Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Séverine Sabia is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Séverine Sabia.


JAMA | 2010

Association of Socioeconomic Position With Health Behaviors and Mortality

Silvia Stringhini; Séverine Sabia; Martin J. Shipley; Eric Brunner; Hermann Nabi; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux

CONTEXT Previous studies may have underestimated the contribution of health behaviors to social inequalities in mortality because health behaviors were assessed only at the baseline of the study. OBJECTIVE To examine the role of health behaviors in the association between socioeconomic position and mortality and compare whether their contribution differs when assessed at only 1 point in time with that assessed longitudinally through the follow-up period. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Established in 1985, the British Whitehall II longitudinal cohort study includes 10 308 civil servants, aged 35 to 55 years, living in London, England. Analyses are based on 9590 men and women followed up for mortality until April 30, 2009. Socioeconomic position was derived from civil service employment grade (high, intermediate, and low) at baseline. Smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity were assessed 4 times during the follow-up period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All-cause and cause-specific mortality. RESULTS A total of 654 participants died during the follow-up period. In the analyses adjusted for sex and year of birth, those with the lowest socioeconomic position had 1.60 times higher risk of death from all causes than those with the highest socioeconomic position (a rate difference of 1.94/1000 person-years). This association was attenuated by 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-94%) when health behaviors assessed at baseline were entered into the model and by 72% (95% CI, 42%-154%) when they were entered as time-dependent covariates. The corresponding attenuations were 29% (95% CI, 11%-54%) and 45% (95% CI, 24%-79%) for cardiovascular mortality and 61% (95% CI, 16%-425%) and 94% (95% CI, 35%-595%) for noncancer and noncardiovascular mortality. The difference between the baseline only and repeated assessments of health behaviors was mostly due to an increased explanatory power of diet (from 7% to 17% for all-cause mortality, respectively), physical activity (from 5% to 21% for all-cause mortality), and alcohol consumption (from 3% to 12% for all-cause mortality). The role of smoking, the strongest mediator in these analyses, did not change when using baseline or repeat assessments (from 32% to 35% for all-cause mortality). CONCLUSION In a civil service population in London, England, there was an association between socioeconomic position and mortality that was substantially accounted for by adjustment for health behaviors, particularly when the behaviors were assessed repeatedly.


PLOS Medicine | 2011

Health Behaviours, Socioeconomic Status, and Mortality: Further Analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL Prospective Cohorts

Silvia Stringhini; Aline Dugravot; Martin J. Shipley; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins; Mika Kivimäki; Michael Marmot; Séverine Sabia; Archana Singh-Manoux

Further analysis of data from two prospective cohorts reveals differences in the extent to which health behaviors attenuate associations between socioeconomic position and mortality outcomes.


BMC Geriatrics | 2013

Measures of frailty in population-based studies: an overview

Kim Bouillon; Mika Kivimäki; Mark Hamer; Séverine Sabia; Eleonor Fransson; Archana Singh-Manoux; Catharine R. Gale; G. David Batty

BackgroundAlthough research productivity in the field of frailty has risen exponentially in recent years, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the measurement of this syndrome. This overview offers three services: first, we provide a comprehensive catalogue of current frailty measures; second, we evaluate their reliability and validity; third, we report on their popularity of use.MethodsIn order to identify relevant publications, we searched MEDLINE (from its inception in 1948 to May 2011); scrutinized the reference sections of the retrieved articles; and consulted our own files. An indicator of the frequency of use of each frailty instrument was based on the number of times it had been utilized by investigators other than the originators.ResultsOf the initially retrieved 2,166 papers, 27 original articles described separate frailty scales. The number (range: 1 to 38) and type of items (range of domains: physical functioning, disability, disease, sensory impairment, cognition, nutrition, mood, and social support) included in the frailty instruments varied widely. Reliability and validity had been examined in only 26% (7/27) of the instruments. The predictive validity of these scales for mortality varied: for instance, hazard ratios/odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for mortality risk for frail relative to non-frail people ranged from 1.21 (0.78; 1.87) to 6.03 (3.00; 12.08) for the Phenotype of Frailty and 1.57 (1.41; 1.74) to 10.53 (7.06; 15.70) for the Frailty Index. Among the 150 papers which we found to have used at least one of the 27 frailty instruments, 69% (n = 104) reported on the Phenotype of Frailty, 12% (n = 18) on the Frailty Index, and 19% (n = 28) on one of the remaining 25 instruments.ConclusionsAlthough there are numerous frailty scales currently in use, reliability and validity have rarely been examined. The most evaluated and frequently used measure is the Phenotype of Frailty.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2009

Body mass index over the adult life course and cognition in late midlife: the Whitehall II Cohort Study.

Séverine Sabia; Mika Kivimäki; Martin J. Shipley; Michael Marmot; Archana Singh-Manoux

BACKGROUND The extent to which cognition in late midlife is influenced by lifetime obesity is unclear. OBJECTIVE We examined the association between body mass index (BMI) over the adult life course and cognition in late midlife and assessed the cumulative effects of obesity and underweight. DESIGN Data from the Whitehall II Study were examined. BMI at 25 y (early adulthood) was self-reported at phase 1 and was measured in early midlife (mean age = 44 y; phase 1) and in late midlife (mean age = 61 y; phase 7). Cognition (n = 5131) was assessed in late midlife (phase 7) by using the Mini-Mental State Examination and tests of memory and executive function, all of which were standardized to T scores (mean +/- SD: 50 +/- 10). RESULTS Both underweight and obesity were associated with lower cognition in late midlife and with early adulthood, early midlife, and late midlife measures of BMI. Being obese at 2 or 3 occasions was associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores and scores of memory and executive function in analyses adjusted for age, sex, and education [difference (95% CI) in mean T scores compared with normal-weight group: -1.51 (-2.77, -0.25), -1.27 (-2.46, -0.07), and -1.35 (-2.45, -0.24), respectively]. Participants who were underweight at > or =2 occasions from early adulthood to late midlife had lower executive function [difference (95% CI) in mean T score: -4.57 (-6.94, -2.20)]. A large increase in BMI from early to late midlife was associated with lower executive function. CONCLUSIONS Long-term obesity and long-term underweight in adulthood are associated with lower cognitive scores in late midlife. Public health messages should promote a healthy weight at all ages.


Circulation | 2012

Physical Activity and Inflammatory Markers Over 10 Years Follow-Up in Men and Women From the Whitehall II Cohort Study

Mark Hamer; Séverine Sabia; G. David Batty; Martin J. Shipley; Adam G. Tabak; Archana Singh-Manoux; Mika Kivimäki

Background— Inflammatory processes are putative mechanisms underlying the cardioprotective effects of physical activity. An inverse association between physical activity and inflammation has been demonstrated, but no long-term prospective data are available. We therefore examined the association between physical activity and inflammatory markers over a 10-year follow-up period. Methods and Results— Participants were 4289 men and women (mean age, 49.2 years) from the Whitehall II cohort study. Self-reported physical activity and inflammatory markers (serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6) were measured at baseline (1991) and follow-up (2002). Forty-nine percent of the participants adhered to standard physical activity recommendations for cardiovascular health (2.5 h/wk moderate to vigorous physical activity) across all assessments. Physically active participants at baseline had lower C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels, and this difference remained stable over time. Compared with participants who rarely adhered to physical activity guidelines over the 10-year follow-up, the high-adherence group displayed lower loge C-reactive protein (&bgr;=−0.07; 95% confidence interval, −0.12 to −0.02) and loge interleukin-6 (&bgr;=−0.07; 95% confidence interval, −0.10 to −0.03) at follow-up after adjustment for a range of covariates. Compared with participants who remained stable, those who reported an increase in physical activity of at least 2.5 h/wk displayed lower loge C-reactive protein (&bgr; coefficient=−0.05; 95% confidence interval, −0.10 to −0.001) and loge interleukin-6 (&bgr; coefficient=−0.06; 95% confidence interval, −0.09 to −0.03) at follow-up. Conclusions— Regular physical activity is associated with lower markers of inflammation over 10 years of follow-up and thus may be important in preventing the proinflammatory state seen with aging.


American Journal of Epidemiology | 2012

Job Strain as a Risk Factor for Leisure-Time Physical Inactivity: An Individual-Participant Meta-Analysis of Up to 170,000 Men and Women The IPD-Work Consortium

Eleonor Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Solja T. Nyberg; Marie Zins; Hugo Westerlund; Peter Westerholm; Ari Väänänen; Marianna Virtanen; Jussi Vahtera; Töres Theorell; Sakari Suominen; Archana Singh-Manoux; Johannes Siegrist; Séverine Sabia; Reiner Rugulies; Jaana Pentti; Tuula Oksanen; Maria Nordin; Martin L. Nielsen; Michael Marmot; Linda L. Magnusson Hanson; Idat Eh Madsen; Thorsten Lunau; Constanze Leineweber; Meena Kumari; Anne Kouvonen; Aki Koskinen; Markku Koskenvuo; Anders Knutsson; Karl-Heinze Jöckel

Unfavorable work characteristics, such as low job control and too high or too low job demands, have been suggested to increase the likelihood of physical inactivity during leisure time, but this has not been verified in large-scale studies. The authors combined individual-level data from 14 European cohort studies (baseline years from 1985–1988 to 2006–2008) to examine the association between unfavorable work characteristics and leisure-time physical inactivity in a total of 170,162 employees (50% women; mean age, 43.5 years). Of these employees, 56,735 were reexamined after 2–9 years. In cross-sectional analyses, the odds for physical inactivity were 26% higher (odds ratio = 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.38) for employees with high-strain jobs (low control/high demands) and 21% higher (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.31) for those with passive jobs (low control/low demands) compared with employees in low-strain jobs (high control/low demands). In prospective analyses restricted to physically active participants, the odds of becoming physically inactive during follow-up were 21% and 20% higher for those with high-strain (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.32) and passive (odds ratio = 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.30) jobs at baseline. These data suggest that unfavorable work characteristics may have a spillover effect on leisure-time physical activity.


BMJ | 2009

Common mental disorder and obesity: insight from four repeat measures over 19 years: prospective Whitehall II cohort study

Mika Kivimäki; Debbie A. Lawlor; Archana Singh-Manoux; G. D. Batty; Jane E. Ferrie; M Shipley; Hermann Nabi; Séverine Sabia; Michael Marmot; Markus Jokela

Objectives To examine potential reciprocal associations between common mental disorders and obesity, and to assess whether dose-response relations exist. Design Prospective cohort study with four measures of common mental disorders and obesity over 19 years (Whitehall II study). Setting Civil service departments in London. Participants 4363 adults (28% female, mean age 44 years at baseline). Main outcome Common mental disorder defined as general health questionnaire “caseness;” overweight and obesity based on Word Health Organization definitions. Results In models adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index at baseline, odds ratios for obesity at the fourth screening were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.77), 1.64 (1.13 to 2.36), and 2.01 (1.21 to 3.34) for participants with common mental disorder at one, two, or three preceding screenings compared with people free from common mental disorder (P for trend<0.001). The corresponding mean differences in body mass index at the most recent screening were 0.20, 0.31, and 0.50 (P for trend<0.001). These associations remained after adjustment for baseline characteristics related to mental health and exclusion of participants who were obese at baseline. In addition, obesity predicted future risk of common mental disorder, again with evidence of a dose-response relation (P for trend=0.02, multivariable model). However, this association was lost when people with common mental disorder at baseline were excluded (P for trend=0.33). Conclusions These findings suggest that in British adults the direction of association between common mental disorders and obesity is from common mental disorder to increased future risk of obesity. This association is cumulative such that people with chronic or repeat episodes of common mental disorder are particularly at risk of weight gain.


American Journal of Epidemiology | 2009

Health Behaviors From Early to Late Midlife as Predictors of Cognitive Function The Whitehall II Study

Séverine Sabia; Hermann Nabi; Mika Kivimäki; Martin J. Shipley; Michael Marmot; Archana Singh-Manoux

The authors examined associations of health behaviors over a 17-year period, separately and in combination, with cognition in late midlife in 5,123 men and women from the Whitehall II study (United Kingdom). Health behaviors were assessed in early midlife (mean age = 44 years; phase 1, 1985-1988), in midlife (mean age = 56 years; phase 5, 1997-1999), and in late midlife (mean age = 61 years; phase 7, 2002-2004). A score of the number of unhealthy behaviors (smoking, alcohol abstinence, low physical activity, and low fruit and vegetable consumption) was defined as ranging from 0 to 4. Poor (defined as scores in the worst sex-specific quintile) executive function and memory in late midlife (phase 7) were analyzed as outcomes. Compared with those with no unhealthy behaviors, those with 3-4 unhealthy behaviors at phase 1 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27, 2.65), phase 5 (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.76, 3.22), and phase 7 (OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 2.04, 3.73) were more likely to have poor executive function. A similar association was observed for memory. The odds of poor executive function and memory were the greater the more times the participant reported unhealthy behaviors over the 3 phases. This study suggests that both the number of unhealthy behaviors and their duration are associated with subsequent cognitive function in later life.


BMJ | 2012

Contribution of modifiable risk factors to social inequalities in type 2 diabetes: prospective Whitehall II cohort study

Silvia Stringhini; Adam G. Tabak; Tasnime N. Akbaraly; Séverine Sabia; Martin J. Shipley; Michael Marmot; Eric Brunner; G. David Batty; Pascal Bovet; Mika Kivimäki

Objective To assess the contribution of modifiable risk factors to social inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes when these factors are measured at study baseline or repeatedly over follow-up and when long term exposure is accounted for. Design Prospective cohort study with risk factors (health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), body mass index, and biological risk markers (systolic blood pressure, triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol)) measured four times and diabetes status assessed seven times between 1991-93 and 2007-09. Setting Civil service departments in London (Whitehall II study). Participants 7237 adults without diabetes (mean age 49.4 years; 2196 women). Main outcome measures Incidence of type 2 diabetes and contribution of risk factors to its association with socioeconomic status. Results Over a mean follow-up of 14.2 years, 818 incident cases of diabetes were identified. Participants in the lowest occupational category had a 1.86-fold (hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 2.32) greater risk of developing diabetes relative to those in the highest occupational category. Health behaviours and body mass index explained 33% (−1% to 78%) of this socioeconomic differential when risk factors were assessed at study baseline (attenuation of hazard ratio from 1.86 to 1.51), 36% (22% to 66%) when they were assessed repeatedly over the follow-up (attenuated hazard ratio 1.48), and 45% (28% to 75%) when long term exposure over the follow-up was accounted for (attenuated hazard ratio 1.41). With additional adjustment for biological risk markers, a total of 53% (29% to 88%) of the socioeconomic differential was explained (attenuated hazard ratio 1.35, 1.05 to 1.72). Conclusions Modifiable risk factors such as health behaviours and obesity, when measured repeatedly over time, explain almost half of the social inequalities in incidence of type 2 diabetes. This is more than was seen in previous studies based on single measurement of risk factors.


Neurology | 2013

Predicting cognitive decline A dementia risk score vs the Framingham vascular risk scores

Sara Kaffashian; Aline Dugravot; Alexis Elbaz; Martin J. Shipley; Séverine Sabia; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux

Objective: Our aim was to compare 2 Framingham vascular risk scores with a dementia risk score in relation to 10-year cognitive decline in late middle age. Methods: Participants were men and women with mean age of 55.6 years at baseline, from the Whitehall II study, a longitudinal British cohort study. We compared the Framingham general cardiovascular disease risk score and the Framingham stroke risk score with the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score that uses risk factors in midlife to estimate risk of late-life dementia. Cognitive tests included reasoning, memory, verbal fluency, vocabulary, and global cognition, assessed 3 times over 10 years. Results: Higher cardiovascular disease risk and higher stroke risk were associated with greater cognitive decline in all tests except memory; higher dementia risk was associated with greater decline in reasoning, vocabulary, and global cognitive scores. Compared with the dementia risk score, cardiovascular and stroke risk scores showed slightly stronger associations with 10-year cognitive decline; these differences were statistically significant for semantic fluency and global cognitive scores. For example, cardiovascular disease risk was associated with −0.06 SD (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.08, −0.05) decline in the global cognitive scores over 10 years whereas dementia risk was associated with −0.03 SD (95% CI = −0.04, −0.01) decline (difference in β coefficients = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.05). Conclusions: The CAIDE dementia and Framingham risk scores predict cognitive decline in late middle age but the Framingham risk scores may have an advantage over the dementia risk score for use in primary prevention for assessing risk of cognitive decline and targeting of modifiable risk factors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Séverine Sabia's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mika Kivimäki

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexis Elbaz

Université Paris-Saclay

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Marmot

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Brunner

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. David Batty

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Hamer

Loughborough University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua A. Bell

University College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge