Shai Berlin

Gαi and Gβγ Jointly Regulate the Conformations of a Gβγ Effector, the Neuronal G Protein-activated K+ Channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gαi/o. Whether and how Gαi/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gαi3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gαi3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gαi3GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gαi3GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gαi3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gαi3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gαi3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between GαiGTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gαi/o and the Gαiβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.

Gαi3 primes the G protein‐activated K+ channels for activation by coexpressed Gβγ in intact Xenopus oocytes

G protein‐activated K+ channels (GIRK) mediate postsynaptic inhibitory effects of neurotransmitters in the atrium and in the brain by coupling to G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). In neurotransmitter‐dependent GIRK signalling, Gβγ is released from the heterotrimeric Gαβγ complex upon GPCR activation, activating the channel and attenuating its rectification. Now it becomes clear that Gα is more than a mere Gβγ donor. We have proposed that Gαi3–GDP regulates GIRK gating, keeping its basal activity low but priming (predisposing) the channel for activation by agonist in intact cells, and by Gβγ in excised patches. Here we have further investigated GIRK priming by Gαi3 using a model in which the channel was activated by coexpression of Gβγ, and the currents were measured in intact Xenopus oocytes using the two‐electrode voltage clamp technique. This method enables the bypass of GPCR activation during examination of the regulation of the channel in intact cells. Using this method, we further characterize the priming phenomenon. We tested and excluded the possibility that our estimates of priming are affected by artifacts caused by series resistance or large K+ fluxes. We demonstrate that both Gαi3 and membrane‐attached Gβγ scavenger protein, m‐phosducin, reduce the basal channel activity. However, Gαi3 allows robust channel activation by coexpressed Gβγ, in sharp contrast to m‐phosducin, which causes a substantial reduction in the total Gβγ‐induced current. Furthermore, Gαi3 also does not impair the Gβγ‐dependent attenuation of the channel rectification, in contrast to m‐phosducin, which prevents this Gβγ‐induced modulation. The Gαi3‐induced enhancement of direct activation of GIRK by Gβγ, demonstrated here for the first time in intact cells, strongly supports the hypothesis that Gαi regulates GIRK gating under physiological conditions.

Two distinct aspects of coupling between Gα(i) protein and G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK) revealed by fluorescently labeled Gα(i3) protein subunits.

G protein-activated K+ channels (Kir3 or GIRK) are activated by direct interaction with Gβγ. Gα is essential for specific signaling and regulates basal activity of GIRK (Ibasal) and kinetics of the response elicited by activation by G protein-coupled receptors (Ievoked). These regulations are believed to occur within a GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex. Fluorescent energy resonance transfer (FRET) studies showed strong GIRK-Gβγ interactions but yielded controversial results regarding the GIRK-Gαi/o interaction. We investigated the mechanisms of regulation of GIRK by Gαi/o using wild-type Gαi3 (Gαi3WT) and Gαi3 labeled at three different positions with fluorescent proteins, CFP or YFP (xFP). Gαi3xFP proteins bound the cytosolic domain of GIRK1 and interacted with Gβγ in a guanine nucleotide-dependent manner. However, only an N-terminally labeled, myristoylated Gαi3xFP (Gαi3NT) closely mimicked all aspects of Gαi3WT regulation except for a weaker regulation of Ibasal. Gαi3 labeled with YFP within the Gα helical domain preserved regulation of Ibasal but failed to restore fast Ievoked. Titrated expression of Gαi3NT and Gαi3WT confirmed that regulation of Ibasal and of the kinetics of Ievoked of GIRK1/2 are independent functions of Gαi. FRET and direct biochemical measurements indicated much stronger interaction between GIRK1 and Gβγ than between GIRK1 and Gαi3. Thus, Gαi/oβγ heterotrimer may be attached to GIRK primarily via Gβγ within the signaling complex. Our findings support the notion that Gαi/o actively regulates GIRK. Although regulation of Ibasal is a function of GαiGDP, our new findings indicate that regulation of kinetics of Ievoked is mediated by GαiGTP.

Divergent regulation of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the neuronal G protein gated K+ channel by GαiGDP and Gβγ

G protein activated K+ channels (GIRK, Kir3) are switched on by direct binding of Gβγ following activation of Gi/o proteins via G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although Gαi subunits do not activate GIRKs, they interact with the channels and regulate the gating pattern of the neuronal heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel (composed of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Coexpressed Gαi3 decreases the basal activity (Ibasal) and increases the extent of activation by purified or coexpressed Gβγ. Here we show that this regulation is exerted by the ‘inactive’ GDP‐bound Gαi3GDP and involves the formation of Gαi3βγ heterotrimers, by a mechanism distinct from mere sequestration of Gβγ‘away’ from the channel. The regulation of basal and Gβγ‐evoked current was produced by the ‘constitutively inactive’ mutant of Gαi3, Gαi3G203A, which strongly binds Gβγ, but not by the ‘constitutively active’ mutant, Gαi3Q204L, or by Gβγ‐scavenging proteins. Furthermore, regulation by Gαi3G203A was unique to the GIRK1 subunit; it was not observed in homomeric GIRK2 channels. In vitro protein interaction experiments showed that purified Gβγ enhanced the binding of Gαi3GDP to the cytosolic domain of GIRK1, but not GIRK2. Homomeric GIRK2 channels behaved as a ‘classical’ Gβγ effector, showing low Ibasal and strong Gβγ‐dependent activation. Expression of Gαi3G203A did not affect either Ibasal or Gβγ‐induced activation. In contrast, homomeric GIRK1* (a pore mutant able to form functional homomeric channels) exhibited large Ibasal and was poorly activated by Gβγ. Expression of Gαi3GDP reduced Ibasal and restored the ability of Gβγ to activate GIRK1*, like in GIRK1/2. Transferring the unique distal segment of the C terminus of GIRK1 to GIRK2 rendered the latter functionally similar to GIRK1*. These results demonstrate that GIRK1 containing channels are regulated by both Gαi3GDP and Gβγ, while GIRK2 is a Gβγ‐effector insensitive to Gαi3GDP.

Divergent regulation of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the neuronal G protein gated K+ channel by GalphaiGDP and Gbetagamma.

G protein activated K+ channels (GIRK, Kir3) are switched on by direct binding of Gβγ following activation of Gi/o proteins via G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although Gαi subunits do not activate GIRKs, they interact with the channels and regulate the gating pattern of the neuronal heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel (composed of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Coexpressed Gαi3 decreases the basal activity (Ibasal) and increases the extent of activation by purified or coexpressed Gβγ. Here we show that this regulation is exerted by the ‘inactive’ GDP‐bound Gαi3GDP and involves the formation of Gαi3βγ heterotrimers, by a mechanism distinct from mere sequestration of Gβγ‘away’ from the channel. The regulation of basal and Gβγ‐evoked current was produced by the ‘constitutively inactive’ mutant of Gαi3, Gαi3G203A, which strongly binds Gβγ, but not by the ‘constitutively active’ mutant, Gαi3Q204L, or by Gβγ‐scavenging proteins. Furthermore, regulation by Gαi3G203A was unique to the GIRK1 subunit; it was not observed in homomeric GIRK2 channels. In vitro protein interaction experiments showed that purified Gβγ enhanced the binding of Gαi3GDP to the cytosolic domain of GIRK1, but not GIRK2. Homomeric GIRK2 channels behaved as a ‘classical’ Gβγ effector, showing low Ibasal and strong Gβγ‐dependent activation. Expression of Gαi3G203A did not affect either Ibasal or Gβγ‐induced activation. In contrast, homomeric GIRK1* (a pore mutant able to form functional homomeric channels) exhibited large Ibasal and was poorly activated by Gβγ. Expression of Gαi3GDP reduced Ibasal and restored the ability of Gβγ to activate GIRK1*, like in GIRK1/2. Transferring the unique distal segment of the C terminus of GIRK1 to GIRK2 rendered the latter functionally similar to GIRK1*. These results demonstrate that GIRK1 containing channels are regulated by both Gαi3GDP and Gβγ, while GIRK2 is a Gβγ‐effector insensitive to Gαi3GDP.

Recruitment of Gβγ controls the basal activity of G‐protein coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels: crucial role of distal C terminus of GIRK1

The G‐protein coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel is an important mediator of neurotransmission via Gβγ subunit of the heterotrimeric Gi/o protein released by G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activation. Channels containing the GIRK1 subunit exhibit high basal currents, whereas channels that are formed by the GIRK2 subunit have very low basal currents. GIRK1‐containing channels, but not channels consisting of GIRK2 only, recruit Gβγ to the plasma membrane. The Gα subunit of the G protein is not recruited by either GIRK1/2 or GIRK2. The unique distal C terminus of GIRK1 (G1‐dCT) endows the channel with strong interaction with Gβγ, and deletion of G1‐dCT abolishes the Gβγ recruitment and reduces the basal currents. These findings suggest that the basal activity of GIRK channels depends on channel‐induced recruitment of Gβγ. The unique C terminus of GIRK1 subunit plays an important role in Gβγ recruitment.

Rearrangements in the Relative Orientation of Cytoplasmic Domains Induced by a Membrane-anchored Protein Mediate Modulations in Kv Channel Gating

Interdomain interactions between intracellular N and C termini have been described for various K+ channels, including the voltage-gated Kv2.1, and suggested to affect channel gating. However, no channel regulatory protein directly affecting N/C interactions has been demonstrated. Most Kv2.1 channel interactions with regulatory factors occur at its C terminus. The vesicular SNARE that is also present at a high concentration in the neuronal plasma membrane, VAMP2, is the only protein documented to affect Kv2.1 gating by binding to its N terminus. As its binding target has been mapped near a site implicated in Kv2.1 N/C interactions, we hypothesized that VAMP2 binding to the N terminus requires concomitant conformational changes in the C terminus, which wraps around the N terminus from the outside, to give VAMP2 access. Here, we first determined that the Kv2.1 N terminus, although crucial, is not sufficient to convey functional interaction with VAMP2, and that, concomitant to its binding to the “docking loop” at the Kv2.1 N terminus, VAMP2 binds to the proximal part of the Kv2.1 C terminus, C1a. Next, using computational biology approaches (ab initio modeling, docking, and molecular dynamics simulations) supported by molecular biology, biochemical, electrophysiological, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyses, we mapped the interaction sites on both VAMP2 and Kv2.1 and found that this interaction is accompanied by rearrangements in the relative orientation of Kv2.1 cytoplasmic domains. We propose that VAMP2 modulates Kv2.1 inactivation by interfering with the interaction between the docking loop and C1a, a mechanism for gating regulation that may pertain also to other Kv channels.

A Quantitative Model of the GIRK1/2 Channel Reveals That Its Basal and Evoked Activities Are Controlled by Unequal Stoichiometry of Gα and Gβγ.

G protein-gated K+ channels (GIRK; Kir3), activated by Gβγ subunits derived from Gi/o proteins, regulate heartbeat and neuronal excitability and plasticity. Both neurotransmitter-evoked (Ievoked) and neurotransmitter-independent basal (Ibasal) GIRK activities are physiologically important, but mechanisms of Ibasal and its relation to Ievoked are unclear. We have previously shown for heterologously expressed neuronal GIRK1/2, and now show for native GIRK in hippocampal neurons, that Ibasal and Ievoked are interrelated: the extent of activation by neurotransmitter (activation index, Ra) is inversely related to Ibasal. To unveil the underlying mechanisms, we have developed a quantitative model of GIRK1/2 function. We characterized single-channel and macroscopic GIRK1/2 currents, and surface densities of GIRK1/2 and Gβγ expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Based on experimental results, we constructed a mathematical model of GIRK1/2 activity under steady-state conditions before and after activation by neurotransmitter. Our model accurately recapitulates Ibasal and Ievoked in Xenopus oocytes, HEK293 cells and hippocampal neurons; correctly predicts the dose-dependent activation of GIRK1/2 by coexpressed Gβγ and fully accounts for the inverse Ibasal-Ra correlation. Modeling indicates that, under all conditions and at different channel expression levels, between 3 and 4 Gβγ dimers are available for each GIRK1/2 channel. In contrast, available Gαi/o decreases from ~2 to less than one Gα per channel as GIRK1/2s density increases. The persistent Gβγ/channel (but not Gα/channel) ratio support a strong association of GIRK1/2 with Gβγ, consistent with recruitment to the cell surface of Gβγ, but not Gα, by GIRK1/2. Our analysis suggests a maximal stoichiometry of 4 Gβγ but only 2 Gαi/o per one GIRK1/2 channel. The unique, unequal association of GIRK1/2 with G protein subunits, and the cooperative nature of GIRK gating by Gβγ, underlie the complex pattern of basal and agonist-evoked activities and allow GIRK1/2 to act as a sensitive bidirectional detector of both Gβγ and Gα.

Tracking Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent conformational transitions in syntaxin 1A during exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells

Summary A key issue for understanding exocytosis is elucidating the various protein interactions and the associated conformational transitions underlying soluble N-ethylmeleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein assembly. To monitor dynamic changes in syntaxin 1A (Syx) conformation along exocytosis, we constructed a novel fluorescent Syx-based probe that can be efficiently incorporated within endogenous SNARE complexes, support exocytosis, and report shifts in Syx between ‘closed’ and ‘open’ conformations by fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. Using this probe we resolve two distinct Syx conformational transitions during membrane depolarization-induced exocytosis in PC12 cells: a partial ‘opening’ in the absence of Ca2+ entry and an additional ‘opening’ upon Ca2+ entry. The Ca2+-dependent transition is abolished upon neutralization of the basic charges in the juxtamembrane regions of Syx, which also impairs exocytosis. These novel findings provide evidence of two conformational transitions in Syx during exocytosis, which have not been reported before: one transition directly induced by depolarization and an additional transition that involves the juxtamembrane region of Syx. The superior sensitivity of our probe also enabled detection of subtle Syx conformational changes upon interaction with VAMP2, which were absolutely dependent on the basic charges of the juxtamembrane region. Hence, our results further suggest that the Ca2+-dependent transition in Syx involves zippering between the membrane-proximal juxtamembrane regions of Syx and VAMP2 and support the recently implied existence of this zippering in the final phase of SNARE assembly to catalyze exocytosis.

Collision coupling in the GABAB receptor – G protein – GIRK signaling cascade

The signaling cascade comprising the 4‐aminobutyrate(B) receptor (GABABR), G protein and the G protein‐gated K+ channel (GIRK) mediates neuronal inhibition in the brain. Precoupling between components of the pathway (within a permanent macromolecular complex) has been proposed, but this remains debatable. We investigated this mechanism in Xenopus oocytes by varying the expression of the GABABR. Increased expression of GABABR accelerates activation of GIRK by agonist, implying that some of the components in this cascade interact by a classical collision mechanism. We also find that GABABR has a bidirectional effect on the basal activity of the GIRK channel. Our results suggest a complex mechanism of coupling between GABABR and GIRK which involves elements of both precoupling and collision coupling.