Shane F. Williams
Microsoft
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shane F. Williams.
human factors in computing systems | 2017
Anna Maria Feit; Shane F. Williams; Arturo Toledo; Ann Paradiso; Harish S. Kulkarni; Shaun K. Kane; Meredith Ringel Morris
For eye tracking to become a ubiquitous part of our everyday interaction with computers, we first need to understand its limitations outside rigorously controlled labs, and develop robust applications that can be used by a broad range of users and in various environments. Toward this end, we collected eye tracking data from 80 people in a calibration-style task, using two different trackers in two lighting conditions. We found that accuracy and precision can vary between users and targets more than six-fold, and report on differences between lighting, trackers, and screen regions. We show how such data can be used to determine appropriate target sizes and to optimize the parameters of commonly used filters. We conclude with design recommendations and examples how our findings and methodology can inform the design of error-aware adaptive applications.
international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2018
Qian Zhao; Paul N. Bennett; Adam Fourney; Anne Loomis Thompson; Shane F. Williams; Adam Troy; Susan T. Dumais
In this paper, we study how to leverage calendar information to help with email re-finding using a zero-query prototype, Calendar-Aware Proactive Email Recommender System (CAPERS). CAPERS proactively selects and displays potentially useful emails to users based on their upcoming calendar events with a particular focus on meeting preparation. We approach this problem domain through a survey, a task-based experiment, and a field experiment comparing multiple email recommenders in a large technology company. We first show that a large proportion of email access is related to meetings and then study the effects of four email recommenders on user perception and engagement taking into account four categories of factors: the amount of email content, email recency, calendar-email content match, and calendar-email people match. We demonstrate that these factors all positively predict the usefulness of emails to meeting preparation and that calendar-email content match is the most important. We study the effects of different machine learning models for predicting usefulness and find that an online-learned linear model doubles user engagement compared with the baselines, which suggests the benefit of continuous online learning.
Archive | 2005
Shane F. Williams; Steven J. Ball
Archive | 2009
Andrzej Turski; Lili Cheng; Michael Anthony Affronti; Shane F. Williams
Archive | 2005
Shane F. Williams; Steven J. Ball
Archive | 2007
Shishir Mehrotra; Shane F. Williams; Greg Friedman; Quentin J. Clark; Steve De Mar; Josh Michaels
Archive | 2005
Shane F. Williams; Steven J. Ball
Archive | 2005
Shane F. Williams; Steven J. Ball
Archive | 2007
Steve De Mar; Shishir Mehrotra; Shane F. Williams
Archive | 2008
Andrzej Turski; Shane F. Williams; Stacey Harris; Lili Cheng; Michael Anthony Affronti; Owen C. Braun