Shaobai Wang

Adult Scoliosis in Patients Over Sixty-five Years of Age: Outcomes of Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment at a Minimum Two-year Follow-up

Study Design. Retrospective case-control study. Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the self-reported outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients over the age of 65 with adult scoliosis, using 4 distinct self-assessment questionnaires (SRS-22, SF-12, EQ5D, and Oswestry disability index [ODI]) and standard radiographic measurement parameters. Summary of Background Data. The current spine literature contains no studies that directly compare the self-reported and radiographic outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively treated patients over the age of 65 years with adult scoliosis. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the self-reported outcomes of 83 adult scoliosis in patients over the age of 65 years. A total of 34 patients were treated operatively, whereas 49 patients were managed nonoperatively. For each of these patients, standard radiographic measurements were recorded both before and after treatment, and each patient received 4 questionnaires (SRS-22, SF-12, EQ5D, and ODI) that were completed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up from the time the treatment was initiated. The outcomes of both groups were then statistically compared. Results. As compared to the nonoperative group, the operative group reported significantly better self-assessment scores for the EQ5D index, EQ5D Visual Analogue Score, and SRS-22 questionnaires. However, no statistically significant difference between the groups was detected for the ODI, SF-12 Mental Health Component Summary, and SF-12 PCS. Furthermore, the operative group also had a significant improvement in radiographic measurements. Conclusion. Adult scoliosis patients over the age of 65 years treated operatively had significantly less pain, a better health-related quality of life, self image, mental health, and were more satisfied with their treatment than patients treated conservatively. However, we found no statistically significant differences in their degree of disability as measured by the ODI as well as physical and mental health by the SF-12 instrument. Preoperative radiographic deformity was not determined to be a significant factor for predicting whether an operative or nonoperative treatment course was chosen.

Measurement of Vertebral Kinematics Using Noninvasive Image Matching Method–validation and Application

Study Design. In vitro and in vivo laboratory study. Objective. To validate a dual fluoroscopic image matching technique for measurement of in vivo spine kinematics. Summary of Background Data. Accurate knowledge of the spinal structural functions is critical to understand the biomechanical factors that affect spinal pathology. Many studies have investigated vertebral motion both in vitro and in vivo. However, determination of in vivo motion of the vertebrae under physiologic loading conditions remains a challenge in biomedical engineering because of the limitations of current technology and the complicated anatomy of the spine. Methods. In in vitro validation, an ovine spine was moved to a known distance in a known speed by an MTS machine. The dual fluoroscopic system was used to capture the spine motion and reproduce the moving distance and speed. In in vivo validation, a living subject moved the spine in various positions under weightbearing. The fluoroscopes were used to reproduce the in vivo spine positions 5 times. The standard deviations in translation and orientation of the 5 measurements were used to evaluate the repeatability of technique. Results. The translation positions of the ovine spine could be determined with a mean accuracy less than 0.40 mm for the image matching technique using magnetic resonance image-based vertebral models. The spine speed could be reproduced within an accuracy of 0.2 mm/s. The repeatability of the method in reproducing in vivo human spine 6DOF kinematics was less than 0.3 mm in translation and less than 0.7° in orientation. Conclusion. The image matching technique was accurate and repeatable for noninvasive measurement of spine vertebral motion. The technique could be a useful tool for determination of vertebral positions and orientations before and after surgical treatment of spinal pathology to evaluate and improve the efficacy of the various surgical methods in restoring normal spine function.

Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo.

Study Design. Controlled laboratory study. Objective. To measure the range of motion of lumbar facet (zygapophyseal) joints in vivo during various functional weight-bearing positions of the upper body. Summary of Background Data. Determination of normal in vivo motion of the lumbar facet joints remains elusive despite numerous in vitro studies, animal models, and finite element simulations. Alterations in motion of the facet joints have been thought to be associated with various types of lumbar spine pathology including disc degeneration, facet degeneration, and neural impingement. Methods. Eleven healthy subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to obtain three-dimensional models of the lumbar vertebrae from L2–L5. Each patient was then scanned using a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system while positioning the body in different postures: maximal forward-backward bend, side-to-side bending, and maximal left-right torsion. This fluoroscopic set-up was then recreated in solid modeling software where positions of the vertebrae were reproduced at each studied posture by matching the MRI-based models to the fluoroscopic images. The kinematics was measured using a Cartesian coordinate system placed in the center of each facet. The facet orientation in the sagittal and transverse plane was also determined. Results. During flexion-extension movements of the trunk, the facet joints rotated primarily along the mediolateral axis (average: 2°–6°) and were translated in the cephalad caudad direction (average: 2–4 mm). However, during lateral bending and twisting, the facet joints did not rotate or translate in 1 dominant direction. Instead, the resulting motion represented a coupling of rotation and translation in different directions (average: <5° and 3 mm). Further, the kinematic behavior of the facets of the upper lumbar spine (L2–L3 and L3–L4) were similar but different from that of the lower lumbar spine (L4–L5). Conclusion. These findings provide baseline information to enable the study of kinematic changes that occur in pathologic conditions of the spine and to determine how these might be affected following surgical intervention.

Segmental Lumbar Rotation in Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain During Functional Weight-Bearing Activities

BACKGROUND Little information is available on vertebral motion in patients with discogenic low back pain under physiological conditions. We previously validated a combined dual fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging system to investigate in vivo lumbar kinematics. The purpose of the present study was to characterize mechanical dysfunction among patients with confirmed discogenic low back pain, relative to asymptomatic controls without degenerative disc disease, by quantifying abnormal vertebral motion. METHODS Ten subjects were recruited for the present study. All patients had discogenic low back pain confirmed clinically and radiographically at L4-L5 and L5-S1. Motions were reproduced with use of the combined imaging technique during flexion-extension, left-to-right bending, and left-to-right twisting movements. From local coordinate systems at the end plates, relative motions of the cephalad vertebrae with respect to caudad vertebrae were calculated at each of the segments from L2 to S1. Range of motion of the primary rotations and coupled translations and rotations were determined. RESULTS During all three movements, the greatest range of motion was observed at L3-L4. L3-L4 had significantly greater motion than L2-L3 with left-right bending and left-right twisting movements (p < 0.05). The least motion occurred at L5-S1 for all movements; the motion at this level was significantly smaller than that at L3-L4 (p < 0.05). Range of motion during left-right bending and left-right twisting at L3-L4 was significantly larger in the degenerative disc disease group than in the normal group. The range of motion at L4-L5 was significantly larger in the degenerative group than in the normal group during flexion; however, the ranges of motion in both groups were similar during left-to-right bending and left-to-right twisting. CONCLUSIONS The greatest range of motion in patients with discogenic back pain was observed at L3-L4; this motion was greater than that in normal subjects, suggesting that superior adjacent levels developed segmental hypermobility prior to undergoing fusion. L5-S1 had the least motion, suggesting that segmental hypomobility ensues at this level in patients with discogenic low back pain.

In-vivo motion characteristics of lumbar vertebrae in sagittal and transverse planes

Lumbar vertebrae are complicated in structure and function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in-vivo motion characteristics of different portions of the lumbar vertebrae during functional activities. Motion of L2, L3 and L4 was reproduced using a combined dual fluoroscopic and MR imaging technique during flexion-extension and left-right twisting of the trunk. The ranges of motion (ROM) of the proximal vertebra with respect to the distal one at 3 representative locations: the center of the vertebral body, the center of the spinal canal and the tip of the spinous process were measured. Centers of rotation (COR) of the vertebrae were then determined by calculation of the points of zero motion in 2D sagittal and transverse planes. During flexion-extension, the center of the vertebral body moved less than 0.6mm, while the tip of the spinous process moved less than 7.5mm in the sagittal plane. The CORs of both L23 (L2 with respect to L3) and L34 were located inside the vertebral body, at a distance about one-third the length of the vertebral body from the posterior edge. During left-right twisting, the center of the vertebral body moved less than 1.0mm, while the tip of the spinous process moved less than 1.6mm in the transverse plane. The CORs of both L23 and L34 were located approximately 30mm anterior to the front edge of the vertebral body. The results of this study may be used to define the ideal locations for surgical placement of the disc prosthesis, thus help improve the prosthesis design and surgical treatment of various pathological conditions.

Measurement of geometric deformation of lumbar intervertebral discs under in-vivo weightbearing condition

Quantitative data of spinal intervertebral disc deformation is instrumental for investigation of spinal disc pathology. In this study, we employed a combined dual fluoroscopic imaging system and the MR imaging technique to determine the lumbar disc deformation in living human subjects. Discs at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 levels were investigated in 8 normal subjects. The geometric deformation of the discs under full body weight loading condition (upright standing) was determined using the supine, non-weightbearing condition as a reference. The average maximum tensile deformation was -21% in compression and 24% in tension, and maximum shear deformation on the disc surface reached 26%. The data indicated that different portions of the disc are under different tensile and shear deformation. Further, discs of L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 have different deformation behavior under the physiological weightbearing condition. In general, the higher level discs have higher deformation values. The technique used in this study can be used to investigate the deformation behaviors of diseased discs as well as the efficacy of different surgical modalities at restoring normal disc deformation patterns.

A novel dual fluoroscopic imaging method for determination of THA kinematics: In-vitro and in-vivo study

Accurate measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom in-vivo kinematics of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) is essential in gaining insights into in-vivo THA performance. The objective of this study was to validate a novel dual fluoroscopy imaging system (DFIS) for determination of the THA kinematics using both in-vitro and in-vivo approaches. The in-vitro validation utilized cadaveric hip specimens to compare the THA motion using the DFIS technique with those measured by a radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The differences between the DFIS technique and the RSA were within 0.33±0.81 mm (mean±SD) in translation and 0.45±0.65° in rotation during dynamic motion of the hips. In the in-vivo validation, the THA kinematics of two patients during a treadmill gait was assessed for the feasibility/repeatability of the DFIS technique in measurement of THA kinematics. The poses of the THAs during the treadmill gait was measured using the DFIS technique with the maximum standard deviation of 0.35 mm in translation and of 0.55° in rotation. This study demonstrated that the DFIS technique has comparable accuracy of the RSA and is highly repeatable for measurement of dynamic THA motion, suggesting that the DFIS is a promising tool in evaluating the in-vivo THA biomechanics during functional activities.

Lumbar Facet Joint Motion in Patients with Degenerative Disc Disease at Affected and Adjacent Levels: An In Vivo Biomechanical Study

Study Design. Controlled laboratory study. Objective. To evaluate the effect of lumbar degenerative disc diseases (DDDs) on motion of the facet joints during functional weight-bearing activities. Summary of Background Data. It has been suggested that DDD adversely affects the biomechanical behavior of the facet joints. Altered facet joint motion, in turn, has been thought to associate with various types of lumbar spine pathology including facet degeneration, neural impingement, and DDD progression. However, to date, no data have been reported on the motion patterns of the lumbar facet joint in DDD patients. Methods. Ten symptomatic patients of DDD at L4–S1 were studied. Each participant underwent magnetic resonance images to obtain three-dimensional models of the lumbar vertebrae (L2–S1) and dual fluoroscopic imaging during three characteristic trunk motions: left-right torsion, left-right bending, and flexion-extension. In vivo positions of the vertebrae were reproduced by matching the three-dimensional models of the vertebrae to their outlines on the fluoroscopic images. The kinematics of the facet joints and the ranges of motion (ROMs) were compared with a group of healthy participants reported in a previous study. Results. In facet joints of the DDD patients, there was no predominant axis of rotation and no difference in ROMs was found between the different levels. During left-right torsion, the ROMs were similar between the DDD patients and the healthy participants. During left-right bending, the rotation around mediolateral axis at L4–L5, in the DDD patients, was significantly larger than that of the healthy participants. During flexion-extension, the rotations around anterioposterior axis at L4–L5 and around craniocaudal axis at the adjacent level (L3–L4), in the DDD patients, were also significantly larger, whereas the rotation around mediolateral axis at both L2–L3 and L3–L4 levels in the DDD patients were significantly smaller than those of the healthy participants. Conclusion. DDD alters the ROMs of the facet joints. The rotations can increase significantly not only at the DDD levels but also at their adjacent levels when compared to those of the healthy participants. The increase in rotations did not occur around the primary rotation axis of the torso motion but around the coupled axes. This hypermobility in coupled rotations might imply a biomechanical mechanism related to DDD.

In-vitro validation of a non-invasive dual fluoroscopic imaging technique for measurement of the hip kinematics.

Measurement of accurate in vivo hip joint kinematics in 6-DOF is difficult. Few studies have reported non-invasive measurements of the hip kinematics. The objective of this study was to validate a non-invasive dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) for measurement of hip kinematics. Bi-lateral hip joints of a cadaveric pelvic specimen were CT scanned to create bone models of the femur and pelvis, and subsequently tested in static and dynamic conditions inside the DFIS. The poses of the hip in space were then determined by matching the bone models with the fluoroscopic images. The pose data was compared to those obtained using a radio-stereometric analysis to determine the accuracy of the DFIS. The accuracy ± precision for measuring the hip kinematics were less than 0.93 ± 1.13 mm for translations and 0.59 ± 0.82° for rotations in all conditions. The repeatability of the DFIS technique was less than ± 0.77 mm and ± 0.64° in position and orientation for measuring hip kinematics in both static and dynamic positions. This technique could thus be a promising tool for determining 6-DOF poses of the hip during functional activities, which may help to understand biomechanical factors in hip pathologic conditions such as osteoarthritis and femoroacetabular impingement before and after surgical treatment.

In vivo Loads in the Lumbar L3-4 Disc during a Weight Lifting Extension

BACKGROUND Knowledge of in vivo human lumbar loading is critical for understanding the lumbar function and for improving surgical treatments of lumbar pathology. Although numerous experimental measurements and computational simulations have been reported, non-invasive determination of in vivo spinal disc loads is still a challenge in biomedical engineering. The object of the study is to investigate the in vivo human lumbar disc loads using a subject-specific and kinematic driven finite element approach. METHODS Three dimensional lumbar spine models of three living subjects were created using MR images. Finite element model of the L3-4 disc was built for each subject. The endplate kinematics of the L3-4 segment of each subject during a dynamic weight lifting extension was determined using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. The endplate kinematics was used as displacement boundary conditions to calculate the in-vivo disc forces and moments during the weight lifting activity. FINDINGS During the weight lifting extension, the L3-4 disc experienced maximum shear load of about 230 N or 0.34 bodyweight at the flexion position and maximum compressive load of 1500 N or 2.28 bodyweight at the upright position. The disc experienced a primary flexion-extension moment during the motion which reached a maximum of 4.2 Nm at upright position with stretched arms holding the weight. INTERPRETATION This study provided quantitative data on in vivo disc loading that could help understand intrinsic biomechanics of the spine and improve surgical treatment of pathological discs using fusion or arthroplasty techniques.