Sharon P. Rodrigues

Relevance of Motion-Related Assessment Metrics in Laparoscopic Surgery

Introduction. Motion metrics have become an important source of information when addressing the assessment of surgical expertise. However, their direct relationship with the different surgical skills has not been fully explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relevance of motion-related metrics in the evaluation processes of basic psychomotor laparoscopic skills and their correlation with the different abilities sought to measure. Methods. A framework for task definition and metric analysis is proposed. An explorative survey was first conducted with a board of experts to identify metrics to assess basic psychomotor skills. Based on the output of that survey, 3 novel tasks for surgical assessment were designed. Face and construct validation was performed, with focus on motion-related metrics. Tasks were performed by 42 participants (16 novices, 22 residents, and 4 experts). Movements of the laparoscopic instruments were registered with the TrEndo tracking system and analyzed. Results. Time, path length, and depth showed construct validity for all 3 tasks. Motion smoothness and idle time also showed validity for tasks involving bimanual coordination and tasks requiring a more tactical approach, respectively. Additionally, motion smoothness and average speed showed a high internal consistency, proving them to be the most task-independent of all the metrics analyzed. Conclusion. Motion metrics are complementary and valid for assessing basic psychomotor skills, and their relevance depends on the skill being evaluated. A larger clinical implementation, combined with quality performance information, will give more insight on the relevance of the results shown in this study.

Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to examine the influence of training under direct vision prior to training with indirect vision on the learning curve of the laparoscopic suture task.MethodsNovices were randomized in two groups. Group 1 performed three suturing tasks in a transparent laparoscopic box trainer under direct vision followed by three suturing tasks in a standard non-transparent laparoscopic box trainer equipped with a 0° laparoscope. Group 2 performed six suturing tasks in a standard laparoscopic box trainer. Performance time, motion analysis parameters (economy of movements) and interaction force parameters (tissue handling) were measured. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing: self-perceived dexterity before and after the training, their experienced frustration and the difficulty of the training.ResultsA total of 34 participants were included, one was excluded because of incomplete training. Group 1 used significantly less time to complete the total of six tasks (27 %). At the end of the training, there were no differences in motion or force parameters between the two groups. Group 2 rated their self-perceived dexterity after the training significantly lower than before the training and also reported significantly higher levels of frustration compared to group 1. Both groups rated the difficulty of the training similar.ConclusionNovices benefit from starting their training of difficult basic laparoscopic skills, e.g., suturing, in a transparent box trainer without camera. It takes less time to complete the tasks, and they get less frustrated by the training with the same results on their economy of movements and tissue handling skills.

Patient safety risk factors in minimally invasive surgery: a validation study

This study was conducted to adapt and validate a patient safety (PS) framework for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as a first step in understanding the clinical relevance of various PS risk factors in MIS. Eight patient safety risk factor domains were identified using frameworks from a systems approach to patient safety. A questionnaire was drafted containing 34 questions. Three experts in the field of patient safety critically reviewed the questionnaire on clinical relevance and completeness. The questionnaire was distributed among known patient safety experts in person and also sent electronically. A total of 41 questionnaires were distributed and the response rate was 71%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.42 representing moderate agreement. For seven of nine risk domains, Cronbach’s alpha was sufficient (α > 0.7). Mean scores of the risk domains showed the following order of influence on patient safety from high to low: surgeon’s experience [6.6, standard deviation (SD) 0.5], technical skills surgeon (6.6, SD 0.7), technology (5.9, SD 1.1), complications (5.9, SD 1.2), social interaction (5.0, SD 1.0), leadership surgeon (5.4, SD 1.2), blood loss (5.0, SD 1.2), length of surgery (5.0, SD 1.3), surgical team (4.9, SD 1.3), fallibility (4.9, SD 1.3), patient (4.5, SD 1.5), safety measures (4.4, SD 1.5), and finally environment(3.9, SD 1.5). This study is an initiative to give insight into clinical relevance of the maze of PS risk factors in MIS. All investigated risk domains were considered to be of noticeable influence on PS. Nevertheless, it is possible to prioritize various risk domains. In fact, experience and technical skills of the surgeon, technology, and complications are rated as the most important risk factors, closely followed by social interaction and leadership of the surgeon. Patient, safety measures, and environment are rated as the least important risk factors.

Tying different knots: what forces do we use?

AbstractBackgroundA study was performed to determine differences in applied interaction force between conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery during suturing in a non-clinical setting.MethodsIn a laparoscopic box trainer set-up, experts performed two intracorporeal and two extracorporeal sutures on an artificial skin model. They also performed two instrument-tie knots and two one-hand square knots in a similar conventional training set-up. The force exerted on the artificial tissue (mean force, mean non-zero, maximum, and volume) and the time to complete a task were measured. For analysis purposes, sutures are divided in a needle driving phase (Phase 1) and knot-tying phase (Phase 2). ResultsPhase 1: Force values in laparoscopic suturing are significantly higher than in conventional suturing, except for the force volume during extracorporeal suturing versus the one-hand square knot. Phase 2: The mean force non-zero and maximum force during the intracorporeal knot are significantly higher than during the instrument-tie knot. The mean and maximum force during the extracorporeal knot are significantly higher than during the one-hand square knot. Furthermore, laparoscopic suturing takes longer time than conventional suturing.ConclusionExpert surgeons apply significantly higher force during laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional surgery even though the same strategy is used. Aspects such as the limited visual and haptic feedback, and movement possibilities hamper surgeons’ ability to assess the applied interaction force. Therefore it can be useful to provide additional force feedback about the applied interaction force during training in non-clinical settings.

Measuring surgical safety during minimally invasive surgical procedures: a validation study

BackgroundDuring the implementation of new interventions (i.e., surgical devices and technologies) in the operating room, surgical safety might be compromised. Current safety measures are insufficient in detecting safety hazards during this process. The aim of the study was to observe whether surgical teams are capable of measuring surgical safety, especially with regard to the introduction of new interventions.MethodsA Surgical Safety Questionnaire was developed that had to be filled out directly postoperative by three surgical team members. A potential safety concern was defined as at least one answer between (strongly) disagree and indifferent. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparison with the results from video analysis. Two different observers annotated the presence and effect of surgical flow disturbances during 40 laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between November 2010 and April 2012.ResultsThe surgeon reported a potential safety concern in 16% (85/520 questions). With respect to the scrub nurse and anesthesiologist, this was both 9% (46/520). With respect to the preparation, functioning, and ease of use of the devices in 37.5–47.5% (15–19/40 procedures) a potential safety concern was reported by one or more team members. During procedures after which a potential safety concern was reported, surgical flow disturbances lasted a higher percentage of the procedure duration [9.3 ± 6.2 vs. 2.9 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD), p < .001]. After procedures during which a new instrument or device was used, more potential safety concerns were reported (51.2 vs. 23.1%, p < .001).ConclusionsPotential safety concerns were especially reported during procedures in which a relatively high percentage of the duration consisted of surgical flow disturbances and during procedures in which a new instrument or device was used. The Surgical Safety Questionnaire can act as a validated tool to evaluate and maintain surgical safety during minimally invasive procedures, especially during the introduction of a new intervention.