Sheila Bermejo

Factores predictivos de nefropatía no diabética en pacientes diabéticos: Utilidad de la biopsia renal

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Diabetic renal lesions can only be diagnosed by kidney biopsy. These biopsies have a high prevalence of non-diabetic lesions. The aims of the study were to determine the predictability of non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) in diabetics and study differences in survival and renal prognosis. In addition, we evaluated histological lesions and the effect of proteinuria on survival and renal prognosis in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). MATERIAL AND METHODS A descriptive, retrospective study of kidney biopsies of diabetics between 1990 and 2013 in our centre. RESULTS 110 patients were included in the study: 87 men (79%), mean age 62 years (50-74), mean serum creatinine 2.6mg/dl (0.9-4.3) and proteinuria 3.5g/24hours (0.5-6.5). 61.8% showed NDN, 34.5% showed DN and 3,6% showed DN+NDN. The most common NDN was IgA nephropathy (13,2%). In the multivariate analysis, creatinine (OR: 1.48, 1.011-2.172, p=0.044), proteinuria/24hours (OR: 0.813, 0.679-0.974, p=0.025), duration of diabetes (OR: 0.992, 0.987-0.998, p=0.004), age (OR: 1.068, 95% CI: 1.010-1.129, p=0.022), and diabetic retinopathy (OR: 0.23, 0.066-0.808, p=0.022) were independently associated with NDN. We did not find any differences in survival or renal prognosis. Concerning patients with DN, increased nodular mesangial expansion (p=0.02) and worse renal prognosis (p=0.004) were observed in nephrotic proteinuria as compared to non-nephrotic proteinuria. We did not find differences in patient survival. CONCLUSIONS The most common cause of NDN was IgA nephropathy. Higher creatinine levels, shorter duration of diabetes, absence of diabetic retinopathy, lower proteinuria, and older age were risk factors for NDN. Patients with DN and nephrotic-range proteinuria had worse renal prognosis.

Impact of Recurrent Acute Kidney Injury on Patient Outcomes

Background/Aims: Recurrent acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among patients after a first hospitalized AKI. However, little is known about the prognosis of recurrent AKI episodes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) development, cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods: A retrospective study included patients admitted to our Hospital from 2000 to 2010. AKI was defined according to the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative criteria. In the follow-up period after the first AKI episode, clinical, laboratory data and the number of repeated AKI episodes, etiology and severity were recorded. Results: Among the 359 AKI survivor patients included, 250 new AKI episodes were observed in 122 patients (34%). Variables independently associated to new episodes were: type 2 DM [OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.2-3.8, p=0.001], ischemic heart disease [OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.1-3.6, p=0.012], and SCr at the first AKI event>2,6 mg/dl [OR 1.2; 95%CI 1.03-1.42, p=0.02]. Development of CKD during four years follow-up was more frequent in patients with recurrent AKI, HR [2.2 (95% CI: 1.09-4.3, p=0.003)] and 44% of recurrent AKI patients who developed CKD occurred during the first 6 months after the initial event. Cardiovascular events were more frequent among patients with recurrent AKI patients than in those with one AKI episode (47.2% vs 24%, p=0.001). Mortality at 4 years was higher in the patient subgroup with several episodes of AKI as compared with those with a single episode [HR: 4.5 (95% CI 2.7-7.5) p<0.001]. Conclusion: Episodes of recurrent AKI have a high potential to be associated with relevant complications such as cardiovascular events, mortality and CKD development.

The large spectrum of renal disease in diabetic patients

Abstract The prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) among diabetic patients seems to be overestimated. Recent studies with renal biopsies show that the incidence of non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) among diabetic patients is higher than expected. Renal impairment of diabetic patients is frequently attributed to DN without meeting the KDOQI criteria or performing renal biopsy to exclude NDN. In this editorial, we update the spectrum of renal disease in diabetic patients and the impact on diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.

KDPI Score: A comparison with classical ECD/SCD classification in predicting outcomes

Background Kidney donor shortage requires an expansion in selection criteria and objective tools to minimize discarded organs. Easy donor pretransplant variables such as age, standard/expanded criteria donors (SCD/ECD) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), have demonstrated correlations with patient and graft outcomes. We aimed to establish the accuracy of the three models to determine the prognostic value on kidney transplantation (KT) major outcomes. Methods Retrospective study in deceased donor KT at our institution. Unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier survival, and multivariate Cox analysis were fitted to analyze the impact of the three predictor scores donor age, SCD/ECD and KDPI on outcomes. Results KT included. Donor age 53.6±15.2y; 41.9% ECD; mean KDPI 69.4±23.4%. Median follow-up 51.9m. Unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier showed that the three prognostic variables (donor age, ECD status and KDPI) were related with increased risk of patient death, graft failure and death-censored graft failure. However, in the multivariate analysis only KDPI was related with higher risk of graft failure (HR 1.03 each 1% [1.01-1.05]; p=0.014). Multivariate models for graft failure were calculated including donor age as a continuous variable, donor age >60y, ECD definition, KDPI (continuous variable) or different KDPI cut-offs (Figure). Figure. No caption available. Conclusions SCD/ECD classification did not provide significant prognostic outcome information. KDPI was linearly related with higher risk of graft failure, providing a better assessment. More studies are needed before using KDPI as a tool to discard or accept kidneys for transplantation.

Usefulness of the KDPI in Spain: A comparison with donor age and definition of standard/expanded criteria donor

INTRODUCTION Kidney donor shortage requires expanding donor selection criteria, as well as use of objective tools to minimize the percentage of discarded organs. Some donor pre-transplant variables such as age, standard/expanded criteria donor (SCD/ECD) definition and calculation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), have demonstrated correlations with patient and graft outcomes. We aimed to establish the accuracy of the three models to determine the prognostic value of kidney transplantation (KT) major outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study in deceased donor KTs at our institution. Unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier survival, and multivariate Cox analyses were fitted to analyze the impact of donor age, SCD/ECD and KDPI on outcomes. RESULTS 389 KTs were included. Mean donor age was 53.6±15.2 years; 163 (41.9%) came from ECD; mean KDPI was 69.4±23.4%. Median follow-up was 51.9 months. The unadjusted Cox and Kaplan-Meier showed that the three prognostic variables of interest were related to increased risk of patient death, graft failure and death-censored graft failure. However, in the multivariate analysis only KDPI was related to a higher risk of graft failure (HR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.05]; p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS SCD/ECD classification did not provide significant prognostic information about patient and graft outcomes. KDPI was linearly related to a higher risk of graft failure, providing a better assessment. More studies are needed before using KDPI as a tool to discard or accept kidneys for transplantation.

Bloqueo del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona en pacientes con enfermedad renal diabética avanzada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of end-stage chronic kidney disease. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade has been shown to slow the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Our objectives were: to study the percentage of patients with diabetic kidney disease treated with RAAS blockade, to determine its renal function, safety profile and assess whether its administration is associated with increased progression of CKD after 3 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study. 197 diabetic kidney disease patients were included and divided into three groups according to the treatment: patients who had never received RAAS blockade (non-RAAS blockade), patients who at some point had received RAAS blockade (inconstant-RAAS blockade) and patients who received RAAS blockade (constant-RAAS blockade). Clinical characteristics and analytical variables such as renal function, electrolytes, glycosylated haemoglobin and glomerular filtration rate according to chronic kidney disease -EPI and MDRD formulas were assessed. We also studied their clinical course (baseline, 1 and 3 years follow-up) in terms of treatment group, survival, risk factors and renal prognosis. RESULTS Non-RAAS blockade patients had worse renal function and older age (p<0.05) at baseline compared to RAAS blockade patients. Patients who received RAAS blockade were not found to have greater toxicity or chronic kidney disease progression and no differences in renal prognosis were identified. Mortality was higher in non-RAAS blockade patients, older patients and patients with worse renal function (p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis, older age and worse renal function were risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with RAAS blockade is more common in diabetic kidney disease patients with eGFR≥30ml/min/1.73m2. In our study, there were no differences in the evolution of renal function between the three groups. Older age and worse renal function were associated with higher mortality in patients who did not receive RAAS blockade.