Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Seth P. Epstein is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Seth P. Epstein.


The Lancet | 2005

Age-related cataract

Penny A. Asbell; Ivo Dualan; Joel S. Mindel; Dan Brocks; Mehdi Ahmad; Seth P. Epstein

Cataract, opacification of the lens, is one of the commonest causes of loss of useful vision, with an estimated 16 million people worldwide affected. Several risk factors have been identified in addition to increasing age--genetic composition, exposure to ultraviolet light, and diabetes. However, no method to halt the formation of a cataractous lens has been shown to be effective. Nevertheless, advances in surgical removal of cataracts, including small-incision surgery, use of viscoelastics, and the development of intraocular lenses, have made treatment very effective and visual recovery rapid in most cases. Despite these advances, cataract continues to be a leading public-health issue that will grow in importance as the population increases and life expectancy is extended worldwide.


Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics | 2009

Comparative Toxicity of Preservatives on Immortalized Corneal and Conjunctival Epithelial Cells

Seth P. Epstein; Michael Ahdoot; Edward Marcus; Penny A. Asbell

PURPOSE Nearly all eye drops contain preservatives to decrease contamination. Nonpreservatives such as disodium-ethylene diamine tetra-acetate (EDTA) and phosphate-buffered saline are also regularly added as buffering agents. These components can add to the toxicity of eye drops and cause ocular surface disease. To evaluate the potential toxicity of these common components and their comparative effects on the ocular surface, a tissue culture model utilizing immortalized corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells was utilized. METHODS Immortalized human conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells were grown. At confluency, medium was replaced with 100 microL of varying concentrations of preservatives: benzalkonium chloride (BAK), methyl paraben (MP), sodium perborate (SP), chlorobutanol (Cbl), and stabilized thimerosal (Thi); varying concentrations of buffer: EDTA; media (viable control); and formalin (dead control). After 1 h, solutions were replaced with 150 microL of MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazonium bromide). After 4 h, solutions decanted, 100 microL of acid isopropanol added, and the optical density determined at 572 nm to evaluate cell viability. RESULTS Conjunctival and corneal cell toxicity was seen with all preservatives. Depending upon concentration, BAK exhibited from 56% to 89% toxicity. In comparison, Cbl exhibited from 50% to 86%, MP from 30% to 76%, SP from 23% to 59%, and Thi from 70% to 95%. EDTA with minimal toxicity (from 6% to 59%) was indistinguishable from SP. CONCLUSIONS Generally, the order of decreasing toxicity at the most commonly used concentrations: Thi (0.0025%) > BAK (0.025%) > Cbl (0.25%) > MP (0.01%) > SP (0.0025%) approximately EDTA (0.01%). Even at low concentration, these agents will cause some degree of ocular tissue damage.


Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics | 2009

Evaluation of biomarkers of inflammation in response to benzalkonium chloride on corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.

Seth P. Epstein; D. Chen; Penny A. Asbell

PURPOSE Most eye drops contain preservatives; benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is most common. Recent data demonstrated BAK adding to toxicity. BAK is degraded into hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), which in even small amounts is known to be an irritant. Increased toxicity should cause localized inflammation with increased elaboration of inflammatory biomarkers. To evaluate the inflammation BAK causes to the ocular surface, enzyme linked immunosorbant assays (ELISAs) were utilized to quantify the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in response to BAK and/or H(2)O(2). METHODS Immortalized human conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells were exposed to: BAK (0.001%-0.1%), hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) (0.01%-0.1%), and cell media for 1 h. Cytokine quantification was performed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [ELISAs]). Additional experimentation was performed in which testing solutions were replaced with media after 1 h and the resulting supernatants quantified after 24 h. RESULTS BAK induced significant amounts of interleukin (IL-) 1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), but only moderate amounts of C-reactive protein (CRP), IL- 10 and 12, and H(2)O(2). Lower concentrations of BAK induced proportionally less elaboration. Replacing the test solutions with media and providing 23 h for cytokine elaboration significantly increased TNF, but not IL-1. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) positive controls induced substantial elaboration/release of both IL-1 and TNF as did in increasing the exposure to the full 24 h. CONCLUSIONS After 1 h of exposure, BAK increased quantities of all biomarkers. The biomarkers in decreasing order of induction/upregulation were: TNF > or = IL-1 > or = IL-12 > or = IL-10 > or = CRP. Even low concentrations caused some degree of inflammation. Replacing the testing solution with media and providing 23 h for cytokine elaboration, significantly increased the elaboration/release of TNF, but not IL-1, as compared to the 1-h BAK exposure. Whereas increasing the exposure to the full 24 h by not removing the testing solution at the 1-h time point significantly increased the elaboration/release of both IL-1 and TNF.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2013

Tear cytokine profile as a noninvasive biomarker of inflammation for ocular surface diseases: standard operating procedures.

Yi Wei; Neha Gadaria-Rathod; Seth P. Epstein; Penny A. Asbell

PURPOSE To provide standard operating procedures (SOPs) for measuring tear inflammatory cytokine concentrations and to validate the resulting profile as a minimally invasive objective metric and biomarker of ocular surface inflammation for use in multicenter clinical trials on dry eye disease (DED). METHODS Standard operating procedures were established and then validated with cytokine standards, quality controls, and masked tear samples collected from local and distant clinical sites. The concentrations of the inflammatory cytokines in tears were quantified using a high-sensitivity human cytokine multiplex kit. RESULTS A panel of inflammatory cytokines was initially investigated, from which four key inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, INF-γ, and TNF-α) were chosen. Results with cytokine standards statistically satisfied the manufacturers quality control criteria. Results with pooled tear samples were highly reproducible and reliable with tear volumes ranging from 4 to 10 μL. Incorporation of the SOPs into clinical trials was subsequently validated. Tear samples were collected at a distant clinical site, stored, and shipped to our Biomarker Laboratory, where a masked analysis of the four tear cytokines was successfully performed. Tear samples were also collected from a feasibility study on DED. Inflammatory cytokine concentrations were decreased in tears of subjects who received anti-inflammatory treatment. CONCLUSIONS Standard operating procedures for human tear cytokine assessment suitable for multicenter clinical trials were established. Tear cytokine profiling using these SOPs may provide objective metrics useful for diagnosing, classifying, and analyzing treatment efficacy in inflammatory conditions of the ocular surface, which may further elucidate the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ocular surface disease.


Experimental Eye Research | 2013

HLA-DR EXPRESSION AS A BIOMARKER OF INFLAMMATION FOR MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIALS OF OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE

Seth P. Epstein; Neha Gadaria-Rathod; Yi Wei; Maureen G. Maguire; Penny A. Asbell

There are currently no validated minimally invasive objective metrics for the classification and evaluation of ocular surface diseases and/or for evaluating treatment efficacy. We thus sought to establish a standardized methodology for determining the relative amount of the inflammatory biomarker HLA-DR on the ocular surface and to evaluate the precision, reliability and repeatability of its use for large multicenter clinical trials and translational research studies of ocular surface disease. Multiple studies were conducted to establish a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for utilizing HLA-DR expression as a minimally invasive, objective, ocular surface inflammatory biomarker. The established SOPs provide specific guidelines for HLA-DR collection and analysis, in order to incorporate it reliably into multicenter clinical trials and/or translational research. Duplicate cell samples from impression cytology (IC) samples of both normal and dry eye individuals were collected and split to assess repeatability (between the splits and between the duplicate samples). To determine storage capability, one duplicate was stained immediately and the other after 30 days cold storage. To demonstrate the feasibility of the use of the SOP for a multicenter clinical trial, clinicians out-of-state were trained to collect IC samples, and the samples shipped to our Biomarker Laboratory, logged, processed and analyzed. Demonstration of the ability to incorporate of IC into a randomized double masked clinical trial of dry eye disease (DED) was performed. In all cases, processing and analyses were performed by a masked independent observer. The validity/viability of the SOPs was established by demonstrating that: 1) sufficient numbers of cells can be collected via IC; 2) the precision/repeatability of the relative biomarker expression quantified in samples; 3) personnel at distant sites can be taught to collect, store and ship samples successfully; 4) samples can be stored for up to 30 days (refrigeration) before processing without affecting results; 5) IC can be incorporated into a double blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) of DED; and 6) the Biomarker Laboratory can track a large number of masked samples reliably. In conclusion, our standard operating procedure for impression cytology analysis of HLA-DR expression appears to be repeatable and reproducible for use in multicenter clinical trials, providing a minimally invasive objective biomarker of inflammation of the ocular surface.


Cornea | 2008

Evaluation of toxicity of commercial ophthalmic fluoroquinolone antibiotics as assessed on immortalized corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.

Alejandro Babayan Sosa; Seth P. Epstein; Penny A. Asbell

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity of a variety of the fluoroquinolone antibiotics on the ocular surface by using tissue culture models of corneal epithelial cells and conjunctival epithelial cells. Methods: Immortalized conjunctival (CCC) and human corneal (HCE) epithelial cells were grown and when confluent the cells allowed to air dry for 1 hour. Medium was then replaced with 100 μL of one of the following: 1) Vigamox [moxifloxacin (0.5%: MX)]; (2) Zymar [gatifloxacin (0.3%: GA)]; 3) Quixin [levofloxacin (0.5%: LE)]; 4) Ocuflox [ofloxacin (0.3%: OF)]; 5) Ciloxan [ciprofloxacin (0.3%: CP)]; 6) medium (viable control); 7) “normal”/physiologic saline; 8) formalin (dead control). After one hour, 150 μL of MTT (3--[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazonium bromide was added and incubated for 4 hours. After decanting, precipitate was dissolved in 150 μL of isopropanol. Absorbance was determined at 572 nm. Results: The lowest amount of cell death was associated with the viable control. All ophthalmic preparations showed both corneal and conjunctival cell toxicity. Aside from the viable control, normal saline showed the next lowest amount of toxicity. Of the topical ocular antibiotics tested, MX showed the least amount of toxicity. All of the other antibiotics tested were statistically indistinguishable from each other. Conclusions: All of the topical ocular antibiotics tested showed evidence of both corneal and conjunctival toxicity (MX < OF ≤ LE ≤ CP ≤ GA), although only MX was statistically significant. Whether this finding reflects on in vivo wound healing remains to be determined. This model provides a rapid and cost-effective method to screen for surface toxicity of topical agents.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011

sPLA2-IIa Amplifies Ocular Surface Inflammation in the Experimental Dry Eye (DE) BALB/c Mouse Model

Yi Wei; Seth P. Epstein; Shima Fukuoka; Neil Birmingham; Xiu-Min Li; Penny A. Asbell

PURPOSE sPLA2-IIa is a biomarker for many inflammatory diseases in humans and is found at high levels in human tears. However, its role in ocular surface inflammation remains unclear. An experimentally induced BALB/c mouse dry eye (DE) model was used to elucidate the role of sPLA2-IIa in ocular surface inflammation. METHODS BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with scopolamine and placed in a daytime air-drying device for 5 to 10 days. Control mice received no treatment. DE status was evaluated with tear production with a phenol-red thread method. Tear inflammatory cytokines were quantified by multiplex immunoassays. Ocular surface inflammation and sPLA2-IIa expression were examined by immune-staining and quantitative (q)RT(2)-PCR. Conjunctiva (CNJ) of the mice was cultured for prostaglandin E2 production induced by sPLA2-IIa with various amount of sPLA2-IIa inhibitor, S-3319. RESULTS Treated mice produced fewer tears and heavier corneal (CN) fluorescein staining than the untreated controls (P < 0.001). They also revealed lower goblet cell density (P < 0.001) with greater inflammatory cell infiltration within the conjunctiva, and higher concentration of tear inflammatory cytokines than the controls. Moreover, treated mice showed heavier sPLA2-IIa immune staining than the controls in the CNJ epithelium, but not in the CN epithelium or the lacrimal gland. Treated mice exhibited upregulated sPLA2-IIa and cytokine gene transcription. Furthermore, CNJ cultures treated with sPLA2-IIa inhibitor showed significantly reduced sPLA2-IIa-induced inflammation. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report regarding sPLA2-IIa in the regulation of ocular surface inflammation. The findings may therefore lead to new therapeutic strategies for ocular surface inflammation, such as DE disease.


Eye & Contact Lens-science and Clinical Practice | 2006

Susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of pseudomonas aeruginosa to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin as a guide to treating pseudomonas ocular infections.

Seth P. Epstein; Edward J. Bottone; Penny A. Asbell

Purpose. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ocular infections most frequently originate from an environmental source; successful treatment with various ocular antibiotics is well established. However, emergence of resistant clones to available antibiotics poses a real threat to successful treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibilities of 100 random clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin, potential agents for the treatment of ocular infections caused by this microorganism. Methods. One hundred consecutive strains of P. aeruginosa were isolated from clinical specimens submitted to the clinical microbiology hospital laboratory. Duplicate isolates were not included. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these isolates were determined by using Etests, performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains of Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus served as reference controls. Results. Although most isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin and the MICs were not significantly different, significant numbers were resistant. The standardized controls rendered expected MICs. The susceptibility of the isolates varied with regard to source, and resistant strains showed increased resistance. Conclusions. Based on the data, the treatment of ocular infections caused by P. aeruginosa with levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin still has a high likelihood of success. However, six of the isolates collected were resistant to all three of the fluoroquinolones tested. Based on the data, clinicians must be aware that clinical resistance can occur even with the newer fluoroquinolones.


Clinical Ophthalmology | 2015

Modulation of HLA-DR in dry eye patients following 30 days of treatment with a lubricant eyedrop solution

Karen Fernandez; Seth P. Epstein; Geoffrey S Raynor; Alan T Sheyman; M. L. Massingale; Peter G. Dentone; Lukas D. Landegger; Penny A. Asbell

Purpose To determine the changes in dry eye disease (DED) severity and the percentage of cells expressing HLA-DR on the ocular surface following treatment with lubricant eyedrops containing polyethylene glycol and propylene glycol (PEG/PG) and the gelling agent hydroxypropyl guar (HP-Guar). Patients and methods Nineteen patients with DED used PEG/PG + HP-Guar eyedrops four times per day for 30 days. Assessments included DED severity (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], corneal staining, conjunctival staining, tear film break-up time [TFBUT], and Schirmer testing) and impression cytology of the conjunctiva with masked flow cytometry at baseline and at 30 days. Results There was a significant decrease in corneal staining (P<0.01), OSDI (P=0.02), and TFBUT (P<0.01) following treatment with PEG/PG + HP-Guar. Results from flow cytometry revealed a significant decrease in cells expressing HLA-DR (P=0.02). Conclusion Treatment with PEG/PG + HP-Guar eyedrops showed improvement in dry eye severity and reduction in surface inflammation as indicated by a reduction in HLA-DR expression.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2012

Isoforms of Secretory Group Two Phospholipase A (sPLA2) in Mouse Ocular Surface Epithelia and Lacrimal Glands

Yi Wei; Alexander Pinhas; Ying Liu; Seth P. Epstein; Ju Wang; Penny A. Asbell

PURPOSE To compare and contrast the distribution patterns of select secretory group two phospholipase A (sPLA2) isoforms in corneal epithelia (CN), conjunctival epithelia (CNJ), and lacrimal glands (LG) of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. METHODS Gene expression of select sPLA2 isoforms was quantified via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT(2)-PCR). Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) of the sPLA2-IIa, -V, and -X isoforms were used to confirm qRT(2)-PCR results. sPLA2-IIa function was confirmed via in vitro CN and CNJ culturing. RESULTS qRT(2)-PCR revealed that sPLA2 isoforms (pla2g5, 12a, and 12b), cPLA2 isoform (pla2g4a), iPLA2 isoform (pla2g6), and PLA2-receptor (pla2r1) were present in all tissues of both strains, whereas sPLA2 isoforms (pla2g1b, 2e, and 3) were absent. sPLA2 isoforms (pla2g2a, 2d, 2f, and 10) showed tissue- and strain-specific expression: 2a in BALB/c CNJ only; 2d at higher levels in CNJ than LG; and 2f and 10 in CN and CNJ, but absent in LG. Upon dry eye (DE) induction, pla2g2a, 2d, and 2f were upregulated in BALB/c CNJ, and 10 was absent from CN. Furthermore, BALB/c DE mice showed upregulation of pla2r1 in CN and CNJ and downregulation of 12a and 12b in LG. IFA of sPLA2-IIa, -V, and -X in DE CNJ confirmed the upregulation of pla2g2a, 5, and 10. Last, in vitro CN and CNJ culturing confirmed that sPLA2-IIa amplifies ocular surface inflammation in CNJ but not in CN. CONCLUSIONS sPLA2 isoforms exhibit differential expression patterns when comparing BALB/c with C57BL/6 mice; and DE with control BALB/c mice. These findings suggest that at least some sPLA2 isoforms must have significant roles in ocular surface physiology and inflammation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Seth P. Epstein's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Penny A. Asbell

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yi Wei

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Chen

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. L. Massingale

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neha Gadaria-Rathod

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter G. Dentone

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. M. Wolosin

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Vallabhajosyula

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Pinhas

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge