Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sevan Stepanian is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sevan Stepanian.


The Journal of Urology | 2008

Prostate Cancer Severity Among Low Income, Uninsured Men

David C. Miller; Mark S. Litwin; Jonathan Bergman; Sevan Stepanian; Sarah E. Connor; Lorna Kwan; William J. Aronson

PURPOSE The proportion of American men with organ confined, low risk prostate cancer has increased significantly during the last 2 decades. Whether this trend also applies to men at the extremes of socioeconomic disadvantage remains unknown. Therefore, we evaluated trends in prostate cancer severity in an ethnically diverse cohort of low income, uninsured men served by a state funded public health program in California. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of 570 disadvantaged men enrolled in the California program from 2001 through 2006. Using routinely collected clinical variables we defined 2 measures of cancer severity as 1) the proportion of enrollees with metastases at diagnosis and 2) the proportions of men with nonmetastatic tumors whose cancers had low, intermediate or high risk features at diagnosis. We performed bivariate analyses to assess time trends in cancer severity. RESULTS Prostate specific antigen levels at diagnosis exceeded 10 ng/ml for 51% of enrollees, 50% had a Gleason score 7 or greater and 43% had clinical T stage T2 or greater. Of disadvantaged men 19% had metastatic cancer at diagnosis and this proportion remained stable over time (p = 0.66). Among men with nonmetastatic cancers 24% had tumors with low risk features and the proportion of low risk cancers did not increase over time (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS Unlike the broader United States population the proportion of disadvantaged men with organ confined, low risk prostate cancer has not been increasing. Thus, while much attention focuses on potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men with screen detected prostate cancer, our findings suggest that for low income, uninsured men, underdetection and undertreatment remain significant concerns.


European Urology | 2014

Technique and Outcomes of Robot-assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Study

Jim C. Hu; Eric Treat; Christopher P. Filson; Ian D. McLaren; Siwei Xiong; Sevan Stepanian; Khaled S. Hafez; Alon Z. Weizer; James Porter

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RARPN) may be used for posterior renal masses or with prior abdominal surgery; however, there is relatively less familiarity with RARPN. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate RARPN technique and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective multicenter study of 227 consecutive RARPNs was performed at the Swedish Medical Center, the University of Michigan, and the University of California, Los Angeles, from 2006 to 2013. SURGICAL PROCEDURE RARPN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We assessed positive margins and cancer recurrence. Stepwise regression was used to examine factors associated with complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median age was 60 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-66), and the median body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 kg/m(2) (IQR: 25.6-32.6). Median maximum tumor diameter was 2.3 cm (IQR: 1.7-3.1). Median OT and WIT were 165 min (IQR: 134-200) and 19 min (IQR: 16-24), respectively; median EBL was 75 ml (IQR: 50-150), and median LOS was 2 d (IQR: 1-3). Twenty-eight subjects (12.3%) experienced complications, three (1.3%) had urine leaks, and three (1.3%) had pseudoaneurysms that required reintervention. There was one conversion to radical nephrectomy and three transfusions. Overall, 143 clear cell carcinomas (62.6%) composed most of the histology with eight positive margins (3.5%) and two recurrences (0.9%) with a median follow-up of 2.7 yr. In adjusted analyses, intersurgeon variation was associated with complications (odds ratio [OR]: 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-10.27; p = 0.014) and WIT (parameter estimate [PE; plus or minus standard error]: 4.84 ± 2.14; p = 0.025). Higher surgeon volume was associated with shorter WIT (PE: -0.06 ± 0.02; p = 0.002). Higher BMI was associated with longer OT (PE: 2.09 ± 0.56; p < 0.001). Longer OT was associated with longer LOS (PE: 0.01 ± 0.01; p = 0.002). Finally, there was a trend for intersurgeon variation in OT (PE: 18.5 ± 10.3; p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS RARPN has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, despite intersurgeon variation in WIT and complications. Greater experience is associated with shorter WIT. PATIENT SUMMARY Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, and there is intersurgeon variation in warm ischemia time and complications.


European Urology | 2016

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: Evolution of the Technique

Sevan Stepanian; Mayank Patel; James Porter

BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an accepted staging and treatment option for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Robotic surgery offers technical advantages and is being increasingly used in urologic procedures. OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for RPLND. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective review of robotic (R)-RPLND performed by a single surgeon from April 2008 to October 2014 using two approaches was performed. In total, 20 procedures in 19 patients were evaluated. Eleven men had clinical stage (CS) I disease, six had CS II, one of whom had prior chemotherapy, and two had CS III disease and had also undergone previous chemotherapy. SURGICAL PROCEDURE A lateral robotic approach was initially used; however, a supine robotic approach was developed to allow for bilateral dissection in one setting without repositioning. Template dissection with nerve sparing was performed for CS I patients and full bilateral dissection for patients with CS II or higher disease and for those who had active disease according to intraoperative frozen section results. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Mean operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and lymph node count were retrospectively reviewed, as was the presence of recurrence or the need for adjuvant therapy over median follow-up of 49 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 37.4-70.5). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also reviewed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS R-RPLND was performed successfully in 20 procedures in 19 patients; 11 were performed from a lateral approach and nine from a supine approach. The median operating time (available for 19 of 20 cases) was 293min (IQR 257.5-317). Median estimated blood loss and length of stay were 50ml (IQR 50-100) and 1 d (IQR 1-2), respectively. Some 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged after one night. The median lymph node yield was 19.5 (IQR 13.8-27. 3). Eleven patients had pathologic stage I disease, and eight had residual disease on pathology. There was one ureteral transection that was repaired robotically at the time of surgery with no long-term sequelae. There were no open conversions or transfusions. Two patients had ejaculatory dysfunction following bilateral RPLND. There has been no evidence of retroperitoneal disease recurrence during the follow-up period. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the single surgeon experience. CONCLUSIONS R-RPLND can be successfully performed and provides improved visualization and dexterity over conventional laparoscopy. Patients experience significantly reduced morbidity and the nodal yield is comparable to open surgical techniques. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied our experience with robot-assisted removal of lymph nodes from the abdomen among men with testicular cancer. This method was found to be safe and effective with a very short hospital stay.


Cancer Prevention Research | 2014

Effect of a low-fat fish oil diet on proinflammatory eicosanoids and cell-cycle progression score in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Colette Galet; Kiran Gollapudi; Sevan Stepanian; Joshua Bryant Byrd; Susanne M. Henning; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; David Heber; Jonathan W. Said; Pinchas Cohen; William J. Aronson

We previously reported that a 4- to 6-week low-fat fish oil (LFFO) diet did not affect serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels (primary outcome) but resulted in lower omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratios in prostate tissue and lower prostate cancer proliferation (Ki67) as compared with a Western diet. In this post hoc analysis, the effect of the LFFO intervention on serum pro-inflammatory eicosanoids, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and 15-S-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid [15(S)-HETE], and the cell-cycle progression (CCP) score were investigated. Serum fatty acids and eicosanoids were measured by gas chromatography and ELISA. CCP score was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Associations between serum eicosanoids, Ki67, and CCP score were evaluated using partial correlation analyses. BLT1 (LTB4 receptor) expression was determined in prostate cancer cell lines and prostatectomy specimens. Serum omega-6 fatty acids and 15(S)-HETE levels were significantly reduced, and serum omega-3 levels were increased in the LFFO group relative to the Western diet group, whereas there was no change in LTB4 levels. The CCP score was significantly lower in the LFFO compared with the Western diet group. The 15(S)-HETE change correlated with tissue Ki67 (R = 0.48; P < 0.01) but not with CCP score. The LTB4 change correlated with the CCP score (r = 0.4; P = 0.02) but not with Ki67. The LTB4 receptor BLT1 was detected in prostate cancer cell lines and human prostate cancer specimens. In conclusion, an LFFO diet resulted in decreased 15(S)-HETE levels and lower CCP score relative to a Western diet. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the LFFO diet antiproliferative effects are mediated through the LTB4/BLT1 and 15(S)-HETE pathways. Cancer Prev Res; 7(1); 97–104. ©2013 AACR.


The Journal of Urology | 2007

Positive Margins in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in 855 Cases: A Multi-Institutional Survey From the United States and Europe

Alberto Breda; Sevan Stepanian; Joseph C. Liao; John S. Lam; Giorgio Guazzoni; Michael D. Stifelman; Kent T. Perry; A. Celia; G. Breda; Paolo Fornara; Stephen V. Jackman; Antonio Rosales; J. Palou; Michael Grasso; Vincenzo Disanto; Francesco Porpiglia; Claudio Milani; C.C. Abbou; Richard Gaston; G. Janetschek; Naeem Soomro; J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette; M.P. Laguna; Peter G. Schulam


European Urology | 2007

Use of Haemostatic Agents and Glues during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Institutional Survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 Cases

Alberto Breda; Sevan Stepanian; John S. Lam; Joseph C. Liao; Inderbir S. Gill; Jose R. Colombo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Michael D. Stifelman; Kent T. Perry; Antonio Celia; G. Breda; Paolo Fornara; Stephen V. Jackman; Antonio Rosales; J. Palou; Michael Grasso; Vincenzo Pansadoro; Vincenzo Disanto; Francesco Porpiglia; Claudio Milani; Claude C. Abbou; Richard Gaston; Günter Janetschek; Naeem Soomro; Jean de la Rosette; Pilar Laguna; Peter G. Schulam


Journal of Community Health | 2008

Racial Disparities in Access to Care for Men in a Public Assistance Program for Prostate Cancer

David C. Miller; Lillian Gelberg; Lorna Kwan; Sevan Stepanian; Arlene Fink; Ronald Andersen; Mark S. Litwin


Molecular Genetics and Metabolism | 2003

Characterization of the human glycerol kinase promoter: identification of a functional HNF-4α binding site and evidence for transcriptional activation

Sevan Stepanian; Steven T Huyn; Edward R.B. McCabe; Katrina M. Dipple


Criminology | 2016

A formula to estimate water loss in a malnourished patient with ascites: One inch equals one kilogram

Sevan Stepanian; John A. Tayek


The Journal of Urology | 2015

MP57-05 MATCHED PAIR ANALYSIS OF TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS RETROPERITONEAL ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY

Sevan Stepanian; Ashraf Haddad; Jason Kowitz; Cindy J. Fuller; James Porter

Collaboration


Dive into the Sevan Stepanian's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Colette Galet

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Elashoff

City of Hope National Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Heber

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Porter

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pinchas Cohen

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Breda

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge