Sharon L. Hudson

Iron overload in African Americans

PURPOSE Iron overload unexplained by dietary or medicinal iron excess, transfusion, or sideroblastic anemia has been described infrequently in Americans of African descent. The purpose of this study was to characterize iron overload attributable to excessive iron absorption in African Americans. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a community hematology and medical oncology practice during the interval 1990 to 1993, we identified and evaluated a series of cases comprised of 6 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 55 +/- 14 (SD) years (range 33 to 69). Data on clinical features, serum iron parameters, liver and body iron stores, evaluations of anemia, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, and family studies were analyzed. RESULTS Among our patients, the serum iron parameters were: iron concentration 26 +/- 13 mumol/L, transferrin saturation 59 +/- 21%, and ferritin concentration 1,588 +/- 1,053 micrograms/L. Clinical abnormalities observed included weakness and fatigue, decreased libido and impotence, hepatopathy, arthropathy, diabetes mellitus, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, and hyperpigmentation. Hepatic parenchymal cell iron deposits were increased in each of the 6 patients studied, and Kupffer cell iron deposits were prominent in 4. The occurrence of iron overload was verified by liver iron quantification and therapeutic phlebotomy. Four subjects had alpha-thalassemia minor; 2 others had hemoglobin S and C traits. No proband had HLA-A3 positivity. Four probands had other family members with iron overload. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with Caucasians with hemochromatosis, our patients have slightly lower mean values of serum iron concentration and transferrin saturation, more Kupffer cell iron deposits, a higher incidence of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy, and infrequent positivity for HLA-A3. Iron overload in African Americans appears to be more similar to that in certain sub-Saharan African natives than to hemochromatosis.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation. METHODS This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper. RESULTS Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points. CONCLUSION Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.

Impact of donor/recipient size matching on outcomes in renal transplantation.

Interest in nonimmunologic factors affecting longterm graft survival has focused on adequacy of nephron dosing. Body surface are (BSA) is a reliable surrogate for nephron mass. In a retrospective study of 378 primary recipients of paired kidneys from 189 cadaveric donors, we assessed the impact of matching donor and recipient BSA on outcome over 7 years. BSA of donors was 1.82 +/- 0.26 m2. Initially, paired recipients of kidneys from a single donor were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the recipient with the larger BSA of the pair (1.97 +/- 0.17 m2), while group 2 consisted of smaller BSA recipients (1.69 +/- 0.19 m2). Although early function was better in group 2 patients, graft survival at 1 year (77% vs. 79%) and 5 years (54% vs. 55%) was identical between groups, as were most recent serum creatinine levels (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg/dl). A second analysis divided patients with a functioning allograft at discharge from initial transplant hospitalization (n = 345) into three groups based solely on donor to recipient BSA ratio: the ratio of group A (n = 30) was < or = 0.8, that of group B (n = 255) was between 0.81 and 1.19, and that of group C (n = 51) was > or = 1.2. Graft survival and kidney function over 5 years did not differ among groups. In multivariate analysis of 17 variables, donor:recipient BSA, independent of other risk factors, did not affect risk allograft loss. These data indicate that including nephron mass as a criterion for cadaveric organ allocation is unlikely to improve long-term results in renal transplantation.

A rapid flow cytometry assay for HLA antibody detection using a pooled cell panel covering 14 serological crossreacting groups.

Many studies have demonstrated the usefulness of flow cytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) for selection of regraft recipients, and more recently this assay has been shown to correlate with allograft survival in primary cadaveric transplant patients. The need now exists for a practical antibody screening procedure which uses the same methodology. We describe here a simple and sensitive method to screen for HLA antibodies by FC using a pool of 6 cells selected to cover the 14 serological crossreacting groups defined by Rodey. Screenings of 367 sera (255 primary transplant sera, 112 regraft sera) received for monthly antibody testing were performed by both pooled cell FC and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays. Forty of these sera were also FC-screened using a panel of 16 individual cells for comparison with the pooled cell FC screenings. Analysis indicated a strong correlation between the pooled FC-PRA and the individual cell panel FC-PRA (P = .0001) with mean values of 60% and 73%, respectively. Only 2 of the 40 sera screened by both FC methods resulted in PRAs that differed by > 40%. The majority (82%) of the primary patients did not exhibit HLA antibodies by CDC--however, 22% of the CDC negative patients were positive by flow cytometry. Females were more likely to be positive by FC (35%) than males (16%) (P = .0001). Similarly, black patients were more likely to have FC-demonstrable antibodies (28%) than white candidates (14%) (P = .014). The regraft patients who tested positive by either or all methods had a mean PRA for CDC, pooled FC-PRA, and individual cell FC-PRA of 40, 75, and 85, respectively. FC-PRA proved to be a more sensitive technique in both primary and regraft patients.

Determinants of Cardiovascular Mortality After Renal Transplantation: A Role For Cytomegalovirus?

Death with a functioning graft (DWF) is now the most common cause of late renal transplant failure, with cardiovascular disease its most frequent etiology. In some populations, infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) increases risk of coronary disease. Few data exist regarding CMV and cardiovascular mortality after renal transplantation. We reviewed charts of 158 adult patients who died more than 90 days after receiving renal allografts and a matched cohort of 143 (of 2398) surviving patients transplanted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1990 and 1998. Only advancing donor and recipient age increased risk of DWF; CMV infection did not. However, of 50 patients who died of cardiovascular causes, 94% were seropositive for CMV, while only 74% of the other 108 deaths occurred in CMV‐seropositive patients (p < 0.05). Risk of cardiovascular death was greatest (p < 0.05) in patients with diabetes, advancing age, and CMV seropositivity. In renal transplant recipients, infection with CMV increases risk of death as a result of cardiovascular causes.

A Comparison of OKT3 Monoclonal Antibody and Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

The monoclonal antibody OKT3 (Ortho Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ) was utilized in two separate protocols for treatment of acute renal allograft rejection in patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. In Group I, 54 patients received steroids for primary treatment of acute rejection with OKT3 used for resistant rejections and second rejection episodes. In Group II, 34 patients received OKT3 as primary treatment of acute rejection while steroids were used for rescue and second rejection episodes. OKT3 successfully reversed 82% of initial acute rejection episodes in Group II as compared with a 63% reversal with steroids in Group I. Rescue treatment was required in only 15% of Group II patients compared with 33% of Group I patients. Overall patient survival was 96% and 94%, respectively, for steroid primary and OKT3 primary treatments. Allograft survival at 3 months was identical, 74% in both groups. Based on allograft survival data, OKT3 is equally effective either as primary treatment for allograft rejection, or for rescue therapy if initial corticosteroid treatment fails.

Important risk factors of allograft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation. A study of 426 patients

Multiple risk factors contribute to the allogrnft survival of patients who have cadaveric renal transplantation. A retrospective review of 19 such factors in 426 patients identified race, DR match, B + DR match, number of transplants, and preservation time to have a significant influence. The parametric analysis confirmed the effect to be primarily in the early phase, i.e., first 6 months. All patients received cyclosporine with other methods of immunosupprcssion resulting in an overall 1-year graft survival rate of 66%. The overall 1-year graft survival rate in the white race was 73% and in the black race was 57% (p = 0.002). Allograft survival and DR match showed white recipients with a 1 DR match to have 75% survival at 1 year compared with 57% in the black patient (p = 0.009). If HLA B + DR match was considered, the white recipient allograft survival increased to 76%, 84%, and 88% for 1, 2, and 3 match kidneys by parametric analysis. Patients receiving first grafts had better graft survival (68%) than those undergoing retransplantation (58%) (p = 0.05). Organ preservation less than 12 hours influenced allograft survival with a 78% 1-year survival rate compared with 63% for kidneys with 12–18 hours of preservation. Despite the benefits of B + DR typing, short preservation time, and first transplants to the white recipient, the allograft survival in the black recipient remained uninfluenced by these parameters.

The effect of erythropoietin and blood transfusions on highly sensitized patients on a single cadaver renal allograft waiting list

The effects of EPO on transfusion requirements and HLA allosensitization were studied in a group of 145 sensitized patients on a single cadaveric renal allograft waiting list. All patients included in the study had PRA levels greater than 40% and at least six months of follow-up after the general availability of EPO. A total of 108 (74%) of these patients received EPO during the study period while 37 (26%) did not. The EPO patients had a much higher incidence of prior transfusions than the non-EPO patients (64% vs. 39% P less than 0.05). During the follow-up period, there was a marked reduction in transfusion incidence in the patients who received EPO from 64% to 14% (P less than 0.05). A lesser and nonsignificant reduction in incidence of transfusions was seen in the non-EPO-EPO patients. Analysis of PRA levels in the EPO and non-EPO groups demonstrated a reduction in PRA levels over time but there was no difference between the two groups. When the patients were divided by the need for transfusions in the follow-up period, a comparison of these two groups demonstrated significant differences. At the six-month follow-up point, patients in the nontransfused group had a significantly lower mean PRA than the transfused patients (49% vs. 62%, respectively, P less than 0.05). Furthermore, a greater number of patients in the nontransfused group had PRA declines greater than or equal to 15% compared with the nontransfused group (56/46% vs. 4/15%, respectively; P = .007). Stepwise logistic regression analysis of possible risk factors for persistent high PRA levels demonstrated that continued transfusion was the only significant factor. This study suggests that the institution of EPO therapy in sensitized patients on a single cadaveric waiting list can result in substantial reduction in the need for on-going transfusions. However, the decline in PRA levels appears to be more closely tied to the avoidance of transfusion rather than to the specific institution of EPO therapy.

The impact of the UNOS mandatory sharing policy on recipients of the black and white races--experience at a single renal transplant center.

The impact of the United Network for Organ Sharing mandatory sharing policy on a large transplant center procuring kidneys primarily from caucasians while serving a pool of prospective recipients composed mainly of blacks is described. This policy requires that all 6-antigen-matched and phenotypically identical donor kidneys be shipped to the appropriately matched recipients. The study consisted of 49 kidneys from 25 cadaveric donors; one kidney was unusable. In general, the 33 recipients of the mandatorily shared kidneys were caucasian (94%), unsensitized (70%), and first-time transplants (73%). Allograft survival for the 24 first-time recipients was 100% (mean graft survival = 11.3 months). Of the 9 regraft kidneys, 2 have failed (mean graft survival = 11.9 months) due to chronic rejection. In comparison, the 16 paired kidneys transplanted into non-6-antigen-matched recipients exhibited a 1-year graft survival of 80% versus 92% for the 33 recipients of mandatorily shared kidneys (P = 0.01). These 16 recipients were composed of more blacks (38%), fewer regrafts (6%), and most were unsensitized (75%). All 25 cadaveric donors were caucasians with very common HLA types. Thus, kidneys provided by the UNOS mandatory sharing policy had excellent allograft survival, and the recipients were largely unsensitized caucasians receiving their first kidney. The low number of blacks receiving allografts under this policy may be due to two factors. First, the histocompatibility differences between black recipients and the primarily caucasian cadaveric donor pool limit the number of kidneys available to blacks. Secondly, blacks do not have access to the best-matched kidneys, in part due to few black donors, their best source for well-matched kidneys. Thus, the mandatory sharing program is of clear benefit to the recipients of these well-matched kidneys; however, for a local program servicing a waiting list composed of 64% blacks the policy has been of limited value. In contrast, over 50% of local cadaveric transplants are into black recipients in a waiting time of 197 days, one third the national average for blacks. In conclusion, this study supports efforts to improve graft survival through matching but emphasizes the need to broaden our efforts in all areas of research and organ procurement to serve the entire recipient population, regardless of race.