Shahar Nevo
Bar-Ilan University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shahar Nevo.
Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations | 2001
Shahar Nevo
Let D be a plane domain a meromorphic function on D and k a fixed positive integer. Let F be a collection of functions meromorphic on D, none of which have poles in common with φ. According to a result of Schwick (cf. Yang [9]), if each f ε F satisfies for z ε D then .F is a normal family. We give a very simple proof of this result, based on applying a suitable refinement of Zalcmans Lemma.
Analysis | 2001
Shahar Nevo
A family F of meromorphic functions on a plane domain D is called quasi-normal on D if each sequence S of functions in F has a subsequence which converges locally χ-uniformly on D \E, where E = E(S) is a subset of D having no accumulation points in D. The notion of quasi-normality generalizes the concept of normal family, which corresponds to E = ∅. Chi-Tai Chuang extended the notion of quasi-normal family further in an inductive fashion. According to Chuang, a family F of meromorphic functions on a plane domain D is Qm-normal (m = 0, 1, 2, . . . ) if each sequence S of functions in F has a subsequence which converges locally χ-uniformly on the domain D \ E, where E = E(S) ⊂ D satisfies E D = ∅. (Here E (m) D is the m-th derived set of E in D.) In particular, a Q0-normal family is a normal family, and a Q1-normal family is a quasi-normal family. This paper gives generalizations of Zalcman’s Lemma to Qm-normal families, together with applications of these generalizations – specifically, determining the degree of normality (m) of families of meromorphic functions obtained as linear combinations of functions taken from given families.
Computational Methods and Function Theory | 2008
Xuecheng Pang; Shahar Nevo; Lawrence Zalcman
Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function on ℂ, all but finitely many of whose zeros are multiple, and let R be a rational function, R ≢ 0. Then f′ − R has infinitely many zeros.
Electronic Research Announcements of The American Mathematical Society | 2006
Shahar Nevo; Xuecheng Pang; Lawrence Zalcman
The derivative of a transcendental meromorphic function all of whose zeros are multiple assumes every nonzero complex value infinitely often. In 1959, Hayman [3] proved the following seminal result, which has come to be known as Hayman’s Alternative. Theorem A. Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function on the complex plane C. Then either (i) f assumes each value a ∈ C infinitely often, or (ii) f (k) assumes each value b ∈ C \ {0} infinitely often for k = 1, 2, . . . . Considering the function g(z) = [f(z)− a]/b shows that it suffices to take a = 0 and b = 1 in Theorem A. Associated with Theorem A are the following companion results. Theorem B. Let f be a meromorphic function on C. If f(z) = 0 and f (z) = 1 for some fixed positive integer k and all z ∈ C, then f is constant. Theorem C. Let F be a family of meromorphic functions on a plane domain D. Suppose that for each f ∈ F , f(z) = 0 and f (z) = 1 for some fixed positive integer k and all z ∈ D. Then F is a normal family on D. Theorem B is an immediate consequence of Theorem A, which shows that no transcendental meromorphic function can satisfy f(z) = 0, f (z) = 1 for all z ∈ C. On the other hand, if f is a nonconstant rational function such that f(z) = 0 for z ∈ C, then f(∞) = 0 for each k ≥ 1, so f (k) assumes every value with the possible exception of 0 in the finite plane. Theorem C, a celebrated result of Gu [4], is related to Theorem B via Bloch’s Principle [8, p. 222]; for a very simple proof along these lines, see [8, p. 225]. In recent years, it has become clear that, in many instances, the condition f = 0 can be replaced by the assumption that all zeros of f have sufficiently high multiplicity. This announcement concerns such an extension of Theorem A. We restrict our attention to the case k = 1. Received by the editors November 23, 2005. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 30D35, 30D45.
Revista Matematica Iberoamericana | 2005
Xuecheng Pang; Shahar Nevo; Lawrence Zalcman
Let \(F\) be a quasinormal family of meromorphic functions on D, all of whose zeros are multiple, and let ϕ be a holomorphic function univalent on D. Suppose that for any f ∊ \(F\) , f′(z) ≠ ϕ′(z) for z ∊ D. Then \(F\) is quasinormal of order 1 on D. Moreover, if there exists a compact set K ⊂ D such that each f ∊ \(F\). vanishes at two distinct points of K, then \(F\) is normal on D.
Results in Mathematics | 2003
Shahar Nevo
The theory of Qm-normal families, m ∈ℕ, was developed by P. Montel for the cases m = 0 (normal families) [5] and m = 1 (quasinormal families) [4] and later generalized by C.T. Chuang [2] for any m ≥ 0. In this paper, we extend the definition to an arbitrary ordinal number α as follows. Given E ⊂D, define the α-th derived set % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaaeaart1ev0aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXanrfitLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqt% ubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq% -Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0x% fr-xfr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyuam% aaBaaaleaacaaIXaGaaGimaaqabaGccqGH9aqpciGGSbGaaiOBaiaa% ysW7caWGRbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIXaaabeaakiaac+cacaWGRb% WaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIYaaabeaakiabg2da9iabgkHiTmaabmaa% baGaamyramaaBaaaleaacaWGHbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGsbaacaGLOa% GaayzkaaGaey41aq7aaiWaaeaadaqadaqaaiaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGa% aGOmaaqabaGccqGHsislcaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaaGcca% GLOaGaayzkaaGaai4laiaacIcacaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaikdaaeqa% aOGaaGjbVlaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGaamysaaqabaGccaGGPaaacaGL7b% GaayzFaaaaaa!5C4A!
Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations | 2010
Juergen Grahl; Shahar Nevo
E^{(\alpha)}_D
Computational Methods and Function Theory | 2001
Shahar Nevo
of E with respect to D by % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaaeaart1ev0aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXanrfitLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqt% ubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq% -Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0x% fr-xfr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyuam% aaBaaaleaacaaIXaGaaGimaaqabaGccqGH9aqpciGGSbGaaiOBaiaa% ysW7caWGRbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIXaaabeaakiaac+cacaWGRb% WaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIYaaabeaakiabg2da9iabgkHiTmaabmaa% baGaamyramaaBaaaleaacaWGHbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGsbaacaGLOa% GaayzkaaGaey41aq7aaiWaaeaadaqadaqaaiaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGa% aGOmaaqabaGccqGHsislcaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaaGcca% GLOaGaayzkaaGaai4laiaacIcacaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaikdaaeqa% aOGaaGjbVlaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGaamysaaqabaGccaGGPaaacaGL7b% GaayzFaaaaaa!5C4A!
Bulletin of The London Mathematical Society | 2018
Jürgen Grahl; Shahar Nevo
(E^{(\alpha-1)}_D)^{(1)}_D
Computational Methods and Function Theory | 2012
Shai Gul; Shahar Nevo
if α has an immediate predecessor and by % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaaeaart1ev0aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXanrfitLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqt% ubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq% -Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0x% fr-xfr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyuam% aaBaaaleaacaaIXaGaaGimaaqabaGccqGH9aqpciGGSbGaaiOBaiaa% ysW7caWGRbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIXaaabeaakiaac+cacaWGRb% WaaSbaaSqaaiaadsfacaaIYaaabeaakiabg2da9iabgkHiTmaabmaa% baGaamyramaaBaaaleaacaWGHbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGsbaacaGLOa% GaayzkaaGaey41aq7aaiWaaeaadaqadaqaaiaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGa% aGOmaaqabaGccqGHsislcaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaaGcca% GLOaGaayzkaaGaai4laiaacIcacaWGubWaaSbaaSqaaiaaikdaaeqa% aOGaaGjbVlaadsfadaWgaaWcbaGaamysaaqabaGccaGGPaaacaGL7b% GaayzFaaaaaa!5C4A!