Shaloo Gupta
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shaloo Gupta.
Hiv Clinical Trials | 2011
Timothy Juday; Shaloo Gupta; Kristy Grimm; Samuel Wagner; Edward Kim
Abstract Purpose: To assess factors associated with adherence, particularly pill burden, to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) using multivariate models. Method: A cross-sectional survey of US adults with a self-reported diagnosis of HIV/AIDS was conducted between April and May 2007. Respondents on a cART regimen of at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus at least 1 protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (n = 461) were included in the analytic sample. Multiple logistic regression models determined independent predictors of complete adherence (defined as never missing or skipping an antiretroviral dose). Results: Fifty-four percent of respondents reported complete adherence to cART. Adherent respondents reported a lower percentage of hospitalizations (11% vs 28%; P < .0001) and emergency room visits (26% vs 34%; P < .09). Respondents taking the single tablet efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir fixed-dose regimen were significantly more likely to have complete adherence than respondents taking other cART regimens (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, P < .05), and higher imputed daily HIV pill count was associated with lower likelihood of complete adherence (OR 0.93, P < .05). Conclusion: This study shows the negative impact of higher pill burden on medication adherence, an important factor associated with treatment outcomes in patients with HIV/AIDS.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | 2011
Marco DiBonaventura; Shaloo Gupta; Margaret McDonald; Alesia Sadosky
BackgroundThere has been increasing recognition that osteoarthritis (OA) affects younger individuals who are still participants in the workforce, but there are only limited data on the contribution of OA pain to work productivity and other outcomes in an employed population. This study evaluated the impact of OA pain on healthcare resource utilization, productivity and costs in employed individuals.MethodsData were derived from the 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to characterize employed individuals (full-time, part-time, or self-employed) ≥20 years of age who were diagnosed with OA and had arthritis pain in the past month relative to employed individuals not diagnosed with OA or not experiencing arthritis pain in the past month. Work productivity was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire; health status was assessed using the physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12v2 Health Survey and SF-6D health utilities; and healthcare utilization was evaluated by type and number of resources within the past 6 months. Direct and indirect costs were estimated and compared between the two cohorts.ResultsIndividuals with OA pain were less likely to be employed. Relative to workers without OA pain (n = 37,599), the OA pain cohort (n = 2,173) was significantly older (mean age 52.1 ± 11.5 years vs 41.4 ± 13.2 years; P < 0.0001) and with a greater proportion of females (58.2% vs 45.9%; P < 0.0001). OA pain resulted in greater work impairment than among workers without OA pain (34.4% versus 17.8%; P < 0.0001), and was primarily due to presenteeism (impaired activity while at work). Health status, assessed both by the SF-12v2 and the SF-6D was significantly poorer among workers with OA pain (P < 0.0001), and healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than workers without OA pain. Total costs were higher in the OA pain cohort (
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | 2012
Marco DiBonaventura; Shaloo Gupta; Margaret McDonald; Alesia Sadosky; Dan Pettitt; Stuart G. Silverman
15,047 versus
Aids Care-psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of Aids\/hiv | 2012
Marco DiBonaventura; Shaloo Gupta; Michelle Cho; Joseph M. Mrus
8,175; P < 0.0001), driven by indirect costs that accounted for approximately 75% of total costs.ConclusionsA substantial proportion of workers suffer from OA pain. After controlling for confounders, the impact of OA pain was significant, resulting in lower productivity and higher costs.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | 2013
Ishan Hirji; Shaloo Gupta; Amir Goren; Diana Chirovsky; Alyson Moadel; Eduardo Olavarria; Timothy W Victor; Catherine Davis
BackgroundAlthough osteoarthritis (OA) often affects older persons, it has a profound effect on individuals actively employed. Despite reports of reduced productivity among workers with OA, data are limited regarding the impact of OA among workers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of self-rated OA severity on quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, productivity and costs in an employed population relative to employed individuals without OA.MethodsThis cross-sectional analysis used data derived from the 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Multivariable analyses characterized outcomes and costs (direct medical costs and indirect) among workers (full-time, part-time, or self-employed) ≥ 20 years of age who were diagnosed with OA and who self-rated their OA severity as mild, moderate, or severe relative to workers without OA. Evaluated outcomes included productivity, assessed using the Work Productivity and Impairment (WPAI) scale; health-related quality of life, using the SF-12v2 Health Survey; and healthcare resource utilization.Results4,876 workers reported being diagnosed with OA (45.0% mild, 45.9% moderate, and 9.1% severe); 34,896 workers comprised the non-OA comparator cohort. There was a greater proportion of females in the OA cohort (55.5% vs 45.6%; P < 0.0001) and more individuals in the 40-64 year and ≥ 65 year age ranges (P < 0.0001). As OA severity increased, workers reported more frequent pain, poorer quality of life, greater use of specific healthcare resources (hospitalizations) and reduced productivity. All outcomes indicated a significantly greater burden among workers with OA relative to those without OA (P < 0.0001). Estimated total annual costs per worker were
PLOS ONE | 2013
Amir Goren; Xianchen Liu; Shaloo Gupta; Teresa A. Simon; Hemant Phatak
9,801 for mild OA,
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research | 2014
Guy Jerusalem; Shaloo Gupta; Jie Zhang
14,761 for moderate OA,
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2017
Laurent Eckert; Shaloo Gupta; Caroline Amand; Abhijit Gadkari; Puneet Mahajan; Joel M. Gelfand
22,111 for severe OA compared with
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy | 2015
Shaloo Gupta; L. Richard; Anna Forsythe
7,901 for workers without OA (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsWorkers with OA were characterized by significant disease and economic burdens relative to workers without OA that substantially increased with greater self-rated OA severity. Greater levels of OA severity were associated with reductions in quality of life and productivity, and increases in healthcare resource utilization and costs.
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2012
Felicia Allen-Ramey; Shaloo Gupta; Marco DiBonaventura
Abstract Due to stable incidence and improved survival rates, there are an increasing number of patients living with HIV/AIDS in the USA. Although highly effective, current antiretroviral therapies are associated with a variety of side effects. The role side effects play on health outcomes has not been fully examined. The current study assessed the association of medication side effects with (1) self-assessed health status; (2) work productivity and activity impairment; and (3) healthcare resource utilization. Data were from a cross-sectional patient-reported survey fielded in the USA using a dual methodology of Internet and paper questionnaires. A total of 953 patients living with HIV/AIDS who were currently taking a medication for their condition were included in the analyses. The most frequent side effects reported by patients were fatigue (70.72%), diarrhea (62.96%), insomnia (58.97%), dizziness (52.78%), neuropathy (52.68%), joint pain (52.36%), nausea (51.63%), and abdominal pain (50.37%). The presence of each side effect was associated with reduced self-assessed health status, increased productivity loss, increased activity impairment, and increased healthcare resource use. Controlling for CD4 cell counts in regression modeling did little to diminish the impact of side effects. Although not all side effects were associated with all outcomes, every side effect was associated with worse health status, some measure of increased work productivity loss, and/or some measure of increased healthcare resource use. Patients are living longer with HIV and, therefore, spending a greater length of time on treatment. The results of the current study suggest that many of these patients are experiencing a wide array of side effects from these therapies. These side effects have demonstrated a profound association with self-assessed health, work productivity, and healthcare resource use. Improved management of these side effects or development of treatments with a better side effect profile may have a substantial humanistic and economic benefit.