Shelly R. Gunn
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shelly R. Gunn.
Modern Pathology | 2009
I-Tien Yeh; Mathew A Martin; Ryan S. Robetorye; Aswani R. Bolla; Chris McCaskill; Rashmi Shah; Mercedes E. Gorre; Mansoor S. Mohammed; Shelly R. Gunn
The HER2 gene is an important prognostic and therapeutic marker in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Currently, HER2 status is most frequently determined by immunohistochemical detection of HER2 protein expression on the cellular membrane surface or by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of HER2 gene copy number in fixed tissue using locus-specific probes for the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 centromere. However, these methods are problematic because of issues with intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and preanalytic variables, such as fixation time. In addition, the commonly used HER2/chromosome 17 ratio presumes that chromosome 17 polysomy is present when the centromere is amplified, even though analysis of the rest of the chromosome is not included in the assay. In this study, 97 frozen samples of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma, with known immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization results for HER2, were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization to a commercially available bacterial artificial chromosome whole-genome array containing 99 probes targeted to chromosome 17 and the HER2/TOP2 amplicon. Results were 97% concordant for HER2 status, meeting the College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncologys validation requirements for HER2 testing. Surprisingly, not a single case of complete polysomy 17 was detected even though multiple breast cancer cases showed clear polysomies of other chromosomes. We conclude that array comparative genomic hybridization is an accurate and objective DNA-based alternative for clinical evaluation of HER2 gene copy number, and that polysomy 17 is a rare event in breast cancer.
Leukemia Research | 2009
Shelly R. Gunn; Aswani R. Bolla; Lynn L. Barron; Mercedes E. Gorre; Mansoor S. Mohammed; David W. Bahler; Clemens H.M. Mellink; Marinus H. J. van Oers; Michael J. Keating; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Kevin R. Coombes; Lynne V. Abruzzo; Ryan S. Robetorye
We used BAC array-based CGH to detect genomic imbalances in 187 CLL cases. Submicroscopic deletions of chromosome 22q11 were observed in 28 cases (15%), and the frequency of these deletions was second only to loss of the 13q14 region, the most common genomic aberration in CLL. Oligonucleotide-based array CGH analysis showed that the 22q11 deletions ranged in size from 0.34 Mb up to approximately 1 Mb. The minimally deleted region included the ZNF280A, ZNF280B, GGTLC2, and PRAME genes. Quantitative real-time PCR revealed that ZNF280A, ZNF280B, and PRAME mRNA expression was significantly lower in the 22q11 deletion cases compared to non-deleted cases.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2003
Shelly R. Gunn; Mansoor S. Mohammed; Xavier T. Reveles; David H. Viskochil; Janice C. Palumbos; Teresa L. Johnson-Pais; Daniel E. Hale; Jack L. Lancaster; L. Jean Hardies; Odile Boespflug-Tanguy; Jannine D. Cody; Robin J. Leach
We report on a 12‐year‐old boy who presented with delayed development and CNS dysmyelination. Genetic studies showed a normal 46,XY karyotype by routine cytogenetic analysis, and 46,XY.ish del(18)(q23)(D18Z1+, MBP−) by FISH using a locus‐specific probe for the MBP gene (18q23). Though the patient appeared to have normal chromosome 18s by repeated high resolution banding analysis, his clinical features were suggestive of a deletion of 18q. These included hearing loss secondary to stenosis of the external auditory canals, abnormal facial features, and foot deformities. FISH studies with genomic probes from 18q22.3 to 18qter confirmed a cryptic deletion which encompassed the MBP gene. In an attempt to further characterize the deletion, whole genome screening was conducted using array based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analysis. The array CGH data not only confirmed a cryptic deletion in the 18q22.3 to 18qter region of approximately 7 Mb, it also showed a previously undetected 3.7 Mb gain of 4q material. FISH studies demonstrated that the gained 4q material was translocated distal to the 18qter deletion breakpoint. The 18q deletion contains, in addition to MBP, other known genes including CYB5, ZNF236, GALR1, and NFATC1, while the gained 4q material includes the genes FACL1 and 2, KLKB1, F11 and MTNR1A. The use of these combined methodologies has resulted in the first reported case in which array CGH has been used to characterize a congenital chromosomal abnormality, highlighting the need for innovative molecular cytogenetic techniques in the diagnosis of patients with idiopathic neurological abnormalities.
Leukemia | 2009
Shelly R. Gunn; M. K. Hibbard; S. H. Ismail; M. Lowery-Nordberg; Clemens H.M. Mellink; David W. Bahler; Lynn Abruzzo; E. L. Enriquez; M. E. Gorre; M. S. Mohammed; Ryan S. Robetorye
Atypical 11q deletions identified by array CGH may be missed by FISH panels for prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | 2008
Russell A. Higgins; Shelly R. Gunn; Ryan S. Robetorye
Genomic aberrations have increasingly gained attention as prognostic markers in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the detection rate of genomic alterations in CLL from approximately 50% using conventional cytogenetics to greater than 80%. More recently, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has gained popularity as a clinical tool that can be applied to detect genomic gains and losses of prognostic importance in CLL. Array CGH and FISH are particularly useful in CLL because genomic gains and losses are key events with both biologic and prognostic significance, while balanced translocations have limited prognostic value. Although FISH has a higher technical sensitivity, it requires separate, targeted hybridizations for the detection of alterations at genomic loci of interest. Array CGH, on the other hand, has the ability to provide a genome-wide survey of genomic aberrations with a single hybridization reaction. Array CGH is expanding the known genomic regions of importance in CLL and allows these regions to be evaluated in the context of a genome-wide perspective. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the use of genomic aberrations as tools for risk-stratifying patients for therapy, thus increasing the need for reliable and high-yield methods to detect these genomic changes. In this review, we consider the use of array CGH as a clinical tool for the identification of genomic alterations with prognostic significance in CLL, and suggest ways to integrate this test into the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory work flow.
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | 2007
Shelly R. Gunn; Ryan S. Robetorye; Mansoor S. Mohammed
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) genome scanning is a powerful method for the global detection of gains and losses of genetic material in both congenital and neoplastic disorders. When used as a clinical diagnostic test, array CGH combines the whole genome perspective of traditional G-banded cytogenetics with the targeted identification of cryptic chromosomal abnormalities characteristic of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the presence of structural variants in the human genome can complicate analysis of patient samples, and array CGH does not provide morphologic information about chromosome structure, balanced translocations, or the actual chromosomal location of segmental duplications. Identification of such anomalies has significant diagnostic and prognostic implications for the patient. We therefore propose that array CGH should be used as a guide to the presence of genomic structural rearrangements in germline and tumor genomes that can then be further characterized by FISH or G-banding, depending on the clinical scenario. In this article, we share some of our experiences with diagnostic array CGH and discuss recent progress and challenges involved with the integration of array CGH into clinical laboratory medicine.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2006
Shelly R. Gunn; Xavier T. Reveles; Jeanette Hamlington; Lee Sadkowski; Teresa L. Johnson-Pais; James H. Jorgensen
ABSTRACT This is the first reported case of human disease caused by Tricosporon dermatis, an organism recently transferred to the genus Trichosporon from Cryptococcus and now confirmed to be a human pathogen.
Journal of Ovarian Research | 2013
Shelly R. Gunn; Xavier T. Reveles; Korrie Weldon; Andres Barrera; Mariam Ishaque; Dale Taylor; Chris McCaskill; Jae Weon Kim; Rashmi Shah; Mansoor S. Mohammed; Todd S. Barry; Brianne Kaiser; Amita Patnaik; Anthony W. Tolcher
BackgroundThere is a clinical need for routinely available genomic biomarker testing in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. In the current study we performed molecular cytogenetics using a validated array based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) assay to screen for the presence of predictive and prognostic biomarkers in archival diagnostic tissue from ovarian cancer patients. We hypothesized that biomarkers of high-risk disease would be detectable in tumor samples from patients with treatment refractory, advanced disease, and would be detected less frequently in tumor samples from patients with more favorable outcomes. In addition, we predicted that the use of a genome-wide copy number analysis (CNA) testing platform would enable us to identify novel potentially targetable chromosomal alterations of therapeutic significance in a percentage of cases.MethodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) tumor bank specimens were retrieved from the initial surgical resection for 18 ovarian cancer patients. Molecular cytogenetics was performed by array CGH for the detection of somatic chromosomal alterations associated with high-risk disease including amplifications of the CCNE1 and HER2 genes. Genomic risk stratification results were correlated with available clinical data. CGH data from each patient’s tumor genome was also surveyed for the presence of potentially targetable aberrations. Relevant therapeutic agents and open studies for investigational drugs were reported for each patient.ResultsHigh-risk genomic alterations were identified in 12/18 (67%) of cases and all patients with high-risk markers had advanced, treatment refractory disease. Three tumors with minimal genomic changes had no high-risk markers and were from patients with Stage I/II disease that had been completely resected and under surveillance for recurrence. Eleven patients (61%) had at least one potentially targetable genomic alteration including CCNE1, HER2, KRAS gene amplifications, and somatic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene deletions. Bi-allelic PTEN gene deletion was detected in one patient’s tumor.ConclusionsClinical genomic profiling of ovarian tumors by array CGH augments pathologic grade and stage to help stratify newly diagnosed ovarian cancer into high and low-risk disease. This personalized genomic information can also help guide treatment planning and disease monitoring by identifying novel potentially targetable genomic alterations that can be used by clinicians to choose rational directed therapies for patients with chemo-resistant disease.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2012
Elvera Sofos; Matthew F. Pescosolido; Jose Bernardo Quintos; Dianne N. Abuelo; Shelly R. Gunn; Karine Hovanes; Eric M. Morrow; Natasha Shur
We evaluated a patient with mild intellectual disability, obesity, overgrowth, and dysmorphic features. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis showed a single copy number increase of a BAC clone in the 11p15.4 region. Oligonucleotide aCGH refined the duplication to approximately 2.29 megabases (Mb) in size. Testing the parents revealed that the father, who had learning disabilities and overgrowth, also had the 11p15.4 duplication, and the mother had a normal microarray. In addition, the patients brother and grandmother all share clinical features with the proband and tested positive for the duplication. The duplicated region (Chr11:6,934,067‐9,220,605) encompasses 29 genes, including the ZNF214 gene, which has been postulated to play a role in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome [Alders et al., 2000 ]. This three‐generation pedigree outlines features of a novel microduplication syndrome.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2012
Barbara K. Zehentner; Luise Hartmann; Krystal Johnson; Christine F. Stephenson; Douglas Chapman; Monica E. de Baca; Denise A. Wells; Michael R. Loken; Budi Tirtorahardjo; Shelly R. Gunn; Lony C. L. Lim
The discovery of genomic abnormalities present in monoclonal plasma cells has diagnostic, prognostic, and disease-monitoring implications in plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs). However, technical and disease-related limitations hamper the detection of these abnormalities using cytogenetic analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, 28 bone marrow specimens with known PCNs were examined for the presence of genomic abnormalities using microarray analysis after plasma cell enrichment. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on 15 of 28 samples, revealing disease-related genomic aberrations in only 3 (20%) of 15 cases. FISH analysis was performed on enriched plasma cells and detected aberrations in 84.6% of specimens while array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) detected abnormalities in 89.3% of cases. Furthermore, aCGH revealed additional abnormalities in 24 cases compared with FISH alone. We conclude that aCGH after plasma cell enrichment, in combination with FISH, is a valuable approach for routine clinical use in achieving a more complete genetic characterization of patients with PCN.
Collaboration
Dive into the Shelly R. Gunn's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs