D. Gary Gilliland; Robert J. Klein; Ross L. Levine
Polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) characterized by multilineage clonal hematopoiesis. Given that the identical somatic activating mutation in the JAK2 tyrosine kinase gene (JAK2V617F) is observed in most individuals with polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, there likely are additional genetic events that contribute to the pathogenesis of these phenotypically distinct disorders. Moreover, family members of individuals with MPN are at higher risk for the development of MPN, consistent with the existence of MPN predisposition loci. We hypothesized that germline variation contributes to MPN predisposition and phenotypic pleiotropy. Genome-wide analysis identified an allele in the JAK2 locus (rs10974944) that predisposes to the development of JAK2V617F-positive MPN, as well as three previously unknown MPN modifier loci. We found that JAK2V617F is preferentially acquired in cis with the predisposition allele. These data suggest that germline variation is an important contributor to MPN phenotype and predisposition.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2012
Jason A. Willis; Sara H. Olson; Irene Orlow; Semanti Mukherjee; Robert R. McWilliams; Robert C. Kurtz; Robert J. Klein
Purpose: To explore the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on pancreatic cancer risk and overall survival (OS). Experimental Design: The germ line DNA of 531 pancreatic cancer cases and 305 healthy controls from a hospital-based study was genotyped at SNPs previously reported to be associated with pancreatic cancer risk or clinical outcome. We analyzed putative risk SNPs for replication of their reported effects on risk and tested for novel effects on OS. Similarly, we analyzed putative survival-associated SNPs for replication of their reported effects on OS and tested for novel effects on risk. Finally, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of OS using a subset of 252 cases, with two subsequent validation sets of 261 and 572 patients, respectively. Results: Among seven risk SNPs analyzed, two (rs505922 and rs9543325) were associated with risk (P < 0.05). Among 24 survival-associated SNPs analyzed, one (rs9350) was associated with OS (P < 0.05). No putative risk SNPs or putative survival-associated SNPs were found to be associated with OS or risk, respectively. Furthermore, our GWAS identified a novel SNP [rs1482426, combined stage I and II, P = 1.7 × 10−6, per-allele HR, 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38–2.18] to be putatively associated with OS. Conclusions: The effects of SNPs on pancreatic cancer risk and OS were replicated in our study, although further work is necessary to understand the functional mechanisms underlying these effects. More importantly, the putative association with OS identified by GWAS suggests that GWAS may be useful in identifying SNPs associated with clinical outcome in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 18(14); 3942–51. ©2012 AACR.
Cell | 2010
Robert J. Klein; Xing Xu; Semanti Mukherjee; Jason A. Willis; James Hayes
In a recent Essay in Cell, McClellan and King argue that genomic resequencing rather than genome-wide association studies (GWAS) will be necessary to understand the genetic basis of common disease (McClellan and King, 2010). Like the authors, we too are excited about the potential for emerging sequencing technologies to facilitate discoveries that explain the missing heritability of common diseases. However, we disagree with the implication that GWAS have not been successful to date. Instead, we propose that insofar as the goal of these studies is to understand the etiology of heritable diseases, GWAS have provided numerous tantalizing clues for us biologists to decipher.
Frontiers in Genetics | 2014
Jason A. Willis; Semanti Mukherjee; Irene Orlow; Agnes Viale; Kenneth Offit; Robert C. Kurtz; Sara H. Olson; Robert J. Klein
Although family history is a risk factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, much of the genetic etiology of this disease remains unknown. While genome-wide association studies have identified some common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with pancreatic cancer risk, these SNPs do not explain all the heritability of this disease. We hypothesized that copy number variation (CNVs) in the genome may play a role in genetic predisposition to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Here, we report a genome-wide analysis of CNVs in a small hospital-based, European ancestry cohort of pancreatic cancer cases and controls. Germline CNV discovery was performed using the Illumina Human CNV370 platform in 223 pancreatic cancer cases (both sporadic and familial) and 169 controls. Following stringent quality control, we asked if global CNV burden was a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Finally, we performed in silico CNV genotyping and association testing to discover novel CNV risk loci. When we examined the global CNV burden, we found no strong evidence that CNV burden plays a role in pancreatic cancer risk either overall or specifically in individuals with a family history of the disease. Similarly, we saw no significant evidence that any particular CNV is associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Taken together, these data suggest that CNVs do not contribute substantially to the genetic etiology of pancreatic cancer, though the results are tempered by small sample size and large experimental variability inherent in array-based CNV studies.
JCO Precision Oncology | 2018
Nitya Prabhakar Raj; Ronak Shah; Zsofia K. Stadler; Semanti Mukherjee; Joanne Chou; Brian R. Untch; Janet Y. Li; Virginia Kelly; Muyinat Osoba; Leonard Saltz; Diana Mandelker; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F. Berger; David Klimstra; Diane Reidy-Lagunes
Purpose We assessed the usefulness of real-time molecular profiling through next-generation sequencing (NGS) in predicting the tumor biology of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and in characterizing genomic evolution. Methods Patients with metastatic panNETs were recruited in the routine clinical practice setting (between May 2014 and March 2017) for prospective NGS of their tumors as well as for germline analysis using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing platform. When possible, NGS was performed at multiple time points. Results NGS was performed in 96 tumor samples from 80 patients. Somatic alterations were identified in 76 of 80 patients (95%). The most commonly altered genes were MEN1 (56%), DAXX (40%), ATRX (25%), and TSC2 (25%). Alterations could be defined in pathways that included chromatin remodeling factors, histone methyltransferases, and mammalian target of rapamycin pathway genes. Somatic loss of heterozygosity was particularly prevalent (50 of 96 samples [52%]), and the presence of loss of heterozygosity resulted in inferior overall survival (P < .01). Sequencing of pre- and post-treatment samples revealed tumor-grade progression; clonal evolution patterns were also seen (molecular resistance mechanisms and chemotherapy-associated mutagenesis). Germline genetic analysis identified clinically actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 14 of 88 patients (16%), including mutations in high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes (MEN1, TSC2, and VHL). Conclusion A clinical NGS platform reveals pertubations of biologic pathways in metastatic panNETs that may inform prognosis and direct therapies. Repeat sequencing at disease progression reveals increasing tumor grade and genetic evolution, demonstrating that panNETs adopt a more aggressive behavior through time and therapies. In addition to frequent somatic mutations in MEN1 and TSC2, germline mutations in these same genes underlie susceptibility to panNETs and highlight the need to re-evaluate whether germline genetic analysis should be performed for all patients with panNETs.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2018
Maeve Aine Lowery; Winston Wong; Emmet Jordan; Jonathan W. Lee; Yelena Kemel; Joseph Vijai; Diana Mandelker; Ahmet Zehir; Marinela Capanu; Erin E. Salo-Mullen; Angela G. Arnold; Kenneth H. Yu; Anna M. Varghese; David P. Kelsen; Robin Brenner; Erica S. Kaufmann; Vignesh Ravichandran; Semanti Mukherjee; Michael F. Berger; David M. Hyman; David S. Klimstra; Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa; Catherine Tjan; Christina M. Covington; Hannah Maynard; Peter J. Allen; Gokce Askan; Steven D. Leach; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; Mark E. Robson
Blood | 2011
Alison M. Schram; Xing Xu; Outi Kilpivaara; Semanti Mukherjee; Aaron D Viny; Olga A. Guryanova; Robert J. Klein; Ross L. Levine
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Emmet Jordan; Maeve Aine Lowery; Winston Wong; Yelena Kemel; Semanti Mukherjee; Vignesh Ravichandran; Olca Basturk; Kenneth H. Yu; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; Anne Lincoln; Anna M. Varghese; Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa; Steven D. Leach; David S. Klimstra; Peter J. Allen; Mark E. Robson; Zsofia K. Stadler; Joseph Vijai; Kenneth Offit; Eileen Mary O'Reilly
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Semanti Mukherjee; Marjorie G. Zauderer; Vignesh Ravichandran; Yelena Kemel; Diana Mandelker; Nisha Pradhan; Ahmet Zehir; Steven M. Lipkin; Preethi Srinivasan; Chaitanya Bandlamudi; Barry S. Taylor; David R. Jones; Liying Zhang; Michael F. Berger; David B. Solit; Mark E. Robson; Zsofia K. Stadler; Joseph Vijai; Kenneth Offit
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Geoffrey Y. Ku; Semanti Mukherjee; Chizoba Okoro; Medha Sharma; Vignesh Ravichandran; Kenneth Offit; Vijai Joseph; Yelena Y. Janjigian; Zsofia K. Stadler; David P. Kelsen