Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sherri L. Stewart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sherri L. Stewart.


International Journal of Cancer | 2008

Trends in esophageal cancer incidence by histology, United States, 1998–2003

Katrina F. Trivers; Susan A. Sabatino; Sherri L. Stewart

Esophageal adenocarcinoma rates may be increasing, whereas, squamous cell carcinoma rates appear to be decreasing in the United States. Previous population‐based research on esophageal cancer has only covered up to 68% of the country. Additional, updated research on a larger percentage of the country is needed to describe racial, ethnic and regional trends in histologic subtypes of esophageal cancer. Invasive esophageal cancer cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2003 (n = 65,926), collected by the National Program of Cancer Registries or the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, were included. These data cover 83% of the US population. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma incidence fell by 3.6%/year, whereas esophageal adenocarcinoma increased by 2.1%/year. Squamous cell carcinoma rates decreased among both sexes in most racial or ethnic groups, whereas adenocarcinoma rates increased primarily among white or non‐Hispanic men. Except for white or non‐Hispanic men, squamous cell carcinoma rates were similar to, or greater than, adenocarcinoma rates for men and women of all other races and ethnicities. The largest decrease in squamous cell carcinoma rates occurred in the West census region, which also exhibited no increase in adenocarcinoma rates. The rate of regional and distant‐staged adenocarcinomas increased, while rates for local‐staged adenocarcinoma remained stable. This is the first article to characterize esophageal cancer trends using data covering the majority of the US. Substantial racial, ethnic and regional variation in esophageal cancer is present in the US. Our work may inform interventions related to tobacco and alcohol use, and overweight/obesity prevention, and provide avenues for further research. Published 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


Pediatrics | 2008

Cancer incidence among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001-2003.

Jun Li; Trevor D. Thompson; Jacqueline W. Miller; Lori A. Pollack; Sherri L. Stewart

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to describe current childhood cancer incidence in the United States and identify demographic and geographic variation among children and adolescents with cancer. METHODS. We examined data from 39 National Program of Cancer Registries and 5 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results statewide registries (representing >90% of the US population) to identify cancers diagnosed among persons aged 0 to 19 from 2001–2003. Diagnosed cancers were grouped by the third version of the International Childhood Cancer Classification. Analyses were stratified according to gender, age, race, ethnicity, and US census region. A multivariable negative binomial regression model was used to evaluate demographic and geographic differences in incidence for all cancers combined. RESULTS. We identified 36446 cases of childhood cancer with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 165.92 per million. Stratified analyses showed that, for all cancers combined, boys had a significantly higher rate than girls; children (aged 0–14 years) had a significantly lower rate than adolescents (aged 15–19 years); and white children had the highest incidence rate among all races. Young people living in the Northeast had the highest incidence rate among all US census regions, which may be partially attributed to significantly higher incidence rates for central nervous system neoplasms and lymphomas in this region compared with other US census regions. Negative binomial regression analysis demonstrated that the childhood cancer-incidence rate varied significantly according to gender, age, race, ethnicity, and geography. CONCLUSIONS. This study is the first to demonstrate substantial regional differences in the incidence of childhood cancer. It also shows that incidence varies according to gender, age, race, and ethnicity. Our research findings are useful for prioritizing future childhood cancer research needs.


Cancer Epidemiology | 2011

The accuracy of cancer mortality statistics based on death certificates in the United States

Robert R. German; Aliza K. Fink; Melonie Heron; Sherri L. Stewart; Christopher J. Johnson; Jack L. Finch; Daixin Yin

BACKGROUND One measure of the accuracy of cancer mortality statistics is the concordance between cancer defined as the underlying cause of death from death certificates and cancer diagnoses recorded in central, population-based cancer registries. Previous studies of such concordance are outdated. OBJECTIVE To characterize the accuracy of cancer mortality statistics from the concordance between cancer cause of death and primary cancer site at diagnosis. DESIGN Central cancer registry records from California, Colorado, and Idaho in the U.S. were linked with state vital statistics data and evaluated by demographic and tumor information across 79 site categories. A retrospective arm (confirmation rate per 100 deaths) compared death certificate data from 2002 to 2004 with cancer registry diagnoses from 1993 to 2004, while a prospective arm (detection rate per 100 deaths) compared cancer registry diagnoses from 1993 to 1995 with death certificate data from 1993 to 2004 by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) version used to code deaths. RESULTS With n=265,863 deaths where cancer was recorded as the underlying cause based on the death certificate, the overall confirmation rate for ICD-10 was 82.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.6-83.0%), the overall detection rate for ICD-10 was 81.0% (95% CI, 80.4-81.6%), and the overall detection rate for ICD-9 was 85.0% (95% CI, 84.8-85.2%). These rates varied across primary sites, where some rates were <50%, some were 95% or greater, and notable differences between confirmation and detection rates were observed. CONCLUSIONS Important unique information on the quality of cancer mortality data obtained from death certificates is provided. In addition, information is provided for future studies of the concordance of primary cancer site between population-based cancer registry data and data from death certificates, particularly underlying causes of death coded in ICD-10.


Genetics in Medicine | 2011

Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meeting

Cecelia A. Bellcross; Sara Bedrosian; Elvan Daniels; Debra Duquette; Heather Hampel; Kory Jasperson; Djenaba A. Joseph; Celia I. Kaye; Ira M. Lubin; Laurence J. Meyer; Michele Reyes; Maren T. Scheuner; Sheri D. Schully; Leigha Senter; Sherri L. Stewart; Jeanette St. Pierre; Judith A. Westman; Paul E. Wise; Vincent W. Yang; Muin J. Khoury

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer, accounting for approximately 3% of all colorectal cancer cases in the United States. In 2009, an evidence-based review process conducted by the independent Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group resulted in a recommendation to offer genetic testing for Lynch syndrome to all individuals with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, with the intent of reducing morbidity and mortality in family members. To explore issues surrounding implementation of this recommendation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a multidisciplinary working group meeting in September 2010. This article reviews background information regarding screening for Lynch syndrome and summarizes existing clinical paradigms, potential implementation strategies, and conclusions which emerged from the meeting. It was recognized that widespread implementation will present substantial challenges, and additional data from pilot studies will be needed. However, evidence of feasibility and population health benefits and the advantages of considering a public health approach were acknowledged. Lynch syndrome can potentially serve as a model to facilitate the development and implementation of population-level programs for evidence-based genomic medicine applications involving follow-up testing of at-risk relatives. Such endeavors will require multilevel and multidisciplinary approaches building on collaborative public health and clinical partnerships.Genet Med 2012:14(1):152–162


Cancer | 2006

A population-based study of colorectal cancer histology in the United States, 1998–2001†

Sherri L. Stewart; Jennifer M. Wike; Ikuko Kato; Denise Riedel Lewis; Frances Michaud

Histology is an important factor in the etiology, treatment, and prognosis of cancer. The purpose of this study was to descriptively characterize colorectal cancer (CRC) histology in the United States population.


Cancer | 2012

Racial and regional disparities in lung cancer incidence

J. Michael Underwood; Julie S. Townsend; Eric Tai; Shane P. Davis; Sherri L. Stewart; Arica White; Behnoosh Momin; Temeika L. Fairley

Lung cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer‐related death in the United States (US). We examined data from 2004 to 2006 for lung cancer incidence rates by demographics, including race and geographic region, to identify potential health disparities.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2011

Subsequent primary cancers among men and women with in situ and invasive melanoma of the skin

Appathurai Balamurugan; Judy R. Rees; Carol Kosary; Sun Hee Rim; Jun Li; Sherri L. Stewart

BACKGROUND An estimated 750,000 melanoma survivors in the United States are at increased risk of subsequent primary cancers. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the risk of developing subsequent primary cancers among people with cutaneous melanoma. METHODS Using 1992 to 2006 data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 40,881 people with in situ melanoma and 76,041 people with invasive melanoma were followed up (mean of 5.6 years) for the development of subsequent primary cancers. The observed number of subsequent cancers was compared with those expected based on age-/race-/year-/site-specific rates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) (SIR = observed number/expected number) were considered statistically significant if they differed from 1, with an alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS After a first primary in situ melanoma, risk was significantly elevated for subsequent invasive melanoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia among men (SIRs = 8.43 and 1.44, respectively) and women (SIRs = 12.33 and 1.79, respectively). After a first primary invasive melanoma, risk was significantly elevated for subsequent invasive melanoma, thyroid cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia among both men (SIRs = 12.50, 2.67, 1.56, and 1.57, respectively) and women (SIRs = 15.67, 1.77, 1.42, and 1.63, respectively). LIMITATIONS Case ascertainment issues particularly affecting in situ melanoma cases could affect results. The role of detection bias in the diagnoses of some subsequent cancers cannot be completely eliminated. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the study should guide the development of strategies such as posttreatment surveillance, screening, and ultraviolet exposure education among melanoma survivors to improve cancer survivorship.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2011

Surgical staging of early stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Results from the CDC-NPCR ovarian patterns of care study

Rosemary D. Cress; Katrina Bauer; Cynthia D. O'Malley; Amy R. Kahn; Maria J. Schymura; Jennifer M. Wike; Sherri L. Stewart; Gary S. Leiserowitz

OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to determine the adequacy of surgical staging performed on surgically treated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with apparent early stage disease and to determine if receipt of surgical staging had an influence on survival. METHODS Detailed surgical staging information was collected from medical records for 721 patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2000 with EOC. Patients resided in California or New York and were identified through population-based cancer registries. RESULTS Nearly 90% of patients had removal of the omentum and evaluation of bowel serosa and mesentery but only 72% had assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes and the majority of patients did not receive biopsies of other peritoneal locations. Only lymph node assessment (as well as node assessment combined with washings and omentectomy) had a statistically significant association with improved survival. The 5-year survival for women with node sampling was 84.2% versus 69.6% for those without this surgical procedure, and patients who did not have lymph node assessment had nearly twice the risk of death as those who did. When patients were stratified by receipt of chemotherapy, lack of node sampling had an effect only on patients who also had no chemotherapy (adjusted HR=2.2, CI=1.0-4.5). CONCLUSIONS The results of this population-based study confirm the prognostic importance of surgical staging for women with EOC, and the important role of gynecologic oncologists in treating these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to further improve survival for those women who receive adequate surgical staging.


Cancer | 2008

Gallbladder Cancer Incidence Among American Indians and Alaska Natives, US, 1999-2004

Shannon M. Lemrow; David G. Perdue; Sherri L. Stewart; Lisa C. Richardson; Melissa A. Jim; Helen T. French; Judith Swan; Brenda K. Edwards; Charles L. Wiggins; Lois Dickie; David K. Espey

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare; however, it disproportionately affects the American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) population. The purpose of the study was to characterize GBC among AI/AN in the US population.


Genetics in Medicine | 2013

Health behaviors and cancer screening among Californians with a family history of cancer

Julie S. Townsend; C. Brooke Steele; Lisa C. Richardson; Sherri L. Stewart

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare health behaviors and cancer screening among Californians with and without a family history of cancer.Methods:We analyzed data from the 2005 California Health Interview Survey to ascertain cancer screening test use and to estimate the prevalence of health behaviors that may reduce the risk of cancer. We used logistic regression to control for demographic factors and health-care access.Results:Women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer were more likely to be up to date with mammography as compared with women with no family history of cancer (odds ratio = 1.69, 95% confidence interval (1.39, 2.04)); their health behaviors were similar to other women. Men and women with a family history of colorectal cancer were more likely to be up to date with colorectal cancer screening as compared with individuals with no family history of cancer (odds ratio = 2.77, 95% confidence interval (2.20, 3.49)) but were less likely to have a body mass index <25 kg/m2 (odds ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (0.67, 0.94)).Conclusion:Innovative methods are needed to encourage those with a moderate-to-strong familial risk for breast cancer and colorectal cancer to increase their physical activity levels, strive to maintain a healthy weight, quit smoking, and reduce alcohol use.Genet Med 2013:15(3):212–221

Collaboration


Dive into the Sherri L. Stewart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sun Hee Rim

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Michael Underwood

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor D. Thompson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Neri

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie S. Townsend

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Behnoosh Momin

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cynthia A. Gelb

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa C. Richardson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Puckett

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela R. Moore

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge