Sherrie Bhoori

Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with alpha‐interferon after liver resection in HCV cirrhosis

Tumor recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can occur early (<2 years) or late (>2 years) as metastases or de novo tumors. Interferon (IFN) has the potential for chemoprevention against hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related cirrhosis. A predetermined group of 150 HCV RNA–positive patients undergoing resection of early‐ to intermediate‐stage HCC was stratified into 80 HCV‐pure (hepatitis B anticore antibody [anti‐HBc]–negative) and 70 mixed HCV+hepatitis B virus (HBV) (anti‐HBc–positive) groups, then randomized to IFN‐α (3 million units 3 times every week for 48 weeks [n = 76]) versus control (n = 74). The primary end point was recurrence‐free survival (RFS); secondary end points were disease‐specific and overall survival. Intention‐to‐treat and subgroup analysis on adherent patients were conducted. Treatment effects on early/late recurrences were assessed using multiple Cox regression analysis. No patient experienced life‐threatening adverse events. There were 28 adherent patients (37%). After 45 months of median follow‐up, overall survival was 58.5%, and no significant difference in RFS was detectable between the two study arms (24.3% vs. 5.8%; P = .49). HCC recurred in 100 patients (48 IFN‐treated, 52 controls), with a 50% reduction in late recurrence rate in the treatment arm. HCC multiplicity and vascular invasion were significantly related to recurrence (P = .01 and .0003). After viral status stratification, while no treatment effect was apparent in the mixed HCV+HBV population and on early recurrences (72 events), there was a significant benefit on late recurrences (28 events) in HCV‐pure patients adherent to treatment (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.09–0.9; P = .04). In conclusion, IFN does not affect overall prevention of HCC recurrence after resection, but it may reduce late recurrence in HCV‐pure patients receiving effective treatment. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1543–1554.)

Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience†‡

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths; the number of new cases per year is approaching 750,000. The magnitude of the incidence of HCC has discouraged any attempts to apply liver transplantation (LT) as the prevailing curative therapy for HCC worldwide because of the limited sources of donated organs (deceased and living donors) and the poor access to sophisticated health care systems in some geographical areas. If these limitations continue to prevail throughout the world, any attempt to significantly reduce HCC-related mortality rates through the application of LT will be delusional. International experiences have confirmed, however, the potential of LT to definitively cure HCC because it presents a unique opportunity to remove both the tumor (HCC is associated with 695,000 deaths per year) and the underlying cirrhosis. Despite its limited access, LT has become the standard of care for patients with small HCCs and the main driving force for alternative strategies offered to patients with intermediate HCCs. In 1996, a prospective cohort study defined restrictive selection criteria that led to superior survival for transplant patients in comparison with any other previous experience with transplantation or other options for HCC. Since then, these selection criteria have become universally known as the Milan criteria (MC) in recognition of their origin. Ever since their adoption in clinical practice, the MC have helped doctors to single out early-stage HCC as a prognostic category of cancer presentation that is amenable to curative treatments. After their implementation, the favorable posttransplant outcomes that were observed in cohort series were so convincing that the MC immediately became the standard of care for early HCC, and further validation by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was prevented. After the passage of approximately a decade, researchers began to challenge the MC with other proposals designed to capture those patients not meeting the MC who could achieve similar posttransplant survival rates through the expansion of the accepted tumor limits for transplant eligibility. None of these expanded criteria have become the new reference standard for selecting LT candidates with HCC; any broadening of the selection criteria for transplantation is inevitably hampered by severe

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundOrthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the best available option for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although its application is limited by stringent selection criteria, costs, and deceased donor graft shortage, particularly in Asia, where living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has been developed.MethodsThis article reviews the present standards for patient selection represented by size-and-number criteria with particular references to Milan Criteria and novel prediction models based on results achieved in patients exceeding those limits, with consideration of the expanded indication represented by the UCSF Criteria.ResultsThe expected outcomes after deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) or LDLT are favorable if predetermined selection criteria are applied. However, selection bias, difference in waiting time, and ischemia-regeneration injuries of the graft among DDLT vs LDLT may influence long-term results. In the article, the differences between East and West in first-line treatments for HCC (resection vs transplantation), indications, and ethics for the donor, are summarized as well as possible novel predictors of tumor biology (especially DNA mutation and fractional allelic loss, FAI) to be considered for better outcome prediction.ConclusionsLiver transplantation remains the most promising product of modern surgery and represents a cornerstone in the management of patients with HCC.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 study.

Yttrium‐90 radioembolization (Y90RE) is a novel approach to radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), never tested in phase 2 studies. Fifty‐two patients with intermediate (n.17) to advanced (n.35) HCC were prospectively recruited to assess, as the primary endpoint, efficacy of Y90RE on time‐to‐progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were tumor response, safety, and overall survival (OS). All patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0‐1, Child‐Pugh class A‐B7. Y90RE treatments aimed at a lobar delivery of 120 Gy. Retrospective dosimetric correlations were conducted and related to response. Fifty‐eight treatments were performed on 52 patients. The median follow‐up was 36 months. The median TTP was 11 months with no significant difference between portal vein thrombosis (PVT) versus no PVT (7 versus 13 months). The median OS was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12‐18 months) with a nonsignificant trend in favor of non‐PVT versus PVT patients (18 versus 13 months). Five complete responses occurred (9.6%), and the 2 year‐progression rate was 62%. Objective response was 40.4%, whereas the disease control rate (78.8%) significantly affected survival (responders versus nonresponders: 18.4% versus 9.1%; P = 0.009). Tumor response significantly correlated with absorbed dose in target lesions (r = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.41‐0.74, P < 0.001) and a threshold of 500 Gy predicted response (area under the curve, 0.78). Mortality at 30‐90 days was 0%‐3.8%. Various grades of reduction in liver function occurred within 6 months in 36.5% of patients, with no differences among stages. On multivariate analysis, tumor response was the sole variable affecting TTP (P < 0.001) and the second affecting survival (after Child‐Pugh class). Conclusion: Y90RE is an effective treatment in intermediate to advanced HCC, particularly in the case of PVT. Further prospective evaluations comparing Y90RE with conventional treatments are warranted. (HEPATOLOGY 2013)

Resection of hepatocellular cancer ≤2 cm: results from two Western centers

Asian series have shown a 5‐year survival rate of ≈70% after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤2 cm. Western outcomes with resection have not been as good. In addition, ablation of HCC ≤2 cm has been shown to achieve competitive results, leaving the role of resection in these patients unclear. Records of patients undergoing resection at two Western centers between January 1990 and December 2009 were reviewed. Patients with a single HCC ≤2 cm on pathologic analysis were included. Thirty clinical variables including demographics, liver function, tumor characteristics, nature of the surgery, and the surrounding liver were examined. An exploratory statistical analysis was conducted to determine variables associated with recurrence and survival. The study included 132 patients with a median follow‐up of 37.5 months. There was one (<1%) 90‐day mortality. There were 32 deaths with a median survival of 74.5 months and a 5‐year survival rate of 70% (63% in patients with cirrhosis). The median time to recurrence was 31.6 months and the 5‐year recurrence rate was 68%. Presence of satellites (hazard ratio [HR], 2.46; P = 0.031) and platelet count <150,000/μL (HR, 2.37; P = 0.026) were independently associated with survival. Presence of satellites (HR, 2.79; P = 0.003), cirrhosis (HR, 2.3; P = 0.010), and nonanatomic resection (HR, 1.79; P = 0.031) were independently associated with recurrence. Patients with a single HCC ≤2 cm and platelet count ≥150,000/μL achieved a median survival of 138 months and a 5‐year survival rate of 81%, respectively. Conclusion: Resection of HCC ≤2 cm is safe and achieves excellent results in Western centers. Recurrence continues to be a significant problem. Presence of satellites, platelet count, anatomic resection, and cirrhosis are associated with outcomes after resection, even among such early tumors. Resection should continue to be considered a primary treatment modality in patients with small HCC and well‐preserved liver function. (HEPATOLOGY 2013)

Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial.

Background We investigated whether sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation (LTx) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods In a prospective-randomized open-label international trial, 525 LTx recipients with HCC initially receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression were randomized 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation into a group on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression (group A: 264 patients) or a group incorporating sirolimus (group B: 261). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted after 8 years. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results Recurrence-free survival was 64.5% in group A and 70.2% in group B at study end, this difference was not significant (P = 0.28; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62; 1.15). In a planned analysis of RFS rates at yearly intervals, group B showed better outcomes 3 years after transplantation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00). Similarly, OS (P = 0.21; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13) was not statistically better in group B at study end, but yearly analyses showed improvement out to 5 years (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00). Interestingly, subgroup (Milan Criteria-based) analyses revealed that low-risk, rather than high-risk, patients benefited most from sirolimus; furthermore, younger recipients (age ⩽60) also benefited, as well sirolimus monotherapy patients. Serious adverse event numbers were alike in groups A (860) and B (874). Conclusions Sirolimus in LTx recipients with HCC does not improve long-term RFS beyond 5 years. However, a RFS and OS benefit is evident in the first 3 to 5 years, especially in low-risk patients. This trial provides the first high-level evidence base for selecting immunosuppression in LTx recipients with HCC.

Personalized molecular targeted therapy in advanced, recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: A proof of principle

BACKGROUND & AIMS The advent of molecular medicine that targets specific pathways is changing the therapeutic approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. For several aberrantly activated pathways in hepatocarcinoma, surrogate markers of activation can be assessed by immunohistochemistry, although associations with in vivo response to targeted therapies are still lacking. METHODS A patient, who presented with hepatic and extra-hepatic hepatocarcinoma recurrence 11 years after liver transplantation, was assessed for beta-catenin, pERK, and pS6 in primary and secondary tumor specimens, in order to define a possible activation of the Wnt, Ras/MAPK and Akt/mTOR pathways and design a personalized targeted therapy in absence of alternative treatment options. Moreover, mutation analysis of the beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) and DNA microsatellite analyses were performed. RESULTS The identification of the same mutation in the beta-catenin gene, as well as the same microsatellite pattern in tumor tissues taken 11 years apart, proved that the observed hepatocarcinoma was a true recurrence. Nuclear beta-catenin and pS6 in tumor cells were positive, whereas pERK was positive only in the peritumoral endothelium. This pattern of immunohistochemistry, after failure of sorafenib alone, lead to the choice to add the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, to sorafenib. Three months later a 50% tumor reduction was observed, and after 6 months a further reduction of tumor vital components was confirmed, while a grade II gastrointestinal bleeding episode occurred. CONCLUSIONS A personalized approach aimed to treat recurrent hepatocarcinoma is possible through analysis of tumoral molecular pathways. Partial success of the selected combination of sorafenib and everolimus supports the pivotal role of mTOR signalling and highlights the importance of reliable biomarkers to route the best molecular-based therapeutic options in HCC.

Rectal hyperreactivity to distention in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: role of distention rate

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Rectal motor hyperreactivity to distention may be involved in the pathophysiological course of defecatory symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but results of patient studies are conflicting, possibly because of differences in the applied distention rate. Because a fast rate of distention increases the rectal motor response in healthy subjects, it also may show hyperreactivity in patients with IBS. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of 2 distention rates on rectal motor responses and sensations in 16 patients with IBS and 12 healthy subjects. METHODS Rectal distensibility and the frequency of rectal contractions and sensations were recorded during volume-controlled rectal distentions at 2 distention rates (10 and 100 mL/min). RESULTS Recta of patients with IBS were significantly less distensible than those of healthy subjects during fast distention (P = 0.0006), but this difference was not statistically significant during slow distention (P = 0.07). The frequency of rectal contractions and sensations, the majority of which were sensations of gas and a desire to defecate, were significantly greater in patients with IBS during both slow and fast distentions (both P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Recta of patients with IBS are hyperreactive to distention, and fast distention magnifies this abnormal motor response. A greater frequency of sensations during a fixed-time distention period may help to characterize the patients.

The challenges of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) has potentials to improve survival for patients with HCC. However, expansion of indications beyond Milan Criteria (MC) and use of bridging/downstaging procedures to convert intermediate‐advanced stages of HCC within MC limits are counterbalanced by graft shortage and increasing use of marginal donors, partially limited by the use of donor‐division protocols applied to the cadaveric and living‐donor settings. Several challenges in technique, indications, pre‐LT treatments and prioritization policies of patients on the waiting list have to be precised through prospective investigations that have to include individualization of prognosis, biological variables and pathology surrogates as stratification criteria. Also, liver resection has to be rejuvenated in the general algorithm of HCC treatment in the light of salvage transplantation strategies, while benefit of LT for HCC should be determined through newly designed composite scores that are able to capture both efficiency and equity endpoints. Innovative treatments such as radioembolization for HCC associated with portal vein thrombosis and molecular targeted compounds are likely to influence future strategies. Accepting this challenge has been part of the history of LT and will endure so also for the future.

Role of home parenteral nutrition in chronic radiation enteritis

OBJECTIVES:The management of chronic radiation enteritis (CRE) is difficult and often controversial. The aim of the study was to compare long-term outcome of patients with radiation-induced intestinal obstruction treated either surgically or with intestinal rest and home parenteral nutrition (HPN).METHODS:Thirty patients, with mechanical bowel obstruction due to CRE, were retrospectively included in the study and divided in two groups according to the first treatment approach. Seventeen patients underwent surgery (S group) and 13 patients were supported with HPN (HPN group). Survival, nutrition autonomy, number of surgeries, related complications and persistence of symptoms were evaluated in the two groups. Associations between factors and treatment group were assessed by means of the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS:The two groups were similar in terms of age, dose of radiation therapy, time of occurrence and degree of signs and symptoms. 7/13 patients in the HPN group resolved the obstruction without surgery. 10/17 patients of the S group developed intestinal failure which required HPN. Nutrition autonomy was achieved in 100% and 58.8% of HPN and S group respectively (p = 0.01). The overall five-year survival was 90.0% and 68.4% respectively in the HPN and S group (p = 0.0231).CONCLUSIONS:Both HPN and surgery are often necessary in patients with chronic radiation-induced intestinal obstruction. However, the long term nutrition autonomy and survival seem to be better in patients initially treated with intestinal rest and HPN.