Şenol Özyalın
Dokuz Eylül University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Şenol Özyalın.
Journal of Earth System Science | 2014
Mustafa Akgün; Tolga Gönenç; Oya Pamukçu; Şenol Özyalın
Loss of life and property that may occur as a result of a possible earthquake can be reduced by earthquake resistant building designs. In order to investigate possible ground motion amplification in earthquake resistant building design, relationship between the ground and engineering bedrock must be ensured. In order to provide this relation, structure, basic characteristics, and thickness of the ground are investigated. In this context, calculating ground transfer function, obtaining horizontal earthquake acceleration changes, calculating Vs values and defining the engineering bedrock are necessary. In this study, Menemen plain, the nothern part of Izmir metropolitan located in active earthquake zone and its immediate vicinity have been examined to define the structure, ground, engineering and bedrock relation. In this context, Menemen plain has been investigated by geophysical methods, which are supported with borehole data (microtremor, MASW – multichannel analysis of surface waves, microgravity measurements, and vertical electrical sounding–VES). Microtremor method was conducted at 377 points in average in the investigation area to define fundamental period and empirical transfer function; after that in order to create basin model and to define the shallow subsurface geometry, microgravity measurements were carried out by using Scintrex CG-5. Also, MASW measurements were carried out in approximately 277 profiles and Schlumberger VES measurements were conducted at approximately 7 points in the investigation area. The existence of a linear relation between H/V peak period values obtained by microtremor measurements and ground thickness in the investigation area is also supported by geothermal drilling logs (depth of 600 m) with microgravity survey. Also, in some parts of the investigation area, it was observed that high S velocity (Vs) values affected H/V peak period values in sections of the ground close to the surface and there was an inversely correlated relation between this ground thickness and peak period values. This event occurring in shallow depths is supported by both VES sections and 2nd order vertical gravity derivative. As a result, depth of the engineering bedrock was obtained between 200 and 700 m and this unit was proposed as Bornova Melange for the investigation area in the scope of the works carried out. Also, it is observed that the area from ground to the engineering bedrock consists of four different layers which were defined by individual S velocities and densities. According to all results, characterictics of the shallow subsurface show that there is a high heterogeneity. Therefore, according to Eurocode8 (EC8 2004) regulations, soil characteristic of the Menemen plain and its vicinity are in the S1–S2 soil class.
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration | 2017
Eren Pamuk; Özkan Cevdet Özdağ; Şenol Özyalın; Mustafa Akgün
To determine the shear wave velocity structure and predominant period features of Tınaztepe in İzmir, Turkey, where new building sites have been planned, active–passive surface wave methods and single-station microtremor measurements are used, as well as surface acquisition techniques, including the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW), refraction microtremor (ReMi), and the spatial autocorrelation method (SPAC), to pinpoint shallow and deep shear wave velocity. For engineering bedrock (Vs > 760 m/s) conditions at a depth of 30 m, an average seismic shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m of soil (AVs30) is not only accepted as an important parameter for defining ground behavior during earthquakes, but a primary parameter in the geotechnical analysis for areas to be classified by Vs30 according to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). It is also determined that Z1.0, which represents a depth to Vs = 1000 m/s, is used for ground motion prediction and changed from 0 to 54 m. The sediment–engineering bedrock structure for Tınaztepe that was obtained shows engineering bedrock no deeper than 30 m. When compared, the depth of engineering bedrock and dominant period map and geology are generally compatible.
Pure and Applied Geophysics | 2008
Petek Sındırgı; Oya Pamukçu; Şenol Özyalın
Journal of Earth System Science | 2013
Tuǧba Eskişar; Şenol Özyalın; Mehmet Kuruoǧlu; H. Recep Yılmaz
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering | 2017
Yunus Levent Ekinci; Şenol Özyalın; Petek Sındırgı; Çağlayan Balkaya; Gökhan Göktürkler
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering | 2015
Ömer Ündül; Atiye Tugrul; Şenol Özyalın; I. Halil Zarif
Engineering Geology | 2014
Tuğba Eskişar; Mehmet Kuruoğlu; Selim Altun; Şenol Özyalın; H. Recep Yılmaz
Natural Hazards | 2018
Eren Pamuk; Özkan Cevdet Özdağ; Aykut Tunçel; Şenol Özyalın; Mustafa Akgün
Jeofizik Dergisi | 2016
Mustafa Akgün; Tolga Gönenç; Oya Pamukçu; Şenol Özyalın; Özkan Cevdet Özdağ
Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society | 2012
Şenol Özyalın; Oya Pamukçu; Tolga Gönenç; Ayça Yurdakul; Hasan Sözbilir