Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sergey Malyshev is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sergey Malyshev.


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics

Thomas L. Delworth; Anthony J. Broccoli; Anthony Rosati; Ronald J. Stouffer; V. Balaji; John A. Beesley; William F. Cooke; Keith W. Dixon; John P. Dunne; Krista A. Dunne; Jeffrey W. Durachta; Kirsten L. Findell; Paul Ginoux; Anand Gnanadesikan; C. T. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Rich Gudgel; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; Richard S. Hemler; Larry W. Horowitz; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Paul J. Kushner; Amy R. Langenhorst; Hyun-Chul Lee; Shian Jiann Lin; Jian Lu; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly

Abstract The formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled climate models developed at NOAAs Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) are described. The models were designed to simulate atmospheric and oceanic climate and variability from the diurnal time scale through multicentury climate change, given our computational constraints. In particular, an important goal was to use the same model for both experimental seasonal to interannual forecasting and the study of multicentury global climate change, and this goal has been achieved. Two versions of the coupled model are described, called CM2.0 and CM2.1. The versions differ primarily in the dynamical core used in the atmospheric component, along with the cloud tuning and some details of the land and ocean components. For both coupled models, the resolution of the land and atmospheric components is 2° latitude × 2.5° longitude; the atmospheric model has 24 vertical levels. The ocean resolution is 1° in latitude and longitude, wi...


Journal of Climate | 2004

The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations

Jeffrey L. Anderson; V. B Alaji; Anthony J. Broccoli; William F. C Ooke; W. D Ixon; L Eo J. Donner; Krista A. Dunne; Stuart M. Freidenreich; T. G Arner; R Ichard G. Gudgel; Saac M. Held; Richard S. Hemler; L Arry W. H Orowitz; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Paul J. Kushner; Amy R. Langenhost; Ngar-Cheung Lau; Zhi Liang; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Mary Jo Nath; J. Ploshay; Elena Shevliakova; Joseph J. Sirutis; Rian J. Soden; W Illiam F. S Tern; Lori A. Thompson; R. John Wilson; Andrew T. W Ittenberg

The configuration and performance of a new global atmosphere and land model for climate research developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) are presented. The atmosphere model, known as AM2, includes a new gridpoint dynamical core, a prognostic cloud scheme, and a multispecies aerosol climatology, as well as components from previous models used at GFDL. The land model, known as LM2, includes soil sensible and latent heat storage, groundwater storage, and stomatal resistance. The performance of the coupled model AM2‐LM2 is evaluated with a series of prescribed sea surface temperature (SST) simulations. Particular


Journal of Climate | 2011

The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3

Leo J. Donner; Bruce Wyman; Richard S. Hemler; Larry W. Horowitz; Yi Ming; Ming Zhao; Jean-Christophe Golaz; Paul Ginoux; Shian-Jiann Lin; M. Daniel Schwarzkopf; John Austin; Ghassan Alaka; William F. Cooke; Thomas L. Delworth; Stuart M. Freidenreich; Charles T. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Isaac M. Held; William J. Hurlin; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Amy R. Langenhorst; Hyun-Chul Lee; Yanluan Lin; Brian I. Magi; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Vaishali Naik; Mary Jo Nath; Robert Pincus

AbstractThe Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) has developed a coupled general circulation model (CM3) for the atmosphere, oceans, land, and sea ice. The goal of CM3 is to address emerging issues in climate change, including aerosol–cloud interactions, chemistry–climate interactions, and coupling between the troposphere and stratosphere. The model is also designed to serve as the physical system component of earth system models and models for decadal prediction in the near-term future—for example, through improved simulations in tropical land precipitation relative to earlier-generation GFDL models. This paper describes the dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component (AM3) of this model. Relative to GFDL AM2, AM3 includes new treatments of deep and shallow cumulus convection, cloud droplet activation by aerosols, subgrid variability of stratiform vertical velocities for droplet activation, and atmospheric chemistry driven by emiss...


Journal of Climate | 2012

GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

John P. Dunne; Jasmin G. John; Alistair J. Adcroft; Stephen M. Griffies; Robert Hallberg; Elena Shevliakova; Ronald J. Stouffer; William F. Cooke; Krista A. Dunne; Matthew J. Harrison; John P. Krasting; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Peter J. Phillipps; Lori T. Sentman; Bonita L. Samuels; Michael J. Spelman; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Niki Zadeh

AbstractThe authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon–climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences...


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2006

GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview

Randal D. Koster; Y. C. Sud; Zhichang Guo; Paul A. Dirmeyer; Gordon B. Bonan; Keith W. Oleson; Edmond Chan; Diana Verseghy; Peter M. Cox; Harvey Davies; Eva Kowalczyk; C. T. Gordon; Shinjiro Kanae; David M. Lawrence; Ping Liu; David Mocko; Cheng-Hsuan Lu; K. L. Mitchell; Sergey Malyshev; B. J. McAvaney; Taikan Oki; Tomohito J. Yamada; A. J. Pitman; Christopher M. Taylor; Ratko Vasic; Yongkang Xue

Abstract The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) is a model intercomparison study focusing on a typically neglected yet critical element of numerical weather and climate modeling: land–atmosphere coupling strength, or the degree to which anomalies in land surface state (e.g., soil moisture) can affect rainfall generation and other atmospheric processes. The 12 AGCM groups participating in GLACE performed a series of simple numerical experiments that allow the objective quantification of this element for boreal summer. The derived coupling strengths vary widely. Some similarity, however, is found in the spatial patterns generated by the models, with enough similarity to pinpoint multimodel “hot spots” of land–atmosphere coupling. For boreal summer, such hot spots for precipitation and temperature are found over large regions of Africa, central North America, and India; a hot spot for temperature is also found over eastern China. The design of the GLACE simulations are described in full detai...


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2011

The Second Phase of the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment: Soil Moisture Contributions to Subseasonal Forecast Skill

Randal D. Koster; S. P. P. Mahanama; Tomohito J. Yamada; Gianpaolo Balsamo; Aaron A. Berg; M. Boisserie; Paul A. Dirmeyer; Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes; G. B. Drewitt; C. T. Gordon; Z. Guo; Jee-Hoon Jeong; W.-S. Lee; Z. Li; Lifeng Luo; Sergey Malyshev; William J. Merryfield; Sonia I. Seneviratne; Tanja Stanelle; B. J. J. M. van den Hurk; F. Vitart; Eric F. Wood

AbstractThe second phase of the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE-2) is a multi-institutional numerical modeling experiment focused on quantifying, for boreal summer, the subseasonal (out to two months) forecast skill for precipitation and air temperature that can be derived from the realistic initialization of land surface states, notably soil moisture. An overview of the experiment and model behavior at the global scale is described here, along with a determination and characterization of multimodel “consensus” skill. The models show modest but significant skill in predicting air temperatures, especially where the rain gauge network is dense. Given that precipitation is the chief driver of soil moisture, and thereby assuming that rain gauge density is a reasonable proxy for the adequacy of the observational network contributing to soil moisture initialization, this result indeed highlights the potential contribution of enhanced observations to prediction. Land-derived precipitation forec...


Geophysical Research Letters | 2006

Diagnosis of the summertime warm and dry bias over the U.S. Southern Great Plains in the GFDL climate model using a weather forecasting approach

Stephen A. Klein; Xianan Jiang; James S. Boyle; Sergey Malyshev; Shaocheng Xie

Weather forecasts started from realistic initial conditions are used to diagnose the large warm and dry bias over the United States Southern Great Plains simulated by the GFDL climate model. The forecasts exhibit biases in surface air temperature and precipitation within 3 days which appear to be similar to the climate bias. With the model simulating realistic evaporation but underestimated precipitation, a deficit in soil moisture results which amplifies the initial temperature bias through feedbacks with the land surface. The underestimate of precipitation is associated with an inability of the model to simulate the eastward propagation of convection from the front-range of the Rocky Mountains and is insensitive to an increase of horizontal resolution from 2{sup o} to 0.5{sup o} latitude.


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2014

An enhanced model of land water and energy for global hydrologic and earth-system studies

P. C. D. Milly; Sergey Malyshev; Elena Shevliakova; Krista A. Dunne; Kirsten L. Findell; Tom Gleeson; Zhi Liang; Peter J. Phillipps; Ronald J. Stouffer; Sean Claude Swenson

AbstractLM3 is a new model of terrestrial water, energy, and carbon, intended for use in global hydrologic analyses and as a component of earth-system and physical-climate models. It is designed to improve upon the performance and to extend the scope of the predecessor Land Dynamics (LaD) and LM3V models by better quantifying the physical controls of climate and biogeochemistry and by relating more directly to components of the global water system that touch human concerns. LM3 includes multilayer representations of temperature, liquid water content, and ice content of both snowpack and macroporous soil–bedrock; topography-based description of saturated area and groundwater discharge; and transport of runoff to the ocean via a global river and lake network. Sensible heat transport by water mass is accounted throughout for a complete energy balance. Carbon and vegetation dynamics and biophysics are represented as in LM3V. In numerical experiments, LM3 avoids some of the limitations of the LaD model and pro...


Journal of Climate | 2015

Interannual Coupling between Summertime Surface Temperature and Precipitation over Land: Processes and Implications for Climate Change*

Alexis Berg; Benjamin R. Lintner; Kristen Findell; Sonia I. Seneviratne; Bart van den Hurk; Agnès Ducharne; F. Cheruy; Stefan Hagemann; David M. Lawrence; Sergey Malyshev; Arndt Meier; Pierre Gentine

Widespread negative correlations between summertime-mean temperatures and precipitation over land regions are a well-known feature of terrestrial climate. This behavior has generally been interpreted in the context of soil moisture atmosphere coupling, with soil moisture deficits associated with reduced rainfall leading to enhanced surface sensible heating and higher surface temperature. The present study revisits the genesis of these negative temperature precipitation correlations using simulations from the Global Land Atmosphere Coupling Experiment phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (GLACE-CMIP5) multimodel experiment. The analyses are based on simulations with five climate models, which were integrated with prescribed (noninteractive) and with interactive soil moisture over the period 1950-2100. While the results presented here generally confirm the interpretation that negative correlations between seasonal temperature and precipitation arise through the direct control of soil moisture on surface heat flux partitioning, the presence of widespread negative correlations when soil moisture atmosphere interactions are artificially removed in at least two out of five models suggests that atmospheric processes, in addition to land surface processes, contribute to the observed negative temperature precipitation correlation. On longer time scales, the negative correlation between precipitation and temperature is shown to have implications for the projection of climate change impacts on near-surface climate: in all models, in the regions of strongest temperature precipitation anticorrelation on interannual time scales, long-term regional warming is modulated to a large extent by the regional response of precipitation to climate change, with precipitation increases (decreases) being associated with minimum (maximum) warming. This correspondence appears to arise largely as the result of soil moisture atmosphere interactions.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake

Elena Shevliakova; Ronald J. Stouffer; Sergey Malyshev; John P. Krasting; George C. Hurtt; Stephen W. Pacala

Significance This article provides estimates of the climate benefits due to CO2 fertilization of the terrestrial biosphere. Without these benefits, the atmospheric CO2 concentration would have risen by ∼200 ppm since the preindustrial period instead of the observed ∼115 ppm (an 80% increase), and the global climate would have warmed by an additional 0.31 ± 0.06 °C (a 40% increase). These findings were obtained with a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2G. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of enhanced vegetation growth under future elevated atmospheric CO2 for 21st century climate warming. Surprisingly no study has completed an analogous assessment for the historical period, during which emissions of greenhouse gases increased rapidly and land-use changes (LUC) dramatically altered terrestrial carbon sources and sinks. Using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2G and a reconstruction of the LUC, we estimate that enhanced vegetation growth has lowered the historical atmospheric CO2 concentration by 85 ppm, avoiding an additional 0.31 ± 0.06 °C warming. We demonstrate that without enhanced vegetation growth the total residual terrestrial carbon flux (i.e., the net land flux minus LUC flux) would be a source of 65–82 Gt of carbon (GtC) to atmosphere instead of the historical residual carbon sink of 186–192 GtC, a carbon saving of 251–274 GtC.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sergey Malyshev's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. C. D. Milly

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald J. Stouffer

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. T. Gordon

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Lawrence

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kirsten L. Findell

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randal D. Koster

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge