Sherman G. Sorensen

TIMI perfusion grade 3 but not grade 2 results in improved outcome after thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. Ventriculographic, enzymatic, and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-3 Study.

BackgroundCoronary patency has been used as a measure of thrombolysis success after acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group perfusion grades have gained wide acceptance, with grades 0 (no distal flow) and 1 perfusion (minimal flow) being designated as thrombolysis failures and grades 2 (partial perfusion) and 3 (complete perfusion) as thrombolysis successes. However, the significance of the individual TIMI grades on clinical outcome has not been adequately assessed Methods and ResultsTo evaluate the functional significance of TIMI perfusion grades, we compared 1-day coronary patency status with ventriculographic, enzymatic, and ECG indexes of acute myocardial infarction in 298 patients treated with anistreplase or alteplase within 4 hours of myocardial infarction symptom onset. Radionuclide ejection fraction was determined at 1 week and at 1 month. Perfusion grades for the entire study population were distributed as 12% (n=37) grades 0/1, 13% (n=40) grade 2, and 74% (n=221) grade 3. Patency profile did not differ between the two thrombolytic regimens. Further coronary interventions were performed after the 1-day patency determination in 43% of patients (43%, 48%, 42%, respectively, in grades 0/1, 2, and 3 patients). The outcome of grade 2 patients did not differ from grades 0/1 patients in ejection fraction, enzyme peaks, ECG markers, or morbidity index. In contrast, grade 3 patients, compared with grades 0-2 patients, showed 1) a greater global ejection fraction at 1 week (54% versus 49%, p=0.006) and at 1 month (54% versus 49%, p=0.01), 2) a greater infarct zone ejection fraction at 1 week (41% versus 33%, p=0.003) and at 1 month (42% versus 32%, p=0.003), 3) smaller enzyme peaks, significant for lactate dehydrogenase, and shorter times to enzyme peaks, significant for all four enzymes, 4) a smaller QRS score at discharge and at 1 month, and 5) a trend toward a lower morbidity index. ConclusionGrade 3 flow predicts significantly better outcomes than lesser grades of flow and represents an important measure of reperfusion success.

A randomized trial of low-dose beta-blockade therapy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Beta-blockade therapy to improve survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) has been both advocated and criticized. However, randomized studies have not been performed. Thus, 50 patients with IDC were randomized in pairs to standard therapy (C) alone or with beta blockade (BB). Beta-blockade therapy with metoprolol was titrated from 12.5 to 50 mg twice daily as tolerated (final average dose, 61 mg/day). Groups were comparable in age (C, 50 +/- 15 years; BB, 51 +/- 13 years), gender (C, 76% male; BB, 56% male), entry functional class (C, 2.8 +/- 0.8; BB, 2.7 +/- 0.7), and left ventricular ejection fraction (C, 27 +/- 12%; BB, 29 +/- 10%). Follow-up averaged 19 months (range 1 to 38). One subject in each group was lost to follow-up. There were 3 early BB dropouts (within 2 days) due to low-output syndrome (2 patients) or fatigue (1 patient). Eleven patients died. By intention to treat, 5 BB and 6 C patients died (difference not significant). By actual treatment, 3 BB patients died, including 2 late dropouts (at 0.2, 10 and 17 months), and 8 C patients died (at 2, 9, 9, 15, 18, 24, 29 and 32 months, p = 0.12). In additional, functional evaluation on follow-up (functional class, San Diego questionnaire and exercise time) all tended to favor those receiving BB. Low-dose BB is tolerated in 80% of IDC patients on a long-term basis. Those continuing to take BB have a good prognosis. Mortality in C patients, however, is less than in some retrospective studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Does thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) perfusion grade 2 represent a mostly patent artery or a mostly occluded artery? Enzymatic and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-2 study

One measure of the success of thrombolysis is the early patency status of the infarct-related coronary artery. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) study group designated patency grades 0 (occluded) or 1 (minimal perfusion) as thrombolysis failure and grade 2 (partial perfusion) or 3 (complete perfusion) as success. To evaluate their true functional significance, perfusion grades were compared with enzymatic and electrocardiographic (ECG) indexes of myocardial infarction in 359 patients treated within 4 h with anistreplase (APSAC) or streptokinase. Serum enzymes and ECGs were assessed serially. Patency was determined at 90 to 240 min (median 2.1 h) and graded by an observer who had no knowledge of patient data. Results for the two drug arms were similar and combined. Distribution of patency was grade 0 = 20%, n = 72; grade 1 = 8% n = 27; grade 2 = 16%, n = 58 and grade 3 = 56%, n = 202. Interventions were performed after angiography but within 24 h in 51% (n = 37), 70% (n = 19), 41% (n = 24) and 14% (n = 28) of patients with grades 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Outcomes were compared among the four patency groups by the orthogonal contrast method. Patients with perfusion grade 2 did not differ significantly from those with grade 0 or 1 in enzymatic peaks, time to peak activity and evolution of summed ST segments, Q waves and R waves (contrast 2). Conversely, comparisons of patients with grade 3 perfusion with those with grades 0 to 2 yielded significant differences for enzymatic peaks and time to peak activity for three of the four enzymes (p = 0.02 to 0.0001) and ECG indexes of myocardial infarction (p = 0.02 to 0.0001) (contrast 3). Thus, patients with grade 2 flow have indexes of myocardial infarction similar to those in patients with an occluded artery (grades 0 and 1 flow). Only early grade 3 flow results in a significantly better outcome than that of the other grades. Because early achievement of grade 2 flow does not appear to lead to optimal myocardial salvage, the frequency of achieving grade 3 perfusion alone may best measure the reperfusion success of thrombolytic therapy.

Multicenter reperfusion trial of intravenous anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) in acute myocardial infarction: Controlled comparison with intracoronary streptokinase

The recent establishment of a firm therapeutic role for reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction has stimulated interest in the development of more ideal thrombolytic agents. Anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) is a new plasminogen activator possessing properties that are promising for intravenous thrombolytic application in acute myocardial infarction. To assess the reperfusion potential of intravenous APSAC, a multi-center, angiographically controlled reperfusion trial was performed. An approved thrombolytic regimen of intracoronary streptokinase served as a control. Consenting patients with clinical and electrocardiographic signs of acute myocardial infarction were studied angiographically and 240 qualifying patients with documented coronary occlusion (flow grade 0 or 1) were randomized to treatment in less than 6 h of symptom onset (mean 3.4 h, range 0.4 to 6.0) with either intravenous APSAC (30 U in 2 to 4 min) or intracoronary streptokinase (160,000 U over 60 min). Both groups also received heparin for greater than or equal to 24 h. Reperfusion was evaluated angiographically over 90 min and success was defined as advancement of grade 0 or 1 to grade 2 or 3 flow. Rates of reperfusion for the two treatment regimens were 51% (59 of 115) at 90 min after intravenous APSAC and 60% (67 of 111) after 60 min of intracoronary streptokinase (p less than or equal to 0.18). Reperfusion at any time within the 90 min was observed in 55 and 64%, respectively (p less than or equal to 0.16). Time to reperfusion occurred at 43 +/- 23 min after intravenous and 31 +/- 17 min after intracoronary therapy. The success of intravenous therapy was dependent on the time to treatment: 60% of APSAC patients treated within 4 h exhibited reperfusion compared with 33% of those treated after 4 h (p less than or equal to 0.01). Reperfusion rates were also dependent on initial flow grade (p less than or equal to 0.0001): 48% (81 of 168) for grade 0 (APSAC = 43%, streptokinase = 54%), but 78% for grade 1 (APSAC = 78%, streptokinase = 77%). APSAC given as a rapid injection was generally well tolerated, although the median change in blood pressure at 2 to 4 min was greater after APSAC than after streptokinase (-10 versus -5 mm Hg). Mean plasma fibrogen levels fell more at 90 min after the sixfold higher dose of APSAC than after streptokinase (to 32 versus 64% of control). Reported bleeding events were more frequent after APSAC but occurred primarily at the site of catheter insertion and no event was intracranial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A randomized trial of intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The clinical effects of intravenous streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction were compared with those of intracoronary streptokinase in a randomized, prospective study. Comparisons were also made with a historical control group. Fifty patients were entered into the study at 2.4 +/- 1.2 hr after onset of pain, and 27 were assigned to intravenous and 23 to intracoronary therapy. The doses of streptokinase averaged 212,000 U ic and 845,000 U iv (0.75 X 10(6) U/5 hr, n = 14 or 10(6) U/1 hr, n = 13). Results of studies of the two intravenous dosage schedules were similar and so were combined. Streptokinase was administered at 2.8 +/- 1.0 hr after onset of pain in the intravenous and at 4.3 +/- 1.4 hr in the intracoronary drug group (p less than .001). Convalescent (day 10) radionuclide ejection fractions were 54 +/- 14% for the intravenous and 50 +/- 16% for the intracoronary drug group. Change in ejection fraction from day 1 to 10 tended to be greater after intravenous drug: 5.1% (p less than .08) vs 1.2% (NS). Semiquantitative regional wall motion indexes in the infarct zone showed significant and similar modest improvement from admission to day 10 in both groups (p less than .02). Accelerated enzyme-release kinetics were noted after both therapies. Times of peak enzyme levels for patients on intravenous and intracoronary drug were, respectively, 12.5 +/- 5.0 and 11.5 +/- 4.3 hr for creatine kinase MB isoenzyme and 31.7 +/- 11.8 and 28.1 +/- 12.7 hr for lactic dehydrogenase (LDH). Peak LDH-1 level was lower in patients receiving intravenous drug than in the historical control group (p less than .05). Electrocardiographically summed ST segments diminished rapidly after therapy in both groups; Q wave development was similar and overall R wave loss was equivalent and less extensive compared with in historical control subjects. Infarct pain requiring morphine was diminished similarly in both treatment groups. Incidence of early arrhythmias and heart failure also did not differ. Posttherapy ischemic events and early surgery tended to be more common in the intracoronary group and bleeding was more common in the intravenous group. Intravenous drug did not decrease early hospital mortality (intravenous drug = 5, historical control = 4, intracoronary drug = 1); the differences in this parameter among groups were not significant. At convalescent angiographic evaluation, anterograde perfusion was present in 73% of those receiving intravenous and 76% of those receiving intracoronary drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Multicenter patency trial of intravenous anistreplase compared with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. The TEAM-2 Study Investigators.

Thrombolytic therapy has been shown to improve clinical outcome when administered early aftertheonsetofsymptomsofacutemyocardialinfarction;themechanismofbenefitisbelieved to be reestablishment and maintenance ofcoronaryartery patency. Anistreplase is a second generationthrombolyticagentthatiseasilyadministered andhas alongdurationofaction. To compareanistreplase (30units/2-5min)andtherapywiththeFoodandDrugAdministration-approved regimen ofintravenous streptokinase (1.5 million units/60 mmn), a randomized, double-blind, multicenterpatencytrialwasundertakenin370patientslessthan76yearsofage withelectrocardiographic STsegmentelevationwhocouldbetreatedwithin4hoursofsymptom onset. Coronarypatencywasdeterminedbyreading, inablindedfashion, angiograms obtained early (90–240 minutes; mean, 140 minutes) and later (18–48 hours; mean, 28 hours) after beginning therapy. Early total patency (defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 2 or 3 perfusion) was high after both anistreplase (132/183=72%) and streptokinase (129/176=73%) therapy, and overall patency patterns were similar, although patent arteries showed “complete” (grade3) perfusion moreoftenafteranistreplase (83%) than streptokinase (72%) (p = 0.03). Similarly, residualcoronarystenosis, determinedquantitativelybyavalidated computer-assisted method, was slightly less in patent arteries early after anistreplase (mean stenosis diameter, 74.0%) than streptokinase (77.2%, p = 0.02). In patientswith patent arteries withoutotherearlyinterventions, reocclusionriskwithin1-2dayswasdefinedangiographically andfoundtobeverylow (anistreplase=1/96, streptokinase=2/94). Averagecoronaryperfusion gradewasgreater, andpercentresidualstenosiswasless, atfollow-upthanoninitialevaluation anddidnotdifferbetweentreatmentgroups. Enzymaticandelectrocardiographicevolutionwas not significantly different in the two groups. Despite rapid injection, anistreplase was associated with only a small (4–5 mmHg), transient (at 5–10 minutes) mean differential fall in bloodpressure. In-hospital mortalityrates were comparable foranistreplase and streptoki-nase (5.91%, 7.1%). Stroke occurred in one (0.5%) and three (1.6%) patients, respectively; one stroke was hemorrhagic. Other serious bleeding events and adverse experiences occurred uncommonlyandwithsimilarfrequencyinthetwogroups. Thus, fortheendpointsofourstudy (patency, safety), anistreplase and streptokinase showed overall favorable and relatively comparable outcomes, with a few differences. When given to patients within 4 hours from onsetofsymptoms ofacutemyocardialinfarction, boththrombolytic agents established high and similar total patency rates within a mean of 2.4 hours after therapy, although quantitative residual stenosis was slightly less early after anistreplase. The clinical importance ofthese orother differences, such as ease ofdrugadministration, are uncertain but will be answered by ongoing comparative mortality studies and by broader clinical experience. In the interim, these data support the continued use ofboth ofthese agents in acute myocardial infarction.

Effect of reperfusion on electrocardiographic and enzymatic infarct size: results of a randomized multicenter study of intravenous anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) versus intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

The effect of early coronary artery reperfusion on ECG and enzymatic parameters was examined in 240 patients with acute myocardial infarction. These patients had participated in a randomized trial comparing intravenous anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) (n = 123) and intracoronary streptokinase (n = 117) therapy. Reperfusion occurred in 59 of 115 (51%) patients receiving APSAC and 67 of 111 (60%) patients receiving streptokinase (p = NS). There was greater early resolution of ST segment elevation in the reperfused than in the nonreperfused patients (p less than or equal to 0.003) and more rapid Q wave evolution (p less than or equal to 0.03). Sigma Q was lower in reperfused than in nonreperfused patients at 8 hours (1.41 +/- 1.18 versus 2.11 +/- 2.10 mV; p less than or equal to 0.05) and at 24 hours (1.43 +/- 1.25 mV versus 2.08 +/- 1.88 mV; p less than or equal to 0.02). Time to peak level was shorter in the reperfused patients for creatine kinase (CK) (10.7 +/- 5.5 hours versus 14.9 +/- 5.9 hours; p less than 0.0001) and lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) (29.6 +/- 13.6 hours versus 34.4 +/- 10.5 hours; less than or equal to 0.03) enzymes. Peak LDH-1 was lower in the reperfused group (274 +/- 149 U/L versus 341 +/- 173 U/L; p less than or equal to 0.04). Reperfusion at a mean of 3.9 hours after the onset of infarction was associated with more rapid resolution of ST segment elevation, faster Q wave evolution, smaller ECG infarct size, earlier cardiac enzyme release, and smaller enzymatic infarct size than later or no reperfusion.

Anistreplase versus alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: Comparative effects on left ventricular function, morbidity and 1-day coronary artery patency

OBJECTIVES This double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was designed to compare the effects of treatment with anistreplase (APSAC) and alteplase (rt-PA) on convalescent left ventricular function, morbidity and coronary artery patency at 1 day in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Anistreplase (APSAC) is a new, easily administered thrombolytic agent recently approved for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Alteplase (rt-PA) is a rapidly acting, relatively fibrin-specific thrombolytic agent that is currently the most widely used agent in the United States. METHODS Study entry requirements were age less than or equal to 75 years, symptom duration less than or equal to 4 h, ST segment elevation and no contraindications. The two study drugs, APSAC, 30 U/2 to 5 min, and rt-PA, 100 mg/3 h, were each given with aspirin (160 mg/day) and intravenous heparin. Prespecified end points were convalescent left ventricular function (rest/exercise), clinical morbidity and coronary artery patency at 1 day. A total of 325 patients were entered, stratified into groups with anterior (37%) or inferior or other (63%) acute myocardial infarction, randomized to receive APSAC or rt-PA and followed up for 1 month. RESULTS At entry, patient characteristics in the two groups were balanced. Convalescent ejection fraction at the predischarge study averaged 51.3% in the APSAC group and 54.2% in the rt-PA group (p less than 0.05); at 1 month, ejection fraction averaged 50.2% versus 54.8%, respectively (p less than 0.01). In contrast, ejection fraction showed similar augmentation with exercise at 1 month after APSAC (+4.3% points) and rt-PA (+4.6% points), and exercise times were comparable. Coronary artery patency at 1 day was high and similar in both groups (APSAC 89%, rt-PA 86%). Mortality (APSAC 6.2%, rt-PA 7.9%) and the incidence of other serious clinical events, including stroke, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, heart failure within 1 month, recurrent ischemia and reinfarction were comparable in the two groups; and mechanical interventions were applied with equal frequency. A combined clinical morbidity index was determined and showed a comparable overall outcome for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS Convalescent rest ejection fraction was high after both therapies but higher after rt-PA; other clinical outcomes, including exercise function, morbidity index, and 1-day coronary artery patency, were favorable and comparable after APSAC and rt-PA.

Dependence of assessment of coronary artery reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction on angiographic criteria and interobserver variability

The angiographic films of 240 patients with acute myocardial infarction were studied in a randomized trial of intravenous anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) versus intracoronary streptokinase therapies. The interobserver variability of grading coronary artery perfusion by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (TIMI) criteria was measured as well as the effect of different definitions of reperfusion on the determination of reperfusion rate. There was good agreement in the reading of infarct artery flow grades between 2 blinded observers for each grade considered separately (k = 0.726 +/- 0.014) and for grades 0 or 1 (no perfusion) versus grades 2 or 3 (perfusion) (k = 0.905 +/- 0.011). Discordance between grades 0 or 1 versus 2 or 3 occurred in 74 (5%) of the 1,615 angiographic readings. Discrepancies of clinical significance which affected qualification for study entry, reperfusion or reocclusion status occurred in only 15 patients (6%). Grade 1 flow was found to have the most variable interpretation. Reperfusion rates for APSAC and streptokinase differed significantly when reperfusion was defined by 3 different criteria. The reperfusion rate ranged from 51 to 72% for APSAC and from 60 to 75% for streptokinase depending upon criteria selected. For comparison of the results of different thrombolytic studies, a standard semiquantitative system for grading infarct artery perfusion should be used, readings should be blinded and the criteria used for the definition of reperfusion should be clearly specified.

Relation of plasma D-dimer concentrations to coronary artery reperfusion before and after thrombolytic treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction☆

This study was designed to investigate the possible role of pre- and posttreatment plasma D-dimer concentration as a reflection of coronary artery thrombolysis. Blood was collected from 206 patients with angiographically documented acute coronary occlusion presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset who were enrolled in a prospective study comparing intravenous APSAC (30 U) (IV-APSAC) with intracoronary streptokinase (160,000 U) (IC-SK). D-dimer concentrations in 104 patients after IV-APSAC therapy were higher than in 90 patients after IC-SK (mean +/- standard error, 1,009 +/- 60 vs 603 +/- 45, p less than 0.001), but there was no difference in patients with and without reperfusion (1,096 +/- 88 vs 875 +/- 67, p = 0.1 for IV-APSAC, and 587 +/- 48 vs 634 +/- 95, p = 0.6 for IC-SK). The median concentrations before treatment were similar in the IV-APSAC and IC-SK groups (93 and 90 ng/ml, respectively). These were higher than the value in 25 ambulatory control subjects (72 ng/ml) but lower than in 29 post-AMI (6 to 30 hours) patients and in preoperative orthopedic patients (140 ng/ml each). There was no difference in D-dimer concentrations in patients with grade 0 or grade 1 coronary artery occlusion (median 85 vs 90 ng/ml) or in patients with or without ultimate successful reperfusion (median 85 vs 93 ng/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)