Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Shannon Melton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Shannon Melton.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005

FAST at MACH 20: Clinical ultrasound aboard the International Space Station

Ashot E. Sargsyan; Douglas R. Hamilton; Jeffrey A. Jones; Shannon Melton; Peggy A. Whitson; Andrew W. Kirkpatrick; David S. Martin; Scott A. Dulchavsky

BACKGROUND Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has been proved accurate for diagnosing trauma when performed by nonradiologist physicians. Recent reports have suggested that nonphysicians also may be able to perform the FAST examination reliably. A multipurpose ultrasound system is installed on the International Space Station as a component of the Human Research Facility. Nonphysician crew members aboard the International Space Station receive modest training in hardware operation, sonographic techniques, and remotely guided scanning. This report documents the first FAST examination conducted in space, as part of the sustained effort to maintain the highest possible level of available medical care during long-duration space flight. METHODS An International Space Station crew member with minimal sonography training was remotely guided through a FAST examination by an ultrasound imaging expert from Mission Control Center using private real-time two-way audio and a private space-to-ground video downlink (7.5 frames/second). There was a 2-second satellite delay for both video and audio. To facilitate the real-time telemedical ultrasound examination, identical reference cards showing topologic reference points and hardware controls were available to both the crew member and the ground-based expert. RESULTS A FAST examination, including four standard abdominal windows, was completed in approximately 5.5 minutes. Following commands from the Mission Control Center-based expert, the crew member acquired all target images without difficulty. The anatomic content and fidelity of the ultrasound video were excellent and would allow clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to conduct a remotely guided FAST examination with excellent clinical results and speed, even with a significantly reduced video frame rate and a 2-second communication latency. A wider application of trauma ultrasound applications for remote medicine on earth appears to be possible and warranted.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 2004

Where’s the Tube? Evaluation of Hand-held Ultrasound in Confirming Endotracheal Tube Placement

Rosaleen Chun; Andrew W. Kirkpatrick; Marco Sirois; A. E. Sargasyn; Shannon Melton; Douglas R. Hamilton; Scott A. Dulchavsky

INTRODUCTION The diagnosis of endotracheal tube (ETT) mal-position may be delayed in extreme environments. Several methods are utilized to confirm proper ETT placement, but these methods can be unreliable or unavailable in certain settings. Thoracic sonography, previously utilized to detect pneumothoraces, has not been tested to assess ETT placement. HYPOTHESIS Thoracic sonography could correlate with pulmonary ventilation, and thereby, help to confirm proper ETT placement. METHODS Thirteen patients requiring elective intubation under general anesthesia, and data from two trauma patients were evaluated. Using a portable, hand-held, ultrasound (PHHU) machine, sonographic recordings of the chest wall visceral-parietal pleural interface (VPPI) were recorded bilaterally in each patient during all phases of airway management: (1) pre-oxygenation; (2) induction; (3) paralysis; (4) intubation; and (5) ventilation. RESULTS The VPPI could be well-imaged for all of the patients. In the two trauma patients, right mainstem intubations were noted in which specific pleural signals were not seen in the left chest wall VPPI after tube placement. These signs returned after correct repositioning of the ETT tube. In all of the elective surgery patients, signs correlating with bilateral ventilation in each patient were imaged and correlated with confirmation of ETT placement by anesthesiology. CONCLUSIONS This report raises the possibility that thoracic sonography may be another tool that could be used to confirm proper ETT placement. This technique may have merit in extreme environments, such as in remote, pre-hospital settings or during aerospace medical transports, in which auscultation is impossible due to noise, or capnography is not available, and thus, requires further scientific evaluation.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005

Ocular examination for trauma; clinical ultrasound aboard the International Space Station

Leroy Chiao; Salizhan Sharipov; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Shannon Melton; Douglas R. Hamilton; Kellie McFarlin; Scott A. Dulchavsky

Background:Ultrasound imaging is a successful modality in a broad variety of diagnostic applications including trauma. Ultrasound has been shown to be accurate when performed by non-radiologist physicians; recent reports have suggested that non-physicians can perform limited ultrasound examinations.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2003

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma in weightlessness: a feasibility study

Andrew W. Kirkpatrick; Douglas R. Hamilton; Savvas Nicolaou; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Mark R. Campbell; Alan Feiveson; Scott A. Dulchavsky; Shannon Melton; George Beck; David L. Dawson

BACKGROUND The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examines for fluid in gravitationally dependent regions. There is no prior experience with this technique in weightlessness, such as on the International Space Station, where sonography is currently the only diagnostic imaging tool. STUDY DESIGN A ground-based (1 g) porcine model for sonography was developed. We examined both the feasibility and the comparative performance of the FAST examination in parabolic flight. Sonographic detection and fluid behavior were evaluated in four animals during alternating weightlessness (0 g) and hypergravity (1.8 g) periods. During flight, boluses of fluid were incrementally introduced into the peritoneal cavity. Standardized sonographic windows were recorded. Postflight, the video recordings were divided into 169 20-second segments for subsequent interpretation by 12 blinded ultrasonography experts. Reviewers first decided whether a video segment was of sufficient diagnostic quality to analyze (determinate). Determinate segments were then analyzed as containing or not containing fluid. A probit regression model compared the probability of a positive fluid diagnosis to actual fluid levels (0 to 500 mL) under both 0-g and 1.8-g conditions. RESULTS The in-flight sonographers found real-time scanning and interpretation technically similar to that of terrestrial conditions, as long as restraint was maintained. On blinded review, 80% of the recorded ultrasound segments were considered determinate. The best sensitivity for diagnosis in 0 g was found to be from the subhepatic space, with probability of a positive fluid diagnosis ranging from 9% (no fluid) to 51% (500 mL fluid). CONCLUSIONS The FAST examination is technically feasible in weightlessness, and merits operational consideration for clinical contingencies in space.


Echocardiography-a Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques | 2011

On‐Orbit Prospective Echocardiography on International Space Station Crew

Douglas R. Hamilton; Ashot E. Sargsyan; David S. Martin; Kathleen Garcia; Shannon Melton; Alan Feiveson; Scott A. Dulchavsky

Objectives: A prospective trial of echocardiography was conducted on six crew members onboard the International Space Station. The main objective was to determine the efficacy of remotely guided tele‐echocardiography, including just‐in‐time e‐training methods and determine what is “space normal” echocardiographic data. Methods: Each crew member operator (n = 6) had 2‐hour preflight training. Baseline echocardiographic data were collected 55–167 days preflight. Similar equipment was used in each 60‐minute in‐flight session (mean microgravity exposure – 114 days [34 – 190]). On‐orbit ultrasound (US) operators used an e‐learning system within 24 hours of these sessions. Expert assistance was provided using US video downlink and two‐way voice. Testing was repeated 5–16 days after landing. Separate ANOVA was used on each echocardiographic variable (n = 33). Within each ANOVA, three tests were made: (a) effect of mission phase (preflight, in‐flight, postflight); (b) effect of echo technician (two technicians independently analyzed the data); (c) interaction between mission phase and technician. Results: Eleven rejections of the null hypothesis (mission phase or technician or both had no effect) were found that could be considered for possible follow up. Of these, eight rejections were for significant technician effects, not space flight. Three rejections of the null hypothesis (aortic valve time velocity integral, mitral E‐wave velocity, and heart rate) were attributable to space flight but determine to not be clinically significant. No rejections were due to the interaction between technician and space flight. Conclusion: Thus, we found no consistent clinically significant effects of long‐duration space flight on echocardiographic variables of the given group of subjects. (Echocardiography 2011;28:491‐501)


Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine | 2011

Sonography for determining the optic nerve sheath diameter with increasing intracranial pressure in a porcine model

Douglas R. Hamilton; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Shannon Melton; Kathleen Garcia; Bill Oddo; David Kwon; Alan Feiveson; Scott A. Dulchavsky

This study investigated whether it is feasible to use sonography to monitor changes in the optic nerve sheath diameter in a porcine model.


Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology | 2009

Diagnostic Ultrasound at MACH 20: Retroperitoneal and Pelvic Imaging in Space

J.A. Jones; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Yael R. Barr; Shannon Melton; D.R. Hamilton; Scott A. Dulchavsky; P.A. Whitson

An operationally available diagnostic imaging capability augments spaceflight medical support by facilitating the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of medical or surgical conditions, by improving medical outcomes and, thereby, by lowering medical mission impacts and the probability of crew evacuation due to medical causes. Microgravity-related physiological changes occurring during spaceflight can affect the genitourinary system and potentially cause conditions such as urinary retention or nephrolithiasis for which ultrasonography (U/S) would be a useful diagnostic tool. This study describes the first genitourinary ultrasound examination conducted in space, and evaluates image quality, frame rate, resolution requirements, real-time remote guidance of nonphysician crew medical officers and evaluation of on-orbit tools that can augment image acquisition. A nonphysician crew medical officer (CMO) astronaut, with minimal training in U/S, performed a self-examination of the genitourinary system onboard the International Space Station, using a Philips/ATL Model HDI-5000 ultrasound imaging unit located in the International Space Station Human Research Facility. The CMO was remotely guided by voice commands from experienced, earth-based sonographers stationed in Mission Control Center in Houston. The crewmember, with guidance, was able to acquire all of the target images. Real-time and still U/S images received at Mission Control Center in Houston were of sufficient quality for the images to be diagnostic for multiple potential genitourinary applications. Microgravity-based ultrasound imaging can provide diagnostic quality images of the retroperitoneum and pelvis, offering improved diagnosis and treatment for onboard medical contingencies. Successful completion of complex sonographic examinations can be obtained even with minimally trained nonphysician ultrasound operators, with the assistance of ground-based real-time guidance.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2010

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Sinusitis During Microgravity in a Novel Animal Model

Michael S. Benninger; Kellie McFarlin; Douglas R. Hamilton; Ilan Rubinfeld; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Shannon Melton; Michelle Moyhi; Patrick J. McLaren; Scott A. Dulchavsky

OBJECTIVES To develop an animal model of rhinosinusitis in microgravity, to characterize the behavior of intracavitary fluid in microgravity, and to assess the accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) diagnosis in microgravity. DESIGN An animal model of acute sinusitis was developed in anesthetized swine by creating a window into a frontal sinus to allow unilateral catheter placement and injection of fluid. We performed US examinations in normal and microgravity environments on control and sinusitis conditions and recorded these for later interpretation. SETTING Henry Ford Hospital and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Microgravity Research Facility in Houston, Texas. SUBJECTS Ground (normal-gravity) experiments were conducted on anesthetized swine (n = 4) at Henry Ford Hospital before the microgravity experiments (n = 4) conducted in the NASA Microgravity Research Facility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Ultrasound visualization of fluid cavity. RESULTS Results of bilateral US examinations before fluid injection demonstrated typical air-filled sinuses. After unilateral injection of 1 mL of fluid, a consistent air-fluid interface was observed on the catheterized side at ground conditions. Microgravity conditions caused the rapid (<10-second) dissolution of the air-fluid interface, associated with uniform dispersion of the fluid to the walls of the sinus. The air-fluid interface reformed on return to normal gravity. CONCLUSIONS The US appearance of fluid in nasal sinuses during microgravity is characterized in the large animal model. On the introduction of microgravity, the typical air-fluid interface disassociates, and fluid lining the sinus can be observed. Such fluid behavior can be used to develop diagnostic criteria for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in the microgravity environment.


Radiology | 2005

Evaluation of Shoulder Integrity in Space: First Report of Musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station

E. Michael Fincke; Gennady Padalka; Doohi Lee; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Ashot E. Sargsyan; Douglas R. Hamilton; David S. Martin; Shannon Melton; Kellie McFarlin; Scott A. Dulchavsky


American Surgeon | 2001

Ultrasound evaluation of the magnitude of pneumothorax: a new concept

Ashot E. Sargsyan; Douglas R. Hamilton; Saavas Nicolaou; Andrew W. Kirkpatrick; Mark R. Campbell; Roger D. Billica; David W. Dawson; David R. Williams; Shannon Melton; George Beck; Kevin Forkheim; Scott A. Dulchavsky

Collaboration


Dive into the Shannon Melton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ashot Sargsyan

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew W. Kirkpatrick

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey A. Jones

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge