Shih-Ho Wang

Intraoperative blood loss is a risk factor for complications in donors after living donor hepatectomy

Complications in a donor are a distressing but inevitable occurrence, since graft procurement is a major undertaking. Although the technique for procurement has some similarities to hepatic resection, a donor is very unlike a patient with malignancy. The risk factors identified in these patients cannot be extrapolated to donors. Donor hepatectomy carried out from June 1995 to March 2005 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center was reviewed with the aim of identifying risk factors for complications. There were 204 living donor liver transplants, with 205 donor hepatectomies, as 1 living donor liver transplantation was a dual graft. Ten donors (4.88%) suffered complications. There was no difference in terms of age, gender, body weight, operation, and parenchymal time between those who had complications and those who did not. There was also no difference in liver function tests between the 2 groups of donors, but the total bilirubin was significantly higher in donors with complications. The graft weight and remnant liver volume were also similar. The proportion of donors with fatty liver was the same between the 2 groups. The mean blood loss in donors with complications was 170 ± 79 mL, and that for donors without complications was 95 ± 77 mL. There was a statistically significant greater blood loss in donors with complications (P < 0.05). The number of segments removed in donors with complications was also higher compared to donors without complications (P < 0.03). Using multivariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss and the number of segments removed were found to be independent risk factors for donor complications. Intraoperative blood loss during graft procurement must be kept low to minimize complications in donors. Liver Transpl 12:950–957, 2006.

Vascular Stents in the Management of Portal Venous Complications in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

To evaluate the efficacy of stent placement in the treatment of portal vein (PV) stenosis or occlusion in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients, 468 LDLT records were reviewed. Sixteen (10 PV occlusions and 6 stenoses) recipients (age range, 8 months–59 years) were referred for possible interventional angioplasty (dilatation and/or stent) procedures. Stent placement was attempted in all. The approaches used were percutaneous transhepatic (n = 10), percutaneous transsplenic (n = 4), and intraoperative (n = 2). Technical success was achieved in 11 of 16 patients (68.8%). The sizes of the stents used varied from 7 mm to 10 mm in diameter. In the five unsuccessful patients, long‐term complete occlusion of the PV with cavernous transformation precluded catherterization. The mean follow‐up was 12 months (range, 3–24). The PV stent patency rate was 90.9% (10/11). Rethrombosis and occlusion of the stent and PV occurred in a single recipient who had a cryoperserved vascular graft to reconstruct the PV during the LDLT operation. PV occlusion of >1 year with cavernous transformation seemed to be a factor causing technical failure. In conclusion, early treatment of PV stenosis and occlusion by stenting is an effective treatment in LDLT. Percutaneous transhepatic and transsplenic, and intraoperative techniques are effective approaches depending on the situation.

Long-term results of living donor liver transplantation for glycogen storage disorders in children†

Liver transplantation (LT) may be indicated in glycogen storage disorders (GSD) when medical treatment fails to control the metabolic problems or when hepatic adenomas develop. We present our institutional experience with living donor LT (LDLT) for children with GSD. A total of 244 patients underwent primary LDLT at our institution from June 1994 to December 2005. A total of 12 (5%) children (8 female and 4 male) were afflicted with GSD and were not responsive to medical treatment. Nine patients had GSD type I and 3 had GSD type III. The median age at the time of transplantation was 7.27 yr (range, 2.4‐15.7). All patients presented with metabolic abnormalities, including hypoglycemia, and lactic acidosis. In addition, 4 patients presented with growth retardation. A total of 11 patients received left lobe grafts and 1 received a right lobe graft. The mean graft‐to‐recipient weight ratio was 1.25 (range, 0.89‐1.61). Two patients had hepatic vein stenoses that were treated by balloon dilatation; 1 patient had bile leak, which settled spontaneously. The overall surgical morbidity rate was 25%. Three patients had hepatic adenomas in the explanted liver. There was a single mortality at 2 months posttransplantation due to acute pancreatitis and sepsis. The mean follow up was 47.45 months. The metabolic abnormalities were corrected and renal function remained normal. In patients with growth retardation, catch‐up growth was achieved posttransplantation. In conclusion, LDLT is a viable option to restore normal metabolic balance in patients with GSD when medical treatment fails. Long‐term follow‐up after LT for GSD shows excellent graft and patient survival. Liver Transpl 13:848–852, 2007.

Liver Regeneration and Splenic Enlargement in Donors after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Liver regeneration after donor hepactectomy offers a unique insight into the process of liver regeneration in normal livers. As the liver restores itself, concurrent splenic enlargement occurs. There are many theories about why this phenomenon takes place: some investigators have proposed a relative portal hypertension that leads to splenic congestion or, perhaps, the presence of a common growth factor that induces both the liver and spleen to enlarge. Between the months of June 2001 and May 2004, 112 live donor liver transplants (LDLTs) were performed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. The total number of donor hepatectomies performed during this period was 113, however, because one of the cases required dual donors. Of our 113 donors, we eventually analyzed the data of 109; 4 patients were lost to follow-up 6 months later and were excluded from our study. The average age of our donor population was 32.32 ± 8.48 years. The mean liver volume at donation was noted to be 1207.72 ± 219.95 cm3, and 6 months later, it was 1027.18 ± 202.41 cm3. Expressed as a percentage of the original volume, the mean liver volume 6 months after hepatectomy was 90.70% ± 12.47% in this series. For right graft donors, mean liver volume after 6 months was 89.68% ± 12.37% of the original liver volume, whereas that for left graft donors was 91.99% ± 12.6%. Only 26 of the 109 (23.85%) donors were able to achieve full regeneration 6 months post-donation. Notably, liver function profiles of all donors were normal when measured 6 months after operation. The average splenic volume at donation as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetry was 159 ± 58 cm3, and the splenic volume 6 months post-donation was 213 ± 85 cm3. There was a mean increment in splenic volume of 35% ± 28% 6 months after donation. The blood profiles of the donors were monitored; particular attention was given to platelet levels and liver function tests, and these were found to be within normal limits 6 months after operation. Of note, splenic enlargement was significantly greater among right-sided donors than their left-sided counterparts. Greater splenic enlargement was also observed in those donors who achieved full liver regeneration at their evaluation 6 months postoperatively than in those who did not. Although original liver volume was not re-established in most patients 6 months after liver donation, there seemed to have been no untoward effects to the donor. The factors that affect liver regeneration are complex and myriad. Although there is splenic enlargement at 6 months post-donation in donors of LDLT, there are no untoward effects of this enlargement.

Needle Tract Implantation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Fine Needle Biopsy

The reported incidence of needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after fine needle biopsy ranges from 1 to 5%. We collected five cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with needle tract implantation after percutaneous biopsy and tried to determine how this complication affects the clinical outcome. From September 1997 to May 2002, five patients with needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma were managed in our institution. For treatment of the primary hepatocellular carcinoma, three patients underwent hepatectomy, one had transarterial chemoembolization, and in one patient peritoneal seeding in the needle tract precluded curative resection. All three hepatectomy patients were detected to have tumor implants in the needle tract at an interval of 39 to 58 months after biopsy. These implants were managed with wide surgical excision. Local control was achieved in two patients after repeat resection, whereas the third developed pulmonary metastasis. Thus, in two of five patients, tract implantation after fine needle biopsy changed a potentially curative disease into an untreatable situation. Because of the risk of tumor implantation in the needle tract, we support a policy of selective use of fine needle biopsy for the definitive diagnosis of liver lesions. The patients who do need a biopsy should be carefully followed up for early detection of implanted tumor and its recurrence after resection.

Donor graft outflow venoplasty in living donor liver transplantation

Hepatic venous outflow reconstruction is a key to successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because its obstruction leads to graft dysfunction and eventual loss. Inclusion or reconstruction of most draining veins is ideal to ensure graft venous drainage and avoids acute congestion in the donor graft. We developed donor graft hepatic venoplasty techniques for multiple hepatic veins that can be used in either right‐ or left‐lobe liver transplantation. In left‐lobe grafts, venoplasty consisting of the left hepatic vein and adjacent veins such as the left superior vein, middle hepatic vein, or segment 3 vein is performed to create a single, wide orifice without compromising outflow for anastomosis with the recipients vena cava. In right lobe graft where a right hepatic vein (RHV) is adjacent with a significantly‐sized segment 8 vein, accessory RHV, and/or inferior RHV, venoplasty of the RHV with the accessory RHV, inferior RHV, and/or segment 8 vein is performed to create a single orifice for single outflow reconstruction with the recipients RHV or vena cava. Of 35 venoplasties, 2 developed hepatic venous stenoses which were promptly managed with percutaneous interventional radiologic procedures. No graft was lost due to hepatic venous stenosis. In conclusion, these techniques avoid interposition grafts, are easily performed at the back table, simplify graft‐to‐recipient cava anastomosis, and avoid venous outflow narrowing. Liver Transpl 12:264–268, 2006.

Diagnosis and Interventional Radiological Treatment of Vascular and Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation in Children With Biliary Atresia

OBJECTIVEnEarly diagnosis and appropriate management of vascular and biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) result in longer survival. We report our institutional experience regarding radiological management of these complications among patients with biliary atresia (BA) who underwent LDLT.nnnMETHODSnWe analyzed the records of 116 children. All patients underwent Doppler ultrasound (US) at operation, daily for the first 2 postoperative weeks, and when necessary thereafter. After primary evaluation using US, the definite diagnosis of postoperative complication was confirmed using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or operation.nnnRESULTSnThere were 61 boys and 55 girls. The overall mean age was 2.69 years. The overall mean preoperative weight and height were 13.06 kg and 83.79 cm, respectively. There were 28 (24.13%) biliary and vascular complications. These were cases of biliary stricture (n = 5), bile leakage (n = 3), hepatic artery stenosis (n = 6), hepatic vein stenosis (n = 4), and portal vein thrombosis (n = 17). The diagnostic accuracy of US in detecting biliary complication, hepatic artery stenosis, hepatic venous stenosis, and portal vein thrombosis was 95.69%, 97.41%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. US in combination with multiple imaging modalities and clinical suspicion resulted in 100% diagnostic accuracy. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stent placement were performed for the complications noted. There was an early mortality due to multiple-organ failure after failed radiological invention and subsequent surgical management.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDoppler US is accurate in detecting postoperative complications after pediatric LDLT for BA. Radiological interventions for vascular and biliary complications are effective and safe alternatives to reconstructive surgery.

Solitary pulmonary nodule in the liver transplant candidate: Importance of diagnosis and treatment

Our objectives were to define the incidence and etiology of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), describe a diagnostic approach to the management of SPNs in LDLT, and define the impact of SPNs on the overall survival of adult LDLT recipients. Nine patients (9/152, 5.9%) were diagnosed with an SPN on the basis of chest radiography findings during the pretransplant survey. All were male. The mean age was 52 years. All the patients had hepatitis B virus–related cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. All were asymptomatic for the lung lesion. All underwent contrast‐enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) to verify the presence and possible etiology of the SPNs. In 3 cases, CT was used to definitely determine that there was no pulmonary nodule; in 2, CT led to a definite diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. In 4, CT led to a definite identification of an SPN but not to an etiological diagnosis. Two patients underwent outright thoracoscopy and biopsy of their SPNs. Biopsy showed cryptococcosis in both patients. One received a therapeutic trial of an antituberculosis treatment, and repeat CT after 1 month showed a regression in the size of the SPN. A diagnosis of tuberculosis was made. One patient had an inconclusive whole body positron emission tomography scan and subsequently underwent thoracoscopy where biopsy showed tuberculosis. A concomitant malignancy, either primary lung cancer or metastasis from the liver tumor, was not identified. All patients were surviving with their original grafts and were lung infection–free. The overall mean posttransplant follow‐up was 54 months (range = 33‐96 months). Liver Transpl 16:760‐766, 2010.

Preoperative Vascular Evaluation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia

BACKGROUNDnLiver transplantation is an important treatment option in the management of end-stage liver disease. Preoperative vascular evaluation plays an important role for a safe and successful operation, especially in pediatric patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).nnnPURPOSEnThe purpose of this study is to assess the usefulness and accuracy of Doppler ultrasound (US), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating vascular anomalies in patients with biliary atresia (BA) undergoing LDLT.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnImages of Doppler US, CTA, and MRA for preoperative vascular evaluation in 55 patients with BA undergoing LDLT were reviewed with the operative findings.nnnRESULTSnAll patients underwent preoperative US, CTA, and MRA. Pathologic portal vein (n = 18), interruption of the retrohepatic vena cava (n = 1), and aberrant right hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery (n = 2) were confirmed during the transplantation. The success rates of CTA and MRA in identifying vascular anomalies were 96% and 82%, respectively (P = .01). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Doppler US were 89%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. For CTA, it was 94%, 97%, and 96%, respectively; for MRA (including technical failure), it was 75%, 97%, and 89%, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONnDoppler US serves as an initial assessment for vascular evaluation and has the advantage in determining vascular flow quantities. CTA and MRA are used for precise surgical planning. However, MRA has lower success and accuracy rates when compared with CTA (P = .01). Doppler US with CTA can provide accurate preoperative vascular imaging in patients with BA undergoing LDLT.

Effects of Different Operating Room Temperatures on the Body Temperature Undergoing Live Liver Donor Hepatectomy

OBJECTIVEnWe sought to compare the effects of operation room temperature (ORT) at typical ambient environment (19-21 degrees C) and ORT at 24 degrees C on the core temperature of patients undergoing living donor hepatectomy.nnnMETHODS AND PATIENTSnSixty-two patients undergoing living donor hepatectomy were divided into 2 groups. In group I (n = 31), surgery was performed at typical ambient ORT, and in group II (n = 31) in ORT at 24 degrees C. Anesthesia and measures to prevent heat loss, except ORT, were all the same. Nasopharyngeal temperature (NT) was recorded after anesthesia induction, then hourly until completion of the operation. Changes in NTs were analyzed as well as patient age, weight, anesthetic duration, blood loss, intravenous fluids, total urine output, and pre- and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between groups.nnnRESULTSnThe patients characteristics between groups were not statistically different. However, a significantly higher core temperature was noted in group II compared with group I. Increased ORT from 19 to 21 degrees C to 24 degrees C resulted in an increased core temperature of at least 0.5 degrees C during living donor hepatectomy.