Shin-ichi Ando

Comparison of Candoxatril and Atrial Natriuretic Factor in Healthy Men Effects on Hemodynamics, Sympathetic Activity, Heart Rate Variability, and Endothelin

The purpose of these experiments was to compare the effects of endopeptidase inhibition with oral candoxatril on systemic and forearm hemodynamics and muscle sympathetic nerve activity with responses to a low-dose atrial natriuretic factor infusion. Eleven healthy men received at random on three separate days either intravenous saline, natriuretic factor (1.6 pmol/kg per minute) plus saline, or oral candoxatril (200 mg) plus saline. Measurements were made at baseline and 30, 60, and 90 minutes after interventions. Atrial natriuretic factor lowered diastolic pressure (P < .01), central venous pressure (P < .001), forearm blood flow (P < .05), and forearm vascular compliance (P < .05) but had no effect on systolic pressure, heart rate or its variability, stroke volume, sympathetic nerve activity, plasma norepinephrine, or endothelin-1. Plasma epinephrine increased (P < .01). Candoxatril lowered central venous pressure (P < .001) and increased systolic pressure (from 116 +/- 6 to 120 +/- 7 mm Hg; P < .05), endothelin (from 4.6 +/- 1.1 to 6.8 +/- 3.2 pmol/L; P < .02), and epinephrine (P < .05), without affecting any other variables. Candoxatril and atrial natriuretic factor lowered central venous pressure in healthy men without causing a reflex increase in sympathetic nerve activity or norepinephrine, yet epinephrine rose. This suggests that both interventions may specifically inhibit sympathetic nerve traffic to muscle at physiological plasma atrial natriuretic factor concentrations. However, whereas the peptide lowered blood pressure, candoxatril increased systolic pressure. These contrasting hemodynamic responses may be related to differences in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration and to altered endothelin metabolism by candoxatril.

Sympathetic Alternans Evidence for Arterial Baroreflex Control of Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Congestive Heart Failure

Alternation in the amplitude of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was documented in three patients with severe heart failure. In the index patient with pulsus alternans, the amplitude of MSNA was inversely related to changes in the preceding diastolic pressure with a lag time of 1.2 to 1.3 seconds, indicating that oscillations in burst amplitude are determined primarily by changes in this component of blood pressure. Spectral analysis of the blood pressure and MSNA signals identified two spectral peaks, one at the cardiac frequency and a second peak, with greater spectral power, at the alternans frequency (ie, at half the heart rate). The latter peak for both blood pressure and MSNA disappeared when alternans was abolished by nitroglycerin. The presence of sympathetic alternans in synchrony with pulsus alternans and the rapid transduction of changes in the diastolic blood pressure afferent signal to the amplitude of sympathetic outflow indicate that the arterial baroreflex control of MSNA must be active and rapidly responsive in human heart failure.

Effect of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide on Muscle Sympathetic Activity and Its Reflex Control in Human Heart Failure

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine if atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) exerts a relative inhibitory effect on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) at rest and during nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in heart failure, as in healthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifteen men (age 39+/-2 years [mean+/-SE]) with dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction 18+/-3%) received intravenous ANP (50 microgram bolus, then 50 ng. kg-1. min-1) and nitroglycerin (NTG, 8 mg/min) as a hemodynamic control. During each infusion MSNA, blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded before and during LBNP at -6 and -12 mm Hg. NTG and ANP caused similar and significant reductions in CVP and diastolic BP, but resting MSNA did not increase with either infusion. LBNP at -6 mm Hg lowered CVP (P<0.05), whereas LBNP at -12 mm Hg caused significant reductions in CVP, systolic BP, and diastolic BP. These effects of nonhypotensive and hypotensive LBNP on CVP and BP were similar during ANP and NTG infusions, yet MSNA was lower both before and with LBNP during ANP (P<0.02). Nonhypotensive LBNP increased MSNA during NTG (+133+/-68 Units; P<0.001) but not during ANP infusion (+24+/-23 Units; P=NS). CONCLUSIONS These observations are consistent with the concept that ANP exerts a sympathoinhibitory action in heart failure. This is most evident in response to reductions in atrial pressures that do not affect systemic BP.

Neural and Hypotensive Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade

Angiotensin II participates in the neural regulation of the heart and circulation at both central and peripheral sites. To explore the role of endogenous angiotensin II in blood pressure regulation, we conducted a randomized double-blind crossover trial in nine young healthy men (aged 33+/-3 [mean+/-SE] years) studied in the absence of salt restriction, comparing the effect of 1 week treatment with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (100 mg daily) against placebo with respect to the following variables, recorded during supine rest: intra-arterial blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), forearm vascular resistance and norepinephrine appearance rate, total body norepinephrine spillover, variability of BP and HR (spectral analysis), and baroreflex sensitivity for HR (gain of the transfer function from systolic BP to HR). Blood pressure was 119+/-7/66+/-4 mm Hg (systolic BP/diastolic BP) after 1 week of placebo and 112+/-6/61+/-3 mm Hg after 1 week of losartan (P<.05). Forearm vascular resistance tended to fall, from 42.3+/-6.9 U on placebo to 32.8+/-5.0 U with losartan treatment (P=.07). Losartan had no effect on HR (60+/-3 on placebo versus 59+/-2 beats per minute with losartan), total body norepinephrine spillover (3.0+/-0.8 versus 3.3+/-1.2 nmol/min), forearm norepinephrine appearance rate (3.8+/-1.1 versus 5.3+/-1.1 pmol/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), power in the high- or low-frequency components of the HR variability and BP variability spectra or on baroreflex sensitivity for HR. Endogenous angiotensin II contributes to the maintenance of supine BP in normal subjects, studied in the absence of sodium restriction. The fall in BP caused by losartan is accompanied by a resetting of the baroreflex regulation of HR and sympathetic outflow, but baroreflex sensitivity for heart rate is not altered. Therefore, the reduction in BP observed after short-term angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism may be achieved through a direct effect on vascular tone rather than through a primary reduction in sympathetic outflow.

Caffeine abstinence augments the systolic blood pressure response to adenosine in humans

Blood pressure and heart rate responses to adenosine infusion (35, 70, and 140 microg/kg/min, intravenously) were studied in 7 healthy men after 6, 30, 78, 150, and 318 hours of abstinence from regular caffeine use. The finding that caffeine abstinence augmented the systolic pressor response (from -1 +/- 2 mm Hg at 6 hours to +9 +/- 2 mm Hg at 318 hours; p = 0.01) but not the tachycardic response to adenosine has implications for current clinical and research applications of this purine.

Atrial natriuretic peptide augments the variability of sympathetic nerve activity in human heart failure.

Objectives Activation of the sympathetic nervous system, decreased heart rate variability (HRV), and loss of modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) within the low frequency (LF, 0.05–0.15 Hz) range are three adverse features of advanced congestive heart failure (CHF). In healthy men, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) infusion attenuates reflex increases in MSNA and reduces LF components of HRV spectral power. Sympathoinhibitory actions have also been documented in CHF, but effects on the variability of MSNA and HRV have not been described. Design and methods Heart rate and MSNA were recorded in 10 men (aged 39 ± 3 years, mean ± SE) with dilated cardiomyopathy (mean EF 20 ± 4%) treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Subjects received i.v. ANP (50 μ g bolus then 50 ng/kg/min) and nitroglycerin (NTG, 8 mg/min) as a hemodynamic control. Signals at baseline, and 13–20 min into each infusion were submitted to spectral analysis. Results ANP had no effect on HRV, but increased MSNA LF (from 7.9 ± 1.5 to 12.1 ± 2.6 U2;P < 0.02) and total spectral power (from 47.9 ± 5.4 to 61.9 ± 6.8 U2;P < 0.05). NTG had no effect on the variability of MSNA or HRV. Conclusions In CHF patients receiving ACE inhibitors, ANP (i) does not suppress HRV and (ii) enhances the modulation of MSNA, particularly within the LF range. This latter action is not observed with NTG. These findings suggest beneficial actions of exogenous ANP on neurogenic circulatory control.