Sharad Goyal

Radiation-Induced Heart Disease: Pathologic Abnormalities and Putative Mechanisms

Breast cancer is a common diagnosis in women. Breast radiation has become critical in managing patients who receive breast conserving surgery, or have certain high-risk features after mastectomy. Most patients have an excellent prognosis, therefore understanding the late effects of radiation to the chest is important. Radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) comprises a spectrum of cardiac pathology including myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, valvular disease, pericardial disease, and arrhythmias. Tissue fibrosis is a common mediator in RIHD. Multiple pathways converge with both acute and chronic cellular, molecular, and genetic changes to result in fibrosis. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of cardiac disease related to radiation therapy to the chest. Our understanding of these mechanisms has improved substantially, but much work remains to further refine radiation delivery techniques and develop therapeutics to battle late effects of radiation.

Cardiac dose sparing and avoidance techniques in breast cancer radiotherapy

Breast cancer radiotherapy represents an essential component in the overall management of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer. As the number of breast cancer survivors has increased, chronic sequelae of breast cancer radiotherapy become more important. While recently published data suggest a potential for an increase in cardiac events with radiotherapy, these studies do not consider the impact of newer radiotherapy techniques commonly utilized. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate cardiac dose sparing techniques in breast cancer radiotherapy. Current options for cardiac protection/avoidance include (1) maneuvers that displace the heart from the field such as coordinating the breathing cycle or through prone patient positioning, (2) technological advances such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT), and (3) techniques that treat a smaller volume around the lumpectomy cavity such as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), or intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). While these techniques have shown promise dosimetrically, limited data on late cardiac events exist due to the difficulties of long-term follow up. Future studies are required to validate the efficacy of cardiac dose sparing techniques and may use surrogates for cardiac events such as biomarkers or perfusion imaging.

Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: A comparison with ECOG study 5194†

Recent data from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5194 (E5194) prospectively defined a low‐risk subset of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients where radiation therapy was omitted after lumpectomy alone. The purpose of the study was to determine the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in DCIS patients who met the criteria of E5194 treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (RT).

Serum Biomarkers for the Detection of Cardiac Toxicity after Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients

Multi-modality cancer treatments that include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted agents are highly effective therapies. Their use, especially in combination, is limited by the risk of significant cardiac toxicity. The current paradigm for minimizing cardiac morbidity, based on serial cardiac function monitoring, is suboptimal. An alternative approach based on biomarker testing, has emerged as a promising adjunct and a potential substitute to routine echocardiography. Biomarkers, most prominently cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides, have been evaluated for their ability to describe the risk of potential cardiac dysfunction in clinically asymptomatic patients. Early rises in cardiac troponin concentrations have consistently predicted the risk and severity of significant cardiac events in patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Biomarkers represent a novel, efficient, and robust clinical decision tool for the management of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity. This article aims to review the clinical evidence that supports the use of established biomarkers such as cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides, as well as emerging data on proposed biomarkers.

Intrafractional Target Motions and Uncertainties of Treatment Setup Reference Systems in Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE This study investigated the magnitude of intrafractional motion and level of accuracy of various setup strategies in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS At lumpectomy, gold fiducial markers were strategically sutured to the surrounding walls of the cavity. Weekly fluoroscopy imaging was conducted at treatment to investigate the respiration-induced target motions. Daily pre- and post-RT kV imaging was performed, and images were matched to digitally reconstructed radiographs based on bony anatomy and fiducial markers, respectively, to determine the intrafractional motion magnitudes over the course of treatment. The positioning differences of the laser tattoo- and the bony anatomy-based setups compared with those of the marker-based setup (benchmark) were also determined. The study included 21 patients. RESULTS Although lung exhibited significant motion, the average marker motion amplitude on the fluoroscopic image was about 1 mm. Over a typical treatment time period, average intrafractional motion magnitude was 4.2 mm and 2.6 mm based on the marker and bony anatomy matching, respectively. The bony anatomy- and laser tattoo-based interfractional setup errors, with respect to the fiducial marker-based setup, were 7.1 and 9.0 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Respiration has limited effects on the target motion during APBI. Bony anatomy-based treatment setup improves the accuracy relative to that of the laser tattoo-based setup approach. Since fiducial markers are sutured directly to the surgical cavity, the marker-based approach can further improve the interfractional setup accuracy. On average, a seroma cavity exhibits intrafractional motion of more than 4 mm, a magnitude that is larger than that which is otherwise derived based on bony anatomy matching. A seroma-specific marker-based approach has the potential to improve treatment accuracy by taking the true inter- and intrafractional motions into consideration.

EGF improves recovery following relief of unilateral ureteral obstruction in the neonatal rat

PURPOSE Renal epidermal growth factor (EGF) is suppressed by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), and we reported previously that exogenous EGF attenuates renal injury due to UUO in the neonatal rat. In this study, we wished to determine whether administration of epidermal growth factor (EGF) improves long-term renal cellular recovery after relief of obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS One ureter of 1 day-old rats was occluded or sham-operated, and rats received daily injections of EGF, 0.1 mg./kg., or saline for the following 7 days. Five days following UUO, the obstruction was removed. Kidneys were removed 28 days following release of UUO or sham operation, and processed for histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Kidney weight and the number of glomeruli were reduced in the postobstructed kidney regardless of administration of EGF. However, EGF reduced tubular vimentin by 36% and clusterin expression by 70% (markers of tubular injury), and decreased tubular atrophy by 50% in the postobstructed kidney compared with saline-treated rats. EGF also reduced interstitial alpha-smooth muscle actin and interstitial collagen deposition by 50% in the postobstructed kidney. CONCLUSIONS Short-term administration of EGF markedly attenuates both tubular and interstitial injury one month following the release of UUO in the neonatal rat. This suggests therapeutic potential for targeted delivery of growth factors to optimize recovery after release of urinary tract obstruction.

Improvement in Interobserver Accuracy in Delineation of the Lumpectomy Cavity Using Fiducial Markers

PURPOSE To determine, whether the presence of gold fiducial markers would improve the inter- and intraphysician accuracy in the delineation of the surgical cavity compared with a matched group of patients who did not receive gold fiducial markers in the setting of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Planning CT images of 22 lumpectomy cavities were reviewed in a cohort of 22 patients; 11 patients received four to six gold fiducial markers placed at the time of surgery. Three physicians categorized the seroma cavity according to cavity visualization score criteria and delineated each of the 22 seroma cavities and the clinical target volume. Distance between centers of mass, percentage overlap, and average surface distance for all patients were assessed. RESULTS The mean seroma volume was 36.9 cm(3) and 34.2 cm(3) for fiducial patients and non-fiducial patients, respectively (p = ns). Fiducial markers improved the mean cavity visualization score, to 3.6 ± 1.0 from 2.5 ± 1.3 (p < 0.05). The mean distance between centers of mass, average surface distance, and percentage overlap for the seroma and clinical target volume were significantly improved in the fiducial marker patients as compared with the non-fiducial marker patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The placement of gold fiducial markers placed at the time of lumpectomy improves interphysician identification and delineation of the seroma cavity and clinical target volume. This has implications in radiotherapy treatment planning for accelerated partial-breast irradiation and for boost after whole-breast irradiation.

Prognostic significance of IGF-1R expression in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

BACKGROUND Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor is a key receptor in apoptotic protection, cell adhesion, longevity, and transformation into a cancerous cell and can induce malignant changes in the presence of the IGF ligand. Over-expression of IGF-1R has been associated with resistance to radiation. Inhibitors of IGF-1R have been shown to enhance tumor radiation sensitivity and amplify radiation therapy-induced apoptosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of IGF-1R expression in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Paraffin specimens from 345 women with early stage breast cancer treated with BCT were constructed into tissue microarrays and stained for IGF-1R, COX-2 and p53. The molecular profiles were correlated with clinical-pathologic factors, overall, local, and distant relapse-free survival. The association between IGF-1R, other co-variables, and outcome was assessed. RESULTS IGF-1R over-expression was identified in 197 cases (57%). IGF-1R over-expression was found to be correlated with African-American race (p=0.0233), p53 status (p=0.0082) and COX-2 expression (p<0.0001). While IGF-1R over-expression was associated with lower overall survival (p=0.0224) in node-negative patients, there was no impact of IGF-1R expression on local control. CONCLUSIONS In node-negative patients, patients with high levels of IGF-1R were found to have a significant reduction in overall survival, but no apparent effect on local control. Given the limited published data on IGF-1R in early stage, conservatively treated patients, further studies investigating IGF-1R expression in this cohort are necessary.

Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and accelerated partial breast irradiation

The purpose of this study was to determine the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients treated in the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial who met the criteria for E5194 treated with local excision and adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).

Clinical Management of Multiple Melanoma Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE The treatment of multiple brain metastases (MBM) from melanoma is controversial and includes surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Several new classes of agents have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, allowing some subsets of patients to have long-term survival. Given this, management of MBM from melanoma is continually evolving. OBJECTIVE To review the current evidence regarding the treatment of MBM from melanoma. EVIDENCE REVIEW The PubMed database was searched using combinations of search terms and synonyms for melanoma, brain metastases, radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy published between January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2015. Articles were selected for inclusion on the basis of targeted keyword searches, manual review of bibliographies, and whether the article was a clinical trial, large observational study, or retrospective study focusing on melanoma brain metastases. Of 2243 articles initially identified, 110 were selected for full review. Of these, the most pertinent 73 articles were included. FINDINGS Patients with newly diagnosed MBM can be treated with various modalities, either alone or in combination. Level 1 evidence supports the use of SRS alone, WBRT, and SRS with WBRT. Although the addition of WBRT to SRS improves the overall brain relapse rate, WBRT has no significant impact on overall survival and has detrimental neurocognitive outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has largely been ineffective; targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been reported to have high response rates and deserve further attention in larger clinical trials. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of these novel regimens in combination with radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE At this time, the standard management for patients with MBM from melanoma includes SRS, WBRT, or a combination of both. Emerging data exist to support the notion that SRS in combination with targeted therapies or immune therapy may obviate the need for WBRT; prospective studies are required to fully evaluate the efficacy of these novel regimens in combination with radiation therapy.