Shingo Harita

Phase III Trial Comparing Docetaxel and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy With Mitomycin, Vindesine, and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: OLCSG 0007

PURPOSE To demonstrate the efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 75 years or younger with LA-NSCLC, stratified by performance status, stage, and institution, were randomly assigned to two arms consisting of DP (docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36) or mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) chemotherapy with concurrent TRT. RESULTS Between July 2000 and July 2005, 200 patients were allocated into either the DP or MVP arm. The survival time at 2 years, a primary end point, was favorable to the DP arm (P = .059 by a stratified log-rank test as a planned analysis and P = .044 by an early-period, weighted log-rank as an unplanned analysis). There was a trend toward improved response rate, 2-year survival rate, median progression-free time, and median survival in the DP arm (78.8%, 60.3%,13.4 months, and 26.8 months, respectively) compared with the MVP arm (70.3%, 48.1%, 10.5 months, and 23.7 months, respectively), which was not statistically significant (P > .05). Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred more often in the MVP arm than in the DP arm (39% v 22%, respectively; P = .012), and grade 3 to 4 radiation esophagitis was likely to be more common in the DP arm than in the MVP arm (14% v 6%, P = .056). CONCLUSION DP chemotherapy combined with concurrent TRT is an alternative to MVP chemotherapy for patients with LA-NSCLC.

A Phase II Trial of Erlotinib Monotherapy in Pretreated Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Do Not Possess Active EGFR Mutations: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0705

Backgrounds: Efficacy of gefitinib therapy strongly depends on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation status in Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, the survival advantage of erlotinib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was not affected by EGFR mutation status in a phase III trial, indicating that patients with EGFR-wild-type (EGFR-wt) tumors might also benefit from this tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib in Japanese patients with EGFR-wt tumors. Methods: The primary end point was an objective response. Patients with EGFR-wt tumors previously receiving one to three chemotherapy regimens were enrolled in this trial. The mutation status was assessed using the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp method. Erlotinib was administered (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled between January and December 2008. Objective response was observed in one patient (3.3%), and the disease became stable in 18 patients (60.0%). Skin rash was the most common side effect. Grades 3–4 adverse events included pulmonary embolism, keratitis, and anemia. Two other patients developed interstitial lung disease (grades 1 and 2). Nevertheless, all these events were reversible, resulting in no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up time of 10.7 months, the median survival time and median progression-free survival times were 9.2 and 2.1 months, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first prospective biomarker study showing that erlotinib therapy for pretreated patients with EGFR-wt tumors seems to have a modest activity with no irreversible toxicity.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Recent studies have suggested the superiority of concomitant over sequential administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Docetaxel and cisplatin have demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the safety, toxicity, and antitumour activity of docetaxel/cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA or IIIB), good performance status, age ⩽75 years, and adequate organ function were eligible. Both docetaxel and cisplatin were given on days 1, 8, 29, and 36. Doses of docetaxel/cisplatin (mg m−2) in the phase I study portion were escalated as follows: 20/30, 25/30, 30/30, 30/35, 30/40, 35/40, 40/40, and 45/40. Beginning on day 1 of chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy was given at a total dose of 60 Gy with 2 Gy per fraction over 6 weeks. In the phase I portion, the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) among 33 patients were docetaxel 45 mg m−2 and cisplatin 40 mg m−2. The major dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was radiation oesophagitis. The recommended doses (RDs) for the phase II study were docetaxel 40 mg m−2 and cisplatin 40 mg m−2. A total of 42 patients were entered in the phase II portion. Common toxicities were leukopenia, granulocytopenia, anaemia, and radiation oesophagitis, with frequencies of grade ⩾3 toxicities of 71, 60, 24, and 19%, respectively. Toxicity was significant, but manageable according to the dose and schedule modifications. Dose intensities of docetaxel and cisplatin were 86 and 87%, respectively. Radiotherapy was completed without a delay in 67% of 42 patients. The overall response rate was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI), 66–91%). The median survival time was 23.4+ months with an overall survival rate of 76% at 1 year and 54% at 2 years. In conclusion, chemotherapy with cisplatin plus docetaxel given on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is efficacious and tolerated in patients with locally advanced NSCLC and should be evaluated in a phase III study.

Interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving gefitinib : An analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes in okayama lung cancer study group

ABSTRACTRisk factors for the development of interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving gefitinib and the prognostic factors after interstitial lung disease development have not been established. The aim of this study was to retrospectively identify and evaluate these possible factors. PATIENTS AND METHODSWe reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of 365 consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received gefitinib in West Japan between 2000 and 2003. RESULTSIn total, 330 patients were eligible for interstitial lung disease evaluation, and 15 patients (4.5%) were finally confirmed to have developed interstitial lung disease by blinded expert review. Multivariate analysis revealed that preexisting pulmonary fibrosis, poor performance status, and prior thoracic irradiation were independent risk factors for interstitial lung disease, with odds ratios of 21.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.12–86.3, P < 0.0001), 9.70 (2.27–41.4, P= 0.001), and 4.33 (1.27–14.8, P= 0.019), respectively. Among the 15 patients who developed interstitial lung disease, eight have died of the condition. Short interval from the initiation of gefitinib treatment to the onset of interstitial lung disease, acute interstitial pneumonia pattern, and the presence of pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis were associated with poor prognosis. DISCUSSIONOur results suggest the importance of patient selection for gefitinib treatment based on interstitial lung disease risk factors in the Japanese population identified.

Comparison of the Incidence and Pattern of Interstitial Lung Disease During Erlotinib and Gefitinib Treatment in Japanese Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Experience

Background: Data comparing the incidence and pattern of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving treatment with gefitinib versus erlotinib, both of which are epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are scarce. We investigated the incidence of ILD in Japanese patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 209 patients treated with erlotinib in 2008 (cohort A) and 330 treated with gefitinib between 2000 and 2003 (cohort B). Toxicity within the first month of treatment was investigated. Results: The patients in cohort A had fewer known risk factors for ILD (e.g., poor performance status and prior pulmonary fibrosis). ILD was detected in two patients (1.0%) from cohort A and eight patients (2.4%) from cohort B during the first month of treatment. The events were graded as follows: one patient each in grades 1 and 2 (cohort A), and one, one, and six patients in grades 3, 4, and 5, respectively (cohort B). Multivariate analysis revealed that poor performance status and prior pulmonary fibrosis were significantly correlated with the occurrence of ILD, but the type of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor administered was not. Conclusion: There was a somewhat lower incidence of ILD with erlotinib therapy than with gefitinib therapy, despite no statistically significant difference. Patient selection based on awareness by Japanese physicians of the risk factors for ILD, rather than the type of agent, may explain the difference in ILD incidence between the two treatments.

Fractionated administration of irinotecan and cisplatin for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group

A phase II study of fractionated administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Between January 1996 and January 1998, 44 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. CDDP at a dose of 60 mg m–2 was given first and followed by CPT-11 at a dose of 50 mg m–2. Both drugs were given by 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8, and repeated every 4 weeks up to 4 cycles. 42 patients were evaluated for response and 44 for survival and toxicity. 20 patients (48%: 95% confidence interval 32–63%) achieved an objective response. The median duration of responses was 8 months, and the median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 12.5 months and 56.8%, respectively. Major toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 70.5% of the patients and one patient died of sepsis. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was experienced in 25.0%, but manageable by conventional therapy. In conclusion, fractionated administration of CPT-11 and CDDP was highly effective for advanced NSCLC with manageable toxicities.

Safety and efficacy of gefitinib treatment in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Experience

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of gefitinib treatment in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively compared toxicity, response and survival outcomes for gefitinib in patients aged 75 years or older (elderly group) with the same outcomes in patients aged younger than 75 years. In total, 350 patients were eligible for this analysis, of whom 92 were in the elderly group and 258 in the non-elderly group. In the elderly group, adverse events were generally mild to moderate and grade 3–4 adverse events were observed in 8 (9%) patients. The objective response rate (17 vs. 21% for elderly vs. non-elderly, respectively) and median survival time (7.6 vs. 9.3 months) were also similar in the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed elderly patients with lower Brinkman index tended to be more sensitive to gefitinib (odds ratio: 4.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–22.72, p = 0.0642). In this study, treatment with gefitinib appeared to be as safe and effective in elderly patients (aged 75 or older) with NSCLC as in non-elderly patients.

Long-term survival following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with concomitant brain metastases only.

We report two patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with concomitant metastases to the brain only who received chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy for the thoracic disease and brain disease, resulting in long-term survival. One patient was a 56-year-old woman who was diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma and showed T2N1 thoracic disease; the other patient was a 57-year-old man diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma who had T1N3 thoracic disease. Both patients demonstrated multiple metastases to the brain only. Chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin (40 mg/m2) and docetaxel (40 mg/m2), was administered on days 1 and 8, with the drugs being given separately, and the chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks for up to three cycles. Whole-brain irradiation (2 Gy/day; total, 36 Gy) and thoracic irradiation (2 Gy/day; total, 60 Gy) were started on days 1 and 29, respectively. Toxicities encountered were manageable by conventional therapy. The concurrent chemoradiation therapy resulted in complete regression of the brain disease in both patients. Brain disease relapsed in the female patient, but it is being controlled by the administration of gefitinib. She has survived for 53 months since the start of treatment, without new metastatic lesions or relapse of the thoracic lesions. The male patient has survived for 37 months without new metastatic lesions or relapses. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in which radiotherapy is applied to both the brain and thoracic lesions may be effective for patients with NSCLC with metastases to the brain only.

A phase II study of amrubicin and topotecan combination therapy in patients with relapsed or extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0401

BACKGROUNDS Chemotherapy is a mainstay in the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), although the survival benefit remains modest. We conducted a phase II trial of amrubicin (a topoisomerase II inhibitor) and topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed SCLC patients. METHODS Amrubicin (35 mg/m(2)) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 3-5 and 1-5, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was set as the primary endpoint, which was assessed separately in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (chemotherapy-naïve 31, relapsed 28). The ORRs were 74% and 43% in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Survival data were also promising, with a median progression-free survival time and median survival time of 5.3 and 14.9 months and 4.7 and 10.2 months in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Even refractory-relapsed cases responded to the treatment favorably (27% ORR). The primary toxicity was myelosuppression with grades 3 or 4 neutropenia in 97% of the patients, which led to grades 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia in 41% of the patients and two toxic deaths. CONCLUSION This phase II study showed the favorable efficacy and moderate safety profiles of a topotecan and amrubicin two-drug combination especially in relapsed patients with ED-SCLC.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) during gefitinib treatment in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group

7063 Background: Risk factors of ILD during gefitinib treatment in patients with NSCLC are undetermined. The objective of this study was to elucidate the risk factors of ILD by analyzing the characteristics of patients with ILD. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 325 patients with NSCLC who had received gefitinib in 12 hospitals between November 2000 and October 2003. Correlations between the various factors and the frequency of ILD following gefitinib treatment were investigated. RESULTS Patients characteristics were as follows; male/female: 68%/32%, Ad/others: 74%/26%, median age: 67 (range; 29-88), and ECOG PS 0-1/2-4: 66%/34%. An objective response rate by gefitinib treatment was 20% (62/307 patients). The median survival time after the initiation of gefitinib treatment was 6.7 months, with a median follow-up time of 10.8 months. Toxicities (grade 3 or more by the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) included hepatic toxicity (5.0%), skin rash (2.2%), diarrhea (0.6%), and nausea/vomiting (0.3%). Twenty-two patients (6.8%) developed ILD after gefitinib treatment. The median toxicity grade of ILD was 3 (range; 2-4), and 10 (3.1%) patients have died. The median time to ILD after initiation of gefitinib treatment was 18 days (range; 3-123). Half of the patients developing ILD manifested the acute onset of dyspnea. Radiographic findings of the ILD were characterized mainly by diffuse ground-glass opacity. Statistically significant factors affecting the occurrence of ILD by multivariate analysis were presence of pulmonary fibrosis before gefitinib treatment and poor PS. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that ILD during gefitinib treatment is considerably frequent. Physicians should carefully decide the indication of gefitinib treatment, especially for patients with lung comorbidities or poor PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.