Shigehiro Asai

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tunnel Position Measurement Reliability on 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Computed Tomography

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver reliability of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel location measurement by use of 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography (CT). METHODS Three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of 31 cadaveric knees were used in this study. Twenty-one knees were operated on with a double-bundle technique, and ten knees were operated on with a single-bundle technique. Femoral tunnel location was measured with 3 methods on the medial-lateral view of the lateral femoral condyle in the strictly lateral position. Tibial tunnel location was measured in the top view of the proximal tibia. The images were evaluated independently by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. A second measurement was performed, by both testers, after a 4-week interval. RESULTS The 3 methods of femoral tunnel location measurement had intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) that ranged from 0.963 to 0.998 and interobserver ICCs that ranged from 0.993 to 0.999. Tibial tunnel measurement had intraobserver ICCs that varied between 0.957 and 0.998 and interobserver ICCs that varied between 0.993 and 0.996. CONCLUSIONS The measurement of the anterior cruciate ligament tunnel location on 3-dimensional reconstructed CT provided excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Three-dimensional reconstructed CT can be used for further studies to assess the effect of tunnel position on knee stability and patient outcomes.

Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model.

PurposeDifferent tunnel configurations have been used for double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, controversy still exists as to whether three-tunnel DB with double-femoral tunnels and single-tibial tunnel (2F-1T) or with single-femoral tunnel and double-tibial tunnels (1F-2T) better restores intact knee biomechanics than single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction. The purpose was to compare the knee kinematics and in situ force in the grafts among SB and two types of three-tunnel DB ACL reconstructions performed in an anatomic fashion.MethodsTwenty-four porcine knees were subjected to an 89-N anterior tibial load (simulated KT-1000 test) at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion and to a 4-Nm internal tibial torque and 7-Nm valgus torque (simulated pivot-shift test) at 30° and 60° of flexion. The resulting knee kinematics and in situ force in the ACL or replacement grafts were measured using a robotic system for (1) ACL-intact, (2) ACL-deficient, and (3) three ACL reconstructed knees: SB; DB 2F-1T; and DB 1F-2T.ResultsDuring the simulated pivot-shift test, the DB grafts more closely restored the in situ force in the intact ACL at low flexion angle than the SB graft. There were no significant differences in knee kinematics between SB and DB ACL reconstruction. The DB 2F-1T reconstruction did not show a significant difference in knee kinematics or in situ force when compared to the DB 1F-2T technique.ConclusionThe in situ force in the ACL is better restored with an anatomic three-tunnel DB reconstruction in response to the simulated pivot-shift test at low flexion angle when compared to an anatomic SB reconstruction. Both three-tunnel DB ACL reconstructions performed in an anatomic fashion had similar biomechanical behavior. As long as it is performed anatomically, DB ACL reconstruction could be better alternative than SB ACL reconstruction, no matter which three-tunnel procedure, 2F-1T or 1F-2T, is used.

The effect of tunnel placement on rotational stability after ACL reconstruction: evaluation with use of triaxial accelerometry in a porcine model

PurposeConventional transtibial technique fails to restore the rotational knee stability in spite of successful anterior laxity, while anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique has been developed expecting better rotational kinematics because of closer reproduction of the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. However, the rotational instability after those two procedures has not been fully examined especially in terms of dynamic component of the rotational stability. The purpose was to assess the effect of anatomic versus non-anatomic tunnel placement on rotational knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry.MethodsSixteen porcine knees underwent a manual pivot-shift test at four different conditions: (1) anterior cruciate ligament intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament deficient, (3) non-anatomic transtibial reconstruction, and (4) anatomic anteromedial portal reconstruction. The three-dimensional acceleration of knee motion during the pivot-shift test was recorded using a triaxial accelerometer.ResultsBoth anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions decreased significantly the acceleration of the pivot-shift test from the increased level in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient condition. However, the transtibial technique fails to reach the intact level of acceleration, while the anteromedial portal technique reduced the acceleration to even less than the intact level.ConclusionThe transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could not restore the dynamic rotational stability of the intact knee, whereas the anteromedial portal technique restored the dynamic rotational stability closer to the intact level.Level of evidenceIII.

Acl Graft Position Affects in Situ Graft Force Following Acl Reconstruction

BACKGROUND The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between graft placement and in situ graft force after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for twelve human cadaveric knees. The knees, in intact and deficient-ACL states, were subjected to external loading conditions as follows: an anterior tibial load of 89 N at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion and a combined rotatory (simulated pivot-shift) load of 5 Nm of internal tibial torque and 7 Nm of valgus torque at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. Three ACL reconstructions were performed in a randomized order: from the center of the tibial insertion site to the center of the femoral insertion site (Mid), the center of the tibial insertion site to a more vertical femoral position (S1), and the center of the tibial insertion site to an even more vertical femoral position (S2). The reconstructions were tested following the same protocol used for the intact state, and graft in situ force was calculated for the two loadings at each flexion angle. MRI was used to measure the graft inclination angle after each ACL reconstruction. RESULTS The mean inclination angle (and standard deviation) was 51.7° ± 5.0° for the native ACL, 51.6° ± 4.1° for the Mid reconstruction (p = 0.85), 58.7° ± 5.4° for S1 (p < 0.001), and 64.7° ± 6.5° for S2 (p < 0.001). At 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion, the Mid reconstruction showed in situ graft force that was closer to that of the native ACL during both anterior tibial loading and simulated pivot-shift loading than was the case for S1 and S2 reconstructions. At greater flexion angles, S1 and S2 had in situ graft force that was closer to that of the native ACL than was the case for the Mid reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Anatomic ACL reconstruction exposes grafts to higher loads at lower angles of knee flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Rehabilitation and return to sports progression may need to be modified to protect an anatomically placed graft after ACL reconstruction.