Seong Ha Cheon

Efficacy and feasibility of radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma

Purpose: Optimal treatment for liver metastases from gastric cancer remains a matter of debate. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of liver-only metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 29 patients who developed liver-only metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma and subsequently underwent gastric resection and RFA (n = 20) or gastric resection and systemic chemotherapy (n = 9) between January 1995 and February 2008. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and was compared using the log rank test to evaluate RFA efficacy. Results: Twenty patients who underwent RFA showed a median overall survival of 30.7 months (range: 2.9 to 90.9 months), a median progression-free survival of 6.8 months (range: 0.8 to 45.2 months), and median overall one-, three-, and five-year survival rates were 66.8%, 40.1%, and 16.1% respectively. The RFA group showed a 76% decreased death rate compared to the chemotherapy-only group (30.7 months versus 7 months, hazard ratio, 0.24; p = 0.004). Most patients tolerated RFA well, and complications were found to be minor (transient fever (20%) and/or right upper quadrant pain (25%)). One case of treatment-related death occurred due to sepsis that originated from a liver abscess at the ablation site. Conclusions: The data suggest that a use of RFA as a liver-directed treatment may provide greater survival benefit than chemotherapy and is an alternative option for the treatment of liver-only metastases from gastric cancer.

The efficacy and safety of standardized allergen-removed Rhus verniciflua extract as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but tumor progression is often inevitable. Strategies are needed to improve the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy. Over recent years, there has been increasing interest in the role of maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of standardized allergen-removed Rhus verniciflua Stokes extract (aRVS) as maintenance therapy in patients with non-progressive disease following first-line chemotherapy. We reviewed the medical records of 33 patients with advanced NSCLC, who started treatment with aRVS in a state of tumor regression or stable disease after completion of four or six cycles of induction chemotherapy at the Integrative Cancer Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong from June 2006 to April 2012. The primary objective of this study was progression-free survival (PFS) of aRVS as maintenance therapy. Secondary objectives included assessments of disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and the safety of aRVS treatment. The median PFS was 5.2 months with a 6- and 12-month PFS rate of 40.6% and 12.9%, respectively. The DCR was 93.9% and the median OS was 34.8 months. The overall survival rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 84.2%, 76.7% and 49.9%, respectively. We observed no hematologic toxicity, nephrotoxicity, or hepatotoxicity during aRVS treatment. In conclusion, maintenance therapy with aRVS for patients with advanced NSCLC is well-tolerated and offers encouraging improved PFS and OS compared with historical controls. Our data provide further evidence that aRVS may be used beyond disease progression in this clinical setting.

A case of recurred hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to doxorubicin after liver transplantation showing response to herbal medicine product, Rhus verniciflua Stokes extract.

There is no established protocol proven to be beneficial for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. Only a few reports have shown direct treatment by surgery or ablation to be independent predictors of survival for localized recurrence. Moreover, the necessity of immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection makes many physicians hesitate to administer systemic chemotherapy. This case report documents a case in which the administration of an herbal product, an extract of the lacquer tree, Rhus verniciflua Stokes, was associated with a decrease in the size of lung metastases in a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation refractory to doxorubicin. This patient experienced prolonged survival compared with average survival times and little toxicity.There is no established protocol proven to be beneficial for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. Only a few reports have shown direct treatment by surgery or ablation to be independent predictors of survival for localized recurrence. Moreover, the necessity of immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection makes many physicians hesitate to administer systemic chemotherapy. This case report documents a case in which the administration of an herbal product, an extract of the lacquer tree, Rhus verniciflua Stokes, was associated with a decrease in the size of lung metastases in a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation refractory to doxorubicin. This patient experienced prolonged survival compared with average survival times and little toxicity.

Treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Aim:  Liver transplantation (LT) is a curative treatment for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the recurrence rate after LT is about 10–20%, with a dismal prognosis. Little data exist as to the natural history, treatment outcome and optimal treatment of recurrent HCC after LT. We reviewed various treatment modalities given to patients with recurrent HCC after LT.

Phase I trial of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and weekly irinotecan in locally advanced rectal cancer

S-1 is a novel, oral fluoropyrimidine and a known radiosensitizer. We conducted a phase I trial to establish a schedule of S-1/irinotecan with standard pelvic radiotherapy as a preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Our findings suggest that this new combination is feasible and well tolerable.