Seth P. Harlow

Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND Sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) surgery was designed to minimise the side-effects of lymph-node surgery but still offer outcomes equivalent to axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND). The aims of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B-32 were to establish whether SLN resection in patients with breast cancer achieves the same survival and regional control as ALND, but with fewer side-effects. METHODS NSABP B-32 was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at 80 centres in Canada and the USA between May 1, 1999, and Feb 29, 2004. Women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either SLN resection plus ALND (group 1) or to SLN resection alone with ALND only if the SLNs were positive (group 2). Random assignment was done at the NSABP Biostatistical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a biased coin minimisation approach in an allocation ratio of 1:1. Stratification variables were age at entry (≤ 49 years, ≥ 50 years), clinical tumour size (≤ 2·0 cm, 2·1-4·0 cm, ≥ 4·1 cm), and surgical plan (lumpectomy, mastectomy). SLN resection was done with a blue dye and radioactive tracer. Outcome analyses were done in patients who were assessed as having pathologically negative sentinel nodes and for whom follow-up data were available. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. All deaths, irrespective of cause, were included. The mean time on study for the SLN-negative patients with follow-up information was 95·6 months (range 70·1-126·7). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00003830. FINDINGS 5611 women were randomly assigned to the treatment groups, 3989 had pathologically negative SLN. 309 deaths were reported in the 3986 SLN-negative patients with follow-up information: 140 of 1975 patients in group 1 and 169 of 2011 in group 2. Log-rank comparison of overall survival in groups 1 and 2 yielded an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1·20 (95% CI 0·96-1·50; p=0·12). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 91·8% (95% CI 90·4-93·3) in group 1 and 90·3% (88·8-91·8) in group 2. Treatment comparisons for disease-free survival yielded an unadjusted HR of 1·05 (95% CI 0·90-1·22; p=0·54). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free survival were 82·4% (80·5-84·4) in group 1 and 81·5% (79·6-83·4) in group 2. There were eight regional-node recurrences as first events in group 1 and 14 in group 2 (p=0·22). Patients are continuing follow-up for longer-term assessment of survival and regional control. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions, mostly related to the administration of the blue dye. INTERPRETATION Overall survival, disease-free survival, and regional control were statistically equivalent between groups. When the SLN is negative, SLN surgery alone with no further ALND is an appropriate, safe, and effective therapy for breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes. FUNDING US Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, and Department of Health and Human Services.

Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial

BACKGROUND The goals of axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND) are to maximise survival, provide regional control, and stage the patient. However, this technique has substantial side-effects. The purpose of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same therapeutic goals as conventional ALND but with decreased side-effects. The aim of this paper is to report the technical success and accuracy of SLN resection plus ALND versus SLN resection alone. METHODS 5611 women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either SLN resection followed by immediate conventional ALND (n=2807; group 1) or SLN resection without ALND if SLNs were negative on intraoperative cytology and histological examination (n=2804; group 2) in the B-32 trial. Patients in group 2 underwent ALND if no SLNs were identified or if one or more SLNs were positive on intraoperative cytology or subsequent histological examination. Primary endpoints, including survival, regional control, and morbidity, will be reported later. Secondary endpoints are accuracy and technical success and are reported here. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial registry, number NCT00003830. FINDINGS Data for technical success were available for 5536 of 5611 patients; 75 declined protocol treatment, had no SLNs removed, or had no SLN resection done. SLNs were successfully removed in 97.2% of patients (5379 of 5536) in both groups combined. Identification of a preincision hot spot was associated with greater SLN removal (98.9% [5072 of 5128]). Only 1.4% (189 of 13171) of SLN specimens were outside of axillary levels I and II. 65.1% (8571 of 13 171) of SLN specimens were both radioactive and blue; a small percentage was identified by palpation only (3.9% [515 of 13 171]). The overall accuracy of SLN resection in patients in group 1 was 97.1% (2544 of 2619; 95% CI 96.4-97.7), with a false-negative rate of 9.8% (75 of 766; 95% CI 7.8-12.2). Differences in tumour location, type of biopsy, and number of SLNs removed significantly affected the false-negative rate. Allergic reactions related to blue dye occurred in 0.7% (37 of 5588) of patients with data on toxic effects. INTERPRETATION The findings reported here indicate excellent balance in clinical patient characteristics between the two randomised groups and that the success of SLN resection was high. These findings are important because the B-32 trial is the only trial of sufficient size to provide definitive information related to the primary outcome measures of survival and regional control. Removal of more than one SLN and avoidance of excisional biopsy are important variables in reducing the false-negative rate.

Effect of Occult Metastases on Survival in Node-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Retrospective and observational analyses suggest that occult lymph-node metastases are an important prognostic factor for disease recurrence or survival among patients with breast cancer. Prospective data on clinical outcomes from randomized trials according to sentinel-node involvement have been lacking. METHODS We randomly assigned women with breast cancer to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy plus axillary dissection or sentinel-lymph-node biopsy alone. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of sentinel lymph nodes obtained from patients with pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes were centrally evaluated for occult metastases deeper in the blocks. Both routine staining and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin were used at two widely spaced additional tissue levels. Treating physicians were unaware of the findings, which were not used for clinical treatment decisions. The initial evaluation at participating sites was designed to detect all macrometastases larger than 2 mm in the greatest dimension. RESULTS Occult metastases were detected in 15.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 17.1) of 3887 patients. Log-rank tests indicated a significant difference between patients in whom occult metastases were detected and those in whom no occult metastases were detected with respect to overall survival (P=0.03), disease-free survival (P=0.02), and distant-disease-free interval (P=0.04). The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios for death, any outcome event, and distant disease were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.86), 1.31 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.60), and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.66), respectively. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival among patients in whom occult metastases were detected and those without detectable metastases were 94.6% and 95.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Occult metastases were an independent prognostic variable in patients with sentinel nodes that were negative on initial examination; however, the magnitude of the difference in outcome at 5 years was small (1.2 percentage points). These data do not indicate a clinical benefit of additional evaluation, including immunohistochemical analysis, of initially negative sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003830.).

Morbidity results from the NSABP B‐32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissection versus axillary dissection

Three year post‐surgical morbidity levels were compared between patients with negative sentinel lymph node dissection alone (SLND) and those with negative sentinel node dissection and negative axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the NSABP B‐32 trial.

Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND This report describes a technique of intraoperative tumor localization by ultrasound without the use of a needle or wire to guide the excision of nonpalpable breast cancers. The results of our experience with pathologic margin status are reviewed. STUDY DESIGN From 1994 to 1998, 65 breast cancers in 62 patients with biopsy-proved nonpalpable breast cancer were excised using intraoperative ultrasound localization. The pathologic status of the margins from the initial surgical excision specimen and any further excisions, either at the first operation or later procedures, was recorded. The distance from the tumor to the closest margin of excision was also determined. RESULTS The overall success in achieving pathologically negative excision margins at first operation was 97% (63 of 65 cancers). Three patients underwent a second operative procedure, two for positive margins and one for a margin less than 1 mm (second operation = 4.8% of patients). After completion of the first operative procedure, the mean distance to the closest margin of excision was 0.8 cm. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative ultrasound localization for excision of nonpalpable breast cancers is feasible and gives results, in terms of pathologic margins, that are comparable with those achieved by standard needle-wire-guided excisions.

NSABP-32: Phase III, randomized trial comparing axillary resection with sentinal lymph node dissection: A description of the trial

The NSABP-32 trial is a randomized, phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node (SN) resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. The primary aims of the trial are to determine if removal of only SNs provides survival and regional control equivalent to those of axillary dissection, while diminishing the magnitude of surgically related side effects. In order to ensure consistency of the outcomes for this trial, a standardized method of SN surgery has been utilized for all cases. A secondary aim of the B32 trial is to evaluate whether patients with “occult” metastases in the SNs have worse survival. Accrual is taking place at 73 institutions in North America, and 217 surgeons are enrolling patients.

Prerandomization Surgical Training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 Trial: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial to Compare Sentinel Node Resection to Conventional Axillary Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Objective:To train surgeons in a standardized technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy and to prepare them for the requirements of a prospective randomized surgical trial. Summary Background Data:The NSABP B32 trial opened to accrual in May 1999. A significant component of this trial was a prerandomization training phase of surgeons performed by a group of core surgical trainers. The goals of this training phase were to expeditiously instruct surgeons in a standardized technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy and to educate those same surgeons in complete and accurate data collection and source documentation for the trial. Methods:This study is a description of the training data collected in a prospective fashion for the training component for surgeon entry into the B32 trial, evaluating the effectiveness of the training program in regards to surgical outcomes and protocol compliance. Results:Two hundred twenty-six registered surgeons underwent site visit training by a core surgical trainer and 187 completed training and were approved to randomize patients on the trial. The results of 815 training (nontrial) cases demonstrated a technical success rate for identifying sentinel nodes at 96.2% with a false negative rate of 6.7%. A protocol compliance analysis, which included the evaluation of 94 separate fields, showed mean protocol compliance of 98.6% for procedural fields, 95.5% for source documentation fields and 95.0% for data entry fields. Conclusions:This training and quality control program has resulted in a large number of surgeons capable of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy in a standardized fashion with a high degree of protocol compliance and pathologic accuracy. This will ensure optimal results for procedures performed on the randomized phase of the trial.

Gamma probe guided biopsy of the sentinel node in malignant melanoma: a multicentre study

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was attempted in 336 patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma. All patients were injected with technetium-99m labelled radio-colloid, with 108 patients simultaneously receiving vital blue dye for sentinel node identification. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 329 patients, giving a technical success rate of 97.9%. Metastatic disease was identified in 39 (11.9%) of the patients in whom sentinel nodes were found. Patients with negative sentinel nodes were observed and patients with positive sentinel nodes underwent comprehensive lymph node dissection. The presence of metastatic disease in the sentinel nodes and primary tumour depth by Breslow or Clark levels were joint predictors of survival based on Cox proportional hazards modelling. Disease recurrences occurred in 26 (8.8%) patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes, with isolated regional recurrences as the first site in 10 (3.4%). No patients with Clark level II primary tumours were found to have positive sentinel nodes or disease recurrences. One patient with a thin (< 0.75 mm) Clark level III primary had metastatic disease in a sentinel node. Patients with metastases confined to the sentinel nodes had similar survival rates regardless of the number of nodes involved

Breast Cancer Cells in the Blood: A Pilot Study

Abstract: The goal of this pilot study was to determine in patients with operable breast cancer the incidence of breast cancer cells present in the blood, the clearance rate after surgical resection of the primary tumor, and the incidence of patients with persistent cancer cells in the blood after the primary tumor was removed. Twenty‐one patients with operable breast cancer had 15 ml venous blood obtained twice prior to surgery and after surgery at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours and also on days 7 and 14. Immunomagnetic selection of malignant cells was performed on each sample. Cells were then fixed on slides and immunocytochemistry performed on the collected cells. Cells that had a rosette of magnetic beads, cytoplasmic staining for keratin, and malignant morphology were counted as breast cancer cells. Eighteen of 19 of patients had cancer cells detected in at least one of the two blood samples preceding surgical removal of the primary tumor. The incidence of cancer cells in the blood of patients rapidly declined during the 48 hours postsurgery. The incidence of cancer cells in the blood remained stable in approximately 30% of patients to 14 days. The majority of breast cancer patients in this pilot study (even with small tumors and negative nodes) had detectable cancer cells in the blood prior to resection of the primary tumor. These findings justify further investigation. Successful application of this methodology may serve as a powerful indicator of which patients need systemic adjuvant therapy, the effectiveness of systemic adjuvant therapy, tumor recurrence, and early detection of breast cancer.

Radiolabeled sentinel node biopsy: collaborative trial with the National Cancer Institute.

The objective of this study was to maximize the success rate of sentinel node (SN) localization in breast cancer patients with the tracer that demonstrated the highest initial success during a preliminary evaluation. Altogether, 145 patients with operable invasive breast cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes were studied. Technetium 99m (99mTc)-sulfur colloid was injected into the breast parenchyma surrounding the invasive cancer or the biopsy cavity. Variable volumes of tracer, amounts of 99mTc, and duration of time between injection and surgery were evaluated. A hand-held gamma detector was used at surgery to locate and guide resection of all radioactive sentinel nodes (SNs), including those that were extraaxillary. A conventional lymphadenectomy was then performed in all cases. Based on previous studies, unfiltered sulfur colloid provided a higher success rate of SN identification than the other tracer types. Further evaluation with 99mTc-sulfur colloid demonstrated that increased volume increased the success rate of SN identification. An injection volume of 8 ml resulted in a success rate of 98%. SNs were not exclusively located in the axilla: In 8.6% of cases SNs were removed from an internal mammary location. The overall accuracy of patients with SNs resected was 98.4%, and the false-negative rate was 4.4%. It was concluded that (1) unfiltered 99mTc-sulfur colloid at a volume of 8 ml resulted in a high success rate for SN identification; (2) a significant number of the SNs were extraaxillary in location; and (3) the accuracy of the SNs for determining whether regional metastases had occurred was high. The U.S. National Cancer Institute is funding a randomized phase III clinical trial to evaluate SN resection compared to conventional axillary lymphadenectomy in clinical node-negative breast cancer patients. Major endpoints of this trial include long-term regional control and survival.