Shalizeh A. Patel
University of Texas at Austin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shalizeh A. Patel.
Operative Dentistry | 2012
Ryan L. Quock; Juliana A. Barros; Sw Yang; Shalizeh A. Patel
The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of the cariostatic and preventive agent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Forty-two caries-free, extracted molars were flattened occlusally and apically using a diamond saw, and the exposed occlusal dentin was polished with a series of silicon carbide papers, all under water irrigation. The teeth were then randomly divided into six groups of seven teeth each that were treated as follows: 1) Peak SE self-etch bonding agent; 2) 12% SDF + Peak SE; 3) 38% SDF + Peak SE; 4) Peak LC etch-and-rinse bonding agent; 5) 12% SDF + Peak LC; and 6) 38% SDF + Peak LC. Four-millimeter buildups of Amelogen Plus were incrementally placed on all teeth; after a 24-hour storage period in distilled water, the specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beams of cross-sectional surface area measuring approximately 1 mm(2). The beams were placed on a microtensile testing machine, which utilized a single-speed pump motor and force gauge at 20 kgf × 0.01 second to record maximum tensile force before failure occurred. Two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were performed to compare the effects of the SDF on microtensile bond strength, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. None of the experimental groups treated with different concentrations of SDF showed a significant difference in bond strength compared to the control groups, and there was no significant difference in bond strength between self-etch and etch-and-rinse groups. However, the effect of SDF on self-etch bonded teeth compared to etch-and-rinse bonded teeth was statistically significant (p=0.0363), specifically at the 12% concentration. SDF does not adversely affect the bond strength of resin composite to noncarious dentin.
Operative Dentistry | 2014
Shalizeh A. Patel; William D. Shepard; Juliana A. Barros; Charles F. Streckfus; Ryan L. Quock
INTRODUCTION Traditional detection techniques have limits in diagnosing occlusal caries. Thus, more accurate methods are needed. This study evaluates the ability of the Midwest Caries ID (Midwest) to detect caries. METHODS Two hundred sixty-four extracted, nonrestored premolars and molars were cleaned and stored in 0.2% sodium azide. Teeth were divided into three groups of 88. One examination site on each occlusal surface was chosen. Each site was inspected by a calibrated examiner via visual, Midwest, and histologic exams. First, a visual exam was performed following the International Caries Detection and Assessment guidelines. Next, the same site was inspected using the Midwest device. Finally, the tooth was sectioned mesiodistally through the site. The half with greater caries progression was visualized under a stereomicroscope (64×). Histologic appearance was scored based on the Downer system. Data were analyzed using Kendall tau-b, partial correlation coefficients, and the receiver operating characteristics curve. RESULTS Overall, the Midwest scoring assessment correlated with histologic assessments (tau = 0.32; p<0.0001), but the visual exam had a stronger correlation (tau = 0.53; p<0.0001) with the histologic exam. The sensitivity and specificity of the Midwest was also reported at 0.56 and 0.84, compared with 0.92 and 0.43, respectively, for the visual exam. CONCLUSIONS Midwest Caries ID is a novel caries detection device that has limitations and should not be used as the sole means to detect occlusal caries.
Journal of Dental Education | 2017
Marilia M. Sly; Juliana A. Barros; Charles F. Streckfus; Dianna M. Arriaga; Shalizeh A. Patel
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a novel assessment software system with the traditional grading protocol used in the University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston operative dentistry preclinical curriculum. In the study, conducted in 2016, 98 Class I preparations were evaluated both traditionally and digitally by two teams of calibrated preclinical faculty members (two evaluators for each team). Scores from each faculty pair were averaged for the traditional and the digital grading systems, and the scores for the two grading systems were compared. The analysis found no significant difference between the two grading systems with respect to isthmus width (p=0.073) and remaining marginal ridge (p=0.5841), but there was a significant difference with respect to pulpal floor depth assessment (p<0.0001). The data suggested that both grading techniques can be used with repeatable confidence for two out of three grading criteria: isthmus width and remaining marginal ridge. In addition, the software offers a self-assessment tool for students to perfect their psychomotor skills while promoting independence and immediate feedback.
Medical Hypotheses | 2011
Ryan L. Quock; Shalizeh A. Patel; Felipe A. Falcao; Juliana A. Barros
Journal of Dental Education | 2015
Shalizeh A. Patel; Juliana A. Barros; Christina M. Clark; Gary N. Frey; Charles F. Streckfus; Ryan L. Quock
Journal of Dental Education | 2018
Robin E. Reinke; Tonya Enright; Rebecca Love; Shalizeh A. Patel; Ala Omar Ali; Zsuzsa Horvath
Springer Berlin Heidelberg | 2015
Shalizeh A. Patel; Juliana A. Barros
Archive | 2015
Juliana Barros; Shalizeh A. Patel; Ryan L. Quock
General dentistry | 2014
Stephen Laman; Gary N. Frey; Shalizeh A. Patel; Ryan L. Quock
Open Journal of Stomatology | 2013
Cynthia P. Trajtenberg; Juliana A. Barros; Shalizeh A. Patel; Leslie Miles; Charles F. Streckfus