Sheila Goodnight-White

Antielastin autoimmunity in tobacco smoking–induced emphysema

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema are common destructive inflammatory diseases that are leading causes of death worldwide. Here we show that emphysema is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antielastin antibody and T-helper type 1 (TH1) responses, which correlate with emphysema severity. These findings link emphysema to adaptive immunity against a specific lung antigen and suggest the potential for autoimmune pathology of other elastin-rich tissues such as the arteries and skin of smokers.

Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

AbstractBackground: Observational studies have suggested that lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is superior to optimal medical therapy for selected subsets of patients with advanced emphysema. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with the exception of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), failed to enroll a sufficient number of patients to provide clinicians and patients with convincing outcome data on the usefulness of LVRS. It was postulated that a meta-analysis of these RCTs (3–12 months’ follow up) may provide more compelling information on the value of LVRS in patients with emphysema. Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database between January 1994 and January 2004 for RCTs on LVRS was performed. Results: From a total of eight RCTs on record, six studies (306 patients) with 3- to 12-month follow up were deemed suitable for meta-analysis. Key baseline features of these RCT populations included heterogeneous emphysema, comparable inclusion/exclusion criteria and, in retrospect, low walking capacity as measured by the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). This profile closely resembles NETT’s ’predominantly upper lobe — low exercise tolerance emphysema’ cohort.The LVRS arm of the meta-analysis population showed better results than the medical cohort in terms of pulmonary function (FEV1 p < 0.0001, FVC p < 0.0001, residual volume p < 0.0001, total lung capactiy p = 0.004), gas exchange (arterial partial pressure of oxygen p < 0.0001) and exercise capacity (6MWD p = 0.0002). Although information on quality-of-life measures was not sufficiently uniform to qualify for meta-analysis, a survey of available data revealed better results in the surgical than in the medical arms of each RCT. Mortality 6–12 months after random assignment to treatment was similar in the two study arms, suggesting that the operative mortality from LVRS was offset, within months, by deaths in the medical arm. Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that a selected subset of patients with advanced, heterogeneous emphysema and low exercise tolerance (6MWD) experienced better outcomes from LVRS than from medical therapy.

Altered thoracic gas compression contributes to improvement in spirometry with lung volume reduction surgery

Background: Thoracic gas compression (TGC) exerts a negative effect on forced expiratory flow. Lung resistance, effort during a forced expiratory manoeuvre, and absolute lung volume influence TGC. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) reduces lung resistance and absolute lung volume. LVRS may therefore reduce TGC, and such a reduction might explain in part the improvement in forced expiratory flow with the surgery. A study was conducted to determine the effect of LVRS on TGC and the extent to which reduced TGC contributed to an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following LVRS. Methods: The effect of LVRS on TGC was studied using prospectively collected lung mechanics data from 27 subjects with severe emphysema. Several parameters including FEV1, expiratory and inspiratory lung resistance (Rle and Rli), and lung volumes were measured at baseline and 6 months after surgery. Effort during the forced manoeuvre was measured using transpulmonary pressure. A novel method was used to estimate FEV1 corrected for the effect of TGC. Results: At baseline the FEV1 corrected for gas compression (NFEV1) was significantly higher than FEV1 (p<0.0001). FEV1 increased significantly from baseline (p<0.005) while NFEV1 did not change following surgery (p>0.15). TGC decreased significantly with LVRS (p<0.05). Rle and maximum transpulmonary pressure (TPpeak) during the forced manoeuvre significantly predicted the reduction in TGC following the surgery (Rle: p<0.01; TPpeak: p<0.0001; adjusted R2 = 0.68). The improvement in FEV1 was associated with the reduction in TGC after surgery (p<0.0001, adjusted R2 = 0.58). Conclusions: LVRS decreased TGC by improving expiratory flow limitation. In turn, the reduction in TGC decreased its negative effect on expiratory flow and therefore explained, in part, the improvement in FEV1 with LVRS in this cohort.