Shaun R. Brown
William Beaumont Army Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shaun R. Brown.
Military Medicine | 2013
Shaun R. Brown; Jonathan P. Swisher; Luke J. Hofmann; Lisa C. Coviello; Kurt G. Davis
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical management and associated complications of penetrating rectal injuries sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. METHODS A retrospective review was performed using the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. U.S. military personnel injured in Iraq and Afghanistan from October 2003 to November 2008 were included. The surgical management of rectal injuries was evaluated, specifically looking at the utilization of diversion with ostomy, distal washout, and presacral drainage. Complications were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS 57 patients who sustained a penetrating rectal injury were included in this study. Surgical management included diversion and ostomy alone in 34 patients (60%), diversion and distal washout in 11 patients (19%), diversion and drainage in 8 patients (14%), and diversion, distal washout, and drainage in 4 patients (7%). Complications were identified in 21% of patients. There were no deaths in the study group. Logistical regression failed to show a correlation between postoperative complications with either distal washout (p = 0.33) or presacral drainage (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients were successfully managed with fecal diversion alone, suggesting that drainage and distal washout may be unnecessary steps in the management of high-velocity, penetrating rectal injuries.
Journal of Surgical Research | 2015
Shaun R. Brown; Mohammed Showkat Ali; Matthew Williams; Jonathan P. Swisher; William V. Rice; Lisa C. Coviello; Sonny S. Huitron; Kurt G. Davis
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on the intracellular environment, specifically evaluating butyrate transport, within the colon of the Sprague-Dawley rat. METHODS Sixty-eight Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to either an MBP group (n = 34) or a control group (n = 34). Twenty-four hours after the completion of the MBP, both groups were euthanized, and the colons were harvested. The level of cellular apoptosis was investigated after DNA fragmentation, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, and caspase assays. Western blot analysis was performed to measure the expression of the butyrate transporter protein, monocarboxylate transporters 1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (a marker for tissue proliferation). Immunohistochemical staining was performed to further investigate cellular proliferation. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was determined using two-tailed t-test. RESULTS Apoptosis was detected without significant differences in both groups. Western Blot analysis demonstrated that the expression of the monocarboxylate transporters 1 protein is downregulated in the MBP group (10.18 ± 3.09) compared with the control group (16.73 ± 7.39, P = 0.001), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen levels showed a decrease in cellular proliferation in the MBP group (13.35 ± 5.88) compared with the control (20.07 ± 7.55, P = 0.018). Immunohistochemistry confirmed a decrease in cellular proliferation after MBP with 23.4 ± 7.8% of the cells staining positive for Ki-67 in the MBP group versus 28.6 ± 7.9% in the control group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS MBP has a negative impact on cellular proliferation and intracellular transport of butyrate within the rat colon, not related to apoptosis. This is the first study to demonstrate the intracellular effects that MBP has on the rat colon.
Journal of Surgical Education | 2009
Shaun R. Brown; John D. Horton; Kurt G. Davis
BACKGROUND Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is not a commonly recognized pathogen isolated from perirectal abscesses. Complex perirectal abscesses of MRSA origin may present a significant challenge to the physician and result in treatment failure. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of MRSA in our patient population with perirectal abscesses and whether antibiotics coverage, if given, was adequate. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of all adult patients who presented with a perirectal abscess. The bacteriology of the cultures taken from more than 100 patients during an 8-year period was examined. The prevalence of MRSA was specifically analyzed, and the sensitivities of the organisms isolated were then compared with any antibiotics prescribed to determine the adequacy of coverage. RESULTS In all, 124 patients were treated for perirectal abscess during the 8-year period. Fifty-nine percent of patients were taken to the operating room for incision and drainage, 52% of the patients had cultures taken of the abscess, and 35% of patients were given antibiotics coupled with incision and drainage. The antibiotics offered adequate coverage when compared with the sensitivities of the organisms 73% of the time. The prevalence of MRSA in our patient population was 19%, and when this organism was cultured, the patient only received adequate coverage 33% of the time. CONCLUSION The presence of MRSA in perirectal abscesses is underrecognized. Recent data has shown that incision and drainage combined with antibiotics offers a superior outcome in soft tissue abscesses caused by this organism. If cultures are not routinely taken at the time of incision and drainage, the institutional incidents of MRSA will remain unknown. Physicians must recognize that MRSA is a potential organism present in perirectal abscesses when considering antimicrobial therapy for complex abscesses.
Respiratory Care | 2011
Shaun R. Brown; John D. Horton; Domingo Rosario; David Dorsey; Stephen P. Hetz; Christopher S. King
High-grade primary pulmonary B cell lymphoma is a rare, aggressive lung malignancy, accounting for less than 0.2% of all primary lung cancers.[1][1] It often presents as a solitary mass with associated systemic symptoms, most commonly in immunosuppressed patients. We present a case of this unusual
American Journal of Surgery | 2010
Shaun R. Brown; Jason D. Meyers; Eric D. Jenkins; Margaret M. Frisella; L. Michael Brunt; J. Christopher Eagon; Kurt G. Davis; Brent D. Matthews
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes for intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomotic techniques for isolated laparoscopic small-intestine resection. METHODS A retrospective database was created for all adult patients who underwent a laparoscopic segmental small-intestine resection. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or requiring an ileocolectomy were excluded. RESULTS Laparoscopic resection was performed in 52 patients (ratio of men:women, 30:22) with a mean age of 47 ± 21 years. A laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 30 patients (58%), and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 22 patients (42%). There was no difference in mean operating room time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complication rate, or length of stay between the 2 groups. Ten patients had a complication, and 5 patients experienced a Clavien grade II or greater complication. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic segmental small-bowel resection using either intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomotic techniques is equally efficacious for pathology isolated to the small bowel.
Archive | 2019
Shaun R. Brown; Terry C. Hicks; Charles B. Whitlow
Abstract Colonoscopy is the most commonly performed procedure for colorectal cancer screening, removal of polyps, and evaluation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms. This chapter reviews the periprocedural care of patients undergoing colonoscopy, including bowel preparation, management of anticoagulation, and procedural sedation. Additionally it addresses the technique of the procedure, the technical aspects of polyp detection and removal, and the treatment of the most common complications of the procedure.
Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2018
Shaun R. Brown; David A. Margolin; Laura K. Altom; Heather Green; David E. Beck; Brian R. Kann; Charles B. Whitlow; H. Vargas
BACKGROUND: Low rectal tumors are often treated with sphincter-preserving resection followed by coloanal anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term complications following straight coloanal anastomosis vs colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis. DESIGN: Patients were identified who underwent proctectomy for rectal neoplasia followed by coloanal anastomosis in the 2008 to 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographic characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between groups. SETTINGS: A national sample was extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. PATIENTS: Inpatients following proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred seventy patients were included, 624 in the straight anastomosis group and 746 in the colonic J-pouch group. Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups, with the exception of preoperative radiation therapy (straight anastomosis 35% vs colonic J-pouch 48%, p = 0.0004). Univariate analysis demonstrated that deep surgical site infection (3.7% vs 1.4%, p = 0.01), septic shock (2.25% vs 0.8%, p = 0.04), and return to the operating room (8.8% vs 5.0%, p = 0.0006) were more frequent in the straight anastomosis group vs the colonic J-pouch group. Major complications were also higher (23% vs 14%, p = 0.0001) and length of stay was longer in the straight anastomosis group vs the colonic J-pouch group (8.9 days vs 8.1 days, p = 0.02). After adjusting for covariates, major complications were less following colonic J-pouch vs straight anastomosis (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.38–0.84; p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of patients who received preoperative radiation therapy demonstrated no difference in major complications between groups. LIMITATIONS: This study had those limitations inherent to a retrospective study using an inpatient database. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications were less following colonic J-pouch anastomosis vs straight anastomosis. Patients who received preoperative radiation had similar rates of complications, regardless of the reconstructive technique used following low anterior resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A468.
Journal of surgical case reports | 2017
Joshua Dilday; Maxwell R. Sirkin; Chelsey McKinnon; Shaun R. Brown
Abstract Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been recently documented after a variety of laparoscopic surgeries. Although it is well established in splenectomies, its prevalence in other laparoscopic procedures is rare. PVT in colectomies has been associated with inflammatory processes, such as ulcerative colitis and diverticulitis. We report a case of postoperative PVT following a total abdominal colectomy for colonic inertia. A 27-year-old female underwent an uneventful elective laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for colonic inertia, and presented on postoperative day (POD) 3 with obstipation, abdominal distention and emesis. Her abdominal pain increased on POD 4 and computed tomography revealed PVT. PVT following laparoscopic surgery is rare in cases not involving the spleen. Although previously seen in colectomies for inflammatory conditions, it can present after colonic inertia. A high index of suspicion should be maintained to diagnosis this rare complication.
Hernia | 2011
Shaun R. Brown; John D. Horton; E. Trivette; Luke J. Hofmann; J. M. Johnson
Pediatric Surgery International | 2009
John D. Horton; Sukhyung Lee; Shaun R. Brown; Julia O. Bader; Donald E. Meier