Shanthi Sivendran

Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trial Publications

PURPOSE Reporting adverse events is a critical element of a clinical trial publication. In 2003, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group generated recommendations regarding the appropriate reporting of adverse events. The degree to which these recommendations are followed in oncology publications has not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS A review of citations from PubMed, Medline, and Embase published between Jan 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011, identified eligible randomized, controlled phase III trials in metastatic solid malignancies. Publications were assessed for 14 adverse event-reporting elements derived from the CONSORT harms extension statement; a completeness score (range, 0 to 14) was calculated by adding the number of elements reported. Linear regression analysis identified which publication characteristics associated with reporting completeness. RESULTS A total of 175 publications, with data for 96,125 patients, were included in the analysis. The median completeness score was eight (range, three to 12). Most publications (96%) reported only adverse events occurring above a threshold rate or severity, 37% did not specify the criteria used to select which adverse events were reported, and 88% grouped together adverse events of varying severity. Regression analysis revealed that trials without a stated funding source and with an earlier year of publication had significantly lower completeness scores. CONCLUSION Reporting of adverse events in oncology publications of randomized trials is suboptimal and characterized by substantial selectivity and heterogeneity. The development of oncology-specific standards for adverse event reporting should be established to ensure consistency and provide critical information required for medical decision-making.

Treatment-related mortality with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Several vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKI) are now approved by regulatory agencies and are important in the treatment of solid tumor malignancies. The risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) with these agents is not well characterized. METHODS PubMed was searched for articles published from 2001 until 2011. Eligible studies included prospective randomized trials evaluating sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, and vandetanib in patients with all malignancies. Thirteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included in a meta-analysis and the number of FAEs (defined by the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria) was extracted and study quality was calculated. Incidence rates and relative risks were calculated for all thirteen studies as well as for the subset of patients with renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS Analysis of the 5164 patients across 13 RCTs revealed that the relative risk was 1.64 (95% CI, 1.16, 2.32; P=0.01; incidence 2.26% vs. 1.26%) for the association of a VEGFR TKI with FAEs using a random-effects model. All exploratory subgroup analyses indicated a trend toward an increase risk of FAEs with VEGFR TKI treatment, though the subgroup analyses reached statistical significance for renal carcinoma studies, studies utilizing placebo as the control arm, and studies evaluating sorafenib. INTERPRETATION This analysis suggests that VEGFR TKIs are associated with a significant increase in the risk of FAEs in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Metabolic complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors for cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND mTOR inhibitors are now approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. The risk of metabolic complications with these agents is not well characterized. METHODS PubMed was searched for articles published from 2001 until 2011. Eligible studies included prospective randomized trials evaluating temsirolimus, everolimus, and ridaforolimus in patients with all solid tumor malignancies. Sixteen eligible phase II clinical trials and 8 randomized controlled clinical trials were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis and the number of metabolic related AEs (hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia) was extracted. Incidence rates and incident rate ratios were calculated. FINDINGS Twenty-four trials, including 4261 patients, were included in the calculation of the incidence rate. The average incidence rate of all grade metabolic related events was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.47, 0.93). The average incidence rate of serious (grade 3 and 4) metabolic related adverse events was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08, 0.15). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a metabolic adverse event with mTOR inhibitor therapy compared with control was 2.93 (95% CI, 2.33, 3.70) and of serious grade 3 and 4 metabolic adverse events was 4.58 (95% CI, 2.86, 7.34). The IRR of all grade hyperglycemia was 2.95 (95% CI, 2.14, 4.05) and of grade 3-4 hyperglycemia was 5.25 (95% CI, 3.07, 9.00). The IRR of all grade hypertriglyceridemia was 2.49 (95% CI, 1.76, 3.52) and of grade 3-4 hypertriglyceridemia was 2.01 (95% CI, 0.65, 6.27). The IRR of all grade hypercholesterolemia was 3.35 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.18) and of grade 3-4 hypercholesterolemia was 6.51 (95% CI, 1.48, 28.59). These findings suggest a statistically significant increase in the risk of hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia (all grades and grade 3 and 4), and all grade hypertriglyceridemia associated with mTOR therapy when compared with control. INTERPRETATION The risk of all grade and grade 3-4, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, are increase in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors compared with control.

Dissection of Immune Gene Networks in Primary Melanoma Tumors Critical for Antitumor Surveillance of Patients with Stage II–III Resectable Disease

Patients with resected stage II-III cutaneous melanomas remain at high risk for metastasis and death. Biomarker development has been limited by the challenge of isolating high-quality RNA for transcriptome-wide profiling from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens. Using NanoString technology, RNA from 40 stage II-III FFPE primary melanomas was analyzed and a 53-immune-gene panel predictive of non-progression (area under the curve (AUC)=0.920) was defined. The signature predicted disease-specific survival (DSS P<0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS P<0.001). CD2, the most differentially expressed gene in the training set, also predicted non-progression (P<0.001). Using publicly available microarray data from 46 primary human melanomas (GSE15605), a coexpression module enriched for the 53-gene panel was then identified using unbiased methods. A Bayesian network of signaling pathways based on this data identified driver genes. Finally, the proposed 53-gene panel was confirmed in an independent test population of 48 patients (AUC=0.787). The gene signature was an independent predictor of non-progression (P<0.001), RFS (P<0.001), and DSS (P=0.024) in the test population. The identified driver genes are potential therapeutic targets, and the 53-gene panel should be tested for clinical application using a larger data set annotated on the basis of prospectively gathered data.

Herpes simplex virus oncolytic vaccine therapy in melanoma

Importance of the field: Advanced melanoma is a devastating disease with a five year survival for Stage IV disease of 10 – 20% and a median survival of 6 – 18 months depending on sub-stage. Current FDA approved therapies demonstrate limited response rates, few complete remissions and no proven survival benefit. New therapies are clearly needed. JSI/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF is a herpes simplex virus-1 (OncoVEXGM-CSF) oncolytic vaccine therapy designed to induce local and systemic anti-tumor immune responses. Areas covered in this review: Evolution of current herpes simplex virus oncolytic vaccines from preclinical to clinical studies from 1994 to 2010. What the reader will gain: Preclinical studies have shown that herpes simplex virus-1 oncolytic vaccines generate local tumor destruction through the lytic action of the virus and local and systemic immune responses. Phase I studies demonstrated limited toxicities with no neurotoxicty. Phase II studies demonstrated durable regressions in patients with metastatic melanoma. A Phase III trial in melanoma is ongoing to determine clinical effectiveness, and a Phase III trial in head and neck cancer will initiate during 2010. Take home message: JSI/34.5-/47-/GM-CSF is a new generation herpes simplex virus-1 oncolytic vaccine that demonstrates direct tumor lysis and systemic immune responses. Early clinical studies have yielded preliminary evidence of activity.

Ring chromosome 18 abnormality in acute myelogenous leukemia: the clinical dilemma

The ring chromosome is a circular, structural abnormality composed of either multiple chromosomes or a single chromosome with loss of genetic material at one or both ends. This chromosomal rearrangement is often unstable with frequent recombinations and may be accompanied by either loss or amplification of genetic material[1]. Considering that ring chromosomes are rare in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), it is difficult to risk stratify patient prognosis, particularly when the ring chromosome occurs as the sole abnormality. Here we report a case of a ring chromosome 18 abnormality in a patient with newly diagnosed AML with monocytic differentiation. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated 46, XY, r(18)(p11q21) karyotype in 19 of 34 evaluated metaphase cells. The patient received induction chemotherapy and subsequent allogeneic cord blood transplant from a sex-matched donor, and remained in hematologic and cytogenetic remission for 120 days post transplant. Soon after, he developed post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and died of multi-organ failure. Although r(18) chromosomal abnormalities were not classified in the recent updated evidence-and expert opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AML (likely due to the small number of reported cases), the patient was treated as high risk with stem cell transplantation. This was based on the unstable nature of the ring chromosome and the poor outcomes described in the literature of patients with sole ring 18 abnormalities.

Oncolytic virus therapy for cancer

The use of oncolytic viruses to treat cancer is based on the selection of tropic tumor viruses or the generation of replication selective vectors that can either directly kill infected tumor cells or increase their susceptibility to cell death and apoptosis through additional exposure to radiation or chemotherapy. In addition, viral vectors can be modified to promote more potent tumor cell death, improve the toxicity profile, and/or generate host antitumor immunity. A variety of viruses have been developed as oncolytic therapeutics, including adenovirus, vaccinia virus, herpesvirus, coxsackie A virus, Newcastle disease virus, and reovirus. The clinical development of oncolytic viral therapy has accelerated in the last few years, with several vectors entering clinical trials for a variety of cancers. In this review, current strategies to optimize the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of the major oncolytic viruses are discussed, and a summary of current clinical trials is provided. Further investigation is needed to characterize better the clinical impact of oncolytic viruses, but there are increasing data demonstrating the potential promise of this approach for the treatment of human and animal cancers.

Defining the role of CD2 in disease progression and overall survival among patients with completely resected stage-II to -III cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of prognosis remains clinically challenging in stage II to III cutaneous melanoma. Studies have implicated CD2 in immune surveillance, T-cell activation, and antitumor immunity, but its role in melanoma progression warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVE We sought to investigate the prognostic role of CD2 in primary cutaneous melanoma. METHODS Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II and III cutaneous melanoma were identified by retrospective review of dermatopathology databases from 2001 to 2010 at Mount Sinai Medical Center and Geisinger Medical Center. Additional patients were provided by New York University Medical Center based on retrospective review and tissue availability. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tumors from 90 patients with known recurrence status and documented follow-up. RESULTS Primary tumors from patients who developed recurrent disease had fewer CD2(+) cells (P = .0003). In multivariable analyses including standard clinicopathologic predictors, CD2 was an independent predictor of disease recurrence (P = .008) and overall survival (P = .007). CD2 count correlated with characterization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (P = .0004). Among the intermediate prognosis group of patients with nonbrisk tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD2 count was predictive of disease recurrence (P = .0006) and overall survival (P = .0318). LIMITATIONS Our retrospective design may have resulted in incomplete representation of patients lacking documented follow-up. CONCLUSIONS CD2 may be an independent predictor of disease recurrence and overall survival among patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.

Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies

BackgroundManuscript abstracts represent a critical source of information for oncology practitioners. Practitioners may utilize the information contained in abstracts as a basis for treatment decisions particularly when full-text articles are not accessible. In 2007, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension statement for abstracts provided a minimum list of elements that should be included in abstracts. In this study we evaluate the degree of adherence to these recommendations and accessibility of full text publications in oncology publications.MethodsA systematic review of abstracts of randomized, controlled, phase III trials in metastatic solid malignancies published between January 2009 and December 2011 in PubMed, Medline, and Embase was completed. Abstracts were assigned a completeness score of 0–18 based on the number of CONSORT-recommended elements. Accessibility through open access was recorded.Results174 abstracts with data for 95,956 patients were reviewed. The median completeness score was 9 (range, 3–17). Open access to full text articles was available for 80 % of abstracts. The remaining 20 % (35 out of 174) had a median cost of 38 USD (range:

Metabolic complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors for cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

22–49.95). The least frequently reported elements were: trial design description (20 %), participant allocation method (13 %), blinding (24 %), trial enrollment status (22 %), registration and name of trial (26 %) and funding source (18 %). The most frequently reported elements were eligibility criteria (98 %), study interventions (100 %), and primary endpoint (87 %).ConclusionThere is poor adherence to the CONSORT recommendations for abstract reporting in publications of randomized cancer clinical trials which could negatively impact clinical decision-making. Full-text articles are frequently available through open access.