Shelley A. Wright
University of California, San Diego
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shelley A. Wright.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2009
David R. Law; Charles C. Steidel; Dawn K. Erb; James E. Larkin; Max Pettini; Alice E. Shapley; Shelley A. Wright
We present the results of a spectroscopic survey of the kinematic structure of star-forming galaxies at redshift z ∼ 2–3 using Keck/OSIRIS integral field spectroscopy. Our sample is comprised of 12 galaxies between redshifts z ∼ 2.0 and 2.5 and one galaxy at z ∼ 3.3 which are well detected in either Hα or [O iii] emission. These galaxies are generally representative of the mean stellar mass of star-forming galaxies at similar redshifts, although they tend to have star formation rate surface densities slightly higher than the mean. These observations were obtained in conjunction with the Keck laser guide star adaptive optics system, with a typical angular resolution after spatial smoothing ∼0. 15 (approximately 1 kpc at the redshift of the target sample). At most five of these 13 galaxies have spatially resolved velocity gradients consistent with rotation while the remaining galaxies have relatively featureless or irregular velocity fields. All of our galaxies show local velocity dispersions ∼60–100 km s −1 , suggesting that (particularly for those galaxies with featureless velocity fields) rotation about a preferred axis may not be the dominant mechanism of physical support. While some galaxies show evidence for major mergers such evidence is unrelated to the kinematics of individual components (one of our strongest merger candidates also exhibits unambiguous rotational structure), refuting a simple bimodal disk/merger classification scheme. We discuss these data in light of complementary surveys and extant UV-IR spectroscopy and photometry, concluding that the dynamical importance of cold gas may be the primary factor governing the observed kinematics of z ∼ 2 galaxies. We conclude by speculating on the importance of mechanisms for accreting low angular momentum gas and the early formation of quasi-spheroidal systems in the young universe.
Nature | 2011
Nicholas J. McConnell; Chung-Pei Ma; Karl Gebhardt; Shelley A. Wright; Jeremy D. Murphy; Tod R. Lauer; James R. Graham; Douglas O. Richstone
Observational work conducted over the past few decades indicates that all massive galaxies have supermassive black holes at their centres. Although the luminosities and brightness fluctuations of quasars in the early Universe suggest that some were powered by black holes with masses greater than 10 billion solar masses, the remnants of these objects have not been found in the nearby Universe. The giant elliptical galaxy Messier 87 hosts the hitherto most massive known black hole, which has a mass of 6.3 billion solar masses. Here we report that NGC 3842, the brightest galaxy in a cluster at a distance from Earth of 98 megaparsecs, has a central black hole with a mass of 9.7 billion solar masses, and that a black hole of comparable or greater mass is present in NGC 4889, the brightest galaxy in the Coma cluster (at a distance of 103 megaparsecs). These two black holes are significantly more massive than predicted by linearly extrapolating the widely used correlations between black-hole mass and the stellar velocity dispersion or bulge luminosity of the host galaxy. Although these correlations remain useful for predicting black-hole masses in less massive elliptical galaxies, our measurements suggest that different evolutionary processes influence the growth of the largest galaxies and their black holes.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2010
Jong-Hak Woo; Tommaso Treu; Aaron J. Barth; Shelley A. Wright; Jonelle L. Walsh; Misty C. Bentz; Paul Martini; Vardha N. Bennert; Gabriela Canalizo; Alexei V. Filippenko; Ellinor Gates; Jenny E. Greene; Weidong Li; Matthew A. Malkan; Daniel Stern; Takeo Minezaki
To investigate the black hole mass versus stellar velocity dispersion (MBH-σ*) relation of active galaxies, we measured the velocity dispersions of a sample of local Seyfert 1 galaxies, for which we have recently determined black hole masses using reverberation mapping. For most objects, stellar velocity dispersions were measured from high signal-to-noise ratio optical spectra centered on the Ca II triplet region (∼ 8500 A), obtained at the Keck, Palomar, and Lick Observatories. For two objects, in which the Ca II triplet region was contaminated by nuclear emission, the measurement was based on high-quality H-band spectra obtained with the OH-Suppressing Infrared Imaging Spectrograph at the Keck-II telescope. Combining our new measurements with data from the literature, we assemble a sample of 24 active galaxies with stellar velocity dispersions and reverberation-based black hole mass measurements in the range of black hole mass 106 < MBH/M⊙ < 109. We use this sample to obtain reverberation-mapping constraints on the slope and intrinsic scatter of the MBH-σ* relation of active galaxies. Assuming a constant virial coefficient f for the reverberation-mapping black hole masses, we find a slope β = 3.55 ± 0.60 and the intrinsic scatter σint = 0.43 ± 0.08 dex in the relation log(MBH/M⊙) = α + β log(σ*/200kms-1), which are consistent with those found for quiescent galaxies. We derive an updated value of the virial coefficient f by finding the value which places the reverberation masses in best agreement with the MBH-σ* relation of quiescent galaxies; using the quiescent MBH-σ* relation determined by Gultekin etal., we find log f = 0.72 +0.09-0.10 with an intrinsic scatter of 0.44 ± 0.07 dex. No strong correlations between f and parameters connected to the physics of accretion (such as the Eddington ratio or line-shape measurements) are found. The uncertainty of the virial coefficient remains one of the main sources of the uncertainty in black hole mass determinations using reverberation mapping, and therefore also in single-epoch spectroscopic estimates of black hole masses in active galaxies.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
A. M. Nierenberg; Tommaso Treu; Shelley A. Wright; C. D. Fassnacht; Matthew W. Auger
Strong gravitational lenses can be used to detect low mass subhalos, based on deviations in image fluxes and positions from what can be achieved with a smooth mass distribution. So far, this method has been limited by the small number of (radio-loud, microlensing free) systems which can be analysed for the presence of substructure. Using the gravitational lens B1422+231, we demonstrate that adaptive optics integral field spectroscopy can also be used to detect dark substructures. We analyse data obtained with OSIRIS on the Keck I Telescope, using a Bayesian method that accounts for uncertainties relating to the point spread function and image positions in the separate exposures. The narrow-line [OIII] fluxes measured for the lensed images are consistent with those measured in the radio, and show a significant deviation from what would be expected in a smooth mass distribution, consistent with the presence of a perturbing low mass halo. Detailed lens modelling shows that image fluxes and positions are fit significantly better when the lens is modelled as a system containing a single perturbing subhalo in addition to the main halo, rather than by the main halo on its own, indicating the significant detection of substructure.The inferred mass of the subhalo depends on the subhalo mass density profile: the 68% confidence interval for the perturber mass within 600 pc are: 8.2
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Michael W. McElwain; Stanimir Metchev; James E. Larkin; Matthew Barczys; Christof Iserlohe; Alfred Krabbe; A. Quirrenbach; Jason Weiss; Shelley A. Wright
^{+0.6}_{-0.8}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Nicholas J. McConnell; Chung-Pei Ma; James R. Graham; Karl Gebhardt; Tod R. Lauer; Shelley A. Wright; Douglas O. Richstone
, 8.2
The Astrophysical Journal | 2005
Jason Melbourne; Shelley A. Wright; Matthew Barczys; Antonin H. Bouchez; Jason C. Y. Chin; M. A. van Dam; Scott K. Hartman; Erik M. Johansson; David C. Koo; Robert E. Lafon; J. Larkin; D. Le Mignant; Jennifer M. Lotz; Claire E. Max; Deanna M. Pennington; Paul J. Stomski; Douglas M. Summers; Peter L. Wizinowich
^{+0.6}_{-1}
Proceedings of SPIE | 2010
James E. Larkin; Anna M. Moore; Elizabeth J. Barton; Brian J. Bauman; Khanh Bui; John Canfield; David Crampton; Alex Delacroix; Murray Fletcher; David Hale; David Loop; Cyndie Niehaus; Andrew C. Phillips; Vladimir Reshetov; Luc Simard; Roger Smith; Ryuji Suzuki; Tomonori Usuda; Shelley A. Wright
and 7.6
The Astronomical Journal | 2014
Tuan Do; Shelley A. Wright; Aaron J. Barth; Elizabeth J. Barton; Luc Simard; James E. Larkin; Anna M. Moore; L. Wang; Brent Ellerbroek
\pm0.3
The Astronomical Journal | 2010
Peter R. M. Eisenhardt; Roger L. Griffith; Daniel Stern; Edward L. Wright; Matthew L. N. Ashby; Mark Brodwin; Michael J. I. Brown; R. S. Bussmann; Arjun Dey; Andrea M. Ghez; Eilat Glikman; Anthony H. Gonzalez; J. Davy Kirkpatrick; Quinn Konopacky; Amy K. Mainzer; David Vollbach; Shelley A. Wright