Sharon A. Salenius

Radiation therapy in the management of medically inoperable carcinoma of the lungs: Results and implications for future treatment strategies

Surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma. For patients who are medically unable to tolerate a surgical resection or who refuse surgery, radiation therapy is an acceptable alternative. We reviewed the records of 152 patients with medically inoperable non-small cell lung carcinoma treated at our institution between 1982 and 1990. Patients with metastatic disease, mediastinal lymph node involvement or unresectable tumors were excluded. The actuarial overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 40% and 10%, respectively. The disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 31% and 15%. The disease-free survival for patients with T1 tumors was 55% at 2 years, versus 20 and 25% for T2 and T3 lesions, respectively (p = .0006). Increasing tumor dose was also associated with increasing disease-free survival (p = .0143). Overall, 66% percent of the patients were considered to have failed. Of these, 70% showed a component of local failure and 45% failed distantly. Patients with T1 tumors experienced a lower probability of failing locally or distantly than did patients with T2 or T3 tumors. A reduced risk of local and distant failure was seen for patients treated to doses of greater than 65 Gray, especially for T1 tumors. We conclude that radical radiation therapy is an effective treatment for small tumors when treated to doses of 65 Gray or more. Since local failure is the prominent pattern of relapse in patients with large tumors, new therapeutic strategies should be considered for this patient group.

Small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the prostate : Seven new cases, review of the literature, and discussion of a therapeutic strategy

Small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the prostate (SCCP) is a rare entity; a literature review disclosed fewer than 150 cases. SCCP has an aggressive course, and both local and distant failure is common. The optimal treatment method has not been clearly established. We review our experience with 7 patients, with attention paid to clinical and pathological details based on a review of the histological specimens. Three patients had mixed tumors of both SCCP and adenocarcinoma, 3 had pure adenocarcinomas that recurred as small cell, and 1 had pure small cell. Our series confirms the aggressive nature of the disease, with all patients dying of their disease < or = 42 months after diagnosis. All patients progressed locally, and at least 5 later developed distant metastases. Treatment with combination chemotherapy and/or hormones resulted in short-lived responses in most patients. We recommend use of hormonal manipulation and combination chemotherapy as well as surgery and/or radiation therapy to the prostate for local control and emphasize that histologic recognition of the entity is important for proper treatment.

Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer After Brachytherapy Alone or With Radiation, Androgen Suppression Therapy, or Both in Men With High-Risk Disease

PURPOSE We estimated the risk of prostate cancer (PC) -specific mortality (PCSM) after brachytherapy alone or in conjunction with androgen suppression therapy (AST), external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or both in men with high-risk PC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study cohort comprised 1,342 men with a prostate-specific antigen level more than 20 ng/mL and clinical T3 or 4 and/or Gleason score 8 to 10 disease. Competing risks multivariable regression was performed to estimate the risk of PCSM in men treated with brachytherapy alone or with supplemental AST, EBRT, or both, adjusting for age, year of treatment, and known PC prognostic factors. RESULTS Despite higher baseline probabilities of PCSM after a median follow-up of 5.1 years, there was a significant reduction in the risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.73; P = .006) in men treated with brachytherapy and both AST and EBRT as compared with neither. When compared with brachytherapy alone, a significant decrease in the risk of PCSM was not observed in men treated with either supplemental AST (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.47; P = .28) or EBRT (AHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.52; P = .26). There was a near-significant reduction (AHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.07; P = .079) in the risk of PCSM in men treated with tri- as compared with bimodality therapy. CONCLUSION Supplemental AST and EBRT but not either supplement compared with brachytherapy alone was associated with a decreased risk of PCSM in men with high-risk PC.

Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (retrospective cohort analysis)

Prostate cancer‐specific mortality and the extent of therapy in healthy elderly men with high‐risk prostate cancer

The risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) in healthy elderly men may depend on extent of treatment. The authors of this report compared the use of brachytherapy alone with combined brachytherapy, external‐beam radiation to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and androgen‐suppression therapy (CMT) in this population.

Diabetes Mellitus, Race and the Odds of High Grade Prostate Cancer in Men Treated With Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE Black men present more frequently with high grade prostate cancer and are more likely to have diabetes mellitus. We evaluated whether there is an independent association between diabetes mellitus and the risk of high grade prostate cancer in men diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was associated with the odds of Gleason score 7 or 8-10 prostate cancer in a cohort of 16,286 men, adjusting for black race, advancing age, prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination findings. RESULTS Black men (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13, p = 0.024) and nonblack men (adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.33-1.89, p <0.001) with diabetes were more likely to have Gleason score 8-10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer than nondiabetic men. However, this was not true for Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer. Black race was significantly associated with Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17-1.63, p <0.001 and 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, p = 0.003, respectively). Black race was also associated with Gleason score 8-10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83, p = 0.04 and 1.58, 95% CI 0.98-2.53, p = 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer independent of black race.

Coronary Revascularization and Mortality in Men With Congestive Heart Failure or Prior Myocardial Infarction Who Receive Androgen Deprivation

A study was undertaken to determine the impact of prior coronary revascularization (angioplasty, stent, or coronary artery bypass graft) on the risk of all‐cause mortality after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) for prostate cancer (PC) in men with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD)‐induced congestive heart failure (CHF) or myocardial infarction (MI).

Mortality in men with localized prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant hormone therapy

Discrepancies exist regarding the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) on the risk of all‐cause mortality (ACM) in men who receive brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to examine the effect of NHT on the risk of ACM in men with prostate cancer who receive with brachytherapy.

Androgen-suppression therapy for prostate cancer and the risk of death in men with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke

Study Type – Prognosis (inception cohort)
Level of Evidence 1b

Type of Diabetes Mellitus and the Odds of Gleason Score 8 to 10 Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE It has been recently shown that diabetes mellitus (DM) is significantly associated with the likelihood of presenting with high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) or Gleason score (GS) 8 to 10; however, whether this association holds for both Type 1 and 2 DM is unknown. In this study we evaluated whether DM Type 1, 2, or both are associated with high-grade PCa after adjusting for known predictors of high-grade disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1991 and 2010, a total of 15,330 men diagnosed with PCa and treated with radiation therapy were analyzed. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether Type 1 or 2 DM was associated with odds of GS 7 or GS 8 to 10 compared with 6 or lower PCa, adjusting for African American race, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and digital rectal examination findings. RESULTS Men with Type 1 DM (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.27; p = 0.003) or Type 2 DM (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.26-1.99; p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with GS 8 to 10 PCa compared with nondiabetic men. However this was not true for GS 7, for which these respective results were AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.93-1.82; p = 0.12 and AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98-1.32; p = 0.10. CONCLUSION Type 1 and 2 DM were associated with a higher odds of being diagnosed with Gleason score 8 to 10 but not 7 PCa. Pending validation, men who are diagnosed with Type I DM with GS 7 or lower should be considered for additional workup to rule out occult high-grade disease.