Sergey Artyomenko

A Randomized Comparison of Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Concomitant Renal Artery Denervation in Patients With Refractory Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Resistant Hypertension

OBJECTIVES The aim of this prospective randomized study was to assess the impact of renal artery denervation in patients with a history of refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) and drug-resistant hypertension who were referred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). BACKGROUND Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular condition responsible for the development and maintenance of AF. Treating drug-resistant hypertension with renal denervation has been reported to control blood pressure, but any effect on AF is unknown. METHODS Patients with a history of symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF refractory to ≥2 antiarrhythmic drugs and drug-resistant hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg despite triple drug therapy) were eligible for enrolment. Consenting patients were randomized to PVI only or PVI with renal artery denervation. All patients were followed ≥1 year to assess maintenance of sinus rhythm and to monitor changes in blood pressure. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, and 14 were randomized to PVI only, and 13 were randomized to PVI with renal artery denervation. At the end of the follow-up, significant reductions in systolic (from 181 ± 7 to 156 ± 5, p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (from 97 ± 6 to 87 ± 4, p < 0.001) were observed in patients treated with PVI with renal denervation without significant change in the PVI only group. Nine of the 13 patients (69%) treated with PVI with renal denervation were AF-free at the 12-month post-ablation follow-up examination versus 4 (29%) of the 14 patients in the PVI-only group (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS Renal artery denervation reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and reduces AF recurrences when combined with PVI.

Selective ganglionated plexi ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND Selective ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation guided by high-frequency stimulation has been proposed for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of the method is not established. OBJECTIVE This study sought to compare selective ablation of GP identified by high-frequency stimulation with extensive regional ablation targeting the anatomic areas of GP in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS Eighty patients with paroxysmal AF (age 53 +/- 9 years) were randomized to undergo selective GP ablation or regional left atrial ablation at the anatomic sites of GP. For selective GP ablation (n = 40), ablation targets were the sites where vagal reflexes were evoked by high-frequency stimulation. Vagal reflexes were defined as prolongation of the R-R interval by >50% and a concomitant decrease in blood pressure (>20 mm Hg) during AF. The end point of the procedure was failure to reproduce vagal reflexes with repeated high-frequency stimulation. For anatomic ablation, lesions were delivered at the sites of GP clustering. RESULTS At 13.1 +/- 1.9 months, 42.5% of patients with selective GP and 77.5% of patients with anatomic ablation were free of symptomatic paroxysmal AF (PAF) (P = .02). Parasympathetic denervation was more prominent in patients with anatomic than selective GP ablation, and in patients free of AF compared to these with AF recurrence immediately after ablation, but this trend was abolished at 6 months. CONCLUSION Selective GP ablation directed by high-frequency stimulation does not eliminate paroxysmal AF in the majority of patients. An anatomic approach for regional ablation at the sites of GP confers better results.

Ganglionated plexi ablation for longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS To study the potential efficacy of ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation in the setting of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS Anatomic ablation at the areas of GP in the left atrium was performed in 89 patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory, persistent AF (71 men, 56 +/- 7 years of age). In 29 patients, a second procedure by means of circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was performed, and 5 of them were subjected to a third circumferential ablation. At 16 +/- 7 months after the final ablation procedure, 53 (59.6%) of the 89 patients were in sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy, 5 (5.6%) patients had permanent AF, and 31 (34.8%) patients had paroxysmal AF. The long-term success rate for patients who underwent a single ablation procedure with only GP ablation was 38.2% over a follow-up of 24 +/- 3 months. Independent predictors of later arrhythmia recurrences were left atrial diameter [HR 1.039 (1.00-1.07), P = 0.028] and duration of AF prior to ablation [HR 1.116 (1.02-1.22), P = 0.008]. CONCLUSION Ganglionated plexi ablation in chronic AF results in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in 38.2% of cases. Repeat procedures with circumferential isolation of all PV offer a success rate of 59.6% over a follow-up of 16 +/- 7 months.

Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison.

BACKGROUND The optimal ablation technique for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. Both linear lesion (LL) and ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but no direct comparison of the 2 methods exists. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of 2 different ablation strategies-PVI+LL vs PVI+GP ablation -in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. METHODS Two hundred sixty-four consecutive patients with persistent/long-standing persistent AF were randomly assigned to 2 different ablation schemes: PVI+LL (n = 132) and PVI+GP (n = 132) ablation. Consistent sinus rhythm (SR) off antiarrhythmic drug was assessed after follow-up of at least 3 years with the use of an implanted monitoring device. RESULTS All procedural end points were acutely achieved. At 12 months after a single procedure, 47% of the patients treated with PVI+LL were in SR compared to 54% of the patients treated with PVI+GP (P = .29). At 3 years, 34% of the patients with PVI+LL and 49% of the patients with PVI+GP maintained SR (P = .035). Atrial flutter was more frequent in the PVI+LL group than in PVI+GP group (18% vs 6%; P = .002). After a second procedure in 78 patients of the PVI+LL group and 55 patients of the PVI+GP group, the long-term overall success rate was 52% and 68%, respectively (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS PVI+GP ablation confers superior clinical results with less ablation-related left atrial flutter and reduced AF recurrence compared to PVI+LL ablation at 3 years of follow-up.

Renal denervation for improving outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension: Early experience

BACKGROUND The potential role of renal denervation (RD) in patients with AF and less severe hypertension is unknown. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the potential role of RD as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and moderate resistant or severe resistant hypertension. METHODS The data for this study were obtained from 2 different prospective randomized studies, analyzed by meta-analysis. Patients with paroxysmal AF or persistent AF and moderate resistant hypertension (office blood pressure BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and <160/100 mm Hg; first study; n = 48) or severe resistant hypertension (≥160/100 mm Hg; second study; n = 38) were randomized to PVI or PVI with RD. RESULTS At 12 months, 26 of the 41 PVI with RD patients (63%) were AF-free vs 16 of the 39 patients (41%) in the PVI-only group (P = .014). In patients with severe hypertension, 11 of the 18 PVI with RD patients (61%) vs 5 of the 18 PVI-only patients (28%) were AF-free (P = .03). For moderate hypertension, the differences were less dramatic: 11 of 21 (52%) vs 15 of 23 (65%) when RD added (P = .19). The superior efficacy of adding RD was most apparent in persistent AF and severe hypertension (hazard ratio 0.25, confidence interval 0.09-0.72, P = .01). Duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy were nonsignificantly longer in the RD group. CONCLUSION RD may improve the results of PVI in patients with persistent AF and/or severe resistant hypertension.

Use of an implantable monitor to detect arrhythmia recurrences and select patients for early repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a pilot study.

Background— Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has proved effective in curing highly symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to identify the optimal treatment of patients with AF recurrences after the first ablation. Methods and Results— Two hundred eighty-six patients with paroxysmal AF underwent ablation (circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with linear lesions) and were monitored with an implantable cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic). Patients without AF recurrences during the 3-month postablation period were assigned to group 1; those with AF recurrences to group 2. Patients in group 2 were randomly assigned to group 3 or group 4. Group 3 patients were treated only with antiarrhythmic drugs for 6 weeks, with no early reablation during the 3-month postablation period. In the case of AF recurrence after the 3-month postablation period, patients underwent reablation. Group 4 patients were treated according to the onset mechanism of AF recurrences, as detected and stored by the implantable cardiac monitor: antiarrhythmic drug therapy, but no reablation if AF was not preceded by triggers; early reablation if premature atrial beats or atrial tachycardias or flutter triggered AF. All patients were followed up for 1 year to assess maintenance of sinus rhythm in each group. On 12-month follow-up examination, of the 119 (42%) patients in group 1, 112 (94%) had no AF recurrences. Among the 83 patients in group 3, only 27 (33%) had no recurrences. Of the 84 group 4 patients, 67 (80%) had no AF recurrences (P<0.0001 versus group 3). Conclusions— Patients with recurrences after the first AF ablation are likely to respond to a second early ablation when AF is triggered by supraventricular arrhythmias or premature contractions. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01164319.

Catheter Ablation of Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexi for Atrial Fibrillation

Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia does not provide complete and long-term elimination of atrial fibrillation. Combining this procedure with local radiofrequency application on sites with strong vagal reflexes results in partial parasympathetic denervation and increases the antiarrhythmic effect. A novel catheter-ablation technique to modify ganglionated plexi in the left atrium was assessed in 58 patients (mean age, 52.1 ± 1.9 years, 67% male) with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation, which was chronic in 21 (36%; mean duration, 14.3 ± 2.9 months; range, 5–39 months). The mean left atrial volume was 93.1 ± 6.1 mL. The patients underwent ablation of 4 areas of ganglionated plexi in the left atrium, with no circumferential ablation of the pulmonary veins; atrial fibrillation ceased immediately in 94.1% of them. Transient vagal bradycardia was seen in 93% of patients. For 7.2 ± 0.4 months after the procedure, 86.2% of them were free from arrhythmias, and no antiarrhythmic drugs were administered. Ganglionated plexi ablation is an efficient treatment for atrial fibrillation.

Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: The PReVENT AF Study I

BACKGROUND Although catheter ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) is successful at eliminating the target arrhythmia, many patients subsequently experience new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether AF can be prevented by prophylactic pulmonary vein ablation in patients with AFL. METHODS A prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in patients whose sole arrhythmia was AFL without AF was conducted. Patients were randomized to cavotricuspid isthmus ablation alone or with concomitant pulmonary vein isolation. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor. RESULTS Fifty patients completed the trial, and patients were well matched. Isthmus ablation was successful in all patients; pulmonary vein isolation was successful in 25 (100%) randomized patients. Procedure (P < .0001) and fluoroscopy (P < .0001) times were longer in the combined ablation group. More patients in the isthmus ablation-only group experienced new-onset AF during follow-up (52% vs. 12%; P = .003). The 1-year AF burden also favored the combined ablation group compared with the isthmus ablation-only group (8.3% vs. 4.0%; P = .034). In the isthmus ablation-only group, 8 (32%) patients subsequently underwent another ablation for AF. The performance of pulmonary vein isolation and male sex were independent predictors of freedom from AF. CONCLUSION In the PREVENT-AF Study I randomized clinical trial of patients in whom only typical AFL had been observed clinically, the addition of pulmonary vein isolation to cavotricuspid isthmus ablation resulted in a marked reduction of new-onset AF during clinical follow-up as assessed with a continuous implantable cardiac monitor.

Percutaneous epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia after failure of endocardial approach in the pediatric population with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

BACKGROUND Despite the high efficacy of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD), in some patients, conventional endocardial ablation is ineffective. These failures could be explained by the presence of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate. In these cases, a percutaneous epicardial ablation may be required. OBJECTIVE This study sought to report the feasibility and results of epicardial VT ablation in a pediatric population of ARVD patients in whom endocardial ablation was unsuccessful. METHODS Seventeen ARVD pediatric patients (mean age 14 ± 4 years) in whom a percutaneous epicardial radiofrequency ablation of VT was attempted were included in this retrospective analysis. A total of 20 mappable, hemodynamically stable, monomorphic VTs were induced (2 macroreentrant and 18 focal). All patients underwent right ventricular epicardial VT ablation. RESULTS At the end of the procedure, 16 (94.1%) of the 17 patients had no inducible VT. Pericardial effusion occurred in 4 patients (23.5%), with 1 (5.9%) patient having tamponade that required percutaneous pericardial drainage. During a mean follow-up of 26 ± 15 (range 6 to 42) months, 12 (70.6%) patients remained free of any episodes of VT. All patients with successful RF ablation were free from any antiarrhythmic drugs. There were no deaths during the follow-up period. Recurrences of VT were recorded in 5 (29.4%) patients. CONCLUSION Percutaneous epicardial catheter ablation is feasible and relatively safe in pediatric ARVD patients with recurrent VT in whom conventional endocardial ablation failed.

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re-Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation. Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure.