Sherrill Davison

Characteristics of H7N2 (Nonpathogenic) Avian Influenza Virus Infections in Commercial Layers, in Pennsylvania, 1997-98

Between January 1997 and March 1998, 11 cases of H7N2 avian influenza (nonpathogenic) were diagnosed at the Laboratory of Avian Medicine and Pathology, Kenneth Square, PA. These cases involved either commercial leghorn laying hens or leghorn pullets raised in Pennsylvania. Grossly and histologically, the most striking lesion associated with disease was salpingitis, usually with edema and occasionally with oviduct necrosis. Fluid, fibrinous, and egg yolk material in the peritoneum (egg yolk peritonitis) as well as pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema were also frequently seen. Oviduct lesions have rarely been described in association with avian influenza infections in previous outbreaks. Mortality in affected houses was mild to moderate (less than 4% total mortality during the outbreak), with concurrent mild to moderate egg production declines (2%-4% at the time of disease onset).

Evaluation of the efficacy of a live fowlpox-vectored infectious laryngotracheitis/avian encephalomyelitis vaccine against ILT viral challenge.

Abstract Infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) is caused by an alphaherpesvirus, and latency can be produced by previous exposure to vaccine virus. The main sites of latency for the ILT virus have been shown to be the trigeminal ganglion and the trachea. Reactivation of latent virus is one factor related to the production of clinical signs. The development of a genetically engineered ILT vaccine has been suggested for many years as a tool to eliminate viral latency. Several approaches have been suggested. Included among them is the development of a thymidine kinase–deficient mutant or the insertion of ILT viral glycoproteins into a viral vector such as a poxvirus. A commercially available, live, fowlpox-vectored infectious laryngotracheitis + avian encephalomyelitis (FP-LT+AE) vaccine was used in field trials in leghorn pullet flocks and evaluated by tracheal challenge in a laboratory setting with the use of the National Veterinary Services Laboratory (Ames, IA) ILT challenge virus. Interference of the pigeon pox vaccine, which is often administered concurrently with fowlpox vaccine, was also evaluated when given in conjunction with the FP-LT+AE vaccine. Overall, the results indicate that the FP-LT+AE vaccine provides adequate protection against ILT viral challenge. Proper administration is essential. In one flock, inadequate protection was most likely a result of either poor vaccine administration or previous exposure to pox virus. In addition, the simultaneous administration of pigeon pox vaccine did not appear to interfere with protection against ILT viral challenge.

Duck Viral Enteritis in Domestic Muscovy Ducks in Pennsylvania

Duck viral enteritis (DVE) outbreaks occurred at two different locations in Pennsylvania in 1991 and 1992. In the first outbreak, four ducks died out of a group of 30 domestic ducks; in the second outbreak, 65 ducks died out of a group of 114 domestic ducks, and 15 domestic geese died as well. A variety of species of ducks were present on both premises, but only muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) died from the disease. On necropsy, gross lesions included hepatomegaly with petechial hemorrhages, petechial hemorrhages in the abdominal fat, petechial hemorrhages on the epicardial surface of the heart, and multifocal to coalescing areas of fibrinonecrotic material over the mucosal surface of the trachea, esophagus, intestine, and cloaca. Histologically, the liver had random multifocal areas of necrosis and eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies in hepatocytes. DVE virus was isolated and identified using muscovy duck embryo fibroblast inoculation and virus neutralization.

Field Observations with Salmonella enteritidis Bacterins

A study involving 11 commercial layer flocks was conducted to determine the efficacy of Salmonella enteritidis bacterins (autogenous or federally licensed). The criterion for evaluation of vaccine efficacy was the presence or absence of S. enteritidis in the environment, the organs of the bird (including ovary and oviduct), and eggs. Environmental, rodent, and organ specimens from dead birds as well as eggs were cultured throughout the life of the flock. All layers were obtained from pullet sources that were negative for S. enteritidis, as determined by organ and environmental cultures. Despite the use of S. enteritidis vaccination, 63.6% of the houses had S. enteritidis-positive environmental cultures and 100% of the flocks had S. enteritidis organ-culture-positive birds. The range of positive cultures for S. enteritidis in the environment in vaccinated flocks was between 0 and 45.5%. Birds in vaccinated flocks were organ-culture positive for S. enteritidis between 10% and 40% of the time. The unvaccinated portion of flocks in the same house and the unvaccinated flock in a complex had similar results compared with the vaccinated portion of the flocks.

A review of the 1996-98 nonpathogenic H7N2 avian influenza outbreak in Pennsylvania

Abstract The nonpathogenic avian influenza (AI) outbreak in Pennsylvania began in December 1996 when there was a trace back from a New York live bird market to a dealers flock. A total of 18 commercial layer flocks, two commercial layer pullet flocks, and a commercial meat turkey flock were diagnosed with nonpathogenic AI (H7N2) viral infection with an economic loss estimated at between

Comparison of an Antigen-capture Enzyme Immunoassay with Virus Isolation for Avian Influenza from Field Samples

3 and

Evaluation of disinfectants with the addition of antifreezing compounds against nonpathogenic H7N2 avian influenza virus.

4 million. Clinical histories of flocks infected with the disease included respiratory disease, elevated morbidity and mortality throughout the house, egg production drops, depression, and lethargy. A unique gross lesion in the commercial layers was a severe, transmural oviduct edema with white to gray flocculent purulent material in the lumen. Layer flocks on two separate premises were quarantined but permitted to remain in the facilities until cessation of virus shed was determined through virus isolation. Several months later, clinical AI appeared again in these flocks. It is not known whether the recurrence of disease in these cases is due to persistence of the organism in the birds or the environment. In addition to serologic testing and virologic testing by chicken embryo inoculation, an antigen capture enzyme immunoassay was evaluated as a diagnostic tool for AI. Research projects related to disinfection, burial pits, and geographical system technology were developed because of questions raised concerning transmission, diagnosis, and control of nonpathogenic AI (H7N2).

Differences Among Restriction Endonuclease DNA Fingerprints of Pennsylvania Field Isolates, Vaccine Strains, and Challenge Strains of Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus

The standard tests used to detect avian influenza (AI) viral infection include virus isolation from tissues of the infected birds and the detection of AI antibody in blood or egg yolk. A new application of an existing human test to rapidly detect the presence of any influenza A virus is now possible. A commercially available antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay (AC-EIA), developed for the detection of influenza A in humans was tested for relative sensitivity and specificity and for speed of use in diagnosing nonpathogenic H7N2 AI in naturally infected poultry. During the recent nonpathogenic H7N2 AI epornitic, the AC-EIA was used for rapid diagnosis and quarantine decisions. Between February and August 1997, 1524 samples from 295 commercial layer, pullet, and broiler flocks were submitted to the Laboratory of Avian Medicine and Pathology, New Bolton Center, for AI virus isolation and testing by AC-EIA. The relative specificity of the AC-EIA was 100% and the relative sensitivity was 79%. We believe that the AC-EIA will be a useful adjunct to standard AI diagnostic tests.

Selection of Egg Component and Optimal Parameters of Incubation for Detection of Salmonella Enteritidis Contamination in Grade a Table Eggs by Monoclonal Antibody-Based ELISA

In the winter of 1997 and 1998, in the midst of the H7N2 avian influenza outbreak in Pennsylvania, producers added antifreeze or windshield washer fluid to disinfectant solutions in wash stations to prevent freezing. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of these products to the disinfectant solutions would have deleterious effects. Four disinfectants (two phenols, one quarternary ammonium, and one combination product: quarternary ammonium and formaldehyde) and one sodium hypochlorite detergent product currently used in the poultry industry were studied. Each product was diluted according to the manufacturers recommendation in sterile distilled water and compared with dilutions of the disinfectants with the addition of antifreeze products (ethylene glycol or propylene glycol) or windshield washer fluid for their effectiveness in killing nonpathogenic H7N2 avian influenza virus. All products diluted according to the manufacturers recommendation killed the nonpathogenic H7N2 avian influenza virus in this test system. The phenol products and the quaternary ammonium product were still efficacious with the addition of the antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. Both the combination product and the sodium hypochlorite detergent had decreased efficacy when the ethylene glycol product was added. When the propylene glycol product was added, the efficacy of all disinfectants remained unaffected, whereas the efficacy of the sodium hypochlorite detergent decreased. With the addition of the windshield washer fluid (methyl alcohol), all products remained efficacious except for the combination product.

Comparison of Environmental Monitoring Protocols for the Detection of Salmonella in Poultry Houses

Restriction endonuclease fingerprints of infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) DNA from 13 Pennsylvania field isolates, embryo-propagated and tissue-culture-propagated vaccine strains, and three reference strains were compared. These comparisons were made to evaluate the possible contribution of mutation of ILTV vaccine strains to recent outbreaks of infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) in Pennsylvania. Six different restriction enzymes were used to generate the fingerprints. Differences in DNA banding patterns were revealed between the currently used ILTV vaccine strains and six of the 13 field isolates. Even greater DNA banding pattern differences were found between the older ILTV reference strains and the vaccine strains. The ILTV DNA fingerprints generated in the present study suggest that at least five different strains of ILTV have contributed to the outbreaks of ILT that have occurred since 1987 in Pennsylvania.