Shaul Schreiber

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is as effective as electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of nondelusional major depressive disorder: an open study

BACKGROUNDnRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a new method for the stimulation of the central nervous system, is being proposed as a potential new treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). We tested the hypothesis that rTMS would be as effective as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with MDD.nnnMETHODSnForty patients with MDD referred for ECT were randomly assigned to either ECT or rTMS. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed at 90% power of the motor threshold. The stimulation frequency was 10 Hz for either 2 sec (first eight patients) or 6 sec (final 12 patients) for 20 trains. Patients were treated for up to 20 treatment days. Electroconvulsive therapy was performed according to standard protocols.nnnRESULTSnOverall patients responded best to ECT (chi(2) = 3.8, p <.05). Patients with MDD and psychosis responded significantly better to ECT (chi(2) = 9.2, p <. 01), whereas MDD patients without psychosis responded similarly to both treatments (chi(2) = 0.0, ns). The analysis of variance with repeated measures of clinical variables for the whole sample revealed significant treatment effects for both groups; however, interaction between group and treatment was seen only for the Global Assessment of Function and the Sleep assessment. When the psychosis-nonpsychosis grouping was considered, patients with psychosis responded dramatically better to ECT in all assessments, whereas those without psychosis responded similarly to both treatments.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOverall ECT was a more potent treatment for patients with MDD, this being particularly evident in patients with MDD and psychosis; however, in patients with MDD without psychosis the effects of rTMS were similar to those of ECT. The results we report are encouraging and support an important role for rTMS in the treatment of severe MDD; however, additional blinded studies are needed to precisely define this role.

A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression.

BACKGROUNDnStudies published over the past few years suggest that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may have significant antidepressant actions. In a previous report, we compared electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive TMS (rTMS) and found ECT to be superior for psychotic major depression (MD); however, ECT and rTMS had similar results in nonpsychotic MD. We now report on a controlled randomized comparison of ECT and rTMS in patients with nonpsychotic MD.nnnMETHODSnForty patients with nonpsychotic MD referred for ECT were included. Electroconvulsive therapy was performed according to established protocols. Repetitive TMS was performed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 90% motor threshold. Patients were treated with 20 sessions (five times per week for 4 weeks) of 10-Hz treatments (1200 pulses per treatment-day) at 90% motor threshold. Response to treatment was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score, with a final HRSD equal or less than 10 points and a final Global Assessment of Function Scale rating of 60 or more points.nnnRESULTSnThe overall response rate was 58% (23 out of 40 patients responded to treatment). In the ECT group, 12 responded and eight did not; in the rTMS group, 11 responded and nine did not (chi2 =.10, ns). Thus, patients responded as well to either ECT or rTMS.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis study adds to the growing literature supporting an antidepressant effect for rTMS. This study is particularly relevant because it suggests that rTMS and ECT reach similar results in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder.

The antinociceptive effect of venlafaxine in mice is mediated through opioid and adrenergic mechanisms.

The antinociceptive effects of the novel phentylethylamine antidepressant drug venlafaxine and its interaction with various opioid, noradrenaline and serotonin receptor subtypes were evaluated. When mice were tested with a hotplate analgesia meter, venlafaxine induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect following i.p. administration with an ED50 of 46.7 mg/kg (20.5; 146.5; 95% CL). Opioid, adrenergic and serotoninergic receptor antagonists were tested for their ability to block venlafaxine antinociception. Venlafaxine-induced antinociception was significantly inhibited by naloxone, nor-BNI and naltrindole but not by beta-FNA or naloxonazine, implying involvement of kappa1- and delta-opioid mechanisms. When adrenergic and serotoninergic antagonists were used, yohimbine (P < 0.005) but not phentolamine or metergoline, decreased antinociception elicited by venlafaxine, implying a clear alpha2- and a minor alpha1-adrenergic mechanism of antinociception. When venlafaxine was administered together with various agonists of the opioid and alpha2- receptor subtypes, it significantly potentiated antinociception mediated by kappa1- kappa3- and delta-opioid receptor subtypes. The alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine significantly potentiated venlafaxine-mediated antinociception. Summing up these results, we conclude that the antinociceptive effect of venlafaxine is mainly influenced by the kappa- and delta-opioid receptor subtypes combined with the alpha2-adrenergic receptor. These results suggest a potential use of venlafaxine in the management of some pain syndromes. However, further research is needed in order to establish both the exact clinical indications and the effective doses of venlafaxine when prescribed for pain.

Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals--preliminary report.

BACKGROUNDnRecent studies have strengthened the claim that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for major depression. The longitudinal outcome of TMS-treated patients, however, has not been described. We report on the 3- and 6-month outcomes of a group of patients treated with either electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (n = 20) or (rTMS) (n = 21).nnnMETHODSnPatients diagnosed with major depressive disorder with or without psychotic features referred for ECT were randomly assigned to receive either ECT or rTMS. Forty-one patients who responded to either treatment constituted the sample. Patients were followed on a monthly basis and outcomes were determined with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 items (HRSD) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales. Medications were routinely prescribed.nnnRESULTSnThere were no differences in the 6-month relapse rate between the groups. Overall, 20% of the patients relapsed (four from the ECT group and four from the rTMS group). Patients reported equally low and not significantly different scores in the HRSD (ECT group 8.4 +/- 5.6 and TMS group 7.9 +/- 7.1) and the GAF (ECT group 72.8 +/- 12 and TMS group 77.8 +/- 17.1) at the 6-month follow up.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatients treated with rTMS do as well as those treated with ECT at the 3- and 6-month follow-up points. These data suggest that the clinical gains obtained with rTMS last at least as long as those obtained with ECT.

The Atypical Neuroleptics Clozapine and Olanzapine Differ Regarding Their Antinociceptive Mechanisms and Potency

Using the mouse tail-flick assay, we evaluated the antinociceptive effect and the interaction with the opioid, adrenergic, and serotonergic systems of the two atypical neuroleptic agents clozapine and olanzapine. Clozapine induced a potent antinociceptive effect in a dose-dependent manner with ED50 of 8.7 mg/kg. This effect was antagonized by the nonselective opioid antagonist naloxone (p < 0.05), implying an opioid mechanism of action involved in clozapine-induced antinociception. Further evaluation demonstrated the involvement of micro1-, micro2-, kappa1- opioid receptor subtypes and of alpha2-adrenoreceptors in clozapine antinociception but not the serotonin receptors. Olanzapine induced a weak antinociceptive effect. The highest effect found was a 50% antinociception following an injection of 10 mg/kg. As the olanzapine dose increased beyond 10 mg/kg, latencies declined almost back to baseline. Yohimbine (an alpha2-adrenoreceptor antagonist) significantly reduced olanzapines antinociceptive effect almost completely (to 10%; p < 0.05), while both naloxone and metergoline (a nonselective 5-HT receptor antagonist) reduced it only partially. These results indicate the possible involvement of the alpha2-adrenoreceptors in olanzapine antinociception and to a less extent the involvement of opioid and serotonergic receptors. Although both clozapine and olanzapine are dibenzodiazepines with similar atypical antipsychotic properties, it seems that they differ notably not only regarding their hematological side effects, but regarding their interaction with the opioid system as well.

Augmentation of opioid induced antinociception by the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone in mice

Risperidone is a novel atypical neuroleptic with a favorable profile of side effects due to its unique pharmacological activity: it exhibits both potent dopamine D2 and 5-HT2 receptor blocking activity, as well as high affinity for alpha1 and alpha2 adrenergic receptors and histamine H1 receptor. We found that risperidone has a potent antinociceptive effect in the tailflick assay with an ED50 of 26.4 mg/kg. This effect of risperidone was antagonized by naloxone (P < 0.05). This sensitivity to naloxone indicates that at least some of the analgesic effects of risperidone are mediated by an opioid mechanism of action. beta-FNA (mu1 mu2-antagonist), naloxonazine (mu1-antagonist) and norbinaltorphamine (nor-BNI; kappa1-analgesia) reversed risperidone antinociceptive effect (P < 0.05). Naltrindole (delta-antagonist) only partially reversed risperidone antinociceptive effect. We found that the sensitivity of risperidone antinociceptive effect to selective antagonists implies involvement of mu1-, mu2- and kappa1-opioid and to a lesser extent delta-opioid mechanisms. These results suggest a possible role for risperidone both in the management of pain and in the management of opiate withdrawal and detoxification.

The Effect of Sertraline Add-On to Brief Dynamic Psychotherapy for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVEnThe efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of mild-to-moderate postpartum depression and the possible advantage of the combination of an antidepressant and psychotherapy have not been adequately studied. We hypothesized that psychotherapy and concurrent antidepressant treatment would be more effective than psychotherapy alone in the treatment of postpartum depression.nnnMETHODnWomen diagnosed with mild-to-moderate severity postpartum depression according to DSM-IV-TR criteria were enrolled in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received 12 sessions of focused brief dynamic psychotherapy (BDP) concurrently with 8-week sertraline or placebo treatment, followed by a 4-week open phase. Primary outcomes were depression scores measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and remission rates. The study was conducted in a referral center from May 2008 to September 2010.nnnRESULTSnForty of 42 women randomized into the study entered the intent-to-treat analysis. A significant time effect for the MADRS was observed (F4,35 = 21.3, P < .0001); however, no time-by-group effect was found for any outcome measure. Response rates were 70% and 55% for the drug and placebo groups, respectively, and remission rates were 65% and 50%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups.nnnCONCLUSIONnWhile both treatment groups improved significantly, the results of the present study did not demonstrate a significant benefit for sertraline over placebo as an add-on treatment to focused BDP in mild-to-moderate postpartum depression. Because of the studys small sample, the results cannot be viewed as definitive, and a much larger study is needed to confirm these results. Furthermore, the promising potential of focused BDP as an intervention in this population should be studied under controlled conditions.nnnTRIAL REGISTRATIONnclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01028482.

The antinociceptive effect of moclobemide in mice is mediated by noradrenergic pathways

Moclobemide is an antidepressant which affects the monoaminergic neurotransmitter system through a reversible inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO), preferentially type A. We examined the antinociceptive effects of moclobemide alone and in conjunction with specific opioid, adrenergic and serotonergic antagonists, using the mouse-tail flick test. Intraperitoneal moclobemide produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect with an ED50 of 69.1 mg/kg. Tests with selective antagonists yielded positive results only for yohimbine (P < 0.001), implying a noradrenergic mechanism of action in the moclobemide antinociceptive effect. This was confirmed by the coadministration of moclobemide with inactive doses of prototype agonists of the opioid, adrenergic and serotonergic systems. Only clonidine, an alpha2 agonist, significantly shifted (8-fold) the dose response curve of moclobemide. We conclude that there is a selective involvement of the alpha2 adrenergic pathways in the moclobemide-induced antinociceptive effect and a lesser involvement (if any) of the opioid, serotonergic and alpha1 adrenergic mechanisms. More research is needed to establish a possible role for moclobemide in pain management.

Magnetic motor threshold and response to TMS in major depressive disorder

Dolberg OT, Dannon PN, Schreiber S, Grunhaus L. Magnetic motor threshold and response to TMS in major depressive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002: 106: 220–223.

Interaction between the tetracyclic antidepressant mianserin HCl and opioid receptors

The antinociceptive effects of the tetracyclic antidepressant mianserin and its interaction with various opioid receptor subtypes was evaluated. Mice were tested with a hotplate analgesia meter. Mianserin elicited an antinociceptive effect in a dose-dependent manner following doses from 1-25 mg/kg. As the mianserin dose increased beyond 30 mg/kg, latencies returned to baseline, yielding a biphasic effect. This effect of mianserin was antagonized by naloxone (P<0.005), implying a possible opioid mechanism of action involved in the mianserin induced antinociceptive effect. When administered with various opioid antagonists, the sensitivity of mianserin to selective opioid antagonists was found significant for mu and kappa1 opioid receptor subtypes (P<0.005), but not for delta-receptor. At the next stage mianserin was administered together with various agonists of opioid receptors. When administered together with opiates, mianserin significantly potentiates analgesia at the mu, kappa1 and kappa3 opioid receptor subtype (P<0.005) and to a lesser extent, at the delta opioid receptors. These results suggest a potential use of mianserin in the management of some pain syndromes. However, further research is needed in order to establish both the exact clinical indications and the effective doses of mianserin when prescribed for pain.