Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sepehr Shakib is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sepehr Shakib.


Drugs & Aging | 2013

Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.

Emily Reeve; Josephine To; Ivanka Hendrix; Sepehr Shakib; Michael S. Roberts; Michael D. Wiese

BackgroundInappropriate medication use is common in the elderly and the risks associated with their use are well known. The term deprescribing has been utilised to describe the complex process that is required for the safe and effective cessation of inappropriate medications. Given the primacy of the consumer in health care, their views must be central in the development of any deprescribing process.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers that may influence a patient’s decision to cease a medication.Data sourcesA systematic search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit and Scopus was conducted and augmented with a manual search. Numerous search terms relating to withdrawal of medications and consumers’ beliefs were utilised.Study eligibility criteriaArticles were included if the barriers or enablers were directly patient/carer reported and related to long-term medication(s) that they were currently taking or had recently ceased.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsDetermination of relevance and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Content analysis with coding was utilised for synthesis of results.ResultsTwenty-one articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Three themes, disagreement/agreement with ‘appropriateness’ of cessation, absence/presence of a ‘process’ for cessation, and negative/positive ‘influences’ to cease medication, were identified as both potential barriers and enablers, with ‘fear’ of cessation and ‘dislike’ of medications as a fourth barrier and enabler, respectively. The most common barrier/enabler identified was ‘appropriateness’ of cessation, with 15 studies identifying this as a barrier and 18 as an enabler.Conclusions and implications of key findingsThe decision to stop a medication by an individual is influenced by multiple competing barriers and enablers. Knowledge of these will aid in the development of a deprescribing process, particularly in approaching the topic of cessation with the patient and what process should be utilised. However, further research is required to determine if the proposed patient-centred deprescribing process will result in improved patient outcomes.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2013

People's Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences Regarding Polypharmacy and Willingness to Deprescribe

Emily Reeve; Michael D. Wiese; Ivanka Hendrix; Michael S. Roberts; Sepehr Shakib

To capture peoples attitudes, beliefs, and experiences regarding the number of medications they are taking and their feelings about stopping medications.


Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics | 2007

Pharmacists’ role in the post‐discharge management of patients with heart failure: a literature review

A Ponniah; B Anderson; Sepehr Shakib; Christopher J. Doecke; M Angley

Background and Objective:  The incidence of heart failure is increasing in developed countries. In the aged population, heart failure is a common cause of hospitalization and hospital readmission, which in conjunction with post‐discharge care, impose a significant cost burden. Inappropriate medication management and drug‐related problems have been identified as major contributors to hospital readmissions. In order to enhance the care and clinical outcomes, and reduce treatment costs, heart failure disease management programmes (DMPs) have been developed. It is recommended that these programmes adopt a multi‐disciplinary approach, and pharmacists, with their understanding and knowledge of medication management, can play a vital role in the post‐discharge care of heart failure patients.


Vaccine | 2015

A randomized phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of three ascending dose levels of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) in healthy adults

Michael D. Nissen; Helen Marshall; Peter Richmond; Sepehr Shakib; Qin Jiang; David A. Cooper; Denise Rill; James Baber; Joseph Eiden; William C. Gruber; Kathrin U. Jansen; Emilio A. Emini; Annaliesa S. Anderson; Edward T. Zito; Douglas Girgenti

BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of healthcare-acquired morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare resource utilization. A prophylactic vaccine is being developed that may reduce this disease burden. METHODS Volunteers in good general health aged 50-85 (n=312) and 18-24 (n=96) years were randomized to receive a single intramuscular dose of one of three dose levels of a non-adjuvanted, 3-antigen S. aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) or placebo. SA3Ag antigens included capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8), each conjugated to cross-reactive material 197 (CRM197), and recombinant clumping factor A (ClfA). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were evaluated. RESULTS At day 29 post-vaccination, robust immune responses were observed in both age cohorts at all three SA3Ag dose levels. In the primary analysis population, the 50- to 85-year age stratum, geometric mean-fold-rises in competitive Luminex(®) immunoassay antibody titers from baseline ranged from 29.2 to 83.7 (CP5), 14.1 to 31.0 (CP8), and 37.1 to 42.9 (ClfA), all (P<0.001) exceeding the pre-defined two-fold rise criteria. Similar rises in opsonophagocytic activity assay titers demonstrated functionality of the immune response. Most injection-site reactions were mild in severity and there were no substantial differences (SA3Ag vs. placebo) with regard to systemic or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In this study of healthy adults aged 50-85 and 18-24 years, SA3Ag elicited a rapid and robust immune response and was well tolerated, with no notable safety concerns.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2014

The benefits and harms of deprescribing.

Emily Reeve; Sepehr Shakib; Ivanka Hendrix; Michael S. Roberts; Michael D. Wiese

Deprescribing is the process of trial withdrawal of inappropriate medications. Currently, the strongest evidence for benefit of deprescribing is from cohort and observational studies of withdrawal of specific medication classes that have shown better patient outcomes, mainly through resolution of adverse drug reactions. Additional potential benefits of deprescribing include reduced financial costs and improved adherence with other medications. The harms of ceasing medication use include adverse drug withdrawal reactions, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes and return of the medical condition. These can be minimised with proper planning (ie, tapering), monitoring after withdrawal, and reinitiation of the medication if the condition returns. More evidence is needed regarding negative, non‐reversible effects of ceasing use of certain classes of medication, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Cessation of use has not been studied for many medication classes, and large‐scale randomised controlled trials of systematic deprescribing are required before the true benefits and harms can be known.


Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism | 2015

Efficacy and safety of beloranib for weight loss in obese adults: a randomized controlled trial

Dennis Kim; J. Krishnarajah; S. Lillioja; F.J. De Looze; J. Marjason; Joseph Proietto; Sepehr Shakib; Bronwyn Stuckey; J.E. Vath; T.E. Hughes

To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of beloranib treatment for obesity.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2011

Major bleeding risk associated with warfarin and co‐medications in the elderly population

Agnes Vitry; Elizabeth E. Roughead; Emmae N. Ramsay; Adrian K. Preiss; Philip Ryan; Andrew L. Gilbert; Gillian E. Caughey; Sepehr Shakib; Adrian Esterman; Ying Zhang; Robyn McDermott

Warfarin management in the elderly population is complex as medicines prescribed for concomitant diseases may further increase the risk of major bleeding associated with warfarin use. We aimed to quantify the excess risk of bleeding‐related hospitalisation when warfarin was co‐dispensed with potentially interacting medicines.


BMJ | 2009

A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments

Taryn Bessen; Robyn Clark; Sepehr Shakib; Geoffrey Hughes

Problem Despite widespread acceptance of the Ottawa ankle rules for assessment of acute ankle injuries, their application varies considerably. Design Before and after study. Background and setting Emergency departments of a tertiary teaching hospital and a community hospital in Australia. Key measures for improvement Documentation of the Ottawa ankle rules, proportion of patients referred for radiography, proportion of radiographs showing a fracture. Strategies for change Education, a problem specific radiography request form, reminders, audit and feedback, and using radiographers as “gatekeepers.” Effects of change Documentation of the Ottawa ankle rules improved from 57.5% to 94.7% at the tertiary hospital, and 51.6% to 80.8% at the community hospital (P<0.001 for both). The proportion of patients undergoing radiography fell from 95.8% to 87.2% at the tertiary hospital, and from 91.4% to 78.9% at the community hospital (P<0.001 for both). The proportion of radiographs showing a fracture increased from 20.4% to 27.1% at the tertiary hospital (P=0.069), and 15.2% to 27.2% (P=0.002) at the community hospital. The missed fracture rate increased from 0% to 2.9% at the tertiary hospital and from 0% to 1.6% at the community hospital compared with baseline (P=0.783 and P=0.747). Lessons learnt Assessment of case note documentation has limitations. Clinician groups seem to differ in their capacity and willingness to change their practice. A multifaceted change strategy including a problem specific radiography request form can improve the selection of patients for radiography.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2015

Feasibility of a Patient-Centered Deprescribing Process to Reduce Inappropriate Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Emily Reeve; Jane M. Andrews; Michael D. Wiese; Ivanka Hendrix; Michael S. Roberts; Sepehr Shakib

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are inappropriately prescribed in up to 50% of users. Systematic medication review and cessation of inappropriate medications or deprescribing may improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a patient-centered deprescribing process in a population of adults with complex polypharmacy. Methods: This was a prospective feasibility study. Participants were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. The patient-centered deprescribing process consisted of 5 steps: comprehensive medication history, identification of potentially inappropriate medications, determining if the medication can be ceased, planning the withdrawal regimen (eg, tapering where necessary), and provision of monitoring, support, and documentation. Feasibility was determined by assessing time taken to complete the different steps of the deprescribing process and participant feedback. Results: In all, 57 PPI users were recruited; participants were 70 ± 14 years old and took 14 ± 6 medications. The indication for PPI use was verified in 43 participants and judged as potentially inappropriate in 19 (44%); 8 were suitable for trial withdrawal, and 6 consented. All 6 successfully ceased (n = 3) or reduced (n = 3) their PPI use, and this was sustained at 6 months postintervention in 4 participants. Conclusions: The patient-centered deprescribing process can safely reduce inappropriate PPI prescribing in a small proportion of people. Although the process was acceptable to participants, difficulties in accessing complete medical histories, time limitations, and minimal evidence to support effectiveness in certain indications were barriers to implementation of the process in clinical practice.


Drugs & Aging | 2011

Co-Morbidity and Potential Treatment Conflicts in Elderly Heart Failure Patients

Gillian E. Caughey; Elizabeth E. Roughead; Sepehr Shakib; Agnes Vitry; Andrew L. Gilbert

AbstractBackground: Co-morbidity of both cardiac and non-cardiac conditions is common in the elderly with heart failure (HF) and can be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Objectives: The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence of comorbidity and potential treatment conflicts that may result in adverse clinical outcomes in a large cohort of elderly HF patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using administrative claims data (1 April to 31 July 2007) from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Australia, on all veterans aged ≥65 years with HF. Co-morbidities were defined using the pharmaceutical based co-morbidity index Rx-Risk-V. Potential treatment conflicts for patients with HF and co-morbid diseases were identified from Australian clinical guidelines or reference compendia and their prevalence in the data were determined. Results: A total of 6730 patients were included in the study, with a median of 6 co-morbid conditions (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) and 11 (IQR 8–15) unique medicines. Almost the entire HF cohort (97.8%) were identified as having at least one co-morbid condition that may cause a potential treatment conflict, with 55% having three or more. The conditions identified as being of greatest concern, based on their prevalence and potential for treatment conflict, were chronic airways disease, depression, chronic pain/inflammatory disease, glaucoma, diabetes mellitus and diseases treatable with corticosteroids. Conclusions: Potential treatment conflicts are common in the highly co-morbid population of elderly patients with HF, and may influence the therapeutic management of not only HF but all conditions present.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sepehr Shakib's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gillian E. Caughey

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth E. Roughead

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Agnes Vitry

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew L. Gilbert

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily Reeve

Royal Adelaide Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip Ryan

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manya Angley

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicole L. Pratt

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge