Shi-Ming Lin

Non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

A decade ago, surgery was the only satisfactory treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it was limited only to selected cases. For the majority of cases of HCC, systemic chemotherapy was one of the few treatment alternatives, but provided only marginal benefit. In the past 20 years, diagnostic methods have improved to an extent that small HCC less than 1 cm can be detected. Moreover, non‐surgical treatment is available, of which regional therapy has been shown to prolong patients’ survival, and may even replace surgical resection in some cases. Regional therapy is indicated for the treatment of HCC when there is no extrahepatic metastasis and the patient has adequate liver function reserve, thus permitting repeated therapy. Transcatheter hepatic arterial embolization (TAE) using various embolizers has been well documented to include controlled studies. However, it is not indicated for patients with thrombosed main portal veins. Its therapeutic effect is also doubtful when the tumour is infiltrative in nature or is hypovascular, too large or too small. Additional chemotherapeutic agents mixed into the embolizer with lipiodol and degraded starch microspheres or styrene‐maleic acid‐neocarzinostatin in which chemotherapeutic agents are embedded, are used with a better response, but the survival rate has not shown significant improvement. Ultrasound‐guided local injection therapy is another new method of treatment of HCC. Of these techniques, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) is widely used with excellent results for small, encapsulated tumours in livers with less than three HCC. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy can also be used in cases with portal vein thrombosis, but it is not suitable for patients having coagulopathy or ascites. Using acetic acid, OK‐432, interferon or anti‐cancer drugs in the injection therapy shows no further benefit over ethanol alone. Transcatheter echoguided thermotherapy or cryotherapy has been reported in small series of patients, as has target therapy with immune or radiotherapy and conformal radiotherapy. Preliminary studies show encouraging results. Systemic therapy with either single drug or multidrugs is ineffective, with a response rate of less than 20%. Immunotherapy, such as with interferon or other cytokines, is not beneficial. Hormone therapy has not been promising, except for treatment with tamoxifen, which has been reported to show some beneficial effect. Gene therapy is still in its infancy. In summary, recent progress in non‐surgical treatment of HCC has resulted in a breakthrough of regional therapy looking quite promising. Moreover, a combination of different types of regional therapies may yield better outcomes in selected individuals.

Beneficial effect of prednisolone withdrawal followed by human lymphoblastoid interferon on the treatment of chronic type B hepatitis in Asians: a randomized controlled trial.

To evaluate the effect of interferon and the benefit of prednisolone pretreatment in Oriental patients with chronic active hepatitis B, 120 male Chinese patients were randomly allocated to receive: 1) group A: a 4-week course of prednisolone followed by 2 weeks of no treatment and then a 12-week course of human lymphoblastoid interferon, 4 to 6 MU/m2 intramuscularly; 2) group B: as group A, but with placebo given instead of prednisolone; 3) group C: an 18-week course of placebo. Clearance of serum hepatitis B virus-DNA and HBeAg (complete response) was achieved in 21% of group A, 5% of group B and none of group C at the end of therapy (A vs B: p = 0.054; A vs C: p < 0.01). When assessed 12 months after the end of therapy, the complete response rate was 46% in group A, 24% in group B and 25% in group C (p < 0.05). Those with baseline alanine transaminase < or = 200 U/l showed a better response to interferon following prednisolone withdrawal (48%) than with interferon therapy alone (20%, p = 0.056) and no treatment (9%, p < 0.01). Those with a baseline serum hepatitis B virus-DNA < or = 1000 pg/ml also showed a higher complete response rate when pretreated with prednisolone (59%) than when treated with interferon alone (29%, p = 0.084) or untreated (22%, p < 0.03). The strongest independent predictor of a response to treatment was prednisolone withdrawal (p < 0.05). None of the responders lost hepatitis B surface antigen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Severe clinical rebound upon withdrawal of corticosteroid before interferon therapy: Incidence and risk factors

To analyse the incidence and risk factors of clinical rebound and hepatic decompensation during or upon withdrawal of prednisolone pretreatment before interferon (IFN) therapy, two series of Taiwanese patients with chronic viral hepatitis from two independent randomized controlled trials were compared. Group 1 included 41 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were pretreated with daily prednisolone (30 mg) for 3 weeks, 15 mg for 1 week and no prednisolone for 2 weeks prior to lymphoblastoid IFN therapy. Group 2 consisted of 59 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were pretreated with daily prednisolone (40 mg) for 2 weeks, 30 mg prednisolone for 2 weeks, 20 mg prednisolone for 2 weeks and no prednisolone for 2 weeks prior to IFNα‐2a therapy. Clinical rebound developed more frequently in group 2 (67.8%) than in group 1 patients (41.5%; P <0.01). The peak serum transaminase levels of group 1 and 2 patients during clinical rebound were similar. Icteric and symptomatic clinical rebound occurred in four (one cirrhotic) group 2 patients. The incidence of hepatic decompensation was 3.4% in group 2 patients, or 5.0% in group 2 patients with clinical rebound. Patients pretreated with a higher dose (40 mg) of prednisolone (odds ratio 3.0; 95% CI 1.3–6.6; P <0.01) and non‐cirrhotic patients (odds ratio 6.2; 95% CI 1.2–32.1; P < 0.02) tended to suffer from clinical rebound more frequently. However, once clinical rebound develops in cirrhotic patients, the relative risk of decompensation is 16 times that of non‐cirrhotic patients. These results suggest that clinicians should be cautious in prescribing a short course of corticosteroids for patients with chronic viral hepatitis, because hepatic decompensation might occur in Oriental people with or without cirrhosis.

Prednisolone withdrawal followed by recombinant alfainterferon in chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis: An interim results of a randomized controlled trial

SummaryTo determine the efect of a recombinant α interferon 2b (Intron-A) and possible benefit of prednisolone pretreatment in chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis, 75 Chinese patients with clinico-histologically proven chronic hepatitis were randomly allocated to one of the following regimens: (A) 3 million units of Intron-A trice weekly for 6 months; (B) dose titration according to ALTAST values; (C) prednisolone withdrawal followed by regimen A; (D) control group: no treatment for 6 months but followed by alternating treatment with 3 million units of Intron-A trice weekly for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks no treatment for 6 months. Up to September 30, 1990, 67 patients have been followed for a minimum of 2 months. At the end of the second month, compelte response (normal ALT) was achieved in 71% of group A, 50% of groupB, 50% of group C and 0% of group D. At the end of the 6th month, the compelte response rate was 62%, 47% and 64% respectively in groups A, B and C. The response rates in groups A and C were significantly better than the 7% in the control group. Complete resonse usually (91%) occurred within 2 months after the first dose of interferon. Relapse occurred in 40% of the compelte responders, usually within 2 months of the last dose. The cumulative relapse rate was significantly lower in responders of group C (11% vs 43% in group A and 86% in group B during a period of 6 months). Only mild adverse effects were reported though two patients withdrew because of intolerable fatigue. The interim results appear very promising, particularly those pretreated with prednisolone.