Shazia Miller
American Institutes for Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shazia Miller.
Sociology Of Education | 1999
James E. Rosenbaum; Stefanie DeLuca; Shazia Miller; Kevin Roy
Although youths are often confined in jobs that allow minimal gains in earnings, the AA. used quantitative data to examine whether any kinds of job contact allow youths to get jobs that lead to later higher earnings and use qualitative data to illustrate school job contacts and the ways they can help disadvantaged groups. Analyzing data from High School and Beyond, the AA. found that most types of contacts have little effect on early earnings, but relatives and school contacts place students in jobs that lead to higher earnings nine years later (at age 28). Blacks, young women, and high-achieving youths less often get their jobs from relatives but more often get jobs through school contacts. The findings indicate the theoretical importance of social contacts and previously overlooked ways that high schools improve the work-entry process for youths, especially blacks and females
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis | 2013
Spyros Konstantopoulos; Shazia Miller; Arie van der Ploeg
Interim assessments are increasingly common in U.S. schools. We use high-quality data from a large-scale school-level cluster randomized experiment to examine the impact of two well-known commercial interim assessment programs on mathematics and reading achievement in Indiana. Results indicate that the treatment effects are positive but not consistently significant. The treatment effects are smaller in lower grades (i.e., kindergarten to second grade) and larger in upper grades (i.e., third to eighth grade). Significant treatment effects are detected in Grades 3 to 8, especially in third- and fourth-grade reading and in fifth- and sixth-grade mathematics.
Community College Review | 2013
Jonathan Margolin; Shazia Miller; James E. Rosenbaum
This study explored whether community college websites are a useful medium for providing knowledge relevant to degree completion. Ten community students used one of three community college websites to answer 10 questions about occupational degree programs. A facilitator asked participants to think aloud while using the website to answer these questions; their responses were video-recorded and coded in terms of correctness of answers and types of usability problems encountered. The findings suggest that participants frequently encountered problems with finding and understanding information needed to understand degree selection and completion. The content analysis of these problems yields several suggestions for improving the usability of community college websites for answering common questions about degree completion.
Phi Delta Kappan | 2010
Shazia Miller; Karen Drill; Ellen Behrstock
Teachers will use more research when researchers fine-tune how they present their discoveries to teachers.
Educational and Psychological Measurement | 2014
Ryan T. Williams; Andrew Swanlund; Shazia Miller; Spyros Konstantopoulos; Jared Eno; Arie van der Ploeg; Coby Meyers
This study operationalizes four measures of instructional differentiation: one for Grade 2 English language arts (ELA), one for Grade 2 mathematics, one for Grade 5 ELA, and one for Grade 5 mathematics. Our study evaluates their measurement properties of each measure in a large field experiment: the Indiana Diagnostic Assessment Tools Study, which included two consecutive cluster randomized trials (CRTs) of the effects of interim assessments on student achievement. Each log was designed to measure instructional practices as they were implemented for eight randomly selected students in the participating teachers’ classrooms. A total of 592 teachers from 127 schools took part in this study. Logs were administered 16 times in each experiment. Item responses to the logs were scaled using the Rasch model and reliability estimates for the differentiation measures were evaluated at the log level (observations within teachers), the teacher level, and the school level. Estimated reliability was above .70 for each of the log- and teacher-level measures. At the school level, reliability estimates were lower for Grade 5 ELA and mathematics. The variance between teachers and schools on the scaled differentiation measures was substantially less than within-teacher variation. These results provide preliminary evidence that teacher instructional logs may provide useful measures of instructional differentiation in elementary grades at multiple levels of aggregation.
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness | 2016
Spyros Konstantopoulos; Shazia Miller; Arie van der Ploeg; Wei Li
ABSTRACT We use data from a large-scale, school-level randomized experiment conducted in 2010–2011 in public schools in Indiana. Our sample includes more than 30,000 students in 70 schools. We examine the impact of two interim assessment programs (i.e., mCLASS in Grades K–2 and Acuity in Grades 3–8) on mathematics and reading achievement. Two-level models were used to capture the nesting in the data. Results indicate that the treatment effect is insignificant in Grades 3–8, and thus students in treatment schools perform as well as students in control schools. In contrast, the treatment effect is negative and significant in Grades K–2 (i.e., kindergarten and second grade), indicating that students in control schools perform higher than students in treatment schools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement | 2016
Spyros Konstantopoulos; Wei Li; Shazia Miller; Arie van der Ploeg
We use data from a large-scale experiment conducted in Indiana in 2009-2010 to examine the impact of two interim assessment programs (mCLASS and Acuity) across the mathematics and reading achievement distributions. Specifically, we focus on whether the use of interim assessments has a particularly strong effect on improving outcomes for low achievers. Quantile regression is used to estimate treatment effects across the entire achievement distribution (i.e., provide estimates in the lower, middle, or upper tails). Results indicate that in Grades 3 to 8 (particularly third, fifth, and sixth) lower achievers seem to benefit more from interim assessments than higher achieving students.
American Journal of Education | 1996
James E. Rosenbaum; Shazia Miller; Melinda Scott Krei
Work And Occupations | 1997
Shazia Miller; James E. Rosenbaum
Poverty Research | 1997
James E. Rosenbaum; Shazia Miller